AzTrials
AzTrials

SepticaemiaPRefillNCT02208817

The Paediatric Refill Study (PRefill)

An observational study of Septicaemia and Deformity of Spine, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

2 recent national reports 'Why Children Die' and 'Are we there yet?'identified deficiencies in recognising and managing sick children. Key recommendations from both reviews included the development and adoption of 'track and trigger' or a paediatric early warning score (PEWS) to better identify the sick or… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 15 years
Conditions the study is for
Septicaemia, Deformity of Spine, Trauma
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Aug 2014to May 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Children will be recruited in The Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, a teaching hospital, which has a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Who may be able to join

  • Children \& Young Adults
  • Patients aged 1 month to 15 years with parental or legal guardian written informed consent.
  • Patients groups:
  • Patients who require PICU or high dependency care
  • Matched controls who are well (PEWS<3)
  • Must have a realistic prospect of survival
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Parents/carers (for the interview element of the study):
  • Parents/carers of children recruited into the PRefill study
  • Healthcare professionals (for the interview element of the study):
  • Healthcare professionals who have cared for a child with the device on

Who cannot join

  • Children \& Young Adults
  • Known pregnancy
  • Underlying cardiac anomaly likely to affect perfusion,
  • PEWS ≥3 (in matched well controls)
  • Severe eczema/burns/other skin condition on site where CRT device needs to be positioned
  • Known allergy to medical adhesive
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Parents/carers (for the interview element of the study):
  • Unable to communicate despite translation services
  • Healthcare professionals (for the interview element of the study)
  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Nottingham Univeristy Hospitals NHS Trust

    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG72UH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Development of a Novel Paediatric Continuous Early Warning Monitor for the Children at Risk of Respiratory and Cardiovascular Collapse - The Paediatric Refill Study (PRefill)

2 recent national reports 'Why Children Die' and 'Are we there yet?'identified deficiencies in recognising and managing sick children. Key recommendations from both reviews included the development and adoption of 'track and trigger' or a paediatric early warning score (PEWS) to better identify the sick or deteriorating child. PEWS tools offer the potential to identify and respond sooner to clinical deterioration. Capillary refill time (CRT) is a measure of skin blood flow and is a vital part of many early warning and resuscitation scores. It is a sensitive marker of infection and dehydration in children. However, due to how it is performed and interpreted CRT is prone to marked variability between observers.

We have Medical Research Council (MRC) funding to develop an automated capillary refill device and user interface to provide a paediatric continuous early warning (PaedCEW) monitoring system. The PaedCEW system would complement and support current clinical practice and aim to address the difficulties of recognising ill children.

Read more

We aim to recruit 20 ill children on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) with 2 matched controls without significant illness from the Nottingham Children's Hospital. The 20 ill children will have their CRT (and PaedCEW score) monitored before, during and after admission to PICU. This will allow correlation with invasive (BP, central venous oxygen saturations, lactate) and noninvasive (CRT, heart rate, cardiac output) measures of cardiovascular status during periods of stability and compromise. Matched controls will be monitored for around 24 hours. This pilot study will allow development of our system.

This is a proof of concept study. This study aims to demonstrate a novel device for measuring CRT. Its correlation with noninvasive measures of cardiovascular status will enable a pragmatic comparison with current clinical practice. In addition, correlation with invasive measures of cardiovascular status will enable us to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV).

Read the detailed description

Following recruitment, patients will have two devices placed on their skin, one on a limb (e.g. forearm), and one on their chest. They will be fixed to the skin using medical adhesive tape. The devices will be left on for around 1 hour on the "well patients" who are on a general paediatric ward. At the end of this time a member of the research team will remove the devices.

For patients going to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) the devices will be used to gather the CRT data before admission (where possible), during and following discharge from the PICU. The PICU participants will have the device left on during their stay, with the agreement of the clinical team caring for the patient, with the device being resited every 4-6 hours as is normal practice for medical devices attached to the skin. Data will be collected in this way during the PICU stay (which is typically 2-3 days) or until the patient is transferred to the general ward. Before they go home, these participants will be monitored again for up to an hour with the CRT devices to obtain data when they are well.

Collecting data in this way should allow us to show that our CRT device can detect a 30% difference in perfusion between the well and the unwell patient. By comparing well patient to unwell patient, and by comparing unwell patient, with themselves when well. For each participant we will collect routine demographic details, medical history details, Fitzpatrick skin colour assessment (that is their skin tone according to a recognised scale), height, weight and vital signs. Where taken, we will collect clinically relevant data in relation to the treatment received and results of clinical investigations for correlation with our device data. Patients on the PICU will have noninvasive measures of perfusion performed by the clinical team. The research team will also perform these at agreed times suitable to the care of the patient. This will include capillary refill and ultrasound assessment of blood flow (cardiac output).

We will also conduct a semistructured interview with the patient and/or their parents/carer at the time of the study to gain feedback on the device. This should take about 15 minutes and will take the form of a semistructured interview. We will also seek user (i.e. healthcare professionals) feedback on the device and the accompanying GUI using a semistructured interview (approximately 15 minutes).

Keywords
capillary refill, paediatric early warning score, photoplethysmography
Medical subject headings
Toxemia, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02208817
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ill patientsIll patients who require Paediatric Intensive Care or Paediatric High Dependency Care
Well ControlsMatched controls who are well (PEWS<3)
Parent feedbackFeedback from parents/carers of children recruited into the PRefill study
Healthcare professionals feedbackFeedback from healthcare professionals who have cared for a child with the device on

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Detect a 30% difference in measured CRT value between well children (PEWS <3, with normal perfusion) and unwell children (PEWS ≥3, with reduced perfusion).

    Measured: Exit from study; Well patients within 1-2 hours; Unwell patients after leaving PICU average 3 days

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. i.Feedback on acceptability of the device from patients, carers/parents, and healthcare professionals, and feedback on the graphical user interface (GUI) from healthcare professionals.

    Measured: on completion of feedback, 30 minutes

  2. ii. Correlation of automated CRT results with vital cardiovascular clinical observations and tests - both invasive and non-invasive.

    Measured: During study phase average 3 days

  3. iii. Correlation of automated CRT results with treatments supporting the cardiovascular and neurological system

    Measured: during study phase average 3 days

  4. CRT in well compared with unwell patients

    Measured: Grouped at end of study 12 months

  5. CRT changes with age and ethnicity in well children

    Measured: grouped at end of study 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02208817
Sponsor's protocol ID
14021
Other IDs
MRK0076101
Acronym
PRefill
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
14 Jul 2014
Last updated
19 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Septicaemia and Deformity of Spine, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Detect a 30% difference in measured CRT value between well children (PEWS <3, with normal perfusion) and unwell children (PEWS ≥3, with reduced perfusion). (time frame: Exit from study; Well patients within 1-2 hours; Unwell patients after leaving PICU average 3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in