Knee OsteoarthritisNCT02237989
Effects Of Native Collagen Type 2 Treatment
A study testing paracetamol and paracetamol+native collagen type 2 in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Eskisehir Osmangazi University.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate symptomatic efficacy of native collagen type 2 on joint pain and function and its effects on urinary biological markers related to cartilage degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- paracetamol and paracetamol+native collagen type 2
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria:Patients aged 45-70 years with the diagnosis of primary knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, Kellgren Lawrence radiological stage II or III and knee pain -
Exclusion Criteria:Patients with intraarticular injections or physical therapy within the last year, a previous lower extremity surgery, oral treatment with glucosamine chondroitin or other natural health products within the last month, serious concomitant systemic diseases, peripheral or central neurological disorder, hypersensitivity to paracetamol or se¬vere cardiac, renal, hepatic, hematologic disease
-
About this study
Official title: Effects Of Native Collagen Type 2 Treatment In Knee Osteoarthritis : A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this study was to evaluate symptomatic efficacy of native collagen type 2 on joint pain and function and its effects on urinary biological markers related to cartilage degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Read the detailed description
39 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were separated into two groups. The 1st group includes 19 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol, the 2nd group consists of 20 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol and 10mg/day native collagen type 2 for three months.Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analog Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 20-m walking time and Short Form-36 (SF-36), Coll2-1, Coll2-1NO2 and Fibulin-3 levels in urine were compared.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- paracetamol, paracetamol+native collagen type 2
- Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis, native collagen type 2, paracetamol
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
paracetamolDrug
1500 mg
paracetamol+native collagen type 2Drug
paracetamol (1500 mg) + native collagen type 2 (10mg)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| paracetamol | Active comparator | The 1st group includes 19 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol for three months Receives: Drug: paracetamol |
| native collagen type 2 + paracetamol | Experimental | The 2nd group consists of 20 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol and 10mg/day native collagen type 2 for three months Receives: Drug: paracetamol+native collagen type 2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the Change From Baseline in Pain During Walking Visual Analog Scale (VAS Walking)
Post treatment comparison of VAS walking between the groups minimum score is 0, maximum score is 10. The clinic of the patient worses when the score increases.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
the Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total Score
Post treatment comparison of WOMAC between the groups minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. The clinic of the patient worses when the score increases.
Measured: 3 months
the Change From Baseline in 20 Meters Walking Time
Post treatment comparison of 20 meters walking time between the groups When the time increases, clinical of the patient worses
Measured: 3 months
the Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 / Bodily Pain Subgroup
Post treatment comparison of short form 36-bodily pain between groups minimum score 0 maximum score 100 When the score increases, clinic of patient gets better
Measured: 3 months
the Change From Baseline in Coll2-1 Levels
Post treatment comparison of Coll2-1 levels between groups
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Onur Armağan, Eskisehir Osmangazi University
- Investigators
- Fulya Bakilan, Specialist, Study director, Yerkoy State Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02237989
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FY2001
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bakilan F, Armagan O, Ozgen M, Tascioglu F, Bolluk O, Alatas O. Effects of Native Type II Collagen Treatment on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eurasian J Med. 2016 Jun;48(2):95-101. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2015.15030.
PubMed 27551171
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects Of Native Collagen Type 2 Treatment In Knee Osteoarthritis : A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02237989
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FY2001
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis, native collagen type 2, paracetamol
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to evaluate symptomatic efficacy of native collagen type 2 on joint pain and function and its effects on urinary biological markers related to cartilage degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Detailed description
39 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were separated into two groups. The 1st group includes 19 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol, the 2nd group consists of 20 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol and 10mg/day native collagen type 2 for three months.Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analog Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 20-m walking time and Short Form-36 (SF-36), Coll2-1, Coll2-1NO2 and Fibulin-3 levels in urine were compared.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| paracetamol | Active comparator | Drug: paracetamolThe 1st group includes 19 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol for three months |
| native collagen type 2 + paracetamol | Experimental | Drug: paracetamol+native collagen type 2The 2nd group consists of 20 patients given 1500mg/day paracetamol and 10mg/day native collagen type 2 for three months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| paracetamol1500 mg | Drug | paracetamol |
| paracetamol+native collagen type 2paracetamol (1500 mg) + native collagen type 2 (10mg) | Drug | native collagen type 2 + paracetamol |
Primary outcome
the Change From Baseline in Pain During Walking Visual Analog Scale (VAS Walking)
Time frame: 3 months
Post treatment comparison of VAS walking between the groups minimum score is 0, maximum score is 10. The clinic of the patient worses when the score increases.
4 secondary outcomes
the Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total Score
Time frame: 3 months
the Change From Baseline in 20 Meters Walking Time
Time frame: 3 months
the Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 / Bodily Pain Subgroup
Time frame: 3 months
the Change From Baseline in Coll2-1 Levels
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27551171Bakilan F, Armagan O, Ozgen M, Tascioglu F, Bolluk O, Alatas O. Effects of Native Type II Collagen Treatment on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eurasian J Med. 2016 Jun;48(2):95-101. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2015.15030.
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fulya Bakilan, Specialist study director
Yerkoy State Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing paracetamol and paracetamol+native collagen type 2 in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Eskisehir Osmangazi University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the Change From Baseline in Pain During Walking Visual Analog Scale (VAS Walking) (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02237989, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.