Peripheral Vascular DiseasePhase 4BIOLUX 4EVERNCT02211664
Physician-Initiated Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Stenotic Disease With the Biotronik Passeo-18 Lux Drug Releasing Balloon and the Biotronik Pulsar-18 Stent (Comparing With 4EVER Trial Results)
A Phase 4 study testing Passeo-18 balloon, Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon and Pulsar-18 stent in people with Peripheral Vascular Disease, run by Flanders Medical Research Program at 5 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the short- and long-term (up to 24 months) outcome of treatment by means of dilation with the Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon and by Pulsar-18 stent implantation in symptomatic (Rutherford 2-4) femoro-popliteal arterial stenotic or occlusive lesions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Vascular Disease
- What is being tested?
- Passeo-18 balloon, Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon and Pulsar-18 stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- General Inclusion Criteria:
- De novo lesions located in the femoropopliteal arteries suitable for endovascular treatment
- Patient presenting with a score from 2 to 4 according to the Rutherford classification
- Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the predefined time intervals time
- Patients is >18 years old
- Patient understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrollment in the study
Show all 13Show fewer
- Prior to enrollment, the target lesion was crossed with standard guidewire manipulation
- Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
- The target lesions are located within the native SFA: distal point 3 cm above knee joint and 1 cm below the origin of the profunda femoralis
- The target lesion has angiographic evidence of stenosis >50% or occlusion
- Length of the target lesion is ≤ 19 cm by visual estimation and can be covered with one stent
- Target vessel diameter visually estimated is ≥4 mm and ≤6 mm
- There is angiographic evidence of at least one-vessel-runoff to the foot
Who cannot join
- Presence of another stent in the target vessel that was placed during a previous procedure
- Presence of an aortic thrombosis or significant common femoral ipsilateral stenosis
- Previous bypass surgery in the same limb
- Patients contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytics
- Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus at the target lesion site
- Perforation at the angioplasty site evidenced by extravasation of contrast medium
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium
- Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders
- Female patient with child bearing potential not taking adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding
- Life expectancy of less than 12 months
- Ipsilateral iliac artery treatment before target lesion treatment with a residual stenosis > 30%
- Use of thrombectomy, atherectomy or laser devices during procedure
- Any planned surgical intervention/procedure 30 days after the study procedure
- Any patient considered to be hemodynamically unstable at onset of procedure
- Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached the primary endpoint
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Belgium5 sites
OLV Hospital
Aalst, 9300
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden, 2820
AZ Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, 9200
University Hospital Antwerp
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650
RZ Heilig Hart Hospital
Tienen, 3300
About this study
The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the short- and long-term (up to 24 months) outcome of treatment by means of dilation with the Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon and by Pulsar-18 stent implantation in symptomatic (Rutherford 2-4) femoro-popliteal arterial stenotic or occlusive lesions.
Read the detailed description
Ever since its introduction, one of the major limitations of endovascular therapy is the occurrence of restenosis after treatment. Factors contributing to loss of primary patency after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) due to balloon injury are negative arterial remodeling, excessive neointimal proliferation and elastic recoil. In order to increase sustained vessel patency, systemic medication administration and brachytherapy have been proposed, but have not led to any success. With the introduction of stents, patency rates have been optimized also on longer term. However, neointimal hyperplasia after endovascular stent placement in infra-inguinal arteries remains a major limiting issue. Stents themselves contribute to this excessive intimal formation because of the vascular response to the metallic prosthesis. In order to find a solution to overcome this limitation, the possibilities of drug-eluting technologies are being examined.
Current concepts include drug-eluting stents (DES), which provide sustained release of anti-proliferative medication into the vessel wall. The application of a drug coating on a stent surface inhibits the inflammatory response and smooth muscle cell proliferation in the vessel wall during a certain period and delays the process of intimal hyperplasia. Thus, DES technology was developed to prevent early restenosis and late luminal loss to potentially improve long-term patency rates. Because DES with active stent coatings have shown to be beneficial in the treatment of coronary artery disease, the technique of active stent coatings (sirolimus or paclitaxel) as commonly used in coronary interventions was transferred to the infrainguinal vascular bed. However, an active stent coating (sirolimus or paclitaxel) only inhibits the inflammatory response and smooth muscle cell proliferation in the vessel wall for a certain period; in fact, it merely delays the process of intimal hyperplasia as demonstrated by the 2-year results of the SIROCCO study.
Another novel way of inhibiting restenosis after PTA is the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB), which inhibit restenosis by an immediate local release of medication during the intervention. The rationale behind the use of DCBs is based on the finding that sustained drug elution is not a necessary to obtain a sustained inhibition of restenosis. The concept of using a balloon with medication to treat vascular disease was introduced in 2003 by Scheller et al.
One of the most commonly used drugs for arterial applications is the anti-proliferative paclitaxel (Taxol), which impedes cell division in the cell cycle. Paclitaxel has certain characteristics which make it a promising candidate for treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Because it is hydrophobic, paclitaxel does not require the use of a polymer to prevent wash-off during tracking or implantation. Adequate drug delivery to the vessel wall is possible because of its lipophilic characteristic, which enables paclitaxel to interact with the high concentrations of lipids present in the vessel wall and avoids the need for a polymer. Results of preclinical and clinical studies have shown that short-term exposure to Paclitaxel may suffice to obtain a sustained reduction in late lumen loss and avoid restenosis in both coronary and peripheral arteries: in contrast to stents, DCBs do not leave any residual material in the artery lumen that could trigger neointimal proliferation, thus making DCBs an attractive alternative to stents, especially in challenging arterial anatomies. Further investigation is warranted in order to obtain conclusive data. Furthermore, the benefit of treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the peripheral arteries with DCBs has yet to be investigated, although limited data is already available to date.
The clinical value of these drug-eluting technologies has been proven repeatedly in the coronary arteries, and evidence of therapeutic applications to peripheral artery disease is starting to build. It is the intent of this prospective study to evaluate the treatment of a drug-coated balloon followed by stent implant and comparing this to the results of the 4EVER trial and results in the literature.
- Conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Being tested
- Passeo-18 balloon, Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon, Pulsar-18 stent
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Vascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Passeo-18 balloonDevice
Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloonDevice
Pulsar-18 stentDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Passeo-18-Lux & Pulsar-18 | Experimental | The interventional procedure sequence consists of the following steps:
1. pre-dilation of the lesion with a Passeo-18 balloon (mandatory)
2. dilation of the lesion with a Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon (mandatory); a maximum of 2 Passeo-18 Lux balloons can be used per lesion (drug load cannot exceed 12µg)
3. stenting of the lesion with a Pulsar-18 stent (mandatory)
4. post-dilation of the lesion with a Passeo-18 balloon (not mandatory) Receives: Device: Passeo-18 balloon; Device: Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon; Device: Pulsar-18 stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary patency at 12 months
Defined as freedom from >50% restenosis as indicated by an independently verified duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) <2.5 in the target vessel with no reintervention.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Technical success
Defined as the ability to cross and stent the lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% and residual stenosis less than 50% by duplex imaging.
Measured: 1 day post-op
Procedural success
Defined as the ability to perform the procedure as stated in the protocol, with the Biotronik portfolio.
Measured: 1 day post-op
Number of puncture site complications
Measured: 1 day post-op
Compression time
In patients when manual compression is applied to close the puncture site (instead of a closure device).
Measured: 1 day post-op
Primary patency rate at 1-month follow-up
Defined as freedom from >50% restenosis as indicated by an independently verified duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) <2.5 in the target vessel with no re-intervention.
Measured: 1 month
Primary patency rate at 6- and 24-month follow-up
Defined as freedom from >50% restenosis as indicated on a duplex ultrasound with peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) <2.5 in the target vessel with no re-intervention.
Measured: 6 and 24 months
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Defined as a repeat intervention to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal an distal to the treated lesion edge.
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
Clinical success at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification.
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Changes in ABI measurements at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months
Defined as the ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement difference at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months compared to the pre-procedure ABI measurement.
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Serious Adverse Events
Measured: up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2017
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral Vascular DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Flanders Medical Research Program
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02211664
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FMRP-120130
- Acronym
- BIOLUX 4EVER
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Deloose K, Bosiers M, Peeters P, Verbist J, Maene L, Beelen R, Keirse K, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, Wauters J, Verschueren M. Combining the Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon and the Pulsar-18 Bare Metal Stent: 12- and 24-Month Outcomes of the BIOLUX 4EVER Investigator-Initiated Trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Dec;27(6):936-945. doi: 10.1177/1526602820952413. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
PubMed 32873131
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physician-Initiated Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Stenotic Disease With the Biotronik Passeo-18 Lux Drug Releasing Balloon and the Biotronik Pulsar-18 Stent (Comparing With 4EVER Trial Results)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02211664
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIOLUX 4EVER / FMRP-120130
- Conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Flanders Medical Research ProgramResearch network
- Study start
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the short- and long-term (up to 24 months) outcome of treatment by means of dilation with the Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon and by Pulsar-18 stent implantation in symptomatic (Rutherford 2-4) femoro-popliteal arterial stenotic or occlusive lesions.
Detailed description
Ever since its introduction, one of the major limitations of endovascular therapy is the occurrence of restenosis after treatment. Factors contributing to loss of primary patency after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) due to balloon injury are negative arterial remodeling, excessive neointimal proliferation and elastic recoil. In order to increase sustained vessel patency, systemic medication administration and brachytherapy have been proposed, but have not led to any success. With the introduction of stents, patency rates have been optimized also on longer term. However, neointimal hyperplasia after endovascular stent placement in infra-inguinal arteries remains a major limiting issue. Stents themselves contribute to this excessive intimal formation because of the vascular response to the metallic prosthesis. In order to find a solution to overcome this limitation, the possibilities of drug-eluting technologies are being examined.
Current concepts include drug-eluting stents (DES), which provide sustained release of anti-proliferative medication into the vessel wall. The application of a drug coating on a stent surface inhibits the inflammatory response and smooth muscle cell proliferation in the vessel wall during a certain period and delays the process of intimal hyperplasia. Thus, DES technology was developed to prevent early restenosis and late luminal loss to potentially improve long-term patency rates. Because DES with active stent coatings have shown to be beneficial in the treatment of coronary artery disease, the technique of active stent coatings (sirolimus or paclitaxel) as commonly used in coronary interventions was transferred to the infrainguinal vascular bed. However, an active stent coating (sirolimus or paclitaxel) only inhibits the inflammatory response and smooth muscle cell proliferation in the vessel wall for a certain period; in fact, it merely delays the process of intimal hyperplasia as demonstrated by the 2-year results of the SIROCCO study.
Another novel way of inhibiting restenosis after PTA is the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB), which inhibit restenosis by an immediate local release of medication during the intervention. The rationale behind the use of DCBs is based on the finding that sustained drug elution is not a necessary to obtain a sustained inhibition of restenosis. The concept of using a balloon with medication to treat vascular disease was introduced in 2003 by Scheller et al.
One of the most commonly used drugs for arterial applications is the anti-proliferative paclitaxel (Taxol), which impedes cell division in the cell cycle. Paclitaxel has certain characteristics which make it a promising candidate for treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Because it is hydrophobic, paclitaxel does not require the use of a polymer to prevent wash-off during tracking or implantation. Adequate drug delivery to the vessel wall is possible because of its lipophilic characteristic, which enables paclitaxel to interact with the high concentrations of lipids present in the vessel wall and avoids the need for a polymer. Results of preclinical and clinical studies have shown that short-term exposure to Paclitaxel may suffice to obtain a sustained reduction in late lumen loss and avoid restenosis in both coronary and peripheral arteries: in contrast to stents, DCBs do not leave any residual material in the artery lumen that could trigger neointimal proliferation, thus making DCBs an attractive alternative to stents, especially in challenging arterial anatomies. Further investigation is warranted in order to obtain conclusive data. Furthermore, the benefit of treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the peripheral arteries with DCBs has yet to be investigated, although limited data is already available to date.
The clinical value of these drug-eluting technologies has been proven repeatedly in the coronary arteries, and evidence of therapeutic applications to peripheral artery disease is starting to build. It is the intent of this prospective study to evaluate the treatment of a drug-coated balloon followed by stent implant and comparing this to the results of the 4EVER trial and results in the literature.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Passeo-18-Lux & Pulsar-18 | Experimental | Device: Passeo-18 balloon, Device: Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon, Device: Pulsar-18 stentThe interventional procedure sequence consists of the following steps: 1. pre-dilation of the lesion with a Passeo-18 balloon (mandatory) 2. dilation of the lesion with a Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon (mandatory); a maximum of 2 Passeo-18 Lux balloons can be used per lesion (drug load cannot exceed 12µg) 3. stenting of the lesion with a Pulsar-18 stent (mandatory) 4. post-dilation of the lesion with a Passeo-18 balloon (not mandatory) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- General Inclusion Criteria:
- Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Presence of another stent in the target vessel that was placed during a previous procedure
- Presence of an aortic thrombosis or significant common femoral ipsilateral stenosis
- Previous bypass surgery in the same limb
- Patients contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytics
- Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus at the target lesion site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Passeo-18 balloon | Device | Passeo-18-Lux & Pulsar-18 |
| Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon | Device | Passeo-18-Lux & Pulsar-18 |
| Pulsar-18 stent | Device | Passeo-18-Lux & Pulsar-18 |
Primary outcome
Primary patency at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Defined as freedom from >50% restenosis as indicated by an independently verified duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) <2.5 in the target vessel with no reintervention.
10 secondary outcomes
Technical success
Time frame: 1 day post-op
Procedural success
Time frame: 1 day post-op
Number of puncture site complications
Time frame: 1 day post-op
Compression time
Time frame: 1 day post-op
Primary patency rate at 1-month follow-up
Time frame: 1 month
Primary patency rate at 6- and 24-month follow-up
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
Clinical success at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Changes in ABI measurements at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 months
Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: up to 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32873131Deloose K, Bosiers M, Peeters P, Verbist J, Maene L, Beelen R, Keirse K, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, Wauters J, Verschueren M. Combining the Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon and the Pulsar-18 Bare Metal Stent: 12- and 24-Month Outcomes of the BIOLUX 4EVER Investigator-Initiated Trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Dec;27(6):936-945. doi: 10.1177/1526602820952413. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Related trials for Peripheral Vascular Disease
Active, not recruiting
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Passeo-18 balloon, Passeo-18 Lux drug releasing balloon and Pulsar-18 stent in people with Peripheral Vascular Disease, run by Flanders Medical Research Program at 5 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary patency at 12 months (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02211664, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2018.