AzTrials
AzTrials

Aplastic AnemiaPhase 2NCT02094417

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG531 in Aplastic Anemia

A Phase 2 study testing AMG531 in people with Aplastic Anemia, run by Kyowa Kirin Korea Co., Ltd. at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMG531 and to determine the recommended initial dose of AMG531 on the basis of its efficacy and safety when it is administered subcutaneously (SC) to the Aplastic Anemia (AA) patients with immunosuppressive-therapy refractory thrombocytopenia… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aplastic Anemia
What is being tested?
AMG531
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
14 Apr 2014to 7 Nov 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient who is diagnosed as AA and refractory to immunosuppressive therapy
  • Platelet ≤ 30,000/μL

Who cannot join

  • Concurrent active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy
  • HIV positivity
  • Bone marrow reticulin grade of > 1
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease
  • Arterial or venous thrombosis within the last 1 year before enrollment
  • Other cause of thrombocytopenia
Show all 11Show fewer
  • AA with hemolytic predominant paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Receiving any agent used to treat AA, including antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or ATG + cyclosporine within 6 months before starting study treatment and/or cyclosporine or anabolic hormone within 6 weeks before starting the study treatment
  • History of PEG-rHuMGDF, recombinant human thrombopoietin, AMG531, and other thrombopoietin (TPO)-receptor agonist
  • Who plans to conduct hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within 1 year

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Korea, Republic of

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel, Comparative, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG531 in Aplastic Anemia Subjects With Thrombocytopenia Refractory to Immunosuppressive Therapy

The present study will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMG531 and to determine the recommended initial dose of AMG531 on the basis of its efficacy and safety when it is administered subcutaneously (SC) to the Aplastic Anemia (AA) patients with immunosuppressive-therapy refractory thrombocytopenia and also to assess the pharmacokinetics of this product. Its efficacy and safety during the extension period beyond one year will also be evaluated.

Conditions
Aplastic Anemia
Being tested
AMG531
Keywords
Anemia, Aplastic, Thrombopoietin, Thrombocytopenia
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Aplastic, Jacobs syndrome, Thrombocytopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AMG531Drug

    Subcutaneous, weekly injection

Study groups in NCT02094417
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AMG531 (Dose 1)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: AMG531
AMG531 (Dose 2)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: AMG531
AMG531 (Dose 3)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: AMG531
AMG531 (Dose 4)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: AMG531

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Platelet Response at Week 9

    The proportion of subjects achieving a platelet response at Week 9, and two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated. Platelet response is defined as 1) achieving absolute platelet increase of ≥ 20x10^9/L above baseline or 2) increase to ≥ 10x10^9/L and by at least 100% from baseline.

    Measured: At week 9

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Platelet Response

    The proportion of subjects with a platelet response in any time during the initial dose evaluation period, Week 1 through Week 12, Week 1 through Week 16, Week 1 through Week 24, Week 1 through Week 52, Week 1 through Week 104 and Week 1 through Week 156.

    Measured: Initial dose evaluation period (Week 9), Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  2. Proportion of Subjects Achieving Platelet Transfusion Independency

    The proportion of subjects achieving platelet transfusion independency in any time during the initial dose evaluation period , Week 1 through Week 12, Week 1 through Week 16, Week 1 through Week 24, Week 1 through Week 52, Week 1 through Week 104, and Week1 through Week 156 will be calculated in the same manner as the primary variables (The number of subjects discontinued or subjects who have missing data will not be calculated). Platelet transfusion independence is defined as achieving transfusion free period of at least 8 consecutive weeks (56 days).

    Measured: Initial dose evaluation period (Week 9), Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  3. Proportion of Subjects Achieving Erythroid Response and/or Neutrophil Response

    The proportion of subjects with erythroid response, neutrophil response and erythroid and/or neutrophil response in any time during the initial dose evaluation period, Week 1 through Week 12, Week 1 through Week 16, Week 1 through Week 24, Week 1 through Week 52, Week 1 through Week 104, and Week1 through Week 156 will be calculated in the same manner as the primary variables (The number of subjects discontinued or subjects who have missing data will not be calculated).

    Measured: Initial dose evaluation period (Week 9), Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  4. Duration of Platelet Response and Time to Platelet Response

    For subjects with a platelet response in any time, time to the initial platelet response and duration of platelet response will be summarized Time to the initial platelet response will be calculated as sampling date (response achieved) minus first dose date of study drug plus 1.

    Duration of platelet response will be calculated as the maximum of the duration of platelet response for each subject, each duration of response calculated as the date when response is disappeared minus the date when response is achieved. The censoring date is defined as the date of the last Platelet examination or EOS whichever archives first.

    Measured: Initial dose evaluation period (Week 9), Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  5. Proportion of Subjects Achieving Tri-lineage Responses

    Tri-lineage response is defined in those achieving platelet response, erythroid response, and neutrophil response all together. The proportion of subjects with tri-lineage response will be calculated in the same manner as the primary variables. Time to tri-lineage response will be summarized in the same manner as time to platelet response. Time to tri-lineage response is defined as duration of the time from Day 1 to the date of platelet response, erythroid response or neutrophil response whichever achieves last in Visit.

    Measured: Initial dose evaluation period (Week 9), Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, and Week 157

  6. Duration of Study Drug Discontinuation While Maintaining Stable Response

    The longest duration of study drug discontinuation in subjects while maintaining a stable response is summarized

    Measured: Initial dose evaluation period (Week 9), Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start14 Apr 2014
  3. Primary completion24 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion7 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02094417
Sponsor's protocol ID
531-KR001
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
18 Mar 2014
Last updated
30 Apr 2024
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Jang JH, Mitani K, Tomiyama Y, Miyazaki K, Nagafuji K, Usuki K, Uoshima N, Fujisaki T, Kosugi H, Matsumura I, Sasaki K, Kizaki M, Sawa M, Hidaka M, Kobayashi N, Ichikawa S, Yonemura Y, Murotani K, Shimizu M, Matsuda A, Ozawa K, Nakao S, Lee JW. Predictive factors of romiplostim response in patients with refractory aplastic anemia: data from two clinical trials. Ann Hematol. 2025 Aug;104(8):4003-4011. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06337-7. Epub 2025 Jul 1.

    PubMed 40593138
  • Lee JW, Lee SE, Jung CW, Park S, Keta H, Park SK, Kim JA, Oh IH, Jang JH. Romiplostim in patients with refractory aplastic anaemia previously treated with immunosuppressive therapy: a dose-finding and long-term treatment phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Nov;6(11):e562-e572. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30153-X. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

    PubMed 31474546

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing AMG531 in people with Aplastic Anemia, run by Kyowa Kirin Korea Co., Ltd. at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Platelet Response at Week 9 (time frame: At week 9). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02094417, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in