AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary DiseaseFAME 3NCT02100722

A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

A study testing FFR guided PCI, CABG and Resolute Integrity Stent in people with Coronary Disease and Coronary Stenosis, run by Stanford University at 46 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Fractional flow reserve (FFR, (coronary pressure wire-based index for assessing the ischemic potential of a coronary lesion)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) will result in similar outcomes to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Disease, Coronary Stenosis
What is being tested?
FFR guided PCI, CABG and Resolute Integrity Stent
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
46 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
25 Aug 2014to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Age ≥ 21 years with angina and/or evidence of myocardial ischemia
  • 2. Three vessel CAD, defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation in each of the three major epicardial vessels or major side branches, but not involving left main coronary artery, and amenable to revascularization by both PCI and CABG as determined by the Heart Team. Patients with a non-dominant right coronary artery may be included if only the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex have ≥50% stenosis
  • 3. Willing and able to provide informed, written consent

Who cannot join

  • 1. Requirement for other cardiac or non-cardiac surgical procedure (e.g., valve replacement, carotid revascularization)
  • 2. Cardiogenic shock and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support
  • 3. Recent STEMI (<5 days prior to randomization)
  • 4. Ongoing Non STEMI with biomarkers (cardiac troponin) still rising
  • 5. Known left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • 6. Life expectancy < 2 years
Show all 15Show fewer
  • 7. Requiring renal replacement therapy
  • 8. Undergoing evaluation for organ transplantation
  • 9. Participation or planned participation in another clinical trial, except for observational registries
  • 10. Pregnancy
  • 11. Inability to take dual antiplatelet therapy for six months
  • 12. Previous CABG
  • 13. Left main disease requiring revascularization
  • 14. Extremely calcified or tortuous vessels precluding FFR measurement
  • 15. Any target lesion with in-stent drug-eluting stent restenosis

Trial locations and contacts

46 sites in 16 countries.

46 sites in 16 countries

United States13 sites
  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia

  • Jesse Brown VA Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Atlanta VA Medical Center

    Decatur, Georgia

  • Houston Methodist Hospital

    Houston, Texas

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Lawrence, Kansas

  • Lexinton VA

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • University of Kentucky Medical Center

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Centennial Heart

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Palo Alto VA

    Palo Alto, California

  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • HealthEast St. Joseph's Hospital

    Saint Paul, Minnesota

  • Baystate Medical Center

    Springfield, Massachusetts

  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305-2004

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom8 sites
  • Wales Heart Research Institute

    Cardiff

  • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire

    Coventry and Warwickshire

  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital

    Glasgow

  • Kings College Hospital

    London

  • St. Thomas' Hospital

    London

  • Wythenshawe Hospital

    Manchester

  • Oxford University Hospital NHS Trust

    Oxford

  • Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Southhampton

Other trials in United Kingdom

Australia5 sites
  • Peninsula Health

    Frankston

  • St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne

    Melbourne

  • Concord Hospital

    Sydney

  • Royal North Shore

    Sydney

  • University of Sydney

    Sydney

Other trials in Australia

Canada3 sites
  • Le'Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

    Montreal

  • York PCI Group INC

    Ontario

  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

    Ottawa

Other trials in Canada

Netherlands3 sites
  • Catharina Hospital Eindhoven

    Eindhoven, 5623 EJ

  • HagaZiekenhuis

    The Hague

  • Isala Klinieken

    Zwolle

Other trials in Netherlands

Sweden3 sites
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    Gothenburg

  • Danderyds Sjukhus

    Stockholm

  • Karolinska Institutet, Dep of clinical science and education, Södersjukhuset

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

Serbia2 sites
  • University Clinical Center of Serbia

    Belgrade

  • Clinical Center Kragujevac

    Kragujevac

Other trials in Serbia

Belgium1 site
  • Cardiovascular Center Aalst

    Aalst, 9300 Aalst

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia1 site
  • Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno

    Brno

Other trials in Czechia

Denmark1 site
  • Rigshospitalet University Hospital

    Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

France1 site
  • Cardiovascular Hospital

    Lyon

Other trials in France

Hungary1 site
  • Hungarian Institute of Cardiology

    Budapest

Other trials in Hungary

Lithuania1 site
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos

    Vilnius

Other trials in Lithuania

New Zealand1 site
  • Waikato Hospital

    Hamilton

Other trials in New Zealand

Norway1 site
  • Stavanger University Hospital

    Stavanger

Other trials in Norway

South Korea1 site
  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Fractional flow reserve (FFR, (coronary pressure wire-based index for assessing the ischemic potential of a coronary lesion)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) will result in similar outcomes to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

Read the detailed description

The FAME 3 trial is a multicenter, international, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. All patients with multivessel CAD (not involving the left main) will be screened by the site's Heart Team (including but not limited to an interventional cardiologist, cardiac surgeon and research coordinator). If all agree that the patient can be treated either with FFR-guided PCI or CABG, and all inclusion criteria are met and no exclusion criteria are met, then the patient will be randomized.

Baseline clinical, functional, laboratory and electrocardiographic data will be obtained. Patients will receive treatment within 4 weeks of randomization. Patients randomized to CABG will receive state of the art therapy at the discretion of the local surgeon with a strong emphasis on arterial revascularization. Patients undergoing PCI will have FFR measured with a St. Jude Medical coronary pressure wire across all lesions. If the FFR is ≤0.80, then PCI will be performed with the Medtronic Resolute Integrity drug-eluting stent (DES) as per usual routine. If the FFR is >0.80 then PCI will be deferred.

All patients will receive medical therapy as per published guidelines. Patients will follow-up at 1 and 6 months, and 1 and 3 years with an evaluation of clinical status, functional status, medications and events. Follow-up may be extended to 5 years, if funding allows.

Core lab analyses will include formal quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) of the baseline angiograms with calculation of the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score and Functional SYNTAX Score.

Being tested
FFR guided PCI, CABG, Resolute Integrity Stent, Resolute Onyx Stent
Medical subject headings
Coronary Disease, Coronary Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FFR guided PCIProcedure or surgery

    Also called Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI

  • CABGProcedure or surgery

    Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)

  • Resolute Integrity StentDevice

    Durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent

  • Resolute Onyx StentDevice

    Durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent

Study groups in NCT02100722
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FFR guided PCIActive comparatorPatients undergoing PCI will have FFR measured with a St. Jude Medical coronary pressure wire across all lesions. If the FFR is ≤0.80, then PCI will be performed with the Medtronic Resolute Integrity (or Onyx) drug-eluting stent (DES) as per usual routine. If the FFR is >0.80 then PCI will be deferred. Only those sites with prior experience measuring FFR will be included in the FAME 3 trial. These patients in whom FFR of a particular lesion was not possible will be included in all analyses based on the intention to treat principle.
Receives: Procedure: FFR guided PCI; Device: Resolute Integrity Stent; Device: Resolute Onyx Stent
CABGActive comparatorCABG will be performed as per clinical routine at each participating center. Both off-pump and on-pump surgery are acceptable, as long as the surgeon and the site are experienced in the particular technique. An internal mammary graft to the LAD should be attempted in all cases, if feasible. Complete arterial revascularization is strongly recommended, however, each center should use a conduit strategy with which they are most comfortable. All vessels ≥ 1,5 mm in diameter and with ≥ 50% stenosis should be bypassed, if technically feasible.
Receives: Procedure: CABG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MACCE

    Death, MI, stroke and any repeat revascularization (MACCE) will be evaluated at 1 year, where subjects contribute data from time of randomization until the occurrence of MACCE or one year follow-up, whichever occurs first. Subjects who die or are lost to follow up before 1 year will be censored at their last recorded activity.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Key Secondary Outcome: Composite of Death From Any Cause, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke

    Death, MI, or stroke at 3-year follow-up

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Number of Participants Experiencing Death, MI, or Stroke

    Subjects who died or are lost to follow up before this time were censored at their last recorded activity.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Death

    Death evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Number of Participants Experiencing Myocardial Infarction

    MI evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Number of Participants Experiencing Stroke

    Stroke evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm.

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Number of Participants Requiring Repeat Revascularization

    Any repeat revascularization evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing BARC Type 3-5 Bleeding

    Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 indicates severe bleeding.

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Number of Participants Experiencing Acute Kidney Injury

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Number of Participants Experiencing Atrial Fibrillation or Clinically Significant Arrhythmia

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Number of Participants Experiencing Definite Stent Thrombosis

    Measured: 1 year

  11. Number of Participants Experiencing Definite Symptomatic Graft Occlusion

    Measured: 1 year

  12. Number of Participants Requiring Rehospitalization Within 30 Days

    Measured: 30 days

  13. MACCE

    Death, MI, stroke and any repeat revascularization (MACCE) rate at 5 years

    Measured: 5 years

  14. Death, MI, or Stroke at 5 Years

    Death, MI, or stroke at 5 years

    Measured: 5 years

  15. Individual Components of Primary Outcome

    Individual components of primary outcome: number of participants experiencing death, myocardial infarction, and stroke

    Measured: At year 3

  16. Individual Components of Primary Outcome

    Individual components of primary outcome: number of participants experiencing death, myocardial infarction, and stroke

    Measured: At year 5

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start25 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02100722
Sponsor's protocol ID
FAME 3
Acronym
FAME 3
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
21 Mar 2014
Last updated
7 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Desai M, Oldroyd KG, Park SJ, Reardon MJ, Wendler O, Woo J, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):619-626.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

    PubMed 26386784
  • Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Desai M, Oldroyd KG, Reardon MJ, Wendler O, Woo J, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. A protocol update of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:156-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 29. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31207442
  • Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, Piroth Z, van Straten AHM, Szekely L, Davidavicius G, Kalinauskas G, Mansour S, Kharbanda R, Ostlund-Papadogeorgos N, Aminian A, Oldroyd KG, Al-Attar N, Jagic N, Dambrink JE, Kala P, Angeras O, MacCarthy P, Wendler O, Casselman F, Witt N, Mavromatis K, Miner SES, Sarma J, Engstrom T, Christiansen EH, Tonino PAL, Reardon MJ, Lu D, Ding VY, Kobayashi Y, Hlatky MA, Mahaffey KW, Desai M, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, Pijls NHJ; FAME 3 Investigators. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):128-137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112299. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

    PubMed 34735046
  • Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Takahashi K, Piroth Z, van Straten AHM, Szekely L, Davidavicius G, Kalinauskas G, Mansour S, Kharbanda R, Ostlund-Papadogeorgos N, Aminian A, Oldroyd KG, Al-Attar N, Jagic N, Dambrink JE, Kala P, Angeras O, MacCarthy P, Wendler O, Casselman F, Witt N, Mavromatis K, Miner SES, Sarma J, Engstrom T, Christiansen EH, Tonino PAL, Reardon MJ, Otsuki H, Kobayashi Y, Hlatky MA, Mahaffey KW, Desai M, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B. Outcomes after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting (FAME 3): 5-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2025 Apr 26;405(10488):1481-1490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00505-7. Epub 2025 Mar 30.

    PubMed 40174598
  • Takahashi K, Otsuki H, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Piroth Z, Oldroyd KG, Wendler O, Reardon MJ, Desai M, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF; FAME 3 Trial Investigators. Outcomes After CABG Compared With FFR-Guided PCI in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 14;18(7):838-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.01.434.

    PubMed 40240081
  • Takahashi K, Otsuki H, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Engstrom T, Horsted Thyregod HG, Beleslin B, Putnik S, Tapp L, Barker T, Redwood S, Young C, Bech GJ, Hoohenkerk GJF, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF; FAME 3 Trial Investigators. FFR-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jun 1;10(6):603-608. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0095.

    PubMed 40072460
  • Takahashi K, Otsuki H, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Oldroyd KG, Wendler O, Reardon MJ, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF; FAME 3 Trial Investigators. Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing FFR-Guided PCI or CABG in the FAME 3 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 27;18(2):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.030. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

    PubMed 39641725
  • Otsuki H, Takahashi K, Zimmermann FM, Mavromatis K, Aminian A, Jagic N, Dambrink JE, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Witt N, Kobayashi Y, Takahashi T, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF; FAME 3 Trial Investigators. Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov;17(11):e014300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014300. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

    PubMed 39502029
  • Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Pijls NHJ, Piroth Z, van Straten AHM, Szekely L, Davidavicius G, Kalinauskas G, Mansour S, Kharbanda R, Ostlund-Papadogeorgos N, Aminian A, Oldroyd KG, Al-Attar N, Jagic N, Dambrink JE, Kala P, Angeras O, MacCarthy P, Wendler O, Casselman F, Witt N, Mavromatis K, Miner SES, Sarma J, Engstrom T, Christiansen EH, Tonino PAL, Reardon MJ, Otsuki H, Kobayashi Y, Hlatky MA, Mahaffey KW, Desai M, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF; FAME 3 Investigators. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery for 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 3 Trial. Circulation. 2023 Sep 19;148(12):950-958. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065770. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

    PubMed 37602376
  • Piroth Z, Otsuki H, Zimmermann FM, Ferenci T, Keulards DCJ, Yeung AC, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF. Prognostic Value of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the FAME 3 Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;15(11):884-891. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012542. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

    PubMed 36121706
  • Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, Zelis JM, Piroth Z, Davidavicius G, Mansour S, Kharbanda R, Ostlund-Papadogeorgos N, Oldroyd KG, Wendler O, Reardon MJ, Woo YJ, Yeung AC, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Desai M, Hlatky MA; FAME 3 Investigators. Quality of Life After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI Compared With Coronary Bypass Surgery. Circulation. 2022 May 31;145(22):1655-1662. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060049. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

    PubMed 35369704

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in