AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPhase 4NCT02164734

Surfactant Via Endotracheal Tube vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway and remifentanil in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) modalities, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway (inserted after pre-medication for pain with a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 48 hours
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
What is being tested?
Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway and remifentanil
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
93 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2014to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 48 hours
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Mild-to-moderate RDS;
  • Postnatal age 2 to 48 hours;
  • Gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks;
  • Treated with nasal CPAP modalities ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 90-95%;
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Weight < 800 g;
  • Airway anomalies;
  • Pulmonary air leaks;
  • Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Albany Medical Center

    Albany, New York, 12208

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Rescue Surfactant Delivery Via Endotracheal Intubation (INSURE Technique) Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Preterm Neonates

In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) modalities, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway (inserted after pre-medication for pain with a short-acting narcotic), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to non-invasive CPAP support, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on non-invasive CPAP (i.e., needs tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires ventilation, retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.

The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.

The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared to standard surfactant treatment following endotracheal intubation with sedation.

Read the detailed description

Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of pulmonary surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure modes (NCPAP or NIPPV). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation, as in the INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation) approach. Because tracheal intubation causes pain and vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates, premedication with atropine and a narcotic is recommended. However, narcotic premedication increases respiratory depression, which may require sustained mechanical ventilation, thus contributing to the failure of INSURE. In a recent trial at our center, standard pretreatment with morphine and atropine was associated with failure of INSURE in more than 2/3 of patients. Consequently, we have recently changed our standard premedication for INSURE to the combination of atropine and remifentanil (a rapid onset, short-acting narcotic). The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates; preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration, which in our trial was associated with a lower failure rate than the morphine plus INSURE approach.

The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will further evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.

The primary hypothesis is that surfactant therapy delivered via LMA is not inferior to surfactant therapy delivered via transient intubation (INSURE technique) with short-acting narcotic premedication for mild to moderate RDS in preterm neonates.

This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, less than 48 hours of age, with gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP (or other NIPPV modality) ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) 90-95%.

After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to "ETT" or "LMA" groups. The "ETT" group is managed according to our current INSURE approach to surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + remifentanil), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.

Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP/NIPPV by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups. Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:

  • Persistent apnea;
  • Severe retractions;
  • Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%

Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:

  1. Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant:
  • FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax. If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, it will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)
  1. Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant:
  • FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
  • FiO2 is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.

If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.

Being tested
Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway, remifentanil
Keywords
surfactant
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endotracheal intubationDevice

    Also called INSURE

  • Laryngeal mask airwayDevice

    Also called LMA North America

  • remifentanilDrug

    additional premedication in the endotracheal intubation/INSURE arm

Study groups in NCT02164734
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endotracheal intubationActive comparatorEndotracheal intubation for surfactant administration, following remifentanil and atropine pre-medication
Receives: Device: Endotracheal intubation; Drug: remifentanil
Laryngeal mask airwayExperimentalLaryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication
Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Failing to Avoid Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

    Failure of surfactant therapy in avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation or clinically equivalent outcomes (FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2, second dose of surfactant within 8 hours, or more than 2 total doses of surfactant)

    Measured: 120 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Number of Surfactant Doses

    Mean number of surfactant doses per patient

    Measured: 120 hours

  2. Days on Any Respiratory Support

    Days on any respiratory support (i.e., other than breathing room air)

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Rate of Pneumothorax

    proportion of participants with pneumothorax diagnosed radiologically or by transillumination

    Measured: 120 hours

  4. Rate of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)

    Defined as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age if gestational age less than 33 weeks, or beyond 28 days of age if gestational age greater than 32 weeks

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Number of Participants With Complications During Insertion of LMA or Endotracheal Tube

    bradycardia, airway obstruction, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    Measured: 120 hours

  6. Mortality Rate

    Mortality prior to hospital discharge (any cause)

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completion20 May 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Why it stopped: Slow to impossible recruitment during COVID-19 pandemic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
93 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02164734
Sponsor's protocol ID
3768
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
13 Jun 2014
Last updated
21 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Gallup JA, Ndakor SM, Pezzano C, Pinheiro JMB. Randomized Trial of Surfactant Therapy via Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Brief Tracheal Intubation in Neonates Born Preterm. J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;254:17-24.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

    PubMed 36241051

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway and remifentanil in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Failing to Avoid Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (time frame: 120 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02164734, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in