AzTrials
AzTrials

AstigmatismNCT02067429

Limbal Relaxing Incision Versus Toric Intraocular Lens for Corneal Astigmatism During Cataract Surgery.

A study testing Limbal Relaxing Incisions and Toric Intraocular Lens in people with Astigmatism and Cataract, run by Christin Henein at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare toric intra-ocular lens (IOL) with limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) in correcting astigmatism in patient undergoing standard cataract surgery. Astigmatism is unequal curvature of the eye; the eye is oval rather than spherical. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Astigmatism, Cataract
What is being tested?
Limbal Relaxing Incisions and Toric Intraocular Lens
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jun 2014to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Symptomatic cataract for which the patient desires surgery
  • Corneal astigmatism of greater than or equal to 0.75 D and lesser than or equal to 2.5D.
  • No significant ophthalmic co-morbidity which would affect the postoperative visual outcomes.

Who cannot join

  • <18 years of age
  • Significant ophthalmic comorbidity detrimental to final visual outcomes
  • Not competent to give consent
  • Concurrent use of ocular medications including lubricants
  • Unable to attend follow ups at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Deborah Horney contact

Deborah.Horney2@bsuh.nhs.uk

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sussex Eye Hospital

    Brighton, BN2 5BF

    Deborah Horney, Deborah.Horney2@bsuh.nhs.uk

    Mayank Nanavaty, DO, MRCSEd, FRCOphth

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Limbal Relaxing Incisions Versus Toric Intraocular Lens for Keratometric Astigmatism <2.5 Diopters in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery and Intraocular Lens Implantation.

This study will compare toric intra-ocular lens (IOL) with limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) in correcting astigmatism in patient undergoing standard cataract surgery.

Astigmatism is unequal curvature of the eye; the eye is oval rather than spherical. Uncorrected astigmatism of greater than approximately 0.75 diopters (D) can cause visual blurring, ghosting of images or halos. Over 20% of patients undergoing cataract surgery have astigmatism which is likely to have been corrected by spectacles.

Read more

Cataract surgery involves the replacement of the natural opacifying crystalline lens with a clear artificial plastic intra-ocular lens (IOL). The lens power can be selected to correct the patient's glasses prescription. The most widely used IOLs only correct glasses at one distance i.e. either near or distance. Residual astigmatism after cataract surgery will need glasses for correction which is undesirable for many patients.

Limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) are circumferential partial thickness cuts to the clear window of the eye (cornea) during surgery. These LRIs can correct corneal astigmatism and have no additional risk of complications.

Alternatively, toric IOLs are available which correct astigmatism inside the eye. They have been available for routine use in the last few years; technology has markedly improved and the lenses have become cheaper.

Studies have suggested toric IOLs provide better vision after cataract surgery than the regular IOLs. Toric IOL are widely used in the private practice and increasingly in the National Health Service (NHS). LRIs are cost effective for treating astigmatism however their predictability is believed to be lower than toric IOLs. As there are no randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes between LRIs and toric IOLs. This research will address this gap in knowledge and accordingly from this research future practice will be able to provide treatment to patients with information about the best outcomes.

Being tested
Limbal Relaxing Incisions, Toric Intraocular Lens
Medical subject headings
Astigmatism, Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Limbal Relaxing IncisionsProcedure or surgery

  • Toric Intraocular LensDevice

Study groups in NCT02067429
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Toric Intraocular lensExperimentalToric intraocular lens implantation during standard cataract surgery
Receives: Device: Toric Intraocular Lens
Limbal Relaxing IncisionsExperimentalLimbal relaxing incisions during standard cataract surgery
Receives: Procedure: Limbal Relaxing Incisions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)

    Measured: 1 months

  2. Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02067429
Sponsor's protocol ID
RCT135670
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
17 Feb 2014
Last updated
2 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Limbal Relaxing Incisions and Toric Intraocular Lens in people with Astigmatism and Cataract, run by Christin Henein at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Deborah Horney (Deborah.Horney2@bsuh.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA) (time frame: 1 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in