Critical Limb IschemiaBEST-CLINCT02060630
Best Endovascular vs. Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
A study testing Open surgical revascularization and Endovascular revascularization in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Carelon Research at 161 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
This study will compare the effectiveness of best available surgical treatment with best available endovascular treatment in adults with critical limb ischemia (CLI) who are eligible for both treatment options. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- Open surgical revascularization and Endovascular revascularization
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,843 participants
- Where
- 161 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to 1 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, age 18 years or older.
- Infrainguinal PAOD (occlusive disease of the arteries below the inguinal ligament).
- CLI, defined as arterial insufficiency with gangrene, non-healing ischemic ulcer, or rest pain consistent with Rutherford categories 4-6.
- Candidate for both endovascular and open infrainguinal revascularization as judged by the treating investigators
- Adequate aortoiliac inflow.
- Adequate popliteal, tibial or pedal revascularization target defined as an infrainguinal arterial segment distal to the area of stenosis/occlusion which can support a distal anastomosis of a surgical bypass.
- Willingness to comply with protocol, attend follow-up appointments, complete all study assessments, and provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Presence of a popliteal aneurysm (>2 cm) in the index limb.
- Life expectancy of less than 2 years due to reasons other than PAOD.
- Excessive risk for surgical bypass (as determined by the operating surgeon and the CLI Team)
- Planned above ankle amputation on ipsilateral limb within 4 weeks of index procedure.
- Active vasculitis, Buerger's disease, or acute limb-threatening ischemia
- Any prior index limb infrainguinal stenting or stent grafting associated with significant restenosis within 1 cm of stent or stent-graft, unless the occlusion/restenosis site is outside the intended treatment zone (i.e.,. a tibial vessel that is not currently intended to be revascularized as a part of the treatment for CLI).
Show all 16Show fewer
- Any of the following procedures performed on the index limb within 3 months prior to enrollment:
- Infrainguinal balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, stent, or stentgraft;
- Infrainguinal bypass with either venous or prosthetic conduit
- Open surgical inflow procedure (aortofemoral, axillofemoral, iliofemoral, thoracofemoral or femorofemoral bypass) within 6 weeks prior to enrollment
- Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
- Absolute contraindication to iodinated contrast due to prior near-fatal anaphylactoid reaction (laryngospasm, bronchospasm, cardiorespiratory collapse, or equivalent) which would preclude patient participation in angiographic procedures.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Administration of an investigational drug for PAD within 30 days of randomization.
- Participation in a clinical trial (except observational studies) within the previous 30 days.
- Prior enrollment or randomization into BEST-CLI.
Trial locations and contacts
161 sites in 5 countries.
161 sites in 5 countries
United States144 sites
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208
New Mexico Heart Institute
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
New Mexico VA Medical Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105
Michigan Heart/St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Maryland Medical System
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21210
Loyola University Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21210
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
VA Boston Healthcare System
Boston, Massachusetts, 02132
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
Deborah Heart and Lung Center
Browns Mills, New Jersey, 08015
VA Western NY Healthcare System
Buffalo, New York, 14215
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
CAMC Clinical Trials Center
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Central DuPage Hospital (Cadence)
Chicago, Illinois, 60190
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65212
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Ohio Health Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Denver Health
Denver, Colorado, 80024
Vascular Institute of the Rockies
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Rocky Mountain Regional VA
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Durham VAMC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Michigan Vascular Center
Flint, Michigan, 48507
University of Florida (Gainesville)
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Spectrum Health
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Prisma Health-Upstate (Formerly Greenville Memorial Hospital)
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Hanover, New Hampshire, 03756
St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06105
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Kaiser Foundation Hospital
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819
Memorial Hermann Hospital TMC
Houston, Texas, 77030
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Medical School
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of California - Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697
Midwest Aortic Vascular Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, 64116
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Gundersen Health System
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
San Diego VAMC
La Jolla, California, 92037
UC San Diego Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center
La Jolla, California, 92037
University of Arkansas for Medical Services
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Loma Linda VA Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92357
VA Long Beach Healthcare System
Long Beach, California, 90822
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90027
VA Greater Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90073
Keck Medical Center of USC
Los Angeles, California, 90089
UCLA-Gonda Vascular Surgery
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706
Meriter Wisconsin Heart
Madison, Wisconsin, 53713
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33176
Mount Sinai Miami
Miami Springs, Florida, 33140
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Milwaukee VAMC
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295
Minneapolis Heart Hospital/Abbott Northwestern Hosp.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Minneapolis VAMC
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417
Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Ochsner Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Sentara Vascular Specialists
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Florida Hospital Ocala
Ocala, Florida, 34471
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
VA Palo Alto Health Care
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Arizona Heart Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102
Providence Heart and Vascular Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Portland VA Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905
The Miriam Hospital/Brown Medical School
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Vascular Health Partners
Queensbury, New York, 12804
North Carolina Heart and Vascular Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55901
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Sacramento VA Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95655
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
The University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Kaiser Permanente (San Diego)
San Diego, California, 92123
Kaiser Permanente Northern California
San Francisco, California, 94118
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94121
University of California-San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143
Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98122
University Health System: LSU Health Sciences
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130
North Central Heart Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108
Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Springfield, Illinois, 62702
St. Louis VA Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63106
Stanford Hospital
Stanford, California, 94305
Staten Island University Hospital
Staten Island, New York, 10305
Stony Brook Medicine
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8191
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13215
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Tampa VAMC
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Holy Name Medical Center
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Scott and White - Temple
Temple, Texas, 76508
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
University of Toledo Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43615
Harbor - UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90509
University of Arizona - Banner University Medical Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85719
Carondelet Heart & Vascular Institute
Tucson, Arizona, 85745
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine at Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, 10595
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
GW Medical Faculty Associates, Inc.
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Mercy Hospital Medical Center
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
West Haven VAMC
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516
South Shore Hospital
Weymouth, Massachusetts, 02189
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Winfield, Illinois, 601611
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Pinnacle Health System
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17043
Canada12 sites
Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H3A7
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A5W9
McGill
Montreal, Quebec, H3A1A1
Jewish General Hostpital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4E9
Chu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1L 3L5
Regina Qu'Appelle
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 0W5
St. Paul's Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M0Z9
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z1M9
St. Boniface General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6
New Zealand3 sites
Auckland City Hospital
Grafton, Auckland, 1023
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, Waikato Region, 3240
Wellington Hospital
Newtown, Wellington Region, 6021
About this study
Official title: Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
This study will compare the effectiveness of best available surgical treatment with best available endovascular treatment in adults with critical limb ischemia (CLI) who are eligible for both treatment options.
Read the detailed description
Male and female subjects aged 18 years or older will be randomized to receive either open surgical treatment or endovascular treatment. They will be followed for at least 2 years and up to 4 years and 2 months after treatment to primarily assess survival and major adverse limb events in the index or treated limb, and secondarily, to determine clinical and cost effectiveness outcomes after treatment. These outcomes (survival-free of major limb events and clinical, functional and cost effectiveness) will be compared within two cohorts of subjects: those with an available single-segment great saphenous vein, and those with an alternative conduit. The null hypotheses for both cohorts is that there will be no difference in MALE-free survival between best endovascular therapy and best surgical therapy.
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Being tested
- Open surgical revascularization, Endovascular revascularization
- Keywords
- Surgical revascularization, Endovascular revascularization, Amputation, Peripheral artery disease, Critical limb ischemia, claudication, leg pain, leg ulcer, gangrene
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication, Leg Ulcer, Gangrene
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Open surgical revascularizationProcedure or surgery
Endovascular revascularizationDevice
A variety of FDA approved devices will be used within this treatment arm. The trial will submit a proof-of-concept IDE application to the FDA to cover all devices.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Available vein, open surg. revasc. | Other | Subjects with an available SSGSV cohort randomized to open surgical revascularization Receives: Procedure: Open surgical revascularization |
| Available vein, endovasc. revasc. | Other | Subjects with an available SSGSV cohort randomized to endovascular revascularization Receives: Device: Endovascular revascularization |
| Alternative conduit, open surg. revasc. | Other | Subjects with an alternative conduit cohort randomized to open surgical revascularization Receives: Procedure: Open surgical revascularization |
| Alternative conduit, endovasc. revasc. | Other | Subjects with an alternative conduit cohort randomized to endovascular revascularization Receives: Device: Endovascular revascularization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary efficacy endpoint: MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event)-free survival. MALE is defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb or major re-intervention (e.g. new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/ thrombolysis)
- Time to major adverse limb event or death, whichever occurs first in subjects with Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein (SSGSV) available
- Time to major adverse limb event or death, whichever occurs first in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Secondary outcomes (44)
Clinical: Re-intervention and amputation-free survival (cohort 1)
Time to re-intervention of the index leg, above ankle amputation of the index leg, or death, whichever occurs first in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Re-intervention and amputation-free survival (cohort 2)
Time to re-intervention of the index leg, above ankle amputation of the index leg, or death, whichever occurs first in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from MALE-POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 1)
Time to re-intervention of the index leg, amputation of the index leg, or death within 30 days of index procedure, whichever occurs first in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Clinical: Freedom from MALE-POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 2)
Time to re-intervention of the index leg, amputation of the index leg, or death within 30 days of index procedure, whichever occurs first in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Amputation-free survival (cohort 1)
Time to amputation of the index leg, or death, whichever occurs first in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Amputation-free survival (cohort 2)
Time to amputation of the index leg, or death, whichever occurs first in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 1)
Time to death within 30 days of index procedure in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 2)
Time to death within 30 days of index procedure in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Myocardial Infarction (cohort 1)
Time to myocardial infarction (MI) in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Myocardial Infarction (cohort 2)
Time to myocardial infarction (MI) in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Stroke (cohort 1)
Time to stroke in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Stroke (cohort 2)
Time to stroke in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from re-intervention (major and minor) in index leg (cohort 1)
Time to re-intervention (major and minor) in index leg in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from re-intervention (major and minor) in index leg (cohort 2)
Time to re-intervention (major and minor) in index leg in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Number of re-interventions (major and minor) in per limb salvaged (cohort 1)
Number of re-interventions (major and minor) in per limb salvaged in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Number of re-interventions (major and minor) in per limb salvaged (cohort 2)
Number of re-interventions (major and minor) in per limb salvaged in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from hemodynamic failure (cohort 1)
Time to hemodynamic failure in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from hemodynamic failure (cohort 2)
Time to hemodynamic failure in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from clinical failure (cohort 1)
Time to above ankle amputation, major reintervention, MALE, degradation of WIfI stage or death, whichever occurs first in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from clinical failure (cohort 2)
Time to above ankle amputation, major reintervention, MALE, degradation of WIfI stage or death, whichever occurs first in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) (cohort 1)
Time to resolution of presenting CLI symptoms in the index limb in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) (cohort 2)
Time to resolution of presenting CLI symptoms in the index limb in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from all-cause mortality (cohort 1)
Time to all-cause mortality in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from all-cause mortality (cohort 2)
Time to all-cause mortality in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using VasuQoL (cohort 1)
VasuQOL measurements in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using VasuQoL (cohort 2)
VasuQOL measurements in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using EuroQoL (cohort 1)
EuroQOL measurements in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using EuroQoL (cohort 2)
EuroQOL measurements in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, PCS (cohort 1)
Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, PCS (cohort 2)
Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, MCS (cohort 1)
Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, MCS (cohort 2)
Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, SF-6D R2 (cohort 1)
Utility Index (SF-6D R2) scores in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, SF-6D R2(cohort 2)
Utility Index (SF-6D R2) scores in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Pain Now (cohort 1)
Scores for Pain Now in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Pain Now (cohort 2)
Scores for Pain Now in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Usual level of Pain (cohort 1)
Scores for Usual level of Pain during the last week in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Usual level of Pain (cohort 2)
Scores for Usual level of Pain during the last week in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Best level of Pain (cohort 1)
Scores for Best level of Pain during the last week in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Best level of Pain (cohort 2)
Scores for Best level of Pain during the last week in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Worst level of Pain (cohort 1)
Scores for Worst level of Pain during the last week in subjects with SSGSV available
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Worst level of Pain (cohort 2)
Scores for Worst level of Pain during the last week in subjects without available SSGSV
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Function: Six-minute walk test (cohort 1)
Six-minute walk test measurements in subjects with SSGSV available. The six-minute walk test was performed at a subset of clinical sites (for whom this test was standard of care) and was limited to patients for whom rest pain, wounds, or foot surgery (recent or anticipated) did not preclude weight bearing
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Function: Six-minute walk test (cohort 2)
Six-minute walk test measurements in subjects without available SSGSV. The six-minute walk test was performed at a subset of clinical sites (for whom this test was standard of care) and was limited to patients for whom rest pain, wounds, or foot surgery (recent or anticipated) did not preclude weight bearing
Measured: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completion1 Mar 2022
- Study completion1 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical Limb IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,843 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carelon Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Medical Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Abbott, Bard Ltd, Boston Scientific Corporation, Cordis US Corp., Abbott Medical Devices, Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery, Eastern Vascular Society, W.L.Gore & Associates, Midwest Vascular Society, New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, Society for Interventional Radiology, Southern Vascular Society, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society, Vascular Interventional Advances, Western Vascular Society
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Matthew Menard, MD, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's HospitalAlik Farber, MD, Principal investigator, Boston UniversityKenneth Rosenfield, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General HospitalMark Cziraky, PharmD, CLS, Principal investigator, Carelon ResearchTaye Hamza, PhD, Principal investigator, Carelon Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02060630
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BEST-CLI Trial
- Other IDs
- 1U01HL107407
- Acronym
- BEST-CLI
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lee JY, Parvathinathan G, Liu S, Etemadi A, Stedman MR, Arya S, Chang TI. Efficacy and safety of revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia by kidney function. Am Heart J. 2026 Aug 5:107550. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107550. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42556521Hicks CW, Farber A, Doros G, Kinlay S, Powell RJ, Strong MB, Rosenfield K, Aridi H, Motaganahalli R, Barleben A, Siracuse JJ, Azene E, Malas M, Conte MS, Zayed M, Menard MT. Atherectomy Is Not Associated With Improved Limb-Based Outcomes Among Patients in the BEST-CLI Trial Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Jan 12;19(1):96-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.065.
PubMed 41534992Venermo MA, de Vega M, Houlind K, Siracuse JJ, Doros G, Kiang S, Barshes N, Rosenfield K, Menard MT, Farber A; BEST-CLI haemodynamic working group. Baseline Haemodynamic Measurements and Immediate Change in Parameters after Revascularisation: Ankle Pressure, Ankle Brachial Index, Toe Pressure, and Toe Brachial Index Analysis of the BEST-CLI Participants. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2026 Jun;71(6):942-949. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.12.042. Epub 2025 Dec 24.
PubMed 41453560Tan TW, Dansey KD, Farber A, Doros G, Menard MT, Rosenfield K, Conte MS, Venermo M, Kolh P, Strong MB, Singh N. High rates of nonindex limb amputation in the Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial. J Vasc Surg. 2026 Mar;83(3):905-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.11.009. Epub 2025 Nov 14.
PubMed 41242623Alameddine D, Hamouda M, Doros G, Conte MS, Rosenfield K, Strong MB, Menard MT, Farber A, Hamdan A, Malas M, Ochoa Chaar CI. Insulin therapy and outcomes of revascularization procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2026 Jan;83(1):246-255.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.033. Epub 2025 Aug 29.
PubMed 40886741Jones DW, Farber A, Armstrong DG, Azene E, Duncan A, Todoran TM, Doros G, Strong MB, Rosenfield K, Conte MS, Menard MT. Characteristics of multidisciplinary limb preservation teams and their impact on outcomes in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2026 Feb;83(2):528-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.028. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
PubMed 40885461Alonso A, Huang J, Oro CF, Maaneb de Macedo K, Lotfollahzadeh S, Kalish J, Farber A, King E, Chitalia VC, Siracuse JJ. Factors associated with cancellation of arteriovenous access creations. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Oct;82(4):1477-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.211. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
PubMed 40484061Siracuse JJ, Kaufman JA, Farber A, Menard MT, Rosenfield K, Conte MS, Schanzer A, Powell RJ, Venermo M, Doros G, Faries P, Strong MB, Dake MD. Antiproliferative endovascular drug technology is associated with fewer major reinterventions after femoropopliteal interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Oct;82(4):1375-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.029. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
PubMed 40464723Ramkumar N, Goodney PP, Moore K, Goodney AJ, Ponukumati AS, Menard M, Farber A, Staiger D. Selecting Treatments for Peripheral Artery Disease: Differences Between Registry and a Randomized Controlled Trial Population. J Surg Res. 2025 Apr;308:286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.040. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
PubMed 40138771Conte MS, Farber A, Barleben A, Chisci E, Doros G, Kashyap VS, Kayssi A, Kolh P, Moreira CC, Nypaver T, Rosenfield K, Rowe VL, Schanzer A, Singh N, Siracuse JJ, Strong MB, Menard MT. Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
PubMed 40100950Barleben AR, Patel RJ, Farber A, Menard MT, Venermo M, Creager MA, Reitz KM, Strong M, Rosenfield K, Doros G, Dake M, Chaer RA. An assessment of the BEST-CLI Trial demonstrates that infrainguinal bypass offers a potential advantage in smokers with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1411-1419.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.015. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
PubMed 39984143Alonso A, Kobzeva-Herzog AJ, Levin SR, de Macedo KM, Melvin J, Farber A, King EG, Garg K, Shean KE, O'Donnell TFX, Rybin D, Siracuse JJ. Disability and associated outcomes among patients suffering periprocedural strokes after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1343-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.223. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
PubMed 39923916Ulloa JG, Alabi O, McGinigle K, Lane J, Doros G, Menard M, Moreira CC, Judelson DR, Farber A, Conte MS, Rosenfeld K, Hamouda M, Kirksey L, Strong MB, Malas M, Kernodle A, Rowe VL. Outcomes for Hispanic patients undergoing open bypass in BEST-CLI. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1420-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.212. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
PubMed 39914761Alonso A, Kobzeva-Herzog A, Dalton-Petillo S, Haqqani M, Farber A, King EG, Hicks CW, Malas M, Garg K, Osborne N, Simons JP, Siracuse JJ. Evaluating the management of intermittent claudication before and after publication of the Society of Vascular Surgery's Appropriate Use Criteria. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Aug;82(2):526-533.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.133. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
PubMed 39880293Malas MB, Hamouda M, Farber A, Menard MT, Conte MS, Rosenfield K, Strong MB, Doros G, Powell RJ, Mena-Hurtado C, Gasper W, Schermerhorn ML, Allievi S, Smolderen KG, Dake MD, Rymer JA, Tuttle KR. Outcomes of chronic limb-threatening ischemia revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;81(4):945-956.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.128. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
PubMed 39846933
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02060630
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEST-CLI / BEST-CLI Trial
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Keywords
- Surgical revascularization, Endovascular revascularization, Amputation, Peripheral artery disease, Critical limb ischemia, claudication, leg pain, leg ulcer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,843 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carelon ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Medical Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Abbott, Bard Ltd, Boston Scientific Corporation, Cordis US Corp., Abbott Medical Devices, Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery, Eastern Vascular Society, W.L.Gore & Associates, Midwest Vascular Society, New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, Society for Interventional Radiology, Southern Vascular Society, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society, Vascular Interventional Advances, Western Vascular Society
- Study start
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare the effectiveness of best available surgical treatment with best available endovascular treatment in adults with critical limb ischemia (CLI) who are eligible for both treatment options.
Detailed description
Male and female subjects aged 18 years or older will be randomized to receive either open surgical treatment or endovascular treatment. They will be followed for at least 2 years and up to 4 years and 2 months after treatment to primarily assess survival and major adverse limb events in the index or treated limb, and secondarily, to determine clinical and cost effectiveness outcomes after treatment. These outcomes (survival-free of major limb events and clinical, functional and cost effectiveness) will be compared within two cohorts of subjects: those with an available single-segment great saphenous vein, and those with an alternative conduit. The null hypotheses for both cohorts is that there will be no difference in MALE-free survival between best endovascular therapy and best surgical therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Available vein, open surg. revasc. | Other | Procedure: Open surgical revascularizationSubjects with an available SSGSV cohort randomized to open surgical revascularization |
| Available vein, endovasc. revasc. | Other | Device: Endovascular revascularizationSubjects with an available SSGSV cohort randomized to endovascular revascularization |
| Alternative conduit, open surg. revasc. | Other | Procedure: Open surgical revascularizationSubjects with an alternative conduit cohort randomized to open surgical revascularization |
| Alternative conduit, endovasc. revasc. | Other | Device: Endovascular revascularizationSubjects with an alternative conduit cohort randomized to endovascular revascularization |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male or female, age 18 years or older.
- Infrainguinal PAOD (occlusive disease of the arteries below the inguinal ligament).
- CLI, defined as arterial insufficiency with gangrene, non-healing ischemic ulcer, or rest pain consistent with Rutherford categories 4-6.
- Candidate for both endovascular and open infrainguinal revascularization as judged by the treating investigators
- Adequate aortoiliac inflow.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Presence of a popliteal aneurysm (>2 cm) in the index limb.
- Life expectancy of less than 2 years due to reasons other than PAOD.
- Excessive risk for surgical bypass (as determined by the operating surgeon and the CLI Team)
- Planned above ankle amputation on ipsilateral limb within 4 weeks of index procedure.
- Active vasculitis, Buerger's disease, or acute limb-threatening ischemia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Open surgical revascularization | Procedure or surgery | Alternative conduit, open surg. revasc., Available vein, open surg. revasc. |
| Endovascular revascularizationA variety of FDA approved devices will be used within this treatment arm. The trial will submit a proof-of-concept IDE application to the FDA to cover all devices. | Device | Alternative conduit, endovasc. revasc., Available vein, endovasc. revasc. |
Primary outcome
The primary efficacy endpoint: MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event)-free survival. MALE is defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb or major re-intervention (e.g. new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/ thrombolysis)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
* Time to major adverse limb event or death, whichever occurs first in subjects with Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein (SSGSV) available * Time to major adverse limb event or death, whichever occurs first in subjects without available SSGSV
44 secondary outcomes
Clinical: Re-intervention and amputation-free survival (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Re-intervention and amputation-free survival (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from MALE-POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Clinical: Freedom from MALE-POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Amputation-free survival (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Amputation-free survival (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom POD (POD, defined as death within 30 days of index procedure) (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Myocardial Infarction (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Myocardial Infarction (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Stroke (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Stroke (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from re-intervention (major and minor) in index leg (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from re-intervention (major and minor) in index leg (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Number of re-interventions (major and minor) in per limb salvaged (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Number of re-interventions (major and minor) in per limb salvaged (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from hemodynamic failure (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from hemodynamic failure (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from clinical failure (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from clinical failure (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from all-cause mortality (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Clinical: Freedom from all-cause mortality (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using VasuQoL (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using VasuQoL (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using EuroQoL (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Quality of Life assessment using EuroQoL (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, PCS (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, PCS (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, MCS (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, MCS (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, SF-6D R2 (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Function assessment using SF-12, SF-6D R2(cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Pain Now (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Pain Now (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Usual level of Pain (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Usual level of Pain (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Best level of Pain (cohort 1)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Functional: Numerical rating scale for Pain, Best level of Pain (cohort 2)
Time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42556521Lee JY, Parvathinathan G, Liu S, Etemadi A, Stedman MR, Arya S, Chang TI. Efficacy and safety of revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia by kidney function. Am Heart J. 2026 Aug 5:107550. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107550. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41534992Hicks CW, Farber A, Doros G, Kinlay S, Powell RJ, Strong MB, Rosenfield K, Aridi H, Motaganahalli R, Barleben A, Siracuse JJ, Azene E, Malas M, Conte MS, Zayed M, Menard MT. Atherectomy Is Not Associated With Improved Limb-Based Outcomes Among Patients in the BEST-CLI Trial Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Jan 12;19(1):96-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.065.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41453560Venermo MA, de Vega M, Houlind K, Siracuse JJ, Doros G, Kiang S, Barshes N, Rosenfield K, Menard MT, Farber A; BEST-CLI haemodynamic working group. Baseline Haemodynamic Measurements and Immediate Change in Parameters after Revascularisation: Ankle Pressure, Ankle Brachial Index, Toe Pressure, and Toe Brachial Index Analysis of the BEST-CLI Participants. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2026 Jun;71(6):942-949. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.12.042. Epub 2025 Dec 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41242623Tan TW, Dansey KD, Farber A, Doros G, Menard MT, Rosenfield K, Conte MS, Venermo M, Kolh P, Strong MB, Singh N. High rates of nonindex limb amputation in the Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial. J Vasc Surg. 2026 Mar;83(3):905-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.11.009. Epub 2025 Nov 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40886741Alameddine D, Hamouda M, Doros G, Conte MS, Rosenfield K, Strong MB, Menard MT, Farber A, Hamdan A, Malas M, Ochoa Chaar CI. Insulin therapy and outcomes of revascularization procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2026 Jan;83(1):246-255.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.033. Epub 2025 Aug 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40885461Jones DW, Farber A, Armstrong DG, Azene E, Duncan A, Todoran TM, Doros G, Strong MB, Rosenfield K, Conte MS, Menard MT. Characteristics of multidisciplinary limb preservation teams and their impact on outcomes in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2026 Feb;83(2):528-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.028. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40484061Alonso A, Huang J, Oro CF, Maaneb de Macedo K, Lotfollahzadeh S, Kalish J, Farber A, King E, Chitalia VC, Siracuse JJ. Factors associated with cancellation of arteriovenous access creations. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Oct;82(4):1477-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.211. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40464723Siracuse JJ, Kaufman JA, Farber A, Menard MT, Rosenfield K, Conte MS, Schanzer A, Powell RJ, Venermo M, Doros G, Faries P, Strong MB, Dake MD. Antiproliferative endovascular drug technology is associated with fewer major reinterventions after femoropopliteal interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Oct;82(4):1375-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.029. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40138771Ramkumar N, Goodney PP, Moore K, Goodney AJ, Ponukumati AS, Menard M, Farber A, Staiger D. Selecting Treatments for Peripheral Artery Disease: Differences Between Registry and a Randomized Controlled Trial Population. J Surg Res. 2025 Apr;308:286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.040. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40100950Conte MS, Farber A, Barleben A, Chisci E, Doros G, Kashyap VS, Kayssi A, Kolh P, Moreira CC, Nypaver T, Rosenfield K, Rowe VL, Schanzer A, Singh N, Siracuse JJ, Strong MB, Menard MT. Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39984143Barleben AR, Patel RJ, Farber A, Menard MT, Venermo M, Creager MA, Reitz KM, Strong M, Rosenfield K, Doros G, Dake M, Chaer RA. An assessment of the BEST-CLI Trial demonstrates that infrainguinal bypass offers a potential advantage in smokers with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1411-1419.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.015. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39923916Alonso A, Kobzeva-Herzog AJ, Levin SR, de Macedo KM, Melvin J, Farber A, King EG, Garg K, Shean KE, O'Donnell TFX, Rybin D, Siracuse JJ. Disability and associated outcomes among patients suffering periprocedural strokes after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1343-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.223. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Critical Limb Ischemia
RecruitingObservational study
miRNAs in Critical Limb Ischemia (miRNACLI)
Critical Limb Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Laser Atherectomy and Sirolimus-eluting Balloon Angioplasty for CLTI
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Recruiting
Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingObservational study
Vessel Recoil in Specific CLTI Populations
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug Coated Balloon
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew Menard, MD principal investigator
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Alik Farber, MD principal investigator
Boston University
Kenneth Rosenfield, MD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
161 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Open surgical revascularization and Endovascular revascularization in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Carelon Research at 161 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 161 sites in United States, Canada, New Zealand, Finland, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary efficacy endpoint: MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event)-free survival. MALE is defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb or major re-intervention (e.g. new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/ thrombolysis) (time frame: Through each subject's last regularly scheduled study visit, up to a maximum of 84 months per subject). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02060630, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.