Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT02061956
A Simple Prognostic Scoring System for Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of death of cancer.Although with the development of medical science, more and more patients diagnose HCC at early stage, a lot of patients with HCC still continue to present with multiple tumors or port vein… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- How many people
- 647 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with unresectable HCC received TACE.The diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by either histology, cytology, elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, >400 ng/mL), or by typical radiological appearance.
Who may be able to join
- age between 18-75 years;
- Child-Pugh A or B liver function;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores ≤2;
- HCC with no previous treatment;
Who cannot join
- severe coagulopathy (prothrombin activity <40% or a platelet count of <40,000/mm3);
- Child-Pugh C liver function or evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy;
- ECOG scores 3-4 (5) combined with serious diseases of other organs.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of death of cancer.Although with the development of medical science, more and more patients diagnose HCC at early stage, a lot of patients with HCC still continue to present with multiple tumors or port vein thrombosis. According to AASLD guidelines, these patients could received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or new agents as initial treatment. However, the intermediate group comprises a wide spectrum in terms of liver function and extent of tumour, and this may explain the large differences in survival reported for individual series.
A simple, pragmatic and reliable prognostic index based on objective measures would be of value in providing information to patients, for stratifying patients entering clinical trials and in making meaningful comparisons between series reported in the literature.The aims of our study were (i) to identify predictors of survival in a cohort of patients undergoing TACE or TAE for unresectable HCC, (ii) to develop and validate a simple scoring system and (iii) to compare the new scoring system with the most frequently used prognostic systems for its ability to separate high- and low-risk patients.
Read the detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of death of cancer. The 2005 guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) for HCC states that hepatic resection(HR) can be offered to patients with a solitary lesion if they are non-cirrhotic, or have cirrhosis but still have well-preserved liver function. With the improvement of surgical technique and perioperative care, the surgical mortality for HCC resection can be reduced to less than 1%, and the 5-year overall survival can exceed 50%. Although with the development of medical science, more and more patients diagnose HCC at early stage, a lot of patients with HCC still continue to present with multiple tumors or port vein thrombosis. According to AASLD guidelines, these patients could received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or new agents as initial treatment. However, the intermediate group comprises a wide spectrum in terms of liver function and extent of tumour, and this may explain the large differences in survival reported for individual series.
A simple, pragmatic and reliable prognostic index based on objective measures would be of value in providing information to patients, for stratifying patients entering clinical trials and in making meaningful comparisons between series reported in the literature.The aims of our study were (i) to identify predictors of survival in a cohort of patients undergoing TACE or TAE for unresectable HCC, (ii) to develop and validate a simple scoring system and (iii) to compare the new scoring system with the most frequently used prognostic systems for its ability to separate high- and low-risk patients.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HCC received TACE | Patients with HCC in cancer center, Sun Yat-sen University received TACE between 2011.01-2011.12 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy
1-year overall survival
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Safety
1 month mortality
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 647 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chen Min-Shan, Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02061956
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCC-0014
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Simple Prognostic Scoring System for Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02061956
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCC-0014
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 647 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of death of cancer.Although with the development of medical science, more and more patients diagnose HCC at early stage, a lot of patients with HCC still continue to present with multiple tumors or port vein thrombosis. According to AASLD guidelines, these patients could received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or new agents as initial treatment. However, the intermediate group comprises a wide spectrum in terms of liver function and extent of tumour, and this may explain the large differences in survival reported for individual series.
A simple, pragmatic and reliable prognostic index based on objective measures would be of value in providing information to patients, for stratifying patients entering clinical trials and in making meaningful comparisons between series reported in the literature.The aims of our study were (i) to identify predictors of survival in a cohort of patients undergoing TACE or TAE for unresectable HCC, (ii) to develop and validate a simple scoring system and (iii) to compare the new scoring system with the most frequently used prognostic systems for its ability to separate high- and low-risk patients.
Detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of death of cancer. The 2005 guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) for HCC states that hepatic resection(HR) can be offered to patients with a solitary lesion if they are non-cirrhotic, or have cirrhosis but still have well-preserved liver function. With the improvement of surgical technique and perioperative care, the surgical mortality for HCC resection can be reduced to less than 1%, and the 5-year overall survival can exceed 50%. Although with the development of medical science, more and more patients diagnose HCC at early stage, a lot of patients with HCC still continue to present with multiple tumors or port vein thrombosis. According to AASLD guidelines, these patients could received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or new agents as initial treatment. However, the intermediate group comprises a wide spectrum in terms of liver function and extent of tumour, and this may explain the large differences in survival reported for individual series.
A simple, pragmatic and reliable prognostic index based on objective measures would be of value in providing information to patients, for stratifying patients entering clinical trials and in making meaningful comparisons between series reported in the literature.The aims of our study were (i) to identify predictors of survival in a cohort of patients undergoing TACE or TAE for unresectable HCC, (ii) to develop and validate a simple scoring system and (iii) to compare the new scoring system with the most frequently used prognostic systems for its ability to separate high- and low-risk patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HCC received TACE | – | –Patients with HCC in cancer center, Sun Yat-sen University received TACE between 2011.01-2011.12 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with unresectable HCC received TACE.The diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by either histology, cytology, elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, >400 ng/mL), or by typical radiological appearance.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age between 18-75 years;
- Child-Pugh A or B liver function;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores ≤2;
- HCC with no previous treatment;
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- severe coagulopathy (prothrombin activity <40% or a platelet count of <40,000/mm3);
- Child-Pugh C liver function or evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy;
- ECOG scores 3-4 (5) combined with serious diseases of other organs.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Efficacy
Time frame: 1 year
1-year overall survival
1 secondary outcome
Safety
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2014.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recruiting
Improving Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
DNP-MRSI of HCC Metabolism to Predict Therapeutic Response
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A, B or C HCC, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Recruiting
Targeted Navigation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of VRT106, Combined With Camrelizumab, and Apatinib for Advanced HCC
HCC
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TheraSphere With Durvalumab and Tremelimumab for HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2014.