AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerNCT02174185

Compare the Quality of Life Between Patients With Conduit Diversions or Orthotopic Neobladders

An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Huazhong University of Science and Technology at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between patients underwent conduit diversion and orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy. The investigators plan to use validated HRQoL questionnaires to learn about how the different urinary diversion operations affect the HRQoL of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
validated health-related quality of life questionnaires
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Aug 2014to Aug 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All eligible patients in Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of muscle invasive bladder cancer
  • Must be scheduled for radical cystectomy and subsequent conduit diversion or orthotopic neobladder
  • Must be able to provide informed consent
  • Must be 18 years of age or older
  • May have had received intravesical neoadjuvant, adjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy

Who cannot join

  • Follow-up data not obtained at Wuhan Union Hospital

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Xiaoping Zhang, MD, PhD contact

86 27 85351625

xzhang@hust.edu.cn

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Urology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022

    Xiaoping Zhang, MD, PhD, 86 27 85351625, xzhang@hust.edu.cn

    Hangchuan Shi, MD, 86 13098893958, hangchuan_shi@hust.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Prospective and Comparative Study of Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients With Conduit Diversion or Orthotopic Neobladder

The aim of this study is to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between patients underwent conduit diversion and orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy. The investigators plan to use validated HRQoL questionnaires to learn about how the different urinary diversion operations affect the HRQoL of people living with bladder cancer. The findings from this study may help doctors and patients choosing the proper operation type.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Being tested
validated health-related quality of life questionnaires
Keywords
bladder cancer, conduit diversion, orthotopic neobladder, health-related quality of life, validated questionnaire
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • validated health-related quality of life questionnairesBehavioural

    All eligible patients who agree to participate will be asked to fulfill three different validated health-related quality of life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BLM, FACT-BL and BCI) prior to surgery and at 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively.

Study groups in NCT02174185
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bladder cancer, conduit diversionnew patients with bladder cancer scheduled for radical cystectomy and subsequent conduit diversion
Receives: Behavioral: validated health-related quality of life questionnaires
bladder cancer, orthotopic neobladdernew patients with bladder cancer scheduled for radical cystectomy and subsequent orthotopic neobladder
Receives: Behavioral: validated health-related quality of life questionnaires

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in HRQoL of bladder cancer patients with different types of urinary diversions

    Measured: Preoperative baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Score differences between the two groups of patients in the relevant domains from three various validated tools of HRQoL

    The aim is to compare three various validated tools of HRQoL to study their relative contributions in accounting for variance in prediction of patient HRQoL.

    The three validated tools of HRQoL are EORTC-QLQ-C30/BLM (The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire/bladder cancer module), FACT-BL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder cancer) and BCI (Bladder Cancer Index).

    The two groups are conduit diversion group and orthotopic neobladder group.

    Measured: Preoperative baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively

  2. Score changes of each patient group during the follow-up

    Longitudinally learn about the changes of each individual patient HRQoL after urinary diversion and compare the changes of two groups, i.e. conduit diversion group and orthotopic neobladder group.

    Measured: Preoperative baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively

  3. Objective examination outcomes

    Supplement the assessment by interviewing the patients with some lab and image examinations, such as renal function tests, liver function tests, urine culture, urine cytology, chest radiography, ultrasound of kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB) etc.

    Measured: Preoperative baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionAug 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02174185
Sponsor's protocol ID
01-18-530605
Status last verified
Aug 2014
First submitted
22 Jun 2014
Last updated
4 Aug 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Huazhong University of Science and Technology at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiaoping Zhang, MD, PhD (86 27 85351625, xzhang@hust.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in HRQoL of bladder cancer patients with different types of urinary diversions (time frame: Preoperative baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in