Painful Diabetic NeuropathyPhase 2NCT02068027
Study of Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel, 0.1% in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Diabetic Neuropathy
A Phase 2 study testing Clonidine Gel 0.1% in people with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy and Diabetic Neuropathy, run by BioDelivery Sciences International at 23 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to determine whether clonidine gel is an effective treatment for reducing the pain associated with painful diabetic neuropathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Painful Diabetic Neuropathy, Diabetic Neuropathy, Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Clonidine Gel 0.1%
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject has provided written informed consent.
- The subject is an outpatient aged 18 to 85 years (inclusive) at the time of the Screening Visit.
- The subject has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycemic control that has been optimized and has been stable on diet therapy, oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin, for at least three (3) months prior to the Screening Visit.
- The subject must be a male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female. Females must be practicing an acceptable method of birth control, or be surgically sterile or postmenopausal (amenorrhea for ≥12 months). Non-pregnancy will be confirmed (as applicable) by a pregnancy test conducted at the Screening and Randomization Visits. Double-barrier methods, hormonal contraceptives, and abstinence are acceptable birth control methods for this study.
- The subject has chronic pain attributable to a symmetrical stocking distribution neuropathy in the lower extremities for at least three (3) months. A loss of distal sensation and/or tingling paresthesia primarily in the toes and fingers is acceptable, but must be of secondary importance to the distal neuropathic pain. Pain should be clearly localized to the area of neuropathy (feet) and subjects should be able to distinguish this pain (the target pain) from other painful areas and conditions.
- The subject has an average pain score relevant to the target pain in the feet of ≥4 on an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale over the previous 24 hours at Screening.
Show all 13Show fewer
- The subject has a pain score of at least 2, on the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale , within 30 minutes following topical 0.1% capsaicin application with occlusive dressing to the pretibial area.
- The subject has a mean daily average pain score relevant to the target pain in the feet of ≥4 on an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale during the Baseline Phase.
- The subject has met the pain evaluation and scoring criteria at the end of the Placebo Lead-in Phase by having a mean daily average pain score relevant to the target pain in the feet of ≥4 on an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale without having a decrease in their pain score greater than 20% compared to the Baseline Phase score in the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale .
- The subject has been medically stable for at least 30 days prior to the Screening Visit, and in the opinion of the Investigator, is in otherwise good general health based on medical history, physical examination, ECG, and laboratory evaluation.
- If taking chronic oral pain medications, the subject must be on a stable regimen for at least 14 days prior to the Baseline Visit with the expectation that the medications, dose(s) and schedule will remain stable throughout the study. For medications containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin, subjects must be on a stable dose for at least 7 days prior to the Baseline Visit. As needed pain medications will be limited to acetaminophen from Day -8 until the end of the treatment period. Low dose aspirin (81 mg/day) is not considered as analgesic therapy.
- Subject is compliant with daily pain assessments during the Baseline Phase and Placebo Lead in Phase of the study by recording their Numeric Pain Rating Scale score at least 5 days and the last 3 days of the previous 7 days.
- Subject is alert and has the capabilities of applying topical gel to both feet three times daily. A caregiver, trained by the study staff to apply study drug, would be a suitable alternative to self-application of the treatment.
Who cannot join
- The subject has neuropathy secondary to non-diabetic causes in the opinion of the Investigator (e.g., significant vasculitis, collagen vascular disorder, familial neuropathy, alcoholism, pernicious anemia, hepatitis, malignancy, syphilis, post-herpetic neuralgia, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], medication-induced neuropathy, vitamin B12 deficiency).
- The subject has a significant neurological disorder or a condition that can cause symptoms that mimic peripheral neuropathy or might confound assessment of painful diabetic neuropathy (e.g., stroke with distal neurological deficit, mononeuritis multiplex, lumbar radiculopathy, multiple sclerosis) or has significant asymmetric neuropathic signs and symptoms.
- The subject has other sustained pain with intensity at or greater than the bilateral neuropathic pain in the feet/toes.
- The subject is using an implanted medical device (e.g., spinal cord stimulator, intrathecal pump, or peripheral nerve stimulator) for the treatment of pain.
- The subject has no pin-prick sensitivity to Neuropen testing of non-calloused areas of the foot.
- The subject is clinically hypotensive with a resting diastolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg or a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg.
Show all 27Show fewer
- The subject has recent history (within the past 3 months) or current symptoms of orthostatic hypotension with a sudden fall in blood pressure on standing accompanied by dizziness and lightheadedness.
- The subject has a history of foot or toe amputation, or an active foot or toe ulcer.
- The subject has any significant or unstable medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with his/her ability to participate in the study.
- The subject has a history of substance abuse disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) within the past year, has current evidence for substance abuse disorder, is receiving medicinal treatment for drug abuse, or tests positive upon urine drug screen for a non-prescribed substance of abuse.
- The subject has used capsaicin on the feet for greater than 2 consecutive weeks in the previous 3 months.
- The subject has symptomatic or severe coronary insufficiency, clinically significant cardiac conduction disturbances, myocardial infarction (within last 12 months), moderate to severe cerebrovascular disease, or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen therapy.
- The subject has a serum creatinine value >2.0 mg/dL or a value for alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) >2.5 times the upper limit of normal at Screening.
- The subject was dosed with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
- The subject is likely to be noncompliant or unreliable in providing pain ratings as judged by the Investigator.
- The subject has evidence of clinically significant peripheral vascular disease as evidenced by history of intermittent claudication or evidence of vascular ulcers, including venous stasis ulcers.
- The subject has had prior treatment with clonidine topical gel.
- The subject is currently taking or has taken clonidine in any form (oral, transdermal patch) over the past 4 weeks.
- The subject has known hypersensitivity or intolerance to clonidine.
- Except for acetaminophen, the subject is currently receiving any medications that could affect neuropathic pain and is not at a stable dose for at least 14 days prior to the Baseline Visit (other than medications containing NSAIDs and aspirin which must be stable for 7 days prior to the Baseline Visit).
- The subject is receiving non-oral pain medication(s) (transdermal, topical, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous, intrarectal, sublingual, transmucosal) and/or using "alternative medicine" products or techniques (acupuncture, naturopathy, homeopathy, etc.) for pain treatment ≤7 days prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Subject has a history of malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
- The subject has been hospitalized within 30 days of the Screening Visit, or is planning to have surgery during the study period.
- The subject has clinical evidence of pedal edema or venous stasis disease associated with significant skin changes on physical examination.
- The subject has a clinically relevant painful foot condition, such as tarsal tunnel syndrome, plantar fasciitis, Morton's neuroma, painful bunion, or arthritis of the foot/ankle, or has a condition that may be associated with numbness in the foot.
- The subject has any dermatologic condition of the lower extremities that could affect study drug absorption (e.g., severe edema).
- The subject has current symptoms of depression with a Beck Depression Inventory -II score >19 at Screening.
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country.
23 sites in 1 country
United States23 sites
Study site
Bradenton, Florida, 34205
Study site
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Study site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Study site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Study site
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77055
Study site
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Study site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33143
Study site
Milford, Connecticut, 06460
Study site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
Study site
Renton, Washington, 98057
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Study site
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23451
Study site
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Study site
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
Study site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Arm Parallel-Group Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel, 0.1% in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
The purpose of the study is to determine whether clonidine gel is an effective treatment for reducing the pain associated with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Read the detailed description
Study CLO 290 was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm parallel group study of Clonidine Gel in the treatment of pain associated with PDN. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 of 2 treatments applied topically TID to both feet for 85 days: Clonidine Gel (3.9 mg of clonidine HCl total daily dose), or Placebo Gel (vehicle without clonidine). Approximately 140 adult subjects with symmetrical distal PDN were expected to be randomized into the study. However, a pre-planned fully blinded interim analysis was performed when 70 subjects had completed the study for the purpose of re estimating sample size. Following the recommendation of the independent, third party statistician who conducted the interim analysis, the sample size was adjusted to allow approximately 260 subjects to be randomized into the study.
The study included 5 phases: Screening Phase (up to 21 days duration), Baseline Phase (Day 14 to Day 8), Placebo Lead in Phase (Day -7 to Day 1), Double blind Treatment Phase (85 days), and a Post-treatment Follow up Phase (7 days, only for subjects not enrolling in the open label long term safety study, CLO 311).
- Conditions
- Painful Diabetic Neuropathy, Diabetic Neuropathy, Neuropathy
- Being tested
- Clonidine Gel 0.1%, Placebo
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Pain, Foot pain, Neuropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clonidine Gel 0.1%Drug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Gel 0.1% | Experimental | Clonidine hydrochloride topical gel, 0.1% Receives: Drug: Clonidine Gel 0.1% |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo gel of identical appearance as active treatment Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Day 84 (Week 12) in Numeric Pain Rating Scale Score
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a single reading that measures the patients interpretation of their pain on a scale from 0, no pain to 10, worst pain imaginable. The change from baseline can range from -10 to 10. The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days]) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score assessing the "average pain in the past 24 hours in the painful areas of the feet" averaged over Days 78 to 84 compared to the 7 days at the Baseline Phase (Days -14 to -8). For the primary efficacy endpoint, the mean change in pain intensity from Baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline pain intensity score serving as a covariate. The statistical model also included treatment, site, site by treatment interaction, and strata. If the site by treatment interaction term was not significant at the 0.1 level, then it was excluded from the model.
Measured: The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])
Secondary outcomes (1)
Mean Daily Worst Pain Intensity Numeric Pain Rating Scale Scores
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a single reading that measures the patients interpretation of their pain on a scale from 0, no pain to 10, worst pain imaginable. The change from baseline can range from -10 to 10. The change from Baseline (worst score from Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (worst score during Days 78 to 84 [±3 days]) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score assessing the "worst pain in the past 24 hours in the painful areas of the feet" from Days 78 to 84 compared to the 7 days at the Baseline Phase (Days -14 to -8). For the endpoint, the change in worst pain intensity from Baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline worst pain intensity score serving as a covariate. The statistical model also included treatment, site, site by treatment interaction, and strata. If the site by treatment interaction term was not significant at the 0.1 level, then it was excluded from the model.
Measured: The change from Baseline (worse over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (worse over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionMar 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Painful Diabetic NeuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BioDelivery Sciences International
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aziz Shaibani, MD, Principal investigator, Nerve & Muscle Center of Texas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02068027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLO-290
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Serednicki WT, Wrzosek A, Woron J, Garlicki J, Dobrogowski J, Jakowicka-Wordliczek J, Wordliczek J, Zajaczkowska R. Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD010967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010967.pub3.
PubMed 35587172
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Arm Parallel-Group Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel, 0.1% in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02068027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLO-290
- Conditions
- Painful Diabetic Neuropathy, Diabetic Neuropathy, Neuropathy
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Pain, Foot pain, Neuropathy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BioDelivery Sciences InternationalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether clonidine gel is an effective treatment for reducing the pain associated with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Detailed description
Study CLO 290 was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm parallel group study of Clonidine Gel in the treatment of pain associated with PDN. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 of 2 treatments applied topically TID to both feet for 85 days: Clonidine Gel (3.9 mg of clonidine HCl total daily dose), or Placebo Gel (vehicle without clonidine). Approximately 140 adult subjects with symmetrical distal PDN were expected to be randomized into the study. However, a pre-planned fully blinded interim analysis was performed when 70 subjects had completed the study for the purpose of re estimating sample size. Following the recommendation of the independent, third party statistician who conducted the interim analysis, the sample size was adjusted to allow approximately 260 subjects to be randomized into the study.
The study included 5 phases: Screening Phase (up to 21 days duration), Baseline Phase (Day 14 to Day 8), Placebo Lead in Phase (Day -7 to Day 1), Double blind Treatment Phase (85 days), and a Post-treatment Follow up Phase (7 days, only for subjects not enrolling in the open label long term safety study, CLO 311).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Gel 0.1% | Experimental | Drug: Clonidine Gel 0.1%Clonidine hydrochloride topical gel, 0.1% |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo gel of identical appearance as active treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- The subject has provided written informed consent.
- The subject is an outpatient aged 18 to 85 years (inclusive) at the time of the Screening Visit.
- The subject has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycemic control that has been optimized and has been stable on diet therapy, oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin, for at least three (3) months prior to the Screening Visit.
- The subject must be a male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female. Females must be practicing an acceptable method of birth control, or be surgically sterile or postmenopausal (amenorrhea for ≥12 months). Non-pregnancy will be confirmed (as applicable) by a pregnancy test conducted at the Screening and Randomization Visits. Double-barrier methods, hormonal contraceptives, and abstinence are acceptable birth control methods for this study.
- The subject has chronic pain attributable to a symmetrical stocking distribution neuropathy in the lower extremities for at least three (3) months. A loss of distal sensation and/or tingling paresthesia primarily in the toes and fingers is acceptable, but must be of secondary importance to the distal neuropathic pain. Pain should be clearly localized to the area of neuropathy (feet) and subjects should be able to distinguish this pain (the target pain) from other painful areas and conditions.
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- The subject has neuropathy secondary to non-diabetic causes in the opinion of the Investigator (e.g., significant vasculitis, collagen vascular disorder, familial neuropathy, alcoholism, pernicious anemia, hepatitis, malignancy, syphilis, post-herpetic neuralgia, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], medication-induced neuropathy, vitamin B12 deficiency).
- The subject has a significant neurological disorder or a condition that can cause symptoms that mimic peripheral neuropathy or might confound assessment of painful diabetic neuropathy (e.g., stroke with distal neurological deficit, mononeuritis multiplex, lumbar radiculopathy, multiple sclerosis) or has significant asymmetric neuropathic signs and symptoms.
- The subject has other sustained pain with intensity at or greater than the bilateral neuropathic pain in the feet/toes.
- The subject is using an implanted medical device (e.g., spinal cord stimulator, intrathecal pump, or peripheral nerve stimulator) for the treatment of pain.
- The subject has no pin-prick sensitivity to Neuropen testing of non-calloused areas of the foot.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Gel 0.1% | Drug | Clonidine Gel 0.1% |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Day 84 (Week 12) in Numeric Pain Rating Scale Score
Time frame: The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a single reading that measures the patients interpretation of their pain on a scale from 0, no pain to 10, worst pain imaginable. The change from baseline can range from -10 to 10. The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days]) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score assessing the "average pain in the past 24 hours in the painful areas of the feet" averaged over Days 78 to 84 compared to the 7 days at the Baseline Phase (Days -14 to -8). For the primary efficacy endpoint, the mean change in pain intensity from Baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline pain intensity score serving as a covariate. The statistical model also included treatment, site, site by treatment interaction, and strata. If the site by treatment interaction term was not significant at the 0.1 level, then it was excluded from the model.
1 secondary outcome
Mean Daily Worst Pain Intensity Numeric Pain Rating Scale Scores
Time frame: The change from Baseline (worse over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (worse over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35587172Serednicki WT, Wrzosek A, Woron J, Garlicki J, Dobrogowski J, Jakowicka-Wordliczek J, Wordliczek J, Zajaczkowska R. Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD010967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010967.pub3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of tDCS and tACS on Pain, Dexterity, and Strength in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Effect of Peripheral Nerve Decompression Combined With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Diabetes Complication
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Suzetrigine (SUZ) in Participants With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Modality Choice Before and After Failure for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN), Diabetic Nephropathies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aziz Shaibani, MD principal investigator
Nerve & Muscle Center of Texas
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Clonidine Gel 0.1% in people with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy and Diabetic Neuropathy, run by BioDelivery Sciences International at 23 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Day 84 (Week 12) in Numeric Pain Rating Scale Score (time frame: The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02068027, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2017.