Early Primary Breast CancerPhase 3NCT02214381
A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label 12 Week Neoadjuvant Phase II Trial Optimizing Taxane Therapy in Elderly Patients With Low Response
A Phase 3 study testing Myocet, Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel in people with Early Primary Breast Cancer, run by Women's Cancer Study Group GmbH at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Comparison of pre-surgical Myocet/ Cyclophosphamide (MC) q3w followed by either MC or Paclitaxel - depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or by toxicity for elderly non frail primary breast cancer patients with increased risk of relapse. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Primary Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Myocet, Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to 15 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
General Inclusion Criteria for ADAPT:
- Female patients, age at diagnosis 18 years and above (consider patients at 70 years and above for ADAPT Elderly)
- Candidate for chemotherapy on the basis of conventional criteria
- Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast
- Clinical T1 - T4a-c
- All clinical N (cN)
- No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (M0)
- Known HR status and HER2 status (local pathology)
- Tumor block available for central pathology review
- Performance Status ECOG <= 1 or KI >= 80%
- Written informed consent prior to beginning specific protocol procedures, including expected cooperation of the patients for the treatment and follow-up, must be obtained and documented according to the local regulatory requirements
- The patient must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
- Patients must qualify for neoadjuvant treatment
- LVEF > 50%; LVEF within normal limits of each institution measured by echocardiography and normal ECG (within 42 days prior to chemotherapy)
- Laboratory requirements :
- Leucocytes ≥ 3.5 x 109/L
- Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L
- Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1 x ULN
- ASAT (SGOT) and ALAT (SGPT) ≤ 2.5 x UNL
- Creatinine ≤ 175 µmol/L (2 mg/dl)
Additional inclusion criteria ADAPT Elderly:
- ≥ 70 years old
- Charlson scale ≤ 2
- HR+/HER2- disease: if RS and sequential testing are available N0-1/RS 12-25/poor response or N0-1/RS ≥26
- All G3 with Ki-67 ≥40% in tumors >1cm
- All N2
- All TN
- All subtypes
General Exclusion Criteria for ADAPT:
- Known hypersensitivity reaction to the compounds or incorporated substances
- Prior malignancy with a disease-free survival of < 10 years, except curatively treated basalioma of the skin, pTis of the cervix uteri
- Non-operable breast cancer including inflammatory breast cancer
- Previous or concurrent treatment with cytotoxic agents for any reason after consultation with the sponsor
- Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs. Participation in another clinical trial with any investigational not marketed drug within 30 days prior to study entry (concurrent participation in non-interventional post authorization safety studies not influencing the primary study endpoints is allowed, e.g. WSG PROTROCA for evaluation of primary/secondary G-CSF prophylaxis)
- Male breast cancer
- Sequential breast cancer
- Reasons indicating risk of poor compliance
- Patient not able to consent
Additional Exclusion Criteria ADAPT Elderly:
- Known polyneuropathy ≥ grade 2
- Severe and relevant co-morbidity that would interact with the application of cytotoxic agents or the participation in the study
- Inadequate organ function (e.g. hepatic impairment, pulmonary disease, etc.)
- Uncompensated cardiac function (current unstable ventricular arrhythmia requiring treatment, history of symptomatic CHF NYHA classes II-IV), history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within 12 months of enrollment, history of severe hypertension, CAD - coronary artery disease)
- Severe dyspnea
- Pneumonitis
- Abnormal blood values:
- Thrombocytopenia > CTCAE grade 1
- Increases in ALT/AST > CTCAE grade 1
- Hypokalaemia > CTCAE grade 1
- Neutropenia > CTCAE grade 1
- Anaemia > CTCAE grade 1
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites
Ev. Krankenhaus Bethesda Brustzentrum Niederrhein
Mönchengladbach, 41061
Breast Center of the University of Munich (LMU) Universitätsfrauenklinik Großhadern
Munich, 81337
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Comparison of Pre-surgical Myocet/ Cyclophosphamide (MC) q3w Followed by Either MC or Paclitaxel - Depending on Early Response Assessment by Ultrasound or by Toxicity for Elderly Non Frail Primary Breast Cancer Patients With Increased Risk of Relapse.
Comparison of pre-surgical Myocet/ Cyclophosphamide (MC) q3w followed by either MC or Paclitaxel - depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or by toxicity for elderly non frail primary breast cancer patients with increased risk of relapse.
- Conditions
- Early Primary Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Myocet, Cyclophosphamide, Paclitaxel
- Keywords
- breast cancer, elderly
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MyocetDrug
Also called Doxorubicin
CyclophosphamideDrug
PaclitaxelDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mycet/Cyclophosphamid | Active comparator | 4 x Myocet 60 mg/m² q3w in combination with 4 x cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² q3w depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or on toxicity profile. Receives: Drug: Myocet; Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
| Myocet/Cyclophosphamide/Paclitaxel | Active comparator | 2 x Myocet 60 mg/m² q3w in combination with 2 x cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² q3w followed by 6 x paclitaxel 80 mg/m² q1w depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or on toxicity profile. Receives: Drug: Myocet; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of pCR rates in patients with early response and no severe toxicity (Group 1) and in other patients (Group 2).
Measured: After 5 years of follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) after 1 x MC in patients with primary prophylaxis (PP) vs. others.
Measured: After 5 years of follow-up.
Toxicity in the 4 x MC versus 2 x MC followed 6 x Pac arm as measured by adverse events.
Measured: After 5 years of follow-up.
Number of pCR in non-responders to MC.
Measured: After 5 years of follow-up.
G-CSF use in terms of primary or secondary prophylaxis per patient including occurence febrile neutropenia per patient per cycle
Measured: After 5 years of follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completion15 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Early Primary Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Women's Cancer Study Group GmbH
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nadia Harbeck, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Breast Center of the University of Munich (LMU) Universitätsfrauenklinik Großhadern, Munich, GermanyUlrike Nitz, Prof. Dr., Study chair, Ev. Krankenhaus Bethesda Brustzentrum Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02214381
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WSG-AM06 / ADAPT Elderly
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Comparison of Pre-surgical Myocet/ Cyclophosphamide (MC) q3w Followed by Either MC or Paclitaxel - Depending on Early Response Assessment by Ultrasound or by Toxicity for Elderly Non Frail Primary Breast Cancer Patients With Increased Risk of Relapse.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02214381
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WSG-AM06 / ADAPT Elderly
- Conditions
- Early Primary Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- breast cancer, elderly
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Women's Cancer Study Group GmbHUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA
- Study start
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparison of pre-surgical Myocet/ Cyclophosphamide (MC) q3w followed by either MC or Paclitaxel - depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or by toxicity for elderly non frail primary breast cancer patients with increased risk of relapse.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mycet/Cyclophosphamid | Active comparator | Drug: Myocet, Drug: Cyclophosphamide4 x Myocet 60 mg/m² q3w in combination with 4 x cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² q3w depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or on toxicity profile. |
| Myocet/Cyclophosphamide/Paclitaxel | Active comparator | Drug: Myocet, Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Drug: Paclitaxel2 x Myocet 60 mg/m² q3w in combination with 2 x cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² q3w followed by 6 x paclitaxel 80 mg/m² q1w depending on early response assessment by ultrasound or on toxicity profile. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MyocetAlso: Doxorubicin | Drug | Mycet/Cyclophosphamid, Myocet/Cyclophosphamide/Paclitaxel |
| Cyclophosphamide | Drug | Mycet/Cyclophosphamid, Myocet/Cyclophosphamide/Paclitaxel |
| Paclitaxel | Drug | Myocet/Cyclophosphamide/Paclitaxel |
Primary outcome
Comparison of pCR rates in patients with early response and no severe toxicity (Group 1) and in other patients (Group 2).
Time frame: After 5 years of follow-up.
4 secondary outcomes
Incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) after 1 x MC in patients with primary prophylaxis (PP) vs. others.
Time frame: After 5 years of follow-up.
Toxicity in the 4 x MC versus 2 x MC followed 6 x Pac arm as measured by adverse events.
Time frame: After 5 years of follow-up.
Number of pCR in non-responders to MC.
Time frame: After 5 years of follow-up.
G-CSF use in terms of primary or secondary prophylaxis per patient including occurence febrile neutropenia per patient per cycle
Time frame: After 5 years of follow-up.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2025.
Related trials for Early Primary Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Breast MRI for Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Thuringia
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Ketorolac and Pregabalin Effects on breaSt Cancer (KePreSt)
Early-stage Breast Cancer, Estrogen-receptor-positive Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Reexamining Her Cardiovascular Risk - Ottawa WomeN's Longitudinal Cohort Study
Cardiovascular Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nadia Harbeck, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Breast Center of the University of Munich (LMU) Universitätsfrauenklinik Großhadern, Munich, Germany
Ulrike Nitz, Prof. Dr. study chair
Ev. Krankenhaus Bethesda Brustzentrum Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Myocet, Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel in people with Early Primary Breast Cancer, run by Women's Cancer Study Group GmbH at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of pCR rates in patients with early response and no severe toxicity (Group 1) and in other patients (Group 2). (time frame: After 5 years of follow-up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2025.