Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4POLBOSNCT02192840
POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting Study
A Phase 4 study testing Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
Coronary bifurcation lesions pose therapeutic problems during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and are associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications as well as higher rates of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 243 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits of receiving PCI for true bifurcation lesions, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
- Target main branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm. Target side branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.0 mm.
- Target lesion(s) amenable for PCI with balloon angioplasty of the side branch.
Who cannot join
- STEMI
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
- Subjects who refuse to give informed consent.
- Subjects with LVEF<30%
- Subjects with moderate or severe degree valvular heart disease or primary cardiomyopathy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
Department of Invasive Cardiology Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior
Warsaw
About this study
Official title: Regular DES Versus BiOSS Expert® Stent in Coronary Bifurcation Treatment - Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Controlled POLBOS I (POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting) Study
Coronary bifurcation lesions pose therapeutic problems during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and are associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications as well as higher rates of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Therefore the optimal approach to coronary bifurcations treatment is still a subject of debate, especially when the side branch is large, not easily accessible and narrowed by a long lesion. One of the proposed alternatives are dedicated bifurcation stents (DBS). However, there is large scarcity of randomized trials with DBS.
The aim of POLBOS I (POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting) study was to compare two intervention strategies for bifurcation treatment: provisional T-stenting (PTS) with any regular drug-eluting stent (rDES), the best treatment strategy at the moment, with stenting of bifurcation lesions with dedicated bifurcation paclitaxel-eluting stent BiOSS Expert® (Balton, PL).
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation
- Keywords
- provisional T stenting, dedicated bifurcation stent
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Coronary angioplasty with stent implantationProcedure or surgery
Also called Device: LucChopin (Balton, Poland), Device: Prolim (Balton, Poland), Device: Xience Pro (Abott Vascular), Device: Biomatrix (Biosensors)
Coronary angioplasty in bifurcation lesion with drug-eluting stent implantation: BiOSS or regular DES (rDES)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rDES Group | Active comparator | Regular drug-eluting stent implantation, one of the following:
Device: LucChopin (Balton, Poland) Device: Prolim (Balton, Poland) Device: Xience Pro (Abott Vascular) Device: Biomatrix (Biosensors) Device: Promus (Boston Scientific) Device: Cypher (Cordis) Device: Taxus (Boston Scientific) Device: Coroflex Please (BBraun) Device: Resolute Integrity (Medtronic) Receives: Procedure: Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation |
| BiOSS Group | Experimental | New dedicated bifurcation stent BiOSS Expert (Balton, Warsaw, Poland) implantation Receives: Procedure: Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MACE
Cumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) with or without ST-segment elevation and need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion (TLR).
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
cardiac death
Measured: 12 months
all-cause death
Measured: 12 months
Target lesion revascularization
Measured: 12 months
Target vessel revascularization
Measured: 12 months
myocardial infarction
Measured: 12 months
late lumen loss
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionMar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University National Heart Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacek Bil, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
- Investigators
- Robert J Gil, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02192840
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2.0
- Acronym
- POLBOS
- Status last verified
- Jul 2014
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1446-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.080. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
PubMed 16226167Vassilev D, Gil R. Clinical verification of a theory for predicting side branch stenosis after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):493-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00400.x. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
PubMed 18973506Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Formuszewicz R, Rusicka-Piekarz T, Doganov A. The carina angle-new geometrical parameter associated with periprocedural side branch compromise and the long-term results in coronary bifurcation lesions with main vessel stenting only. J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Dec;22(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00492.x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
PubMed 19702678Vassilev D, Gil R, Kwan T, Nguyen T, Nanjundappa A, Doganov A. Extension distance mismatch--an unrecognized factor for suboptimal side branch ostial coverage in bifurcation lesion stenting. J Interv Cardiol. 2010 Aug;23(4):305-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00574.x. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
PubMed 20642477Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Michalek A, Kern A, Formuszewicz R, Dobrzycki S, Wojcik J, Lesiak M, Kardaszewicz P, Lekston A. Dedicated paclitaxel-eluting bifurcation stent BiOSS(R) (bifurcation optimisation stent system): 12-month results from a prospective registry of consecutive all-comers population. EuroIntervention. 2012 Jul 20;8(3):316-24. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I3A50.
PubMed 22829507Gil RJ, Kern A, Formuszewicz R, Inigo Garcia LA, Dobrzycki S, Vassilev D, Bil J. 6-year results of BiOSS stents in coronary bifurcation treatment. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Aug;51(8):e13555. doi: 10.1111/eci.13555. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
PubMed 33782985
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Regular DES Versus BiOSS Expert® Stent in Coronary Bifurcation Treatment - Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Controlled POLBOS I (POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02192840
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- POLBOS / 2.0
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- provisional T stenting, dedicated bifurcation stent
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, PolandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University National Heart Hospital
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Coronary bifurcation lesions pose therapeutic problems during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and are associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications as well as higher rates of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Therefore the optimal approach to coronary bifurcations treatment is still a subject of debate, especially when the side branch is large, not easily accessible and narrowed by a long lesion. One of the proposed alternatives are dedicated bifurcation stents (DBS). However, there is large scarcity of randomized trials with DBS.
The aim of POLBOS I (POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting) study was to compare two intervention strategies for bifurcation treatment: provisional T-stenting (PTS) with any regular drug-eluting stent (rDES), the best treatment strategy at the moment, with stenting of bifurcation lesions with dedicated bifurcation paclitaxel-eluting stent BiOSS Expert® (Balton, PL).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rDES Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Coronary angioplasty with stent implantationRegular drug-eluting stent implantation, one of the following: Device: LucChopin (Balton, Poland) Device: Prolim (Balton, Poland) Device: Xience Pro (Abott Vascular) Device: Biomatrix (Biosensors) Device: Promus (Boston Scientific) Device: Cypher (Cordis) Device: Taxus (Boston Scientific) Device: Coroflex Please (BBraun) Device: Resolute Integrity (Medtronic) |
| BiOSS Group | Experimental | Procedure: Coronary angioplasty with stent implantationNew dedicated bifurcation stent BiOSS Expert (Balton, Warsaw, Poland) implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits of receiving PCI for true bifurcation lesions, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.
- Target main branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm. Target side branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.0 mm.
- Target lesion(s) amenable for PCI with balloon angioplasty of the side branch.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- STEMI
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
- Subjects who refuse to give informed consent.
- Subjects with LVEF<30%
- Subjects with moderate or severe degree valvular heart disease or primary cardiomyopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary angioplasty with stent implantationAlso: Device: LucChopin (Balton, Poland), Device: Prolim (Balton, Poland), Device: Xience Pro (Abott Vascular), Device: Biomatrix (Biosensors)Coronary angioplasty in bifurcation lesion with drug-eluting stent implantation: BiOSS or regular DES (rDES) | Procedure or surgery | BiOSS Group, rDES Group |
Primary outcome
MACE
Time frame: 12 months
Cumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) with or without ST-segment elevation and need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion (TLR).
6 secondary outcomes
cardiac death
Time frame: 12 months
all-cause death
Time frame: 12 months
Target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 12 months
Target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 12 months
myocardial infarction
Time frame: 12 months
late lumen loss
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2014.
- Background: PubMed 16226167Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1446-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.080. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 18973506Vassilev D, Gil R. Clinical verification of a theory for predicting side branch stenosis after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):493-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00400.x. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
- Background: PubMed 19702678Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Formuszewicz R, Rusicka-Piekarz T, Doganov A. The carina angle-new geometrical parameter associated with periprocedural side branch compromise and the long-term results in coronary bifurcation lesions with main vessel stenting only. J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Dec;22(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00492.x. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 20642477Vassilev D, Gil R, Kwan T, Nguyen T, Nanjundappa A, Doganov A. Extension distance mismatch--an unrecognized factor for suboptimal side branch ostial coverage in bifurcation lesion stenting. J Interv Cardiol. 2010 Aug;23(4):305-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00574.x. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 22829507Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Michalek A, Kern A, Formuszewicz R, Dobrzycki S, Wojcik J, Lesiak M, Kardaszewicz P, Lekston A. Dedicated paclitaxel-eluting bifurcation stent BiOSS(R) (bifurcation optimisation stent system): 12-month results from a prospective registry of consecutive all-comers population. EuroIntervention. 2012 Jul 20;8(3):316-24. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I3A50.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33782985Gil RJ, Kern A, Formuszewicz R, Inigo Garcia LA, Dobrzycki S, Vassilev D, Bil J. 6-year results of BiOSS stents in coronary bifurcation treatment. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Aug;51(8):e13555. doi: 10.1111/eci.13555. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Lipoic Acid on Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure Patients
Heart Failure Due to Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Acoustics for Early Disease Detection
Valvular Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert J Gil, MD, PhD principal investigator
Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Coronary angioplasty with stent implantation in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MACE (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02192840, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2014.