AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainPASTORNCT02056951

Interprofessional Rehabilitation for Adults With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

A study testing Multidisciplinary rehabilitation and Interprofessional rehabilitation in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg at 4 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of the study is to analyse the long-term effectiveness of an interprofessional and interdisciplinary rehabilitation program named "PASTOR", with a biopsychosocial approach for participants with chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) compared to the standard inpatient multidisciplinary orthopaedic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation and Interprofessional rehabilitation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
536 participants
Where
4 sitesGermany
Study dates
Jan 2008to Mar 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • M51.2 Other specified intervertebral disc displacement
  • M51.3 Other specified intervertebral disc degeneration
  • M51.4 Schmorl's nodes
  • M51.8 Other specified intervertebral disc disorders
  • M51.9 Intervertebral disc disorder, unspecified
  • M53.8 Other specified dorsopathies
Show all 12Show fewer
  • M53.9 dorsopathy, unspecified
  • M54.4 Lumbago with sciatica
  • M54.5 Low back pain
  • M54.6 Pain in thoracic spine
  • M54.8 Other dorsalgia
  • M54.9 Dorsalgia, unspecified

Who cannot join

  • age below 18 years or over 65 years
  • specific underlying diagnosis of back pain (e. g. radicular symptoms, myelopathy)
  • considerably reduced health status (e.g. comorbidity)
  • considerably reduced sight and hearing (not corrected)
  • severe psychiatric condition as secondary diagnosis
  • inability to speak German
  • current application for early retirement or invalidity pension (§51 SG V - german law)

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Germany4 sites
  • Frankenklinik

    Bad Kissingen, Bavaria, 97688

  • Klinik Franken, Reha-Zentrum Bad Steben

    Bad Steben, Bavaria, 95138

  • Asklepios Klinik Schaufling

    Schaufling, Bavaria, 94571

  • University of Würzburg, Department of Medical Psychology, Medical Sociology, and Rehabilitation Sciences

    Würzburg, Bavaria, 97070

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Interprofessional Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation to Optimize Inpatient Multidisciplinary Orthopedic Rehabilitation for Chronic Low Back Pain

The primary aim of the study is to analyse the long-term effectiveness of an interprofessional and interdisciplinary rehabilitation program named "PASTOR", with a biopsychosocial approach for participants with chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) compared to the standard inpatient multidisciplinary orthopaedic rehabilitation (MOR) in Germany. The investigators hypothesize that in adults with CLBP the rehabilitation program PASTOR would result in a significantly higher increase in functional ability 12 months after completion of the program in comparison to the standard inpatient MOR. The investigators further hypothesize that PASTOR would lead to significantly larger improvements regarding pain-related cognitions, pain coping strategies, physical activity, health-related quality of life, and back pain episodes compared to the standard inpatient MOR.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation, Interprofessional rehabilitation
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Treatment Outcome, Interprofessional Relations, Interdisciplinary Communication, Behavioural Exercise Therapy, Cognitive Therapy, Health Education, Workplace related information, Multicenter Study
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Health Education

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multidisciplinary rehabilitationProcedure or surgery

    Multidisciplinary rehabilitation includes interventions from the physical and psychological dimensions:

    • health education
    • exercise therapy
    • back school
    • physical treatments
    • psychological interventions in groups and individual counselling
    • rehabilitation/social counselling.
  • Interprofessional rehabilitationProcedure or surgery

    Interprofessional rehabilitation includes also interventions from the physical and psychological dimensions:

    • education about low back pain
    • behavioural exercise therapy
    • coping with pain
    • relaxation
    • work related informations
Study groups in NCT02056951
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multidisciplinary rehabilitationActive comparatorThe central objective of inpatient multidisciplinary orthopedic rehabilitation (MOR) is to improve functional health with the main focus on restoring and improving work ability. A MOR lasts on average 23 days with a total extent of therapy of 48 hours on average. MOR is provided by a multiprofessional team consisting of physicians, psychologists, sport therapists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, masseurs, social workers, dieticians and nurses. The interventions are carried out mainly in open groups.
Receives: Procedure: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation
Interprofessional rehabilitationExperimentalThe central objective of the interprofessional rehabilitation (PASTOR) is the development of active self-management of chronic non-specific low back pain. PASTOR is matched to the MOR with respect to the total duration and total extent of therapy, the included professions and the interventions dimensions (physical, psychological). The differences between PASTOR and MOR are characterized by, a) an integrative combination of profession related modules within a comprehensive and consistent treatment approach, b) an interprofessional and collaborative teamwork based on profession related modules, c) the use of standardized methods, media and materials by all professions in the therapeutic team d) a highly structured and detailed manual for the entire treatment process. The interventions are carried in fixed groups with eight to twelve participants.
Receives: Procedure: Interprofessional rehabilitation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH-R) at 12 months

    The FFbH-R consists of twelve items with a three-stage answering scale (2=yes; 1=yes, but with difficulty; 0=no, or only with assistance). The summary score describes the low back pain associated functional ability in activities of daily living (e.g. "Can you wash and dry yourself from head to toe?") in adults on a scale of 0% (minimum functional ability) to 100% (maximum functional ability).

    Kohlmann Th \& Raspe H (1996). Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover zur alltagsnahen Diagnostik der Funktionsbeeinträchtigung durch Rückenschmerzen (FFbH-R). Die Rehabilitation, 34, I-VIII.

    Measured: baseline, one year

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Health-related Quality of Life (SF-12)

    To assess mental and physical health status during the past four weeks.

    Bullinger M \& Kirchberger I (1998). SF-36, Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Measured: baseline, three weeks, one year

  2. Numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Three items to assess the pain intensity reported by participants at the moment, as well as during the last six months (mean and maximum pain).

    Nagel B, Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G \& Pfingsten M (2002). Entwicklung und empirische Überprüfung des Deutschen Schmerzfragebogens der DGSS. Schmerz, 16 (4), 263-270.

    Measured: baseline, three weeks, one year

  3. Freiburg Questionnaire of physical activity (FFkA)

    The FQPA measures the amount of physical activity in different contexts performed by the participants: occupational setting (rating: intensive movement, moderate movement, mostly sitting) as well as leisure time physical activity (e.g. gardening, stair-climbing, habitual walking and cycling, sports). It consists of eight items.

    Frey I, Berg A, Grathwohl D \& Keul J (1999). Freiburger Fragebogen zur körperlichen Aktivität - Entwicklung, Prüfung und Anwendung. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, 44, 55-64.

    Measured: baseline, one year

  4. Pain Management Questionnaire (FESV)

    Questionnaire to assess cognitive and behavioral pain coping strategies.

    Geissner E (2001). Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Schmerzverarbeitung (FESV). Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Measured: baseline, three weeks, one year

  5. Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ)

    Questionnaire to assess fear-avoidance response pattern and avoidance-endurance response pattern to pain.

    Hasenbring MI, Hallner D \& Rusu AC (2009). Fear-avoidance- and endurance-related responses to pain: development and validation of the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ). Eur J Pain, 13 (6), 620-628.

    Measured: baseline, three weeks, one year

  6. Change from Baseline in Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH-R) at 3 weeks

    The FFbH-R consists of twelve items with a three-stage answering scale (2=yes; 1=yes, but with difficulty; 0=no, or only with assistance). The summary score describes the low back pain associated functional ability in activities of daily living (e.g. "Can you wash and dry yourself from head to toe?") in adults on a scale of 0% (minimum functional ability) to 100% (maximum functional ability).

    Kohlmann Th \& Raspe H (1996). Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover zur alltagsnahen Diagnostik der Funktionsbeeinträchtigung durch Rückenschmerzen (FFbH-R). Die Rehabilitation, 34, I-VIII.

    Measured: baseline, three weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
536 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02056951
Sponsor's protocol ID
0421-FSCP-0529
Acronym
PASTOR
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
4 Feb 2014
Last updated
9 Sep 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Semrau J, Hentschke C, Buchmann J, Meng K, Vogel H, Faller H, Bork H, Pfeifer K. Long-term effects of interprofessional biopsychosocial rehabilitation for adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: a multicentre, quasi-experimental study. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0118609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118609. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25768735

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Multidisciplinary rehabilitation and Interprofessional rehabilitation in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg at 4 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH-R) at 12 months (time frame: baseline, one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02056951, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in