AzTrials
AzTrials

Persistent Pain After InjuryElderly CRASHNCT02054962

Persistent Pain Among Elderly Experiencing Motor Vehicle Collision

An observational study of Persistent Pain After Injury and Functional Decline After Injury, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic problems after traumatic events are common in non-elderly adults. Previous studies have shown that after minor motor vehicle collision (MVC), 10-30% of non-elderly adult patients develop chronic regional pain (neck or back pain). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
How many people
211 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2012to Nov 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Elderly experiencing motor vehicle collision

Who may be able to join

  • Patient speaks English, presented to ER less than 24 hours after an MVC, patient has an address and telephone

Who cannot join

  • Patient
  • is a prisoner,
  • has fractures or an intracranial injury,
  • has injuries that are life threatening or expected to result in hospitalization for more than 72 hours,
  • is receiving end of life, hospice, or comfort care, or
  • is considered ineligible by treating physician.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Spectrum Health - Butterworth Hospital

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Persistent Pain and Associated Functional Decline Among Elderly Experiencing Motor Vehicle Collision

Chronic problems after traumatic events are common in non-elderly adults. Previous studies have shown that after minor motor vehicle collision (MVC), 10-30% of non-elderly adult patients develop chronic regional pain (neck or back pain). In addition, up to 1/3 of non-elderly adults will develop psychological sequelae, including posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety disorders. There have been no prospective studies examining the frequency or predictors of persistent pain or psychological sequelae in older adults. The proposed study seeks to determine the frequency of persistent pain, psychological sequelae, and associated disability in older adults after minor MVC trauma and to identify candidate predictors for a model of adverse outcomes after MVC in this population. 200 individuals over 65 years of age will be recruited from emergency departments in four states with no-fault accident laws. Patients who meet inclusion criteria and who consent to the emergency department (ED) study will undergo a 30-45 minute ED assessment of crash-related, psychosocial, and biological factors, and complete telephone follow-ups at 2 weeks, 6 weeks 6 months, and 12 months. The wealth of information gained from this study will be used to determine the frequency of adverse events in older adults after MVC and to identify high risk elderly patients. These results will inform subsequent development of secondary pharmacologic and/or behavioral interventions to prevent chronic pain and psychological sequelae after traumatic events in older adults.

Keywords
Pain
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02054962
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ElderlyThe investigators intend to asses the effect of fear of movement, PTSD symptoms, and physical activity on persistent pain and functional decline.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average pain 6 months after Emergency Department visit

    Average pain during the past week with pain measured on a 0-10 scale.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Physical function at 6 months after Emergency Department visit

    Function measured on a 0-12 scale based on patient reported ability or difficulty walking, carrying objects, and climbing stairs (Simonsick E, et al. 2001).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
211 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02054962
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-0172
Other IDs
K23AG038548
Acronym
Elderly CRASH
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
3 Feb 2014
Last updated
5 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Persistent Pain After Injury and Functional Decline After Injury, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average pain 6 months after Emergency Department visit (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in