AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent PterygiumNCT02059837

Clinical Analysis of Recurrence Patterns Following Conjunctival Autografts for Pterygium Surgery

An observational study of Recurrent Pterygium, run by Kyungpook National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is conducted to evaluate its morphologic reproliferating patterns in patients with pterygium treated with the excision and conjunctival autograft. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Recurrent Pterygium
What is being tested?
recurrent pterygium excision and following grafting
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
116 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Feb 2009to Oct 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A total of 116 patients were included. They had pterygium excision and conjunctival autograft surgery and followed by anterior photographs.

Who may be able to join

  • Recurrent pterygium
  • Unilateral or bilateral pterygium
  • Both male and female
  • Consenting to participate in study

Who cannot join

  • Fibrovascular proliferation secondary to injury
  • Severe dry eye syndrome
  • Pseudopterygium
  • Signs of malignancy on pterygium
  • Corneoscleral trauma or corneo-limbal scars

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Hong Kyun Kim

    Daegu, Kyungangpookdo, 700-721

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Retrospective Study of Recurrence Patterns Following Conjunctival Autografts for Pterygium Surgery

This study is conducted to evaluate its morphologic reproliferating patterns in patients with pterygium treated with the excision and conjunctival autograft.

Read the detailed description

The medical records of 116 eyes of 116 patients with pterygium who had pterygium excision and conjunctival autograft between February 2009 and May 2011 were reviewed. Using consecutively recorded photographs, we evaluated preoperative morphologic characteristics and its growth patterns.

Being tested
recurrent pterygium excision and following grafting
Medical subject headings
Pterygium

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • recurrent pterygium excision and following graftingProcedure or surgery

    The excision of recurrent pterygial tissue and autograft of conjunctiva was done.

Study groups in NCT02059837
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pterygium,recurrentConsecutively recorded photographs of recurrent pterygium excision and following grafting were analyzed.
Receives: Procedure: recurrent pterygium excision and following grafting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pterygium recurrence pattern

    Morphologic recurrence pattern of pterygium using consecutively recorded photographs.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionOct 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02059837
Sponsor's protocol ID
KNUH 2014-1
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
10 Feb 2014
Last updated
11 Feb 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kwon SH, Kim HK. Analysis of recurrence patterns following pterygium surgery with conjunctival autografts. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e518. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000518.

    PubMed 25634207

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Recurrent Pterygium, run by Kyungpook National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pterygium recurrence pattern (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02059837, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in