AzTrials
AzTrials

Acne VulgarisPhase 4NCT02058628

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Clindamycin + Benzoyl Peroxide Formulation With Azelaic Acid Formulation in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

A Phase 4 study testing Clindamycin + BPO and Azelaic acid in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 11 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, comparator-controlled, single-blind, parallel-group study. The current study proposes to compare a fixed-dose combination product containing 3% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 1% clindamycin against a cream containing 20% azelaic acid for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Acne Vulgaris
What is being tested?
Clindamycin + BPO and Azelaic acid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
222 participants
Where
11 sitesGermany
Study dates
21 Feb 2014to 8 Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects who are males or females 12 to 45 years of age, inclusive.
  • Subjects with acne vulgaris who have: a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 60 inflammatory facial lesions (papules and pustules), including the nose, and no more than 1 facial nodular cystic lesions and a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 125 non-inflammatory facial lesions (open and closed comedones) and an ISGA score of 2 or 3.
  • Subjects agreeing not to use sun-beds or undergo any ultraviolet (UV) light treatment for 4 weeks prior to entering the study and to minimize the amount of exposure to direct sunlight for the duration of the study.
  • Subjects who are capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures are performed. Subjects under the legal age of consent must provide assent and have the written, informed consent of both parents or legal guardians.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to comply with the requirement of the study.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or sexually active and not using reliable contraception and/or not prepared to do so for the duration of the trial (a negative pregnancy test must be confirmed at Visit 1, 3, 4 and 5, for all females if menarche has occurred).
  • Subjects who have any clinically relevant finding at their baseline physical examination or medical history such as severe systemic diseases or diseases of the facial skin other than acne vulgaris.
  • Subjects who have facial hair that may obscure the accurate assessment of acne grade.
  • Subjects who have a history or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, chronic diarrhea, or a history of antibiotic-associated colitis) or similar symptoms.
  • Prior Therapy: Have received treatment with the following therapies at the times specified prior to Baseline: systemic retinoids [6 months]; systemic antibiotics, investigational therapy, facial procedure (chemical or laser peel, microdermabrasion, artificial UV therapy), topical corticosteroids on the face or systemic corticosteroids [4 weeks]; topical antibiotics on the face, topical anti-acne medications (eg, BPO, retinoids, azelaic acid, resorcinol, salicylates, sulfacetamide sodium and derivatives, glycolic acid) [2 weeks]; medications that are reported to exacerbate acne (eg, mega-doses of certain vitamins such as vitamin D, vitamin A, and vitamins B2, B6, and B12; haloperidol; halogens such as iodide and bromide; lithium; hydantoin; and phenobarbital) as these may impact efficacy assessments, neuromuscular blocking agents (Clindamycin has neuromuscular blocking activities, which may enhance the action of other neuromuscular blocking agents), drugs known to be photosensitizers (eg, thiazides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, phenothiazines, sulfonamides) because of the possibility of increased phototoxicity [1 day].
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subjects who are unwilling to stop using the following types of facial products during the study: astringents, toners, abradants, facials, peels containing glycolic or other acids, masks, washes or soaps containing BPO, sulfacetamide sodium or salicylic acid, non-mild facial cleansers, or moisturizers that contain retinol, salicylic acid, or alpha- or beta-hydroxy acids.
  • Subjects who have a known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components (azaleic acid, lincomycin, clindamycin, BPO), or excipients of the study medication.
  • Use of estrogens, including oral, implanted, and topical contraceptives, androgens, or anti-androgenic agents of less than 12 consecutive weeks prior to start of study dosing (change of the dose or drug is not permitted between 12 weeks prior study dosing until end of the study).

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

Germany11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Augsburg, Bavaria, 86179

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Berlin, 10783

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dessau, Saxony-Anhalt, 06847

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Duelmen, Lower Saxony, 48249

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40212

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gilching, Bavaria, 82205

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24148

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39120

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mahlow, Brandenburg, 15831

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70178

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Multi-centre, Single-blind, Parallel Group, Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Clindamycin 1% / Benzoyl Peroxide 3% and Azelaic Acid 20% in the Topical Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris

This is a randomized, comparator-controlled, single-blind, parallel-group study. The current study proposes to compare a fixed-dose combination product containing 3% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 1% clindamycin against a cream containing 20% azelaic acid for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris. The results of the study will enable a better assessment of the safety and efficacy of the new dose regime (BPO 3% + clindamycin 1%) in comparison to a well established treatment. Based on the data more evidence based recommendations will be possible to improve the treatment of subjects with acne vulgaris. A total of 220 subjects will be enrolled and will have 5 study visits (Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12). The duration of the study will be over 12 weeks.

Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Being tested
Clindamycin + BPO, Azelaic acid
Keywords
azelaic acid, Clindamycin, Benzoyl peroxide, Acne vulgaris
Medical subject headings
Acne Vulgaris

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clindamycin + BPODrug

    Gel containing 1.2% clindamycin and 3% BPO for once daily application

  • Azelaic acidDrug

    Cream containing 20% azelaic acid for twice daily application

Study groups in NCT02058628
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalA total of 110 subjects will receive clindamycin + BPO once daily in the evening for 12 weeks as per the randomization schedule.
Receives: Drug: Clindamycin + BPO
Arm 2ExperimentalA total of 110 subjects will receive azelaic acid twice daily (1 in the morning and 1 in the evening) for 12 weeks as per the randomization schedule.
Receives: Drug: Azelaic acid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage Change From Baseline (Day 1) of Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at Week 4 - Superiority Analysis

    A count of IL (papules and pustules, including nasal lesions) was performed at baseline and up to Week 12. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Baseline was defined at Visit 1 (Day 1). Change from Baseline in the number of IL was defined as Week 4 values minus the Baseline values. Raw data has been presented for outcome measure results; however, p value is derived from the Wilcoxon test mean scores.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in IL, Non-inflammatory Lesions (NIL) and Calculated Total Lesions to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    A count of IL (papules and pustules, including nasal lesions), NIL (open and closed comedones) and total lesions was performed at baseline and up to Week 12. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Baseline was defined at Visit 1 (Day 1). Change from Baseline in the number of IL was defined as week 12 values minus the Baseline values.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 2, 4, 8, 12

  2. Percentage Change From Baseline in IL, NIL and Calculated Total Lesions at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    A count of IL (papules and pustules, including nasal lesions),NIL (open and closed comedones) and total lesions was performed at baseline and up to Week 12. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Baseline was defined at Visit 1 (Day 1). Change from Baseline in the number of IL was defined as week 12 values minus the Baseline values.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 2, 4, 8, 12

  3. Speed of Onset : Time to 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Count

    The average time to 50 percent reduction of the calculated total lesion count was analyzed by determination of the number of days between Baseline and the first visit with a 50 percent reduction of the count.

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) to Weeks 2,4,8 and 12

    ISGA was conducted at all study visits. The area considered for the ISGA was confined to the face. A 0-5 point rating scale was used: 0 means Clear- Clear skin with no IL or NIL, 1 means Almost Clear- Rare NIL with no more than one small IL, 2 means Mild- Some NIL with no more than a few IL (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions), 3 means Moderate- Up to many NIL and may have some IL, but no more than one small nodular lesion, 4 means Severe- Up to many NIL and IL, but no more than a few nodular lesions and 5 means Very Severe- Many NIL and IL and more than a few nodular lesions, may have cystic lesions.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

  5. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Local Tolerability as Per Investigator's Assessment at Weeks 2,4,8,12

    Tolerability was assessed by investigator on a 0-3 point rating scale for erythema (0- None, 1- Slight, 2- Some and 3- Very red), dryness (0- None, 1- Slight, 2- Some and 3- Very dry) and peeling (0- None, 1- Slight, 2- Moderate and 3- Strong). A shift table was provided to deduce how the results are varying from the baseline visit to post-baseline visits. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

  6. Number of Participants With Participant Global Change Assessment Score 12 Weeks

    An SGCA was conducted by the participant to assess the efficacy of treatment on Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 as Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse, Very Much Worse and missing.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  7. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Local Tolerability as Per Participant's Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    Tolerability was assessed by the participants based on a 0-3 point rating scale for stinging/burning (S/B) and pruritus of the face (0- None, 1- Slight, 2- Moderate and 3- Strong). A shift table was provided to deduce how the results are varying from the Baseline visit to post-baseline visits.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  8. Number of Participants With Participant Satisfaction Score at Week 12 (Simple Grading)

    The product acceptability and preference questionnaire (PAP-Q ) served as a patient satisfaction score and was performed only once at the final study visit (ie, after 12 weeks (V5) or earlier in case of premature termination). Severity of each facial acne sign and symptom (scaling, redness, dryness, burning, itching) was based on a 0-5 point rating scale (0- None, 1- Very minimal, 2- Mild, 3- Moderate, 4- Severe, 5- Very severe).

    Measured: Week 12

  9. Number of Treatment Adherent Participants at Week 12

    The general assessment of 'overall satisfaction' with study therapy was assessed at week 12 on a 0-4 point rating scale (0-Very satisfied, 1- Satisfied, 2- Neutral, 3- Unsatisfied and 4- Very unsatisfied).

    Measured: Week 12

  10. Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Score as Per Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 2,4,8 and 12

    This outcome measure was a measure of quality of life (QOL). The DLQI was used to assess the quality of life at each visit. Participants completed the questionnaire to evaluate how their acne has affected their life. The DLQI is a 10 item questionnaire, which addresses feelings, daily activities, leisure, work, school, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored out of 0-3, as follows: 0- Not at all, 1- A little, 2- A lot, 3- very much, indicating 0 as the least and 3 as the best quality Index. The sub-scale scores of 10 questions were combined and a composite score was presented. The total score ranged from 0 to 30, 0 indicated the least and highest score indicated the best quality Index. The DLQI was for participants with 17 to 45 years of age. Baseline was defined at Visit 1 (Day 1). Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

  11. Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Score as Per Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at Week 2,4,8 and 12

    This outcome measure was a measure of QOL. The CDLQI was used to assess the quality of life at each visit. Participants completed the questionnaire to evaluate how their acne has affected their life. The DLQI is a 10 item questionnaire, which addresses feelings, daily activities, leisure, work, school, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored out of 0-3, as follows: 0- Not at all, 1- A little, 2- A lot, 3- very much, indicating 0 as the least and 3 as the best quality Index. The sub-scale scores of 10 questions were combined and a composite score was presented. The total score ranged from 0 to 30, 0 indicated the least and highest score indicated the best quality Index. The CDLQI was for participants with 12 to 16 years of age. Baseline was defined at Visit 1 (Day 1). Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12

  12. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) Related to Study Medication

    Adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect and medically significant. TEAEs and TESAEs were reported up to 12 weeks.

    Measured: Up to Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Feb 2014
  3. Primary completion8 Sep 2014
  4. Study completion8 Sep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
222 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02058628
Sponsor's protocol ID
200398
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
6 Feb 2014
Last updated
25 Aug 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Clindamycin + BPO and Azelaic acid in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 11 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage Change From Baseline (Day 1) of Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at Week 4 - Superiority Analysis (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in