AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory Failure With HypoxiaPhase 3NCT02050217

NAVA Helmet in Pediatric Respiratory Failure

A Phase 3 study testing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in people with Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a new form of partial support wherein the machine applies positive pressure throughout inspiration in proportion to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), Because ventilator functioning and cycling are under control of the patient's respiratory drive and rhythm… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 24 months
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia
What is being tested?
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jun 2013to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 24 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants aging > 1 month and < 2 years
  • ARF (PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg, accessory muscle recruitment, Respiratory Rate more than 2 SD related to age),
  • Intact neuromuscular pathway to the diaphragm

Who cannot join

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Reduction in airway protection
  • Coma
  • Contraindication to insert the nasogastric catheter
  • Heart and/or lung transplant
  • Increase in PIC
  • Refusal of the parents or legal guardian

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chidini Giovanna, MD contact

giovannachid@libero.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan, 20122

    Chidini Giovanna, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Patient Ventilator Interaction During Non-invasive Ventilation Delivered With Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA-NIV) in Infants Delivered by Helmet: a Pilot Short Term Physiological Study

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a new form of partial support wherein the machine applies positive pressure throughout inspiration in proportion to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), Because ventilator functioning and cycling are under control of the patient's respiratory drive and rhythm, NAVA has the potential to enhance patient-ventilator interaction ensuring synchrony and minimizing the risk of over-assistance. Among different interfaces, the pediatric helmet is better tolerated than facial or nasal mask, thus requiring less sedation and allowing more prolonged ventilatory assistance (5-6).To date, no data exist on the use of NAVA in infants during noninvasive ventilation. The aim of this physiological study is to compare patient-ventilator interaction in infants receiving NIV by NAVA and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) with helmet.

Read the detailed description

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a new form of partial support wherein the machine applies positive pressure throughout inspiration in proportion to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), as assessed by trans-esophageal electromyography (1). Because ventilator functioning and cycling are under control of the patient's respiratory drive and rhythm, NAVA has the potential to enhance patient-ventilator interaction ensuring synchrony and minimizing the risk of over-assistance. A high incidence of asynchrony events has been demonstrated to have a significant clinical impact by favouring weaning failure and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (2). NAVA has been implemented safely in animals, in healthy volunteers and in critically ill adults and has been shown to improve patient-ventilator synchrony, to limit excessive airway pressure and tidal volume, and to unload the respiratory muscles in tracheally intubated patients (1,3,4). Moreover NAVA was found to be effective in delivering non-invasive ventilation (NIV) even when the interface was excessively leaky (75% leak) with reduced positive end-expiratory pressure (3). With these conditions, NAVA was able to unload the respiratory muscles and preserve gas exchange, while maintaining synchrony to respiratory demand. Data from medical literature from our group demonstrate that the pediatric helmet was better tolerated than facial mask , required less sedation an allowed more prolonged ventilatory assistance due to better tolerance (5-6). To date, no data exist on the use of NAVA in infants during noninvasive ventilation. The aim of this physiological study is to compare patient-ventilator interaction in infants receiving NIV by NAVA and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV). Equipment. NAVA and conventional PSV is provided by the Servo-I ventilator (Maquet Critical Care, Solna, Sweden). Electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) is obtained using an array of nine miniaturized electrodes (spaced 6 mm apart) mounted on a conventional (5.5F) feeding tube (Maquet Critical Care AB, Solna, Sweden; Neurovent Research Inc, Toronto, Canada), and positioned in the lower esophagus at the level of the diaphragm. Confirmation of appropriate placement is achieved by viewing the online electrical displays from the catheter. The presence of a good quality EAdi trace with p waves displayed by the central electrodes indicates optimal positioning, with the array spanning the diaphragm equally in both caudal and cranial directions. A pediatric helmet is used as interface between the patient and the ventilator. Tidal volume , airway pressure and flow trace are recorded with the Servo I NAVA Tracker acquisition system.

Experimental protocol. Enrolled patients, after a stabilization period with oxygen therapy and standard medical treatment (antibiotics, steroids, Inhaled beta 2 agonists), receive two 60-minutes ventilatory trials delivered by pediatric helmet.

After a baseline trial on PSV conventional , children are allocated to receive 1 trial NAVA NIV and 1 trial PSV conventional. The sequence of the two ventilatory trials are randomized according to sealed opaque envelops.

Ventilatory trials are as follows:

  1. NAVA-NIV
  2. PSV conventional . The first 15 mins of each period are considered as a wash out period and patients are carefully observed for any reactions or problems occurring for the technique. After the first 15 mins period, data recording for the study are started.

NAVA and PSV level are set by the attending physician in order to obtain a Tidal Volume (TV) 6-8 ml/kg, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) > 94%, Respiratory Rate (RR) < +/-2 SD for age. Sedation and analgesia are provided according to standardized PICU protocols, if needed and are not changed during the two study windows for the same patient.

Monitoring .All infants are monitored as follow: SpO2, and EKG continuously; arterial blood pressure every 15 min; arterial blood gases at enrolment and once for each trial. The total amount of drug needed for sedation and/or complications (intolerance to the interface, leaks, gastric distension) are also recorded.

Statistics. No data are available at the moment in medical literature in infants. Based on retrospective data from adult literature, the predicted reduction in the primary end point (AI) with NAVA versus Conventional flow triggered PSV, is around 20%. The power analysis indicated a sample size of 12 patients was needed to demonstrate a 20% reduction in the AI between the two ventilator modes with an alfa and beta risk of 005 and 0.2 respectively. Sample size calculation has been performed with GPower3.1.2 software (Kiel University, Germany)

Being tested
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist
Keywords
Helmet, Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Children, Respiratory Failure
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory AssistProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT02050217
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Noninvasive ventilationExperimentalNeurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist versus Pressure Support flow triggered delivered by helmet
Receives: Procedure: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Asynchrony Index

    Measured: 60 minutes trial

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Arterial Blood Gases

    Measured: end of 60 minutes ventilation trial

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02050217
Sponsor's protocol ID
GCHIDINI2014
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
28 Jan 2014
Last updated
30 Jan 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Colombo D, Cammarota G, Bergamaschi V, De Lucia M, Corte FD, Navalesi P. Physiologic response to varying levels of pressure support and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Nov;34(11):2010-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1208-3. Epub 2008 Jul 16.

    PubMed 18629471
  • Sinderby C, Beck J, Spahija J, de Marchie M, Lacroix J, Navalesi P, Slutsky AS. Inspiratory muscle unloading by neurally adjusted ventilatory assist during maximal inspiratory efforts in healthy subjects. Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):711-717. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1909.

    PubMed 17356084
  • Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, Lellouche F, Brochard L. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1515-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8. Epub 2006 Aug 1.

    PubMed 16896854
  • Calderini E, Chidini G, Pelosi P. What are the current indications for noninvasive ventilation in children? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;23(3):368-74. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328339507b.

    PubMed 20440111
  • Chidini G, Calderini E, Pelosi P. Treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a new pediatric helmet in comparison with a standard full face mask: a prospective pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;11(4):502-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b8063b.

    PubMed 19794328
  • Chidini G, Calderini E, Cesana BM, Gandini C, Prandi E, Pelosi P. Noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure in acute respiratory failure: helmet versus facial mask. Pediatrics. 2010 Aug;126(2):e330-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3357. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

    PubMed 20660548

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in people with Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chidini Giovanna, MD (giovannachid@libero.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Asynchrony Index (time frame: 60 minutes trial). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02050217, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in