Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4NCT02065479
A Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients Undergoing PCI With CYP2C19 Loss-of-function:
A Phase 4 study testing Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Prasugrel and Ticagrelor
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to 22 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients scheduled for left heart catheterization and undergoing PCI
- Age 18-75 years
- On aspirin (81mg) or aspirin (81mg) and clopidogrel (75mg/day)
- Presence of at least one 2C19 LOF allele
Who cannot join
- Known allergies to aspirin, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or clopidogrel
- Age >75 years
- Weight <60kg
- Considered at high risk for bleeding
- History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack
- Known severe hepatic dysfunction
Show all 16Show fewer
- On treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy (Vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban)
- Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban)
- Blood dyscrasia or bleeding diathesis
- Platelet count <80x106/mL
- Hemoglobin <10 g/dL.
- Active bleeding or hemodynamic instability
- Creatinine Clearance <30 mL/minute
- Patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) or high degree AV block without pacemaker protection.
- Current treatment with drugs interfering with CYP3A4 metabolism (to avoid interaction with Ticagrelor): Ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, and telithromizycin.
- Pregnant females* *Women of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives) while participating in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI With CYP2C19 Loss-of-function Genotypes: A Feasibility Study With Point-of-care Pharmacodynamic and Genetic Testing
Numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. There are multiple factors contributing to clopidogrel response variability, including genetic variations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme. In particular, loss-of-function (LOF) alleles of the CYP2C19 enzyme reduce transformation of clopidogrel pro-drug into its active metabolite. Thus, patients carrying LOF alleles have lower levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite as well as diminished platelet inhibition, which translates into an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prasugrel and ticagrelor are novel generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors characterized by greater PD potency and reduced ischemic event rates compared with clopidogrel, and are not affected by CYP2C19 LOF polymorphisms. However, to date there are limited head-to-head PD comparisons between these two new P2Y12 receptors blockers, and there are no studies assessing on how these agents behave among CYP2C19 LOF carriers. The aim of the present study is to compare the PD effects of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles using the novel point-of-care genetic testing Spartan RX-CYP2C19 which permits accurate and rapid identification of CYP2C19 genetic status.
Read the detailed description
Clopidogrel is the most broadly utilized platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. There are multiple factors contributing to clopidogrel response variability. Among these, genetic variations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme, a key contributor to clopidogrel metabolism, have been involved. In particular, loss-of-function (LOF) alleles of the CYP2C19 enzyme reduce transformation of clopidogrel pro-drug into its active metabolite. Thus, patients carrying LOF alleles have lower levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite as well as diminished platelet inhibition, which translates into an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because of these findings, drug regulating authorities have provided a boxed warning on the product label of clopidogrel on the potential for reduced efficacy of clopidogrel among CYP2C19 LOF carriers and suggested considering alternative antiplatelet therapies for these individuals. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are novel generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors characterized by greater PD potency and reduced ischemic event rates compared with clopidogrel, and are not affected by CYP2C19 LOF polymorphisms. However, to date there are limited head-to-head PD comparisons between these two new P2Y12 receptors blockers, and there are no studies assessing on how these agents behave among CYP2C19 LOF carriers. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy according to results of genetic testing has been limited in real world clinical practice because of not having readily accessible results of individual's genetic makeup. The aim of the present study is to compare the PD effects of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles using the novel point-of-care genetic testing Spartan RX-CYP2C19 which permits accurate and rapid identification of CYP2C19 genetic status.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Prasugrel, Ticagrelor
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Genetic Polymorphism, Pharmacodynamic
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PrasugrelDrug
Also called Effient
Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor
TicagrelorDrug
Also called Brilinta
Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ticagrelor | Active comparator | The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority in platelet reactivity of prasugrel versus ticagrelor among CYP2C19 loss of function allele carriers. Receives: Drug: Prasugrel |
| Prasugrel | Experimental | The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority in platelet reactivity of prasugrel versus ticagrelor among CYP2C19 loss of function allele carriers. Receives: Drug: Ticagrelor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Platelet Reactivity
The primary endpoint is P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) measured by the Verify Now P2Y12 assay 24hours/hospital discharge post randomization to prasugrel vs ticagrelor. PRU is is an arbitrary unit of measure to assess ADP-induced platelet aggregation.
Measured: 24 hours post loading dose
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completion22 Apr 2019
- Study completion22 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of FloridaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Florida
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dominick J Angiolillo, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02065479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UFJ 2014-12
- Other IDs
- IRB201702750
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Franchi F, Rollini F, Rivas J, Rivas A, Agarwal M, Briceno M, Wali M, Nawaz A, Silva G, Shaikh Z, Maailiki N, Been L, Pineda AM, Suryadevara S, Soffer D, Zenni MM, Bass TA, Angiolillo DJ. Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Genotypes: Results of a Randomized Pharmacodynamic Study in a Feasibility Investigation of Rapid Genetic Testing. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 25;5(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.009. eCollection 2020 May.
PubMed 32478205
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI With CYP2C19 Loss-of-function Genotypes: A Feasibility Study With Point-of-care Pharmacodynamic and Genetic Testing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02065479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UFJ 2014-12
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Genetic Polymorphism, Pharmacodynamic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of FloridaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- 22 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. There are multiple factors contributing to clopidogrel response variability, including genetic variations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme. In particular, loss-of-function (LOF) alleles of the CYP2C19 enzyme reduce transformation of clopidogrel pro-drug into its active metabolite. Thus, patients carrying LOF alleles have lower levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite as well as diminished platelet inhibition, which translates into an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prasugrel and ticagrelor are novel generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors characterized by greater PD potency and reduced ischemic event rates compared with clopidogrel, and are not affected by CYP2C19 LOF polymorphisms. However, to date there are limited head-to-head PD comparisons between these two new P2Y12 receptors blockers, and there are no studies assessing on how these agents behave among CYP2C19 LOF carriers. The aim of the present study is to compare the PD effects of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles using the novel point-of-care genetic testing Spartan RX-CYP2C19 which permits accurate and rapid identification of CYP2C19 genetic status.
Detailed description
Clopidogrel is the most broadly utilized platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, numerous studies have shown that pharmacodynamics (PD) response profiles vary among clopidogrel treated patients and that individuals with reduced response have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. There are multiple factors contributing to clopidogrel response variability. Among these, genetic variations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme, a key contributor to clopidogrel metabolism, have been involved. In particular, loss-of-function (LOF) alleles of the CYP2C19 enzyme reduce transformation of clopidogrel pro-drug into its active metabolite. Thus, patients carrying LOF alleles have lower levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite as well as diminished platelet inhibition, which translates into an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, particularly in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because of these findings, drug regulating authorities have provided a boxed warning on the product label of clopidogrel on the potential for reduced efficacy of clopidogrel among CYP2C19 LOF carriers and suggested considering alternative antiplatelet therapies for these individuals. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are novel generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors characterized by greater PD potency and reduced ischemic event rates compared with clopidogrel, and are not affected by CYP2C19 LOF polymorphisms. However, to date there are limited head-to-head PD comparisons between these two new P2Y12 receptors blockers, and there are no studies assessing on how these agents behave among CYP2C19 LOF carriers. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy according to results of genetic testing has been limited in real world clinical practice because of not having readily accessible results of individual's genetic makeup. The aim of the present study is to compare the PD effects of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles using the novel point-of-care genetic testing Spartan RX-CYP2C19 which permits accurate and rapid identification of CYP2C19 genetic status.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ticagrelor | Active comparator | Drug: PrasugrelThe primary endpoint is the non-inferiority in platelet reactivity of prasugrel versus ticagrelor among CYP2C19 loss of function allele carriers. |
| Prasugrel | Experimental | Drug: TicagrelorThe primary endpoint is the non-inferiority in platelet reactivity of prasugrel versus ticagrelor among CYP2C19 loss of function allele carriers. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PrasugrelAlso: EffientComparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor | Drug | Ticagrelor |
| TicagrelorAlso: BrilintaComparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor | Drug | Prasugrel |
Primary outcome
Platelet Reactivity
Time frame: 24 hours post loading dose
The primary endpoint is P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) measured by the Verify Now P2Y12 assay 24hours/hospital discharge post randomization to prasugrel vs ticagrelor. PRU is is an arbitrary unit of measure to assess ADP-induced platelet aggregation.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32478205Franchi F, Rollini F, Rivas J, Rivas A, Agarwal M, Briceno M, Wali M, Nawaz A, Silva G, Shaikh Z, Maailiki N, Been L, Pineda AM, Suryadevara S, Soffer D, Zenni MM, Bass TA, Angiolillo DJ. Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Genotypes: Results of a Randomized Pharmacodynamic Study in a Feasibility Investigation of Rapid Genetic Testing. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 25;5(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.009. eCollection 2020 May.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
GOT VOICE Feasibility With In-Person Group Singing
Elderly, Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
RecruitingObservational study
Real-life Registry in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Treated With the SELUTION Sirolimus-eluting Balloon. Selution Iberia Registry
Cardiovascular Diseases
Recruiting
Lifewise Preventive Video Education in Primary Care
Prevention Harmful Effects, Health Maintenance
RecruitingPhase 4
Inclisiran Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Limb Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Peripheral Endovascular Intervention
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Peripheral Endovascular Intervention
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Vessel-FFR Versus FFR in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenoses
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dominick J Angiolillo, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Florida
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Platelet Reactivity (time frame: 24 hours post loading dose). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02065479, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2020.