AzTrials
AzTrials

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAMRIKNCT05828446

Improving Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening

A study testing MRI in people with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Naik Vietti Violi at 1 site in Switzerland.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a monocentric, single blind, interventional, single arm study. It is designed to compare the rates of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by ultrasound (US) used in clinical routine vs. abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
MRI
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
330 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
1 Apr 2023to 30 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All adult patients with chronic liver disease and indication for HCC screening according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendations.
  • Informed Consent signed by the subject

Who cannot join

  • History of HCC
  • History of other malignancy
  • Prior liver nodule categorized as LI-RAD 4, 5 or M
  • History of liver transplantation
  • Pregnancy
  • MRI or MRI contrast agent precaution
  • Any other condition making the patient unsuitable for the study
  • Patient's refusal of transmission of relevant medical conditions found on the medical examinations performed during the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Naik Vietti Violi, MD contact

+41213144556

naik.vietti-violi@chuv.ch

Clarisse Dromain, MD contact

+41213144556

Clarisse.dromain@chuv.ch

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Lausanne University Hospital

    Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011

    Naik Vietti Violi, MD, +41795560240, naik.vietti-violi@chuv.ch

    Naik Vietti Violi, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Cost-effectiveness of US and Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening

This is a monocentric, single blind, interventional, single arm study. It is designed to compare the rates of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by ultrasound (US) used in clinical routine vs. abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI). The hypothesis is that dynamic AMRI with extracellular contrast agent injection has a higher patient-level detection rate of HCC than screening US and non-contrast AMRI.

Interested and eligible patients will be enrolled and undergo HCC screening rounds including US +/- contrast-enhanced US (clinical routine) and screening MRI within the same week bi-annually.

Being tested
MRI
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRIDevice

    Also called Constrast-enhanced US

    To compare the diagnostic performance of US+/- Constrast-enhanced US and AMRI for HCC detection in an at-risk population

Study groups in NCT05828446
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HCC screening population according to European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: MRI

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To compare the diagnostic performance of US+/- CEUS and AMRI for HCC detection in an at-risk population

    The patients will undergo all the normal follow-up according to clinical recommendations, consisting of a bi-annual clinical visit in the gastro-enterology department and an US. The US will be followed by CEUS in case of suspicious lesion. On the same week, the study participants will undertake MRI.

    The data of the full MRI will be used to reconstruct two different AMRI sets for reading: non-contrast (NC-) and dynamic (Dyn-) AMRI.

    The endpoint is the rate of HCC detection. Outcome measures will be compared in terms of ROC curve and AUC.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Compare the patient-level accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of US +/- CEUS vs. AMRI for HCC.

    Diagnostic performance of the different tests [(1)US alone, (2) US + CEUS, (3) NC-AMRI, (4) Dyn-AMRI] will be compared using all patient information (including complete MRI and pathology) as the reference standard.

    Outcome measures will be compared in terms accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  2. Evaluate patient satisfaction and comfort with US +/- CEUS vs. AMRI with a questionnaire

    In order to evaluation patient's opinion a survey regarding patient experience and opinion to the different test will be performed.

    Outcome will be measured in term of level of confort using a 5-scale score: from low discomfort to high discomfort:

    1. No discomfort
    2. Low discomfort
    3. Neutral
    4. Comfort
    5. high comfort

    Measured: Once, after the first screening round (US+/-CEUS and MRI), 6 months

  3. To develop and test a DL model for HCC detection based on AMRI.

    AMRI DL based model will be analysed in terms of (1) diagnostic performance (ROC, AUC, sensitivitiy, specificity, accuracy) and (2) time savings compared to AMRI read by a radiologist.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  4. To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing US to different alternative screening strategies for HCC in Switzerland.

    Cost effectiveness analysis will be perfomed by building a model using all study data: patient characteristics, exam diagnostic performance and patient management costs.

    Outcome will be analysed in terms of Lifetime costs, quality adjusted life expectancy

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  5. To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing US to different alternative screening strategies for HCC in Switzerland.

    Cost effectiveness analysis will be perfomed by building a model using all study data: patient characteristics, exam diagnostic performance and patient management costs.

    Outcome will be analysed in terms of incremental costs effectiveness ratios.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2023
  2. Study start1 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
single center interventional prospective study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
330 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05828446
Sponsor's protocol ID
CER-VD 2022-D0116
Acronym
AMRIK
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
19 Jan 2023
Last updated
3 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MRI in people with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Naik Vietti Violi at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Naik Vietti Violi, MD (+41213144556, naik.vietti-violi@chuv.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To compare the diagnostic performance of US+/- CEUS and AMRI for HCC detection in an at-risk population (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in