Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer RecurrentPhase 2FLT-THERANCT02069418
Theranostic Tool During Erlotinib Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patient
A Phase 2 study testing 18F-FLT-TEP and 18F-FDG-TEP in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Recurrent and No EGFR Activating Mutation, run by University Hospital, Angers at 8 sites in France.
Trial summary
In France, lung cancer is the leading cause of death induced by cancer. Therapeutic advances have been made in therapy of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors blocking the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), as erlotinib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Recurrent, No EGFR Activating Mutation
- What is being tested?
- 18F-FLT-TEP and 18F-FDG-TEP
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age over superior to 18
- NSCLC proved by a histological biopsy
- EGFR mutation status known with no activating EGFR mutation
- indication of erlotinib therapy after at least one previous therapy
- patients who have signed an informed consent to participate in this study
- life expectancy exceeding 12 weeks
- WHO activity score between 0 and 2.
Who cannot join
- contraindication for the initiation of erlotinib
- refusal to sign the consent
- progressive inflammatory disease
- infection with the HIV virus
- other malignant disease
- life expectancy less than 12 weeks
- major adults protected by French law
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
France8 sites
University Hospital, Angers
Angers, Maine et Loire, 49933
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Bordeaux, Gironde, 33000
Hospital, Créteil
Créteil, Val de Marne, 94000
University Hospital, Nancy
Nancy, Meurthe et Moselle, 54000
Army Hospital, Percy
Percy, Haut de Seine, 92140
University Hospital, Rouen
Rouen, Seine maritime, 76000
University Hospital, Toulouse
Toulouse, Haute Garonne, 31000
University Hospital, Tours
Tours, Indre et Loire, 37000
About this study
Official title: Could Positon Emission Tomography With Radiolabelled 3'-Deoxy-3'-(18)F-Fluoro-L-Thymidine be a Theranostic Tool During Erlotinib Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients ?
In France, lung cancer is the leading cause of death induced by cancer. Therapeutic advances have been made in therapy of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors blocking the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), as erlotinib.
This drug usually does not induce rapid shrinking of NSCLC tumour explaining why RECIST criteria are less reliable with erlotinib than cytotoxic drugs after 8 weeks of treatment.
Read more
Among patients with unresectable NSCLC, 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluoro-L-thymidine (18F-FLT) and 18F-2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F- FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has identified early responding patients and with better progression-free survival in erlotinib first line and in the second or third line.
To date, none medico-economic study has been conducted to determine if this strategy will be cost-effective.
The purpose of this study is to confirm that an early metabolic imaging with 18 F-FLT and 18FFDG PET could have theranostic issue by identifying at the fourteenth day of erlotinib (second line or more) the subjects that do not respond to erlotinib, i.e. 6 weeks prior to the morphological evaluation based on the new RECIST 1.1, that is typically done at week 8 of erlotinib treatment.
A health economics ancillary study will be achieved. Indeed, recent therapeutic improvements, in particular targeted therapies in NSCLC, have improved quality of life and life expectancy, but have also induce an important increase of the health costs. According to studies, the mean cost of the treatments of NSCLC has been increased by a factor 3 during the 10 last years. More efficient strategies that would permit to stop early with objective endpoints, expensive therapies is a main achievement in thoracic oncology.
The potential clinical impacts of this work are 1) to stop early erlotinib in non-responders and replace another treatment before a deterioration in their physical status, 2) reduce the risk of side effects and costs of unnecessary treatment and 3) to propose a customization treatment after the first line therapy.
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Recurrent, No EGFR Activating Mutation
- Being tested
- 18F-FLT-TEP, 18F-FDG-TEP
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
18F-FLT-TEPRadiation
Patients are going to have two 18F-FLT-TEP : one during the two weeks before the beginning of erlotinib and the second one will occur during the second week after the initiation of erlotinib.
18F-FDG-TEPRadiation
Patients are going to have two 18F-FDG-TEP : one during the two weeks before the beginning of erlotinib and the second one will occur during the second week after the initiation of erlotinib.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm | Experimental | All patients will be in the same arm. Patients are going to have two 18F-FLT-TEP and two 18F-FDG-TEP : the first ones during the two weeks before the beginning of erlotinib and the second ones will occur during the second week after the initiation of erlotinib. The order of TEP is not definite : 18F-FLT-TEP may be planned first or reciprocally. A period of 48 hours must separate two TEP. Receives: Radiation: 18F-FLT-TEP; Radiation: 18F-FDG-TEP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Early prediction of response to erlotinib therapy by 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PETscans
The primary endpoint is the correlation between tumour response to erlotinib assessed by morphological imaging by RECIST 1.1 at Day 56 (considered the gold standard) and the change in the uptake of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG assessed by PET before and at Day 7 after initiation of erlotinib derived from criteria PERCIST. the Kappa test will be used.
Measured: Six months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Economic study of the early prediction of response to erlotinib therapy by 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PETscans
The aim of this study will be to determine if health costs could be minimized by early prediction of response to erltinib therapy.
Measured: Six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionJun 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (38)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer RecurrentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, AngersThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Angers
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Tours, Army Hospital, Percy, Créteil Hospital, University Hospital, Rouen, Central Hospital, Nancy, France, University Hospital, Toulouse, University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- José HUREAUX, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, AngersOlivier COUTURIER, MD, PhD, Study chair, University Hospital, Angers
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02069418
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PHRC 2012-01
- Other IDs
- 2013-001301-87
- Acronym
- FLT-THERA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M, Pugsley JM, Schmidt RA, Rabinowitz P, Peterson LM, Vallieres E, Wood DE. In vivo validation of 3'deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [(18)F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Nov;8(11):3315-23.
PubMed 12429617Aouba A, Pequignot F, Le Toullec A, Jougla E. Les causes médicales de décès en France en 2004 et leur évolution 1980-2004. Bul Epidémiol Hebd 2007;35-36:308-14.
Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Mar;46(4):765-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.12.014. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
PubMed 20116997Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PubMed 18287387Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL, Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
PubMed 19692680Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, Porta R, Cobo M, Garrido P, Longo F, Moran T, Insa A, De Marinis F, Corre R, Bover I, Illiano A, Dansin E, de Castro J, Milella M, Reguart N, Altavilla G, Jimenez U, Provencio M, Moreno MA, Terrasa J, Munoz-Langa J, Valdivia J, Isla D, Domine M, Molinier O, Mazieres J, Baize N, Garcia-Campelo R, Robinet G, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Lopez-Vivanco G, Gebbia V, Ferrera-Delgado L, Bombaron P, Bernabe R, Bearz A, Artal A, Cortesi E, Rolfo C, Sanchez-Ronco M, Drozdowskyj A, Queralt C, de Aguirre I, Ramirez JL, Sanchez JJ, Molina MA, Taron M, Paz-Ares L. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:239-46.
Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabarbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753.
PubMed 16014882Chouaid C, Moser A, Coudray-Omnes C, Vergnenegre A. [Economic impact of second- and third-line erlotinib treatment of non small-cell lung cancer]. Rev Mal Respir. 2008 Nov;25(9):1096-103. doi: 10.1016/s0761-8425(08)74979-9. French.
PubMed 19106905Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981 Jan 1;47(1):207-14. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:13.0.co;2-6.
PubMed 7459811Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
PubMed 10655437Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
PubMed 19097774Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, Larson S, Mankoff DA, Siegel BA, Van den Abbeele A, Yap J, Sullivan D; National Cancer Institute. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):1059-66. No abstract available.
PubMed 16741317Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.
PubMed 19403881Dittmann H, Dohmen BM, Kehlbach R, Bartusek G, Pritzkow M, Sarbia M, Bares R. Early changes in [18F]FLT uptake after chemotherapy: an experimental study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Nov;29(11):1462-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-0925-z. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
PubMed 12397465Barthel H, Perumal M, Latigo J, He Q, Brady F, Luthra SK, Price PM, Aboagye EO. The uptake of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine into L5178Y tumours in vivo is dependent on thymidine kinase 1 protein levels. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Mar;32(3):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1611-0. Epub 2004 Sep 4.
PubMed 15791434
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Could Positon Emission Tomography With Radiolabelled 3'-Deoxy-3'-(18)F-Fluoro-L-Thymidine be a Theranostic Tool During Erlotinib Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients ?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02069418
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLT-THERA / PHRC 2012-01
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Recurrent, No EGFR Activating Mutation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, AngersOther government
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Tours, Army Hospital, Percy, Créteil Hospital, University Hospital, Rouen, Central Hospital, Nancy, France, University Hospital, Toulouse, University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Study start
- Feb 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In France, lung cancer is the leading cause of death induced by cancer. Therapeutic advances have been made in therapy of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors blocking the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), as erlotinib.
This drug usually does not induce rapid shrinking of NSCLC tumour explaining why RECIST criteria are less reliable with erlotinib than cytotoxic drugs after 8 weeks of treatment.
Among patients with unresectable NSCLC, 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluoro-L-thymidine (18F-FLT) and 18F-2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F- FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has identified early responding patients and with better progression-free survival in erlotinib first line and in the second or third line.
To date, none medico-economic study has been conducted to determine if this strategy will be cost-effective.
The purpose of this study is to confirm that an early metabolic imaging with 18 F-FLT and 18FFDG PET could have theranostic issue by identifying at the fourteenth day of erlotinib (second line or more) the subjects that do not respond to erlotinib, i.e. 6 weeks prior to the morphological evaluation based on the new RECIST 1.1, that is typically done at week 8 of erlotinib treatment.
A health economics ancillary study will be achieved. Indeed, recent therapeutic improvements, in particular targeted therapies in NSCLC, have improved quality of life and life expectancy, but have also induce an important increase of the health costs. According to studies, the mean cost of the treatments of NSCLC has been increased by a factor 3 during the 10 last years. More efficient strategies that would permit to stop early with objective endpoints, expensive therapies is a main achievement in thoracic oncology.
The potential clinical impacts of this work are 1) to stop early erlotinib in non-responders and replace another treatment before a deterioration in their physical status, 2) reduce the risk of side effects and costs of unnecessary treatment and 3) to propose a customization treatment after the first line therapy.
Study design
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm | Experimental | Radiation: 18F-FLT-TEP, Radiation: 18F-FDG-TEPAll patients will be in the same arm. Patients are going to have two 18F-FLT-TEP and two 18F-FDG-TEP : the first ones during the two weeks before the beginning of erlotinib and the second ones will occur during the second week after the initiation of erlotinib. The order of TEP is not definite : 18F-FLT-TEP may be planned first or reciprocally. A period of 48 hours must separate two TEP. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- age over superior to 18
- NSCLC proved by a histological biopsy
- EGFR mutation status known with no activating EGFR mutation
- indication of erlotinib therapy after at least one previous therapy
- patients who have signed an informed consent to participate in this study
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- contraindication for the initiation of erlotinib
- refusal to sign the consent
- progressive inflammatory disease
- infection with the HIV virus
- other malignant disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 18F-FLT-TEPPatients are going to have two 18F-FLT-TEP : one during the two weeks before the beginning of erlotinib and the second one will occur during the second week after the initiation of erlotinib. | Radiation | Experimental arm |
| 18F-FDG-TEPPatients are going to have two 18F-FDG-TEP : one during the two weeks before the beginning of erlotinib and the second one will occur during the second week after the initiation of erlotinib. | Radiation | Experimental arm |
Primary outcome
Early prediction of response to erlotinib therapy by 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PETscans
Time frame: Six months
The primary endpoint is the correlation between tumour response to erlotinib assessed by morphological imaging by RECIST 1.1 at Day 56 (considered the gold standard) and the change in the uptake of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG assessed by PET before and at Day 7 after initiation of erlotinib derived from criteria PERCIST. the Kappa test will be used.
1 secondary outcome
Economic study of the early prediction of response to erlotinib therapy by 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PETscans
Time frame: Six months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2014.
- Background: PubMed 12429617Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M, Pugsley JM, Schmidt RA, Rabinowitz P, Peterson LM, Vallieres E, Wood DE. In vivo validation of 3'deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [(18)F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Nov;8(11):3315-23.
- BackgroundAouba A, Pequignot F, Le Toullec A, Jougla E. Les causes médicales de décès en France en 2004 et leur évolution 1980-2004. Bul Epidémiol Hebd 2007;35-36:308-14.
- Background: PubMed 20116997Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Mar;46(4):765-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.12.014. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
- Background: PubMed 18287387Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 19692680Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL, Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
- BackgroundRosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, Porta R, Cobo M, Garrido P, Longo F, Moran T, Insa A, De Marinis F, Corre R, Bover I, Illiano A, Dansin E, de Castro J, Milella M, Reguart N, Altavilla G, Jimenez U, Provencio M, Moreno MA, Terrasa J, Munoz-Langa J, Valdivia J, Isla D, Domine M, Molinier O, Mazieres J, Baize N, Garcia-Campelo R, Robinet G, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Lopez-Vivanco G, Gebbia V, Ferrera-Delgado L, Bombaron P, Bernabe R, Bearz A, Artal A, Cortesi E, Rolfo C, Sanchez-Ronco M, Drozdowskyj A, Queralt C, de Aguirre I, Ramirez JL, Sanchez JJ, Molina MA, Taron M, Paz-Ares L. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:239-46.
- Background: PubMed 16014882Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabarbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753.
- Background: PubMed 19106905Chouaid C, Moser A, Coudray-Omnes C, Vergnenegre A. [Economic impact of second- and third-line erlotinib treatment of non small-cell lung cancer]. Rev Mal Respir. 2008 Nov;25(9):1096-103. doi: 10.1016/s0761-8425(08)74979-9. French.
- Background: PubMed 7459811Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981 Jan 1;47(1):207-14. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:13.0.co;2-6.
- Background: PubMed 10655437Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
- Background: PubMed 19097774Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
- Background: PubMed 16741317Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, Larson S, Mankoff DA, Siegel BA, Van den Abbeele A, Yap J, Sullivan D; National Cancer Institute. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):1059-66. No abstract available.
Related trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Recurrent
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Osimertinib With or Without Bevacizumab as Initial Treatment for Patients With EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer
Advanced Lung Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Lung Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of LY4052031 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer or Other Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumor, Recurrent Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
CR-002 in Adult Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) - Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M), Gastric/GEJ
RecruitingPhase 4
An Open-label, Single-arm Study of Prophylaxis for Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) -Related Stomatitis in Eligible Patients With Metastatic or Inoperable Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer or Locally Advanced or Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Stomatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
José HUREAUX, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Angers
Olivier COUTURIER, MD, PhD study chair
University Hospital, Angers
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 18F-FLT-TEP and 18F-FDG-TEP in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Recurrent and No EGFR Activating Mutation, run by University Hospital, Angers at 8 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Early prediction of response to erlotinib therapy by 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PETscans (time frame: Six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02069418, which also lists 38 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2014.