AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 DiabetesNCT02076347

Comparison of Two Pharmacist-led Population Management Approaches to Increase Monitoring of Vitamin B12 and Serum Creatinine Levels for Patients on Metformin

A study testing Office visit intervention and Electronic Message Intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Vitamin B12 Deficiency, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this project is to compare two pharmacist-led population management strategies designed to increase the rate of appropriate monitoring of vitamin B12 and serum creatinine for patients taking metformin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Office visit intervention and Electronic Message Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
489 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2014to Oct 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • On Metformin for at least one year
  • Activated patient portal for electronic messaging
  • Patient of an attending physician at Ohio State General Internal Medicine
  • No serum vitamin B12 and/or no serum creatinine measurement in the past year

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Ohio State University General Internal Medicine

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this project is to compare two pharmacist-led population management strategies designed to increase the rate of appropriate monitoring of vitamin B12 and serum creatinine for patients taking metformin.

Being tested
Office visit intervention, Electronic Message Intervention
Keywords
Metformin, Vitamin B12 Deficiency, Population Management, Pharmacist
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Vitamin B 12 Deficiency, Anemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Office visit interventionBehavioural

    Pharmacist communicates monitoring recommendations to physician through the electronic medical record prior to a scheduled patient office visit

  • Electronic Message InterventionBehavioural

    Pharmacist communicates need for monitoring directly to patients and instructs them to obtain monitoring on their own time without need for an office visit with physician

Study groups in NCT02076347
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Office visit-based interventionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Office visit intervention
Electronic message-based interventionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Electronic Message Intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of patients in each arm who obtain monitoring of vitamin B12 as recommended

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of patients with newly identified vitamin B12 deficiency

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Percentage of patients with newly identified vitamin B12 deficiency who have prior evidence of anemia upon chart review

    When a patient's serum vitamin B12 level comes back and is low the chart will be reviewed immediately to determine this. This could happen anytime during the 6 month study period.

    Measured: within 6 months

  3. Percentage of patients with newly identified vitamin B12 deficiency who have prior evidence of neuropathy upon chart review

    When a patient's serum vitamin B12 level comes back and is low the chart will be reviewed immediately to determine if neuropathy is also listed as a medical problem. This could happen anytime during the 6 month study period.

    Measured: within 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2014
  3. Primary completionAug 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
489 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02076347
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013H0307
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
26 Feb 2014
Last updated
19 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Matthews DE, Beatty SJ, Grever GM, Lehman A, Barnes KD. Comparison of 2 Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Vitamin B12 Monitoring in Patients Taking Metformin. Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):840-6. doi: 10.1177/1060028016655180. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

    PubMed 27323792

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Office visit intervention and Electronic Message Intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Vitamin B12 Deficiency, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of patients in each arm who obtain monitoring of vitamin B12 as recommended (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02076347, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in