IncontinenceNCT02168556
Interventions to Decrease Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Urodynamic Testing
A study testing Music and Video in people with Incontinence, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized controlled trial to determine if music, a video, or standard of care will decrease anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic testing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Music and Video
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to May 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years old and above,
- female
- urinary dysfunction
- urinary incontinence
- prolapse
- presurgical evaluation of voiding function
- Never undergone Urodynamics before
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Ongoing urinary tract infections
- Inability to cooperate
- Inability to give consent
- Non-English speakers
- Patients who have undergone urodynamic testing in the past
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
About this study
This is a randomized controlled trial to determine if music, a video, or standard of care will decrease anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic testing.
Read the detailed description
Research Design and Methods
This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the interventions of music, a patient educational video, or usual care pre-test teaching practice and anxiety before patients undergo urodynamic testing. This study enrolled women who were scheduled to undergo urodynamic testing within the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery clinic on main campus and at Fairview Hospital. Consenting participants were randomized to receive either usual practice pre-test teaching, usual practice pre-test teaching with soothing music in the background and throughout the test, or usual practice pre-test teaching and watching an educational video before the test was performed. The participants filled out a short questionnaire before urodynamic testing was started with two VAS scales assessing anxiety and pain and Likert Scale Questions, a second short questionnaire when the patient feels "strong urge" with two VAS scales assessing anxiety and pain, and a third questionnaire once the patient has completed the test again testing VAS anxiety and pain as well as some Likert scale questions.
The primary outcome was to determine if pre-urodynamic testing anxiety was decreased after watching a pre-test educational video, or by listening to music before and throughout the procedure, or by receiving standard of care pre-test teaching. Secondary outcomes were to determine baseline anxiety in our urodynamic patient population and to determine if there is decreased discomfort due to the intervention as well as to evaluate if there were certain patients that would benefit from increased information.
Enrollment All patients undergoing urodynamic testing for the first time who are over the age of 18 years old, female with presentation for urodynamics for urinary dysfunction, urinary incontinence, prolapse, or presurgical evaluation of voiding function were screened for participation in the study.
Exclusion criteria included:
- Pregnancy
- Ongoing infections
- Inability to cooperate
- Inability to give consent
- Non-English speakers
- Patients who had undergone urodynamic testing in the past
Randomization
Random treatment assignments were placed in advance in set of sealed envelopes by a person who was not involved in opening the envelopes. Each envelope was numbered. When a patient was randomized, the patients name and the number of the next unopened envelope were recorded in a secure database. The envelope was then pened and the randomization was determined for the patient.
Data Collection Protocol
This study was incorporated into the patient's routine urodynamic testing. No additional visits were necessary.
Demographic data including patient's age, ethnicity, education, catheter history, mental health history and medications were obtained, and patient satisfaction with care scores were also be collected. Paper forms will be stored in the locked research office at the Cleveland Clinic. Questionnaires were then collected in REDcap, a secure, web-based application designned to support data capture. We de-identified each patient and did not include their name or Cleveland Clinic medical record number on our data collection sheet form or on the questionnaires, or in the database. During abstraction, a separate log was kept with patient identifying information and linking it to the database in case it was necessary to go back to the medical record to clarify or complete data entry. This log will be destroyed after data collection is complete and before data analysis. The database was kept on a password protected Gynecology research drive accessible only by the study investigators.
- Patients randomized to the usual care arm woul have received mailings about urodynamic testing prior to arriving to the urodynamic suite. They then entered the urodynamic suite and the urodynamics provider discussed the information that was mailed to them. They also discussed the overall test, placement of catheters, and filling of the bladder with the patient before the provider began the test which is usual care. Once the provider finished giving the information, the patient filled out the first pre-test questionnaire which involved multiple Likert scale questions as well as Visual Analog Scale questions. During the urodynamic testing when the patient reached the point of "strong urge," a two question visual analog scale was given to the patient measuring anxiety and discomfort. Once the test has been concluded, the patient was given one further short post-test questionnaire using the Likert scale and Visual Analog Scale.
- Patients randomized to the video arm arrived to their appointment having received the mailed material (usual practice). Prior to watching the video, the patient was given the pre-test questionnaire. While in the urodynamics suite the patient watched a short patient informational video on urodynamics. Urodynamic testing was then performed and when the patient noted "strong urge"during the testing period, a short, two question visual analog scale questionnaire measuring anxiety and discomfort was given. Once the urodynamic testing was completed, the patient will fill out an additional Likert scale and Visual Analog Scale post-test questionnaire.
- Patients randomized to the music arm arrived to the appointment after having received mailed information about the test. The patient enter the urodynamics suite, was randomized and then slow music (tempo of 60 beats min) was started to play in the background. Usual practice instructions were given. The music continued through the urodynamic testing. Before the test and the usual practice instructions were given, the patient was given the pre-test questionnaire. When the patient notified the test provider that she had "strong urge" a second questionnaire with visual analog scales measuring anxiety and discomfort were given. Once the urodynamic testing was concluded, the patient was given the post-test questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Incontinence
- Being tested
- Music, Video, Standard of care
- Keywords
- Urodynamics, Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MusicBehavioural
Also called Music Therapy
Subject listens to music that is 60bpm while undergoing urodynamic testing.
VideoBehavioural
Also called Video therapy
Subject watches an informational video prior to undergoing urodynamic testing.
Standard of careOther
Standard of care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Placebo comparator | Patient underwent urodynamic testing by receiving only standard of care with mailed information and during test teaching. Receives: Other: Standard of care |
| Music | Active comparator | Patient underwent urodynamic testing while listening to music that was 60 beats per minute and received standard of care information and teaching. Receives: Behavioral: Music |
| Video | Active comparator | Patient watched an informational video prior to urodynamic testing. Receives: Behavioral: Video |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anxiety
The primary outcome is to determine if pre-urodynamic testing anxiety is decreased after watching a pre-test educational video, or by listening to music before and throughout the procedure, or by receiving standard of care pre-test teaching. For measurement of anxiety we used 100mm Visual analog scales. We used a questionnaire to obtain demographics. We used a five point Likert scale to ask questions about their use of the internet and information seeking behavior.
Measured: One day
Secondary outcomes (1)
Discomfort
Secondary outcomes are to determine baseline anxiety in our urodynamic patient population and to determine if there is decreased discomfort due to the intervention as well as to evaluate if there are certain patients that would benefit from increased information. For measurement of discomfort we used 100mm Visual analog scales. We used a questionnaire to obtain demographics. We used a five point Likert scale to ask questions about their use of the internet and information seeking behavior.
Measured: One Day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ellen R Solomon, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland ClinicBeri Ridgeway, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02168556
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-1351
- Status last verified
- Jun 2014
- First submitted
- 27 May 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Solomon ER, Ridgeway B. Interventions to decrease pain and anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic testing: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):975-979. doi: 10.1002/nau.22840. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
PubMed 26227401
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Interventions to Decrease Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Urodynamic Testing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02168556
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12-1351
- Conditions
- Incontinence
- Keywords
- Urodynamics, Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized controlled trial to determine if music, a video, or standard of care will decrease anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic testing.
Detailed description
Research Design and Methods
This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the interventions of music, a patient educational video, or usual care pre-test teaching practice and anxiety before patients undergo urodynamic testing. This study enrolled women who were scheduled to undergo urodynamic testing within the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery clinic on main campus and at Fairview Hospital. Consenting participants were randomized to receive either usual practice pre-test teaching, usual practice pre-test teaching with soothing music in the background and throughout the test, or usual practice pre-test teaching and watching an educational video before the test was performed. The participants filled out a short questionnaire before urodynamic testing was started with two VAS scales assessing anxiety and pain and Likert Scale Questions, a second short questionnaire when the patient feels "strong urge" with two VAS scales assessing anxiety and pain, and a third questionnaire once the patient has completed the test again testing VAS anxiety and pain as well as some Likert scale questions.
The primary outcome was to determine if pre-urodynamic testing anxiety was decreased after watching a pre-test educational video, or by listening to music before and throughout the procedure, or by receiving standard of care pre-test teaching. Secondary outcomes were to determine baseline anxiety in our urodynamic patient population and to determine if there is decreased discomfort due to the intervention as well as to evaluate if there were certain patients that would benefit from increased information.
Enrollment All patients undergoing urodynamic testing for the first time who are over the age of 18 years old, female with presentation for urodynamics for urinary dysfunction, urinary incontinence, prolapse, or presurgical evaluation of voiding function were screened for participation in the study.
Exclusion criteria included:
- Pregnancy
- Ongoing infections
- Inability to cooperate
- Inability to give consent
- Non-English speakers
- Patients who had undergone urodynamic testing in the past
Randomization
Random treatment assignments were placed in advance in set of sealed envelopes by a person who was not involved in opening the envelopes. Each envelope was numbered. When a patient was randomized, the patients name and the number of the next unopened envelope were recorded in a secure database. The envelope was then pened and the randomization was determined for the patient.
Data Collection Protocol
This study was incorporated into the patient's routine urodynamic testing. No additional visits were necessary.
Demographic data including patient's age, ethnicity, education, catheter history, mental health history and medications were obtained, and patient satisfaction with care scores were also be collected. Paper forms will be stored in the locked research office at the Cleveland Clinic. Questionnaires were then collected in REDcap, a secure, web-based application designned to support data capture. We de-identified each patient and did not include their name or Cleveland Clinic medical record number on our data collection sheet form or on the questionnaires, or in the database. During abstraction, a separate log was kept with patient identifying information and linking it to the database in case it was necessary to go back to the medical record to clarify or complete data entry. This log will be destroyed after data collection is complete and before data analysis. The database was kept on a password protected Gynecology research drive accessible only by the study investigators.
- Patients randomized to the usual care arm woul have received mailings about urodynamic testing prior to arriving to the urodynamic suite. They then entered the urodynamic suite and the urodynamics provider discussed the information that was mailed to them. They also discussed the overall test, placement of catheters, and filling of the bladder with the patient before the provider began the test which is usual care. Once the provider finished giving the information, the patient filled out the first pre-test questionnaire which involved multiple Likert scale questions as well as Visual Analog Scale questions. During the urodynamic testing when the patient reached the point of "strong urge," a two question visual analog scale was given to the patient measuring anxiety and discomfort. Once the test has been concluded, the patient was given one further short post-test questionnaire using the Likert scale and Visual Analog Scale.
- Patients randomized to the video arm arrived to their appointment having received the mailed material (usual practice). Prior to watching the video, the patient was given the pre-test questionnaire. While in the urodynamics suite the patient watched a short patient informational video on urodynamics. Urodynamic testing was then performed and when the patient noted "strong urge"during the testing period, a short, two question visual analog scale questionnaire measuring anxiety and discomfort was given. Once the urodynamic testing was completed, the patient will fill out an additional Likert scale and Visual Analog Scale post-test questionnaire.
- Patients randomized to the music arm arrived to the appointment after having received mailed information about the test. The patient enter the urodynamics suite, was randomized and then slow music (tempo of 60 beats min) was started to play in the background. Usual practice instructions were given. The music continued through the urodynamic testing. Before the test and the usual practice instructions were given, the patient was given the pre-test questionnaire. When the patient notified the test provider that she had "strong urge" a second questionnaire with visual analog scales measuring anxiety and discomfort were given. Once the urodynamic testing was concluded, the patient was given the post-test questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | Placebo comparator | Other: Standard of carePatient underwent urodynamic testing by receiving only standard of care with mailed information and during test teaching. |
| Music | Active comparator | Behavioral: MusicPatient underwent urodynamic testing while listening to music that was 60 beats per minute and received standard of care information and teaching. |
| Video | Active comparator | Behavioral: VideoPatient watched an informational video prior to urodynamic testing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- 18 years old and above,
- female
- urinary dysfunction
- urinary incontinence
- prolapse
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Ongoing urinary tract infections
- Inability to cooperate
- Inability to give consent
- Non-English speakers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MusicAlso: Music TherapySubject listens to music that is 60bpm while undergoing urodynamic testing. | Behavioural | Music |
| VideoAlso: Video therapySubject watches an informational video prior to undergoing urodynamic testing. | Behavioural | Video |
| Standard of careStandard of care | Other | Standard of Care |
Primary outcome
Anxiety
Time frame: One day
The primary outcome is to determine if pre-urodynamic testing anxiety is decreased after watching a pre-test educational video, or by listening to music before and throughout the procedure, or by receiving standard of care pre-test teaching. For measurement of anxiety we used 100mm Visual analog scales. We used a questionnaire to obtain demographics. We used a five point Likert scale to ask questions about their use of the internet and information seeking behavior.
1 secondary outcome
Discomfort
Time frame: One Day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26227401Solomon ER, Ridgeway B. Interventions to decrease pain and anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic testing: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):975-979. doi: 10.1002/nau.22840. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
Related trials for Incontinence
Recruiting
Ambulatory Long Length URodynamics Evaluation
Urology, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Fecal Incontinence (FI) is a Debilitating Physical and Psychological Disorder Characterizedbytheinvoluntary Loss of Flatus or Liquid/Solid Stool.
MRI in Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
The Safety and Efficacy of 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonist (Ramosetron) for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
Fecal Incontinence
Active, not recruiting
APPROVE Trial: Evaluating a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Treatment of OAB in Women
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Urgency
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ellen R Solomon, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
Beri Ridgeway, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Music and Video in people with Incontinence, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anxiety (time frame: One day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02168556, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2014.