HabituationNCT02198911
The Effects of Chewing Gum on a Computer Task and Liking Ratings of Ice Cream
A study testing NO GUM, MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum) and C (Cinnamon gum) in people with Habituation, run by The University of Tennessee, Knoxville at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to examine if chewing gum before an eating bout will increase the rate of habituation and subsequently reduce energy intake within the eating bout. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Habituation
- What is being tested?
- NO GUM, MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum) and C (Cinnamon gum)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- age between 18 and 40 years
- of normal weight (body mass index [BMI] between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2)
- unrestrained eater (scoring less than/equal to 12 on the restraint scale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire [TFEQ15])
- non-smoker (not having smoked or used tobacco products for a year or more)
- like and are willing to eat (greater than/equal to 50mm on a 100mm visual analogue scale [VAS]) MCC ice cream
Who cannot join
- have any health condition that requires a specific dietary prescription (i.e., diabetes)
- are unable to chew the gum for the time required in the investigation; 3) do not like the flavors of gum used in the investigation
- are allergic to any ingredients in the foods used in the investigation
- are lactose-intolerant
- plan to make any changes in dietary intake or physical activity over the course of the study
- score >20 on the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT8)
Show all 10Show fewer
- score >16 on the Binge Eating Scale (BES10)
- are not able to stay within the metropolitan area within the time frame of the investigation
- are pregnant, lactating, or plan to become pregnant during the investigation
- are taking any type of medication that influences appetite.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Healthy Eating and Activity Labroatory, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996
About this study
The purpose of this study is to examine if chewing gum before an eating bout will increase the rate of habituation and subsequently reduce energy intake within the eating bout.
Read the detailed description
Approximately two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese, thus placing obesity first as a public health concern in the U.S. Not only is obesity detrimental at the individual level, by increasing risk for chronic disease and premature mortality, but it also presents problems at the economical level by increasing medical costs.
At the heart of weight management is the ability to appropriately regulate energy intake. A key factor in regulation of consumption is satiation, the process by which an eating bout ends. Quicker onset of satiation may result in decreased consumption, which is important in achieving an adequate energy balance. Negative energy balance, in which energy intake is less than energy expenditure, is required for weight loss; however, there are challenges with increased hunger and decreased satiation as energy intake is decreased.
One of the factors believed to influence satiation is the ability to increase the rate of habituation occurring during an eating bout. Habituation is a basic form of learning that can be measured by the rate of decrease in consummatory response to repeated presentations of food orosensory cues. Following this decreased response rate to a particular food, presentation of new orosensory cues may result in dishabituation to both the previously habituated food as well as the new orosensory cue, thus causing an increase in consummatory response. Dishabituation during an eating bout, i.e. exposure to a variety of orosensory cues, may be related to recovery of appetite and decreased satiation, leading the calorie-replete individual to overconsume. Alternatively, with repeated presentations of the same orosensory cue, one becomes accustomed to the taste faster, giving rise to habituation, which should increase satiation. A more rapid rate of habituation would mean that less energy is consumed within an eating bout. Research indicates increased weight status in relation to slower habituation rates as well as an inverse relationship between the extent of orosensory variety and habituation rates. Additionally, research shows a positive association between amount of orosensory cues and amount consumed within an eating bout.
One way to provide a single orosensory cue and initiate enhanced habituation with a minimal amount of additional energy intake is by chewing sugar-free, flavored gum. If matched to the flavor of the food about to be consumed, chewing gum prior to an eating bout may increase the rate of habituation, consequently reducing consumption.
Therefore, the purpose of this proof-of-concept study is to examine if chewing gum before an eating bout will increase the rate of habituation and subsequently reduce energy intake within the eating bout. The outcomes of this study may be useful in the health setting for creating prescriptions for weight-loss, weight maintenance, and weight-gain prevention.
- Conditions
- Habituation
- Being tested
- NO GUM, MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum), C (Cinnamon gum)
- Keywords
- Habituation, Orosensory cues, Satiation
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NO GUMOther
For the NO GUM condition, participants will not chew gum before engaging in a computer task that will allow participants to earn points for MCC ice cream that they can consume.
MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum)Other
For the MCC gum condition, participants will chew MCC gum before engaging in a computer task that will allow participants to earn points for MCC ice cream that they can consume.
C (Cinnamon gum)Other
For the C gum condition, participants will chew Cinnamon gum before engaging in a computer task that will allow participants to earn points for MCC ice cream that they can consume.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Order 1 | Active comparator | Gum chewing order for sessions, 1-3 respectively: NO GUM, MCC, C Receives: Other: NO GUM; Other: MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum); Other: C (Cinnamon gum) |
| Order 2 | Active comparator | Gum chewing order for ice-cream sessions, 1-3 respectively: MCC, C, NO GUM Receives: Other: NO GUM; Other: MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum); Other: C (Cinnamon gum) |
| Order 3 | Active comparator | Gum chewing order for ice-cream sessions, 1-3 respectively: C, NO GUM, MCC Receives: Other: NO GUM; Other: MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum); Other: C (Cinnamon gum) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Grams of ice cream eaten
Amount of ice cream consumed will be measured using the following formula: amount of ice cream before consumption (first weight) - amount of ice cream following consumption (second weight). Grams of ice cream consumed will be determined following each 60 minute session (1, 2, and 3).
Measured: 3 trials (60 minutes)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completion31 Dec 2018
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HabituationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hollie Raynor, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02198911
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9212-B
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Chewing Gum on a Computer Task and Liking Ratings of Ice Cream
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02198911
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9212-B
- Conditions
- Habituation
- Keywords
- Habituation, Orosensory cues, Satiation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to examine if chewing gum before an eating bout will increase the rate of habituation and subsequently reduce energy intake within the eating bout.
Detailed description
Approximately two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese, thus placing obesity first as a public health concern in the U.S. Not only is obesity detrimental at the individual level, by increasing risk for chronic disease and premature mortality, but it also presents problems at the economical level by increasing medical costs.
At the heart of weight management is the ability to appropriately regulate energy intake. A key factor in regulation of consumption is satiation, the process by which an eating bout ends. Quicker onset of satiation may result in decreased consumption, which is important in achieving an adequate energy balance. Negative energy balance, in which energy intake is less than energy expenditure, is required for weight loss; however, there are challenges with increased hunger and decreased satiation as energy intake is decreased.
One of the factors believed to influence satiation is the ability to increase the rate of habituation occurring during an eating bout. Habituation is a basic form of learning that can be measured by the rate of decrease in consummatory response to repeated presentations of food orosensory cues. Following this decreased response rate to a particular food, presentation of new orosensory cues may result in dishabituation to both the previously habituated food as well as the new orosensory cue, thus causing an increase in consummatory response. Dishabituation during an eating bout, i.e. exposure to a variety of orosensory cues, may be related to recovery of appetite and decreased satiation, leading the calorie-replete individual to overconsume. Alternatively, with repeated presentations of the same orosensory cue, one becomes accustomed to the taste faster, giving rise to habituation, which should increase satiation. A more rapid rate of habituation would mean that less energy is consumed within an eating bout. Research indicates increased weight status in relation to slower habituation rates as well as an inverse relationship between the extent of orosensory variety and habituation rates. Additionally, research shows a positive association between amount of orosensory cues and amount consumed within an eating bout.
One way to provide a single orosensory cue and initiate enhanced habituation with a minimal amount of additional energy intake is by chewing sugar-free, flavored gum. If matched to the flavor of the food about to be consumed, chewing gum prior to an eating bout may increase the rate of habituation, consequently reducing consumption.
Therefore, the purpose of this proof-of-concept study is to examine if chewing gum before an eating bout will increase the rate of habituation and subsequently reduce energy intake within the eating bout. The outcomes of this study may be useful in the health setting for creating prescriptions for weight-loss, weight maintenance, and weight-gain prevention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Order 1 | Active comparator | Other: NO GUM, Other: MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum), Other: C (Cinnamon gum)Gum chewing order for sessions, 1-3 respectively: NO GUM, MCC, C |
| Order 2 | Active comparator | Other: NO GUM, Other: MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum), Other: C (Cinnamon gum)Gum chewing order for ice-cream sessions, 1-3 respectively: MCC, C, NO GUM |
| Order 3 | Active comparator | Other: NO GUM, Other: MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum), Other: C (Cinnamon gum)Gum chewing order for ice-cream sessions, 1-3 respectively: C, NO GUM, MCC |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age between 18 and 40 years
- of normal weight (body mass index [BMI] between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2)
- unrestrained eater (scoring less than/equal to 12 on the restraint scale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire [TFEQ15])
- non-smoker (not having smoked or used tobacco products for a year or more)
- like and are willing to eat (greater than/equal to 50mm on a 100mm visual analogue scale [VAS]) MCC ice cream
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- have any health condition that requires a specific dietary prescription (i.e., diabetes)
- are unable to chew the gum for the time required in the investigation; 3) do not like the flavors of gum used in the investigation
- are allergic to any ingredients in the foods used in the investigation
- are lactose-intolerant
- plan to make any changes in dietary intake or physical activity over the course of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NO GUMFor the NO GUM condition, participants will not chew gum before engaging in a computer task that will allow participants to earn points for MCC ice cream that they can consume. | Other | Order 1, Order 2, Order 3 |
| MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum)For the MCC gum condition, participants will chew MCC gum before engaging in a computer task that will allow participants to earn points for MCC ice cream that they can consume. | Other | Order 1, Order 2, Order 3 |
| C (Cinnamon gum)For the C gum condition, participants will chew Cinnamon gum before engaging in a computer task that will allow participants to earn points for MCC ice cream that they can consume. | Other | Order 1, Order 2, Order 3 |
Primary outcome
Grams of ice cream eaten
Time frame: 3 trials (60 minutes)
Amount of ice cream consumed will be measured using the following formula: amount of ice cream before consumption (first weight) - amount of ice cream following consumption (second weight). Grams of ice cream consumed will be determined following each 60 minute session (1, 2, and 3).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Habituation
Recruiting
ASD and Habituation to Dental Examination
Oral Health Training, Habituation
RecruitingObservational study
Habituation's Mechanisms in Preterm and Term Infants
Habituation, Psychophysiological, Preterm, Infant
Not yet recruiting
Neuromodulation Strategies for Treatment-Resistant Essential Tremor Using Chronos™ DBS
Essential Tremor
Recruiting
Impact of Stress on Brain Energy Metabolism
Stress
Recruiting
Neurobehavioral Profiles of Adaptive Stress Responses in Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder
Alcohol Use Disorder, Stress Reaction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NO GUM, MCC (Mint Chocolate Chip gum) and C (Cinnamon gum) in people with Habituation, run by The University of Tennessee, Knoxville at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Grams of ice cream eaten (time frame: 3 trials (60 minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2026.