Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPhase 4NCT02164734
Surfactant Via Endotracheal Tube vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway and remifentanil in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) modalities, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway (inserted after pre-medication for pain with a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 48 hours
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- What is being tested?
- Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway and remifentanil
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 93 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 48 hours
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Mild-to-moderate RDS;
- Postnatal age 2 to 48 hours;
- Gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks;
- Treated with nasal CPAP modalities ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 90-95%;
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Weight < 800 g;
- Airway anomalies;
- Pulmonary air leaks;
- Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Rescue Surfactant Delivery Via Endotracheal Intubation (INSURE Technique) Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Preterm Neonates
In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) modalities, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway (inserted after pre-medication for pain with a short-acting narcotic), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to non-invasive CPAP support, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on non-invasive CPAP (i.e., needs tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires ventilation, retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.
The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.
The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared to standard surfactant treatment following endotracheal intubation with sedation.
Read the detailed description
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of pulmonary surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure modes (NCPAP or NIPPV). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation, as in the INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation) approach. Because tracheal intubation causes pain and vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates, premedication with atropine and a narcotic is recommended. However, narcotic premedication increases respiratory depression, which may require sustained mechanical ventilation, thus contributing to the failure of INSURE. In a recent trial at our center, standard pretreatment with morphine and atropine was associated with failure of INSURE in more than 2/3 of patients. Consequently, we have recently changed our standard premedication for INSURE to the combination of atropine and remifentanil (a rapid onset, short-acting narcotic). The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates; preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration, which in our trial was associated with a lower failure rate than the morphine plus INSURE approach.
The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will further evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.
The primary hypothesis is that surfactant therapy delivered via LMA is not inferior to surfactant therapy delivered via transient intubation (INSURE technique) with short-acting narcotic premedication for mild to moderate RDS in preterm neonates.
This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, less than 48 hours of age, with gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP (or other NIPPV modality) ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) 90-95%.
After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to "ETT" or "LMA" groups. The "ETT" group is managed according to our current INSURE approach to surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + remifentanil), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.
Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP/NIPPV by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups. Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:
- Persistent apnea;
- Severe retractions;
- Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%
Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:
- Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant:
- FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax. If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, it will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)
- Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant:
- FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
- FiO2 is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.
If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- Being tested
- Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway, remifentanil
- Keywords
- surfactant
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endotracheal intubationDevice
Also called INSURE
Laryngeal mask airwayDevice
Also called LMA North America
remifentanilDrug
additional premedication in the endotracheal intubation/INSURE arm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal intubation | Active comparator | Endotracheal intubation for surfactant administration, following remifentanil and atropine pre-medication Receives: Device: Endotracheal intubation; Drug: remifentanil |
| Laryngeal mask airway | Experimental | Laryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Failing to Avoid Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Failure of surfactant therapy in avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation or clinically equivalent outcomes (FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2, second dose of surfactant within 8 hours, or more than 2 total doses of surfactant)
Measured: 120 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Surfactant Doses
Mean number of surfactant doses per patient
Measured: 120 hours
Days on Any Respiratory Support
Days on any respiratory support (i.e., other than breathing room air)
Measured: 3 months
Rate of Pneumothorax
proportion of participants with pneumothorax diagnosed radiologically or by transillumination
Measured: 120 hours
Rate of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)
Defined as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age if gestational age less than 33 weeks, or beyond 28 days of age if gestational age greater than 32 weeks
Measured: 3 months
Number of Participants With Complications During Insertion of LMA or Endotracheal Tube
bradycardia, airway obstruction, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Measured: 120 hours
Mortality Rate
Mortality prior to hospital discharge (any cause)
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completion20 May 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2020
Why it stopped: Slow to impossible recruitment during COVID-19 pandemic
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 93 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Albany Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Rochester, ONY
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joaquim M.B. Pinheiro, Albany Medical College
- Investigators
- Joaquim M Pinheiro, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Albany Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02164734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3768
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Gallup JA, Ndakor SM, Pezzano C, Pinheiro JMB. Randomized Trial of Surfactant Therapy via Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Brief Tracheal Intubation in Neonates Born Preterm. J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;254:17-24.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
PubMed 36241051
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Rescue Surfactant Delivery Via Endotracheal Intubation (INSURE Technique) Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Preterm Neonates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02164734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3768
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- Keywords
- surfactant
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slow to impossible recruitment during COVID-19 pandemic
- Enrolment
- 93 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Albany Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Rochester, ONY
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Sep 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) modalities, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway (inserted after pre-medication for pain with a short-acting narcotic), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to non-invasive CPAP support, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on non-invasive CPAP (i.e., needs tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires ventilation, retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.
The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.
The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared to standard surfactant treatment following endotracheal intubation with sedation.
Detailed description
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of pulmonary surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure modes (NCPAP or NIPPV). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation, as in the INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation) approach. Because tracheal intubation causes pain and vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates, premedication with atropine and a narcotic is recommended. However, narcotic premedication increases respiratory depression, which may require sustained mechanical ventilation, thus contributing to the failure of INSURE. In a recent trial at our center, standard pretreatment with morphine and atropine was associated with failure of INSURE in more than 2/3 of patients. Consequently, we have recently changed our standard premedication for INSURE to the combination of atropine and remifentanil (a rapid onset, short-acting narcotic). The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates; preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration, which in our trial was associated with a lower failure rate than the morphine plus INSURE approach.
The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will further evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.
The primary hypothesis is that surfactant therapy delivered via LMA is not inferior to surfactant therapy delivered via transient intubation (INSURE technique) with short-acting narcotic premedication for mild to moderate RDS in preterm neonates.
This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, less than 48 hours of age, with gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP (or other NIPPV modality) ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) 90-95%.
After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to "ETT" or "LMA" groups. The "ETT" group is managed according to our current INSURE approach to surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + remifentanil), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.
Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP/NIPPV by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups. Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:
- Persistent apnea;
- Severe retractions;
- Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%
Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:
- Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant:
- FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax. If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, it will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)
- Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant:
- FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
- FiO2 is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.
If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal intubation | Active comparator | Device: Endotracheal intubation, Drug: remifentanilEndotracheal intubation for surfactant administration, following remifentanil and atropine pre-medication |
| Laryngeal mask airway | Experimental | Device: Laryngeal mask airwayLaryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 48 hours
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Mild-to-moderate RDS;
- Postnatal age 2 to 48 hours;
- Gestational age 27 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks;
- Treated with nasal CPAP modalities ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 90-95%;
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Weight < 800 g;
- Airway anomalies;
- Pulmonary air leaks;
- Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal intubationAlso: INSURE | Device | Endotracheal intubation |
| Laryngeal mask airwayAlso: LMA North America | Device | Laryngeal mask airway |
| remifentaniladditional premedication in the endotracheal intubation/INSURE arm | Drug | Endotracheal intubation |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Failing to Avoid Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Time frame: 120 hours
Failure of surfactant therapy in avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation or clinically equivalent outcomes (FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2, second dose of surfactant within 8 hours, or more than 2 total doses of surfactant)
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Surfactant Doses
Time frame: 120 hours
Days on Any Respiratory Support
Time frame: 3 months
Rate of Pneumothorax
Time frame: 120 hours
Rate of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)
Time frame: 3 months
Number of Participants With Complications During Insertion of LMA or Endotracheal Tube
Time frame: 120 hours
Mortality Rate
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36241051Gallup JA, Ndakor SM, Pezzano C, Pinheiro JMB. Randomized Trial of Surfactant Therapy via Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Brief Tracheal Intubation in Neonates Born Preterm. J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;254:17-24.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joaquim M Pinheiro, MD, MPH principal investigator
Albany Medical College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway and remifentanil in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Failing to Avoid Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (time frame: 120 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02164734, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.