AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 2NCT02063698

Auranofin in Decreasing Pain in Patients With Paclitaxel-Induced Pain Syndrome

A Phase 2 study testing auranofin and questionnaire administration in people with Pain, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies whether auranofin will relieve pain following paclitaxel in patients who have previously experienced paclitaxel-induced pain. Auranofin is a drug given by mouth to treat other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, and is being studied to see if it will decrease pain… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
auranofin and questionnaire administration
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Feb 2014to 11 Nov 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1500/mm^3
  • Platelet count (PLT) >= 100,000/mm^3
  • Creatinine =< 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Either serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) (alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) or serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) (aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) =< 1.5 x ULN
  • Total/direct bilirubin =< 1.5 x ULN
  • Alkaline phosphatase =< 1.5 x ULN
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Hemoglobin >= 9 mg/dL
  • Negative urine or serum pregnancy test performed =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
  • Previously experienced paclitaxel induced pain during a current or past paclitaxel treatment that the treating healthcare provider thinks is consistent with the paclitaxel-induced acute pain syndrome; note: formal documentation of prior pain is not required
  • Scheduled to receive paclitaxel at a dose >= 70 mg/m^2 =< 14 days from randomization
  • Ability to complete the questionnaires or to do so with assistance

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant women
  • Nursing women
  • Any woman of childbearing potential or male partner of a woman of childbearing potential unwilling to employ acceptable contraception throughout the study and for at least 30 days after the last dose of the study drug
  • History of gold-induced disorders, including but not limited to, necrotizing enterocolitis, pulmonary fibrosis, exfoliative dermatitis, bone marrow aplasias or other severe hematologic disorders; history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to auranofin or other gold compounds
  • Currently receiving Dilantin (phenytoin) or auranofin or another gold-containing compound
  • Anticipated use of filgrastim (G-CSF) or sargramostim (GM-CSF) within 30 days after receiving auranofin
  • Currently receiving immune-modulating therapies

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Test Auranofin (Ridaura®) to Control the Paclitaxel-Induced Pain Syndrome (PIAPS)

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies whether auranofin will relieve pain following paclitaxel in patients who have previously experienced paclitaxel-induced pain. Auranofin is a drug given by mouth to treat other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, and is being studied to see if it will decrease pain following paclitaxel.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Determine whether one dose of auranofin given the day following administration of paclitaxel decreases pain as assessed by daily completion of the Modified Brief Pain Inventory scale for seven days.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Assess whether auranofin is well tolerated in this setting.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients receive auranofin orally (PO) on day 2.

ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO on day 2.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 21-28 days.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
auranofin, placebo, questionnaire administration
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • auranofinDrug

    Also called Ridaura

    Given PO

  • placeboOther

    Also called PLCB

    Given PO

  • questionnaire administrationOther

    Ancillary studies

Study groups in NCT02063698
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I (auranofin)ExperimentalPatients receive auranofin PO on day 2.
Receives: Drug: auranofin; Other: questionnaire administration
Arm II (placebo)Placebo comparatorPatients receive placebo PO on day 2.
Receives: Other: placebo; Other: questionnaire administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Count/Percentage of Patients Who Report Having Experienced the Paclitaxel-induced Pain Syndrome (PIAPS) for One Week After Paclitaxel After Enrollment to the Current Trial, Assessed by the Modified Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI)

    The primary endpoint is the per arm count/percentage of patients who report having experienced the PIAPS for one week after paclitaxel after enrollment to the current trial. Pain was assessed on the question 'Please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours'. The count of participants who report having experienced the PIAPS for one week after paclitaxel after enrollment to the current trial circling 'less than 4' and 'greater than or equal to 4' for each day between day 2 to day 8 are reported below. Modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores corresponding to more /worse pain. Fisher's Exact Test will be used to compare the frequency of patients who experienced PIAPS between the two arms.

    Measured: Up to 28 days

  2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) Summary of Worst Pain in the Last 24 Hours From Days 2 to 8

    Area under the curve (AUC) Summary of Worst Pain in the last 24 hours from days 2 to 8. On a scale of 0-100, with 100=Best QOL. Pain was assessed on the question 'Please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours.' Modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores corresponding to more pain. The AUC for this question was then calculated and ranged from 0-100, with higher scores corresponding to less/improved pain. The Equal Variance T-test will be used to compare the average AUC for worst pain between the two arms.

    Measured: Up to 8 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Normalized AUC for BPI Average Pain From the Modified BPI in the Last 24 Hours From Days 2 to 8

    Normalized AUC for BPI Average pain from the modified BPI in the last 24 hours from days 2 to 8. On a scale of 0-100 with 100:Best QOL. Pain was assessed on the question 'Please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain on the average.' Modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores corresponding to more pain. The AUC for this question was then calculated and ranged from 0-100, with higher scores corresponding to less/improved pain. The Equal Variance T-test will be used to compare the average AUC for worst pain between the two arms.

    Measured: Up to 28 days

  2. Worst Toxicity Assessed Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4

    The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient. The count of participants with worst adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment by maximum grade are reported below.

    Measured: Up to 28 days

  3. Cramp Pain as Measured by the Paclitaxel-Induced Acute Pain Syndrome (PIAPS) Symptom Summary on Day 5

    Cramp Pain as measured by the Paclitaxel-Induced Acute Pain Syndrome (PIAPS) Symptom Summary on Day 5. The PIAPS question 'Please place a check mark (√) by all appropriate words that could be used to describe any pain you have had in the last 24 hours'. The number of participants who completed this question on day 5 were analyzed (those who checked 'cramping' are summarized by the 'Yes' row below and those who did not check 'cramping' are summarized by the 'No' row below. Those who did not complete the symptom summary are summarized by the 'Missing' row.) The chi-square test was used.

    Measured: Up to 5 days

  4. Gnawing Pain as Measure by the Paclitaxel-Induced Acute Pain Syndrome (PIAPS) Symptom Summary on Day 8

    Gnawing Pain as measured by the Paclitaxel-Induced Acute Pain Syndrome (PIAPS) Symptom Summary on Day 8. The PIAPS question 'Please place a check mark (√) by all appropriate words that could be used to describe any pain you have had in the last 24 hours'. The number of participants who completed this question on day 8 were analyzed (those who checked 'gnawing' are summarized by the 'Yes' row below and those who did not check 'gnawing' are summarized by the 'No' row below. Those who did not complete the symptom summary are summarized by the 'Missing' row.) The chi-square test was used.

    Measured: Up to 8 days

  5. Location of New Pain Patient Had in the Last 24 Hours on Day 5 PIAPS Upper Arm Pain

    Location of New Pain Patient had in the last 24 hours on day 5 PIAPS Upper arm pain. PIAPS question: "Please indicate where any new pains are/were located by placing a check mark (√) next to the location. Please mark all that apply:" The number of participants who completed this question on day 5 were analyzed (those who checked 'arm, above the elbow' are summarized by the 'Yes' row below and those who did not check 'arm, above the elbow' are summarized by the 'No' row below. Those who did not complete the symptom summary are summarized by the 'Missing' row.) The chi-square test was used.

    Measured: Up to 5 days

  6. Location of New Pain Patient Had in the Last 24 Hours on Day 5 PIAPS Lower Arm Pain.

    Location of New Pain Patient had in the last 24 hours on day 5 PIAPS Lower arm pain. PIAPS question: "Please indicate where any new pains are/were located by placing a check mark (√) next to the location. Please mark all that apply:" The number of participants who completed this question on day 5 were analyzed (those who checked 'arm, between the elbows and wrists' are summarized by the 'Yes' row below and those who did not check 'arm, between the elbows and wrists' are summarized by the 'No' row below. Those who did not complete the symptom summary are summarized by the 'Missing' row.) The chi-square test was used.

    Measured: Up to 5 days

  7. Location of New Pain Patient Had in the Last 24 Hours on Day 6 PIAPS Lower Arm Pain.

    Location of New Pain Patient had in the last 24 hours on day 6 PIAPS Lower arm pain. PIAPS question: "Please indicate where any new pains are/were located by placing a check mark (√) next to the location. Please mark all that apply:" The number of participants who completed this question on day 5 were analyzed (those who checked 'arm, between the elbows and wrists' are summarized by the 'Yes' row below and those who did not check 'arm, between the elbows and wrists' are summarized by the 'No' row below. Those who did not complete the symptom summary are summarized by the 'Missing' row.) The chi-square test was used.

    Measured: Up to 6 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start19 Feb 2014
  3. Primary completion11 Nov 2015
  4. Study completion11 Nov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02063698
Sponsor's protocol ID
MC1364
Other IDs
NCI-2014-00165, MC1364, P30CA015083
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
12 Feb 2014
Last updated
23 Apr 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing auranofin and questionnaire administration in people with Pain, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Count/Percentage of Patients Who Report Having Experienced the Paclitaxel-induced Pain Syndrome (PIAPS) for One Week After Paclitaxel After Enrollment to the Current Trial, Assessed by the Modified Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI) (time frame: Up to 28 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in