Regional AnesthesiaNCT02050295
Nerve Block Washout
A study testing Nerve block washout and Saline in people with Regional Anesthesia, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Injecting local anesthetic to anesthetize a nerve or group of nerves (a 'nerve block') is an effective way to eliminate pain during and after surgery. There are instances when it would be beneficial to the patient for the nerve block to be resolved quickly rather than waiting for it to naturally wear off. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Regional Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Nerve block washout and Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provide informed written consent
- Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients
- Scheduled for lower extremity surgery wholly or partially under popliteal sciatic nerve block
Who cannot join
- Failure to provide informed consent
- Infection at the needle insertion site
- Known coagulopathy
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
- Presence of sensory or motor impairment in the distribution of the sciatic nerve prior to nerve blockade
- Inability to perform valid sensory or motor examination of the function of the sciatic nerve prior to nerve blockade due to impaired access to the limb, language barrier, or inability of the subject to co-operate with such examination
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Novel Approach to Reverse and Titrate the Clinical Effects of a Nerve Block
Injecting local anesthetic to anesthetize a nerve or group of nerves (a 'nerve block') is an effective way to eliminate pain during and after surgery. There are instances when it would be beneficial to the patient for the nerve block to be resolved quickly rather than waiting for it to naturally wear off. For example, a sciatic nerve block that freezes the lower leg and foot typically takes over 18 hours to resolve on its own, and both the surgeon and patient prefer to have motor function before discharge. The investigators wish to perform a randomized, controlled trial to determine if infusion of a solution such as saline to 'wash out' the nerve block after surgery can allow the patient to be pain-free while still being able to move their leg and foot.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale Peripheral nerve blocks provide effective surgical anesthesia targeted to specific body regions while avoiding the unpleasant side-effects of general anesthesia. Additionally, infusion of local anesthetic (LA) solution through a perineural catheter can provide superior analgesia compared to opioid painkillers and reduces the incidence of opioid-associated side effects.
Most studies to date have focused on the efficacy of agents to extend block duration, thereby maximizing pain relief for patients receiving a nerve block. However, there are occasions when rapid and effective block reversal is needed. For example, interscalene brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery frequently causes paralysis of the diaphragm due to inadvertent anesthesia of the phrenic nerve. A method to 'wash out' the local anesthetic around the phrenic nerve in these cases would be beneficial, especially for patients who have pre-existing pulmonary or respiratory diseases. Saline washout of LA may have an additional safety benefit since LAs are myotoxic; reducing the exposure of muscle to LA solutions while maintaining anesthesia would increase the safety of peripheral nerve blocks.
Several studies have demonstrated that epidural washout using normal saline (NS) or Ringer's lactate following epidural block facilitates more rapid recovery of motor function and sensation than letting the block resolve on its own. However, no studies to date have addressed whether washout is effective for reversal of peripheral nerve blocks. Our limited clinical experience suggests that a bolus of NS through a perineural catheter can rapidly and effectively restore phrenic nerve function following interscalene block, and preliminary laboratory experiments indicate that a continuous washout of 0.9% NS reduces by half the time required for normal diaphragm function following injection of lidocaine around the phrenic nerve. Unclear, however, is the mechanism by which NS is able to resolve the block. Thus, the investigators wish to investigate the optimal approach to block reversal and resolution.
Study objective To demonstrate that an infusion of NS can be used in a clinical setting to modify the properties of a nerve block in patients who have received a nerve block for surgery and post-operative analgesia.
Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that NS can be delivered through a perineural catheter to 'wash out' a nerve block to the point that motor function is restored while maintaining anesthesia of sensory nerve fibers.
Procedure Using a sealed envelope system (see below), patients recruited to the study will be randomized to Control or Study groups. Baseline motor and sensory function will be assessed and recorded (see below for methods). Control group patients will undergo ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block as described previously. A bolus of 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine/0.5% bupivacaine will be delivered through a catheter-over-needle unit (e.g., B.Braun Contiplex C or equivalent) to provide surgical anesthesia to the lower extremity. After withdrawing the needle, the catheter will be left in place throughout the operation to provide a conduit to deliver rescue analgesia if required (see criteria below). Patients in the Study group will undergo the same procedures before and during surgery. After surgery, all patients will be brought to the recovery room for assessment of motor function and sensation in the anesthetized region. Study group patients will then receive a washout infusion regimen (e.g., continuous infusion of 3 mL per hour with a 3 mL bolus of 0.9% NS). Control group patients will receive an infusion of the same solution, but it will only be run at 1 mL/hr to maintain catheter patency.
After the patient is transferred to the ward, motor and sensory assessment (see below) will be performed hourly until full motor function has returned. Once motor function has returned completely, the washout infusion will be stopped. The patient will be monitored for sensory function hourly for a maximum of 8 hours or until the first dose of oral pain medication or rescue analgesia is required. If the patient's pain score (determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score between 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever) is >5, or if the patient is complaining of severe pain, the nerve block will be reinitiated by delivering a bolus of local anesthetic mixture through the catheter. A member of the clinical research team will follow up with the patient every 24 hours post-surgery (up to a maximum of 72 hours or discharge from hospital, whichever happens first) to record motor and sensory data and pain score.
Sensory and motor assessment Sensory assessment will be performed by measuring current perception threshold (CPT) using the Neurometer (Neurotron, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA), a validated device for sensory assessment. The investigators have experience using the Neurometer for CPT measurement and will be able to perform sensory assessment with the device easily and efficiently. Briefly, paired adhesive electrodes (Neotrode II, ConMed Corp., Utica, NY, USA) connected to the Neurometer will be attached to the big toe and the ankle of the leg that was blocked. The Neurometer can be set to three different frequencies - 2000 Hz, 250 Hz, and 5 Hz - that stimulate Aβ (large fiber/motor), Aδ (large fiber/pain), and C (small fiber/pain) fibers, respectively. A member of the research team will increase the current manually until the patient reports feeling an "electrical" sensation in the area where the electrodes are attached. The reading at this time will be recorded as the CPT. The data collector will also note if the current reached its maximum level, which will be defined as complete sensory blockade.
Motor function will be assessed by recording voluntary motor responses in the lower extremity. The investigators will grade plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the foot based on the following scale: 0 = normal movement, 1 = decreased movement, and 2 = no movement. Motor block will be deemed complete when a score of 2 is recorded for both plantar flexion and dorsiflexion. This grading scale has been described before for assessment of motor function following popliteal sciatic nerve block.
Data recording and analysis The clinical research team member will record patient demographic information (age, height, weight, gender), NRS scores before and after surgery, and information about the nerve block and infusion regimen. This individual will also assess motor function and will assess sensory response (see above).
Data will be recorded on a data sheet and transferred to an Excel spreadsheet for statistical analysis. Comparisons between groups will be performed with Student's t-test. Qualitative data will be reported as either absolute numbers or percentage and will be analyzed by Chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test, whichever is appropriate. A p value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Sample size calculation The primary endpoint for this study will be time to return of full motor activity. Several reports have demonstrated that popliteal sciatic nerve block has an average duration of 14-16 hours. Our preliminary results of phrenic nerve block suggest that, following a bolus of washout solution, the time to recovery is reduced to approximately 50% versus time to spontaneous recovery. The investigators assume conservatively that 70% of Study group (washout) patients and 25% of Control group patients will have full motor activity with no pain by 8 hours. Using these parameters with an α value of 0.05 and β value of 0.2, it was determined that 19 patients per group (38 total) will be required to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. To compensate for study protocol violations and/or loss to follow-up, 20 patients will be recruited to each group (40 total).
Randomization Prior to subject recruitment, a member of the study team not involved in data collection will create a series of 40 slips of paper indicating the allocation group (Study or Control) and the intervention (washout regimen or control (1 mL/hr infusion) regimen). The slips will be put into a random order and each placed in an opaque envelope. The envelopes will be sealed and numbered sequentially. During the study, once the patient returns to the post-anesthesia recovery room, the attending regional anesthesiologist will open the envelope to determine the intervention the patient is to receive. If this anesthesiologist is the PI, he will remove himself from the area while a colleague initiates the infusion.
Blinding Both the investigators and participants will be blinded in this study. Investigators will be blinded by having one member of the study team collect the data and another study team member analyze the data. All study participants will have a nerve block catheter and be connected to an infusion pump; however, only Study group patients will receive the washout regimen. Control group patients will have the same solution running but at 1 mL/hr to maintain catheter patency. The pump display showing the infusion rate will be masked with tape or an opaque covering to prevent patients and data collectors from knowing the patient's allocation group.
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Nerve block washout, Sham washout, Saline
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nerve block washoutProcedure or surgery
Saline will be infused through the perineural catheter to reverse motor block.
Sham washoutProcedure or surgery
Infusion of saline to maintain catheter patency.
SalineDrug
Also called Normal saline, Saline 0.9%
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nerve block washout | Experimental | Patients will receive a washout infusion of saline through their perineural catheter to reverse their motor block while maintaining the sensory block. Receives: Procedure: Nerve block washout; Drug: Saline |
| Sham washout | Sham comparator | Patients will receive an infusion of saline run just enough to maintain catheter patency. Receives: Procedure: Sham washout; Drug: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motor function
Motor function (dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) in the absence of pain will be assessed in the period 72 hours following surgery or discharge from hospital, whichever comes first.
Measured: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Sensory function
Post-surgery sensation in the leg/foot will be assessed using a common method (e.g., ability to detect cold stimulus)
Measured: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Pain
Pain (as determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score between 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever) will be recorded before and after surgery.
Measured: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Patient satisfaction
Using questions from the American Pain Society's Patient Satisfaction Survey, patients' satisfaction with their post-operative pain control will be recorded.
Measured: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Time to first oral analgesic
Time between beginning of nerve block washout and first oral analgesic will be recorded.
Measured: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionJan 2018
- Study completionJan 2018
Why it stopped: PI no longer at institution
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Regional AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02050295
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00044120
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.
PubMed 2006740Katircioglu K, Ozkalkanli MY, Kalfaoglu H, Sannav S, Ozgurbuz U, Savaci S. Reversal of prilocaine epidural anesthesia using epidural saline or ringer's lactate washout. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.06.004.
PubMed 17961836Park EY, Kil HK, Park WS, Lee NH, Hong JY. Effect of epidural saline washout on regression of sensory and motor block after epidural anaesthesia with 2% lidocaine and fentanyl in elderly patients. Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64(3):273-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05746.x.
PubMed 19302639Sitzman BT, DiFazio CA, Playfair PA, Stevens RA, Hanes CF, Herman TB, Yates HK, Leisure GS. Reversal of lidocaine with epinephrine epidural anesthesia using epidural saline washout. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):246-51. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.22587.
PubMed 11359224Taboada Muniz M, aLvarez J, Cortes J, Rodrguez J, Atanassoff PG. Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa: correlation between evoked motor response and sensory block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2003.08.007.
PubMed 14556137Tsui BCH, Malherbe S, Koller J, Aronyk K. Reversal of an unintentional spinal anesthetic by cerebrospinal lavage. Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):434-436. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000095152.81728.DC.
PubMed 14742383
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel Approach to Reverse and Titrate the Clinical Effects of a Nerve Block
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02050295
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00044120
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: PI no longer at institution
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Injecting local anesthetic to anesthetize a nerve or group of nerves (a 'nerve block') is an effective way to eliminate pain during and after surgery. There are instances when it would be beneficial to the patient for the nerve block to be resolved quickly rather than waiting for it to naturally wear off. For example, a sciatic nerve block that freezes the lower leg and foot typically takes over 18 hours to resolve on its own, and both the surgeon and patient prefer to have motor function before discharge. The investigators wish to perform a randomized, controlled trial to determine if infusion of a solution such as saline to 'wash out' the nerve block after surgery can allow the patient to be pain-free while still being able to move their leg and foot.
Detailed description
Background and rationale Peripheral nerve blocks provide effective surgical anesthesia targeted to specific body regions while avoiding the unpleasant side-effects of general anesthesia. Additionally, infusion of local anesthetic (LA) solution through a perineural catheter can provide superior analgesia compared to opioid painkillers and reduces the incidence of opioid-associated side effects.
Most studies to date have focused on the efficacy of agents to extend block duration, thereby maximizing pain relief for patients receiving a nerve block. However, there are occasions when rapid and effective block reversal is needed. For example, interscalene brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery frequently causes paralysis of the diaphragm due to inadvertent anesthesia of the phrenic nerve. A method to 'wash out' the local anesthetic around the phrenic nerve in these cases would be beneficial, especially for patients who have pre-existing pulmonary or respiratory diseases. Saline washout of LA may have an additional safety benefit since LAs are myotoxic; reducing the exposure of muscle to LA solutions while maintaining anesthesia would increase the safety of peripheral nerve blocks.
Several studies have demonstrated that epidural washout using normal saline (NS) or Ringer's lactate following epidural block facilitates more rapid recovery of motor function and sensation than letting the block resolve on its own. However, no studies to date have addressed whether washout is effective for reversal of peripheral nerve blocks. Our limited clinical experience suggests that a bolus of NS through a perineural catheter can rapidly and effectively restore phrenic nerve function following interscalene block, and preliminary laboratory experiments indicate that a continuous washout of 0.9% NS reduces by half the time required for normal diaphragm function following injection of lidocaine around the phrenic nerve. Unclear, however, is the mechanism by which NS is able to resolve the block. Thus, the investigators wish to investigate the optimal approach to block reversal and resolution.
Study objective To demonstrate that an infusion of NS can be used in a clinical setting to modify the properties of a nerve block in patients who have received a nerve block for surgery and post-operative analgesia.
Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that NS can be delivered through a perineural catheter to 'wash out' a nerve block to the point that motor function is restored while maintaining anesthesia of sensory nerve fibers.
Procedure Using a sealed envelope system (see below), patients recruited to the study will be randomized to Control or Study groups. Baseline motor and sensory function will be assessed and recorded (see below for methods). Control group patients will undergo ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block as described previously. A bolus of 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine/0.5% bupivacaine will be delivered through a catheter-over-needle unit (e.g., B.Braun Contiplex C or equivalent) to provide surgical anesthesia to the lower extremity. After withdrawing the needle, the catheter will be left in place throughout the operation to provide a conduit to deliver rescue analgesia if required (see criteria below). Patients in the Study group will undergo the same procedures before and during surgery. After surgery, all patients will be brought to the recovery room for assessment of motor function and sensation in the anesthetized region. Study group patients will then receive a washout infusion regimen (e.g., continuous infusion of 3 mL per hour with a 3 mL bolus of 0.9% NS). Control group patients will receive an infusion of the same solution, but it will only be run at 1 mL/hr to maintain catheter patency.
After the patient is transferred to the ward, motor and sensory assessment (see below) will be performed hourly until full motor function has returned. Once motor function has returned completely, the washout infusion will be stopped. The patient will be monitored for sensory function hourly for a maximum of 8 hours or until the first dose of oral pain medication or rescue analgesia is required. If the patient's pain score (determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score between 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever) is >5, or if the patient is complaining of severe pain, the nerve block will be reinitiated by delivering a bolus of local anesthetic mixture through the catheter. A member of the clinical research team will follow up with the patient every 24 hours post-surgery (up to a maximum of 72 hours or discharge from hospital, whichever happens first) to record motor and sensory data and pain score.
Sensory and motor assessment Sensory assessment will be performed by measuring current perception threshold (CPT) using the Neurometer (Neurotron, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA), a validated device for sensory assessment. The investigators have experience using the Neurometer for CPT measurement and will be able to perform sensory assessment with the device easily and efficiently. Briefly, paired adhesive electrodes (Neotrode II, ConMed Corp., Utica, NY, USA) connected to the Neurometer will be attached to the big toe and the ankle of the leg that was blocked. The Neurometer can be set to three different frequencies - 2000 Hz, 250 Hz, and 5 Hz - that stimulate Aβ (large fiber/motor), Aδ (large fiber/pain), and C (small fiber/pain) fibers, respectively. A member of the research team will increase the current manually until the patient reports feeling an "electrical" sensation in the area where the electrodes are attached. The reading at this time will be recorded as the CPT. The data collector will also note if the current reached its maximum level, which will be defined as complete sensory blockade.
Motor function will be assessed by recording voluntary motor responses in the lower extremity. The investigators will grade plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the foot based on the following scale: 0 = normal movement, 1 = decreased movement, and 2 = no movement. Motor block will be deemed complete when a score of 2 is recorded for both plantar flexion and dorsiflexion. This grading scale has been described before for assessment of motor function following popliteal sciatic nerve block.
Data recording and analysis The clinical research team member will record patient demographic information (age, height, weight, gender), NRS scores before and after surgery, and information about the nerve block and infusion regimen. This individual will also assess motor function and will assess sensory response (see above).
Data will be recorded on a data sheet and transferred to an Excel spreadsheet for statistical analysis. Comparisons between groups will be performed with Student's t-test. Qualitative data will be reported as either absolute numbers or percentage and will be analyzed by Chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test, whichever is appropriate. A p value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Sample size calculation The primary endpoint for this study will be time to return of full motor activity. Several reports have demonstrated that popliteal sciatic nerve block has an average duration of 14-16 hours. Our preliminary results of phrenic nerve block suggest that, following a bolus of washout solution, the time to recovery is reduced to approximately 50% versus time to spontaneous recovery. The investigators assume conservatively that 70% of Study group (washout) patients and 25% of Control group patients will have full motor activity with no pain by 8 hours. Using these parameters with an α value of 0.05 and β value of 0.2, it was determined that 19 patients per group (38 total) will be required to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. To compensate for study protocol violations and/or loss to follow-up, 20 patients will be recruited to each group (40 total).
Randomization Prior to subject recruitment, a member of the study team not involved in data collection will create a series of 40 slips of paper indicating the allocation group (Study or Control) and the intervention (washout regimen or control (1 mL/hr infusion) regimen). The slips will be put into a random order and each placed in an opaque envelope. The envelopes will be sealed and numbered sequentially. During the study, once the patient returns to the post-anesthesia recovery room, the attending regional anesthesiologist will open the envelope to determine the intervention the patient is to receive. If this anesthesiologist is the PI, he will remove himself from the area while a colleague initiates the infusion.
Blinding Both the investigators and participants will be blinded in this study. Investigators will be blinded by having one member of the study team collect the data and another study team member analyze the data. All study participants will have a nerve block catheter and be connected to an infusion pump; however, only Study group patients will receive the washout regimen. Control group patients will have the same solution running but at 1 mL/hr to maintain catheter patency. The pump display showing the infusion rate will be masked with tape or an opaque covering to prevent patients and data collectors from knowing the patient's allocation group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nerve block washout | Experimental | Procedure: Nerve block washout, Drug: SalinePatients will receive a washout infusion of saline through their perineural catheter to reverse their motor block while maintaining the sensory block. |
| Sham washout | Sham comparator | Procedure: Sham washout, Drug: SalinePatients will receive an infusion of saline run just enough to maintain catheter patency. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Provide informed written consent
- Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients
- Scheduled for lower extremity surgery wholly or partially under popliteal sciatic nerve block
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Failure to provide informed consent
- Infection at the needle insertion site
- Known coagulopathy
- Known allergy to local anesthetics
- Presence of sensory or motor impairment in the distribution of the sciatic nerve prior to nerve blockade
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nerve block washoutSaline will be infused through the perineural catheter to reverse motor block. | Procedure or surgery | Nerve block washout |
| Sham washoutInfusion of saline to maintain catheter patency. | Procedure or surgery | Sham washout |
| SalineAlso: Normal saline, Saline 0.9% | Drug | Nerve block washout, Sham washout |
Primary outcome
Motor function
Time frame: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Motor function (dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) in the absence of pain will be assessed in the period 72 hours following surgery or discharge from hospital, whichever comes first.
4 secondary outcomes
Sensory function
Time frame: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Pain
Time frame: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Time to first oral analgesic
Time frame: Within 72 hours post-surgery
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI no longer at institution). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 2006740Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.
- Background: PubMed 17961836Katircioglu K, Ozkalkanli MY, Kalfaoglu H, Sannav S, Ozgurbuz U, Savaci S. Reversal of prilocaine epidural anesthesia using epidural saline or ringer's lactate washout. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.06.004.
- Background: PubMed 19302639Park EY, Kil HK, Park WS, Lee NH, Hong JY. Effect of epidural saline washout on regression of sensory and motor block after epidural anaesthesia with 2% lidocaine and fentanyl in elderly patients. Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64(3):273-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05746.x.
- Background: PubMed 11359224Sitzman BT, DiFazio CA, Playfair PA, Stevens RA, Hanes CF, Herman TB, Yates HK, Leisure GS. Reversal of lidocaine with epinephrine epidural anesthesia using epidural saline washout. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):246-51. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.22587.
- Background: PubMed 14556137Taboada Muniz M, aLvarez J, Cortes J, Rodrguez J, Atanassoff PG. Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa: correlation between evoked motor response and sensory block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2003.08.007.
- Background: PubMed 14742383Tsui BCH, Malherbe S, Koller J, Aronyk K. Reversal of an unintentional spinal anesthetic by cerebrospinal lavage. Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):434-436. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000095152.81728.DC.
Related trials for Regional Anesthesia
Recruiting
Intraligamentary vs Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP), Dental Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Control and Recovery After Thoracic Surgery Using SPSIP Block
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Adding Ultrasound-Guided PECS II Block to Standard Multimodal Analgesia in Breast Augmentation Surgery
Postoperative Pain After Breast Augmentation Surgery, Postoperative Analgesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nerve block washout and Saline in people with Regional Anesthesia, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI no longer at institution). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motor function (time frame: Within 72 hours post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02050295, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2020.