AzTrials
AzTrials

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, AtypicalDEPISTRECNCT02244450

Generalized Neonatal Screening of Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies

A study testing SCID screening in people with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical, run by Nantes University Hospital at 51 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Severe combined Immunodeficiencies ( SCID ) are a group of inherited diseases of the immune system by characterised profound abnormalities of T cell development . Infants with SCID require prompt clinical response to Prevent life -threatening infection and studies show significantly improved survival in babies… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 days to 18 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
SCID screening
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
190,539 participants
Where
51 sitesFrance
Study dates
Dec 2014to 28 Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 days to 18 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Screening Group: Newborn on day 3 of birth (premature and non premature)
  • Control group: Patients diagnosed with SCID without screening at participating centers

Who cannot join

  • Lack of parental consent
  • Children whose parents are adults under guardianship,
  • Children without health insurance, for the screening group:
  • The early exit of the child from the maternity hospital

Trial locations and contacts

51 sites in 1 country.

51 sites in 1 country

France51 sites
  • Angers Private Hospital Clinique de l'Anjou

    Angers

  • Angers University Hospital

    Angers

  • Argenteuil Hospital

    Argenteuil

  • Aulnay-sous-Bois Hospital CHI Robert Ballanger

    Aulnay-sous-Bois

  • Bordeaux Maison de Santé Protestante Bordeaux Bagatelle

    Bordeaux

  • Bordeaux Private Hospital Polyclinique Bordeuax Nord Aquitaine

    Bordeaux

  • Bordeaux University Hospital

    Bordeaux

  • Corbeil Essonnes Hospital Sud Francilien

    Corbeil-Essonnes

  • Créteil Hospital

    Créteil

  • Dijon University Hospital

    Dijon

  • Grenoble University Hospital

    Grenoble

  • Le Blanc Mesnil Private Hospital

    Le Blanc-Mesnil

  • Lens Hospital

    Lens

  • Libourne Maternity Hospital

    Libourne

  • Lille University Hospital

    Lille

  • Lormont Maternity Hospital Rive Droite

    Lormont

  • Lyon Maternity Hospital

    Lyon

  • Lyon University Hospital

    Lyon

  • Marseille Saint-Joseph Hospital

    Marseille

  • Marseille University Hospital La Conception

    Marseille

  • Marseille University Hospital Nord

    Marseille

  • Marseille University Hospital

    Marseille

  • Meaux Hospital

    Meaux

  • Montreuil Hospital CHI André Grégroie

    Montreuil

  • Nantes University Hospital

    Nantes, 44000

  • Nantes Private Hospital Clinique Jules Verne

    Nantes

  • Nantes University Hospital

    Nantes

  • Paris Hospital Saint-Joseph

    Paris

  • Paris Necker University Hospital

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Armand-Trousseau

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Bichat

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Bicêtre

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Béclère

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Jean Verdier

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital La Pitié Salpétrière

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Louis Mourier

    Paris

  • Paris University Hospital Necker

    Paris

  • Poissy Hospital CHI Poissy-Saint-Germain

    Poissy

  • Pontoise Hospital René Dubos

    Pontoise

  • Rennes Private Hospital Clinique Mutualiste La Sagesse

    Rennes

  • Rennes University Hospital

    Rennes

  • Saint-Grégoire Private Hospital

    Rennes

  • Roubaix Hospital

    Roubaix

  • Saint-Herblain Private Hospital Polyclinique de l'Atlantique

    Saint-Herblain

  • Saint-Mande Army Hospital Begin

    Saint-Mandé

  • Saint-Martin-d'Hère Private Hospital Clinique Belledonne

    Saint-Martin-d'Hères

  • Strasbourg Private Hospital Clinique Adassa

    Strasbourg

  • Strasbourg University Hospital

    Strasbourg

  • Toulouse Private Hospital Clinique Sarrus Teinturiers

    Toulouse

  • Toulouse University Hospital P. DE VIGUIER

    Toulouse

  • Toulouse University Hospital

    Toulouse

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Clinical Utility and Cost Effectiveness Ratio of Generalized Neonatal Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies (SCID) by Quantification of TRECs on Guthrie Cards

Severe combined Immunodeficiencies ( SCID ) are a group of inherited diseases of the immune system by characterised profound abnormalities of T cell development . Infants with SCID require prompt clinical response to Prevent life -threatening infection and studies show significantly improved survival in babies Diagnosed at birth as a result of previous family history . SCID follows criteria for population -based newborn screening since it is asymptomatic at birth and fatal within the first year of life, the confirmation of the disease is easy, there is a curative treatment , and it is known that early stem cell transplantation improves survival . Quantification of TRECs (T- cell receptor excision circles ) in DNA extracted from Guthrie samples is a sensitive screening test for Specific and SCID .

The investigators propose in this study to perform a neonatal screening of SCID , in a population of 200,000 babies over a period of two years .

The investigators propose to study the clinical utility and cost effectiveness ratio, and SCID screening to demonstrate that could result in a broad benefit to Individuals detected , making screening relatively cost-effective in spite of the low incidence of the disease .

Read the detailed description

The project proposes to study the feasibility and cost-effectiveness ratio ( time management and life expectancy to 10 years) of generalized neonatal screening for SCID children by offering this screening to 200 000 children (100 000 children per year) over the entire territory. Prospective control group consists of children diagnosed with SCID out of 700,000 annual births who do not benefit from screening.

The protocol will be leant against the existing newborn screening , that is to say two more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. Eleven newborn screening regional associations will be involved with the inclusion of children in about 50 maternity hospitals. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized in two laboratories instead of eleven laboratories assigned to RA . Investigative Regional Associations (RAs) represent nearly 600,000 births / year and the amount of 200,000 children will be achieved in two years (duration of inclusion) . All children born in the participating maternity may be included if they meet the inclusion criteria. The result of the screening test for SCID will be available within 21 days after birth, provided that there is no need to request a new sample.

At each of eleven RA is associated a pediatrician referent for immune deficiencies, member of the french reference center (CEREDIH) and who will be responsible to call the parents, offer them a consultation and further exploration if the result of screening is assumed positive.

Analysis of cards from 200,000 children will give the following information:

  • Number of children with a presumptive positive screening , requiring a call by the referent pediatrician, consultation and exploration of lymphocyte subpopulations
  • Number of children with a negative screening
  • Number of children with an inconclusive screening (lack of TRECs and lack of amplification of the reference gene) and requiring a new card,

A micro- costing study will be conducted to assess the cost of testing .

This group of 200,000 children is the experimental group to assess the cost of screening , acceptability by parents (participation rate), the recall rate for abnormal or inconclusive result, the rate of follow-up time for results , the incidence of disease . It will also allow to calculate the specificity of the method .

At the end of the inclusions, the vital status at 18 months with cause of death will be sought for the 200 000 children included , with the CESP ( Centre de Recherche en Epidemiologie et Santé des Populations) via RNIPP (Répertoire National d'Identification des Personnes Physiques) and CepiDc ( Centre d'Epidémiologie sur les causes médicales de décès) . This will establish whether there are SCID in this population which were not detected at birth. Furthermore, the investigators include in the study SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP (including Necker main transplant center) . This will enable to approach the sensitivity of the method . All these data allow the calculation of the predictive values of the test.

In this experimental group will be isolated a group of individuals who screened positive and diagnosed as true SCID . Clinical data for these patients will be collected in an electronic CRF ( CRF ) by the pediatrician referral protocol (Dr Thomas C ) , including:

  • The dates and results of explorations : lymphocyte subpopulations , blood count, determination of immunoglobulin levels
  • The diagnosis made with identification of the genetic defect
  • The date of care before curative treatment ( protected area isolation , anti -infective drugs )
  • , Bacterial , fungal anti -viral treatments , and other
  • The date of transplant, type of transplant or other treatment ... ...
Being tested
SCID screening
Keywords
Neonatal screening, severe combined immunodeficiency, T-cell Receptor Excision Circle
Medical subject headings
Severe combined immunodeficiency, atypical, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SCID screeningBiological

Study groups in NCT02244450
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Screened patientsExperimentalSCID screening: more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized to determine the presence of SCID.
Receives: Biological: SCID screening
Control groupNo interventionSCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth

    Efficacy endpoint: number of children receiving early therapeutic suitable for curative ( transplant, enzyme treatment or gene therapy)

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth

    Efficacy endpoint: life expectancy of children modeled from the results of the study and data from the literature

    Measured: 10 years

  2. The cost of care during the first 18 months of life per child enjoying an early curative treatment in the first 4 months of life.

    Costs of care will be estimated during the first 18 months of life of the child.

    Measured: 18 months

  3. Length of hospitalization of children with SCID in the first 18 months of life

    Measured: 18 months

  4. number of avoided deaths

    Measured: 18 months

  5. number of detected SCID patients

    Measured: 18 months

  6. number of patients detected with other T lymphopenia (SCID variants , DiGeorge , severe T lymphopenia non SCID ... )

    Measured: 18 months

  7. number of false negative and false positive results

    False negative results : patients from the control group diagnosed with SCID without screening who would have a negative screening or patients from the screening group died from a SCID and with a negative screening False positive: patients from the screening group with a positive screening but without SCID

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completion28 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
190,539 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02244450
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC14_0030
Acronym
DEPISTREC
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
2 Sep 2014
Last updated
24 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Thomas C, Durand-Zaleski I, Frenkiel J, Mirallie S, Leger A, Cheillan D, Picard C, Mahlaoui N, Riche VP, Roussey M, Sebille V, Rabetrano H, Dert C, Fischer A, Audrain M. Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results. Clin Immunol. 2019 May;202:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

    PubMed 30946917
  • Audrain MAP, Leger AJC, Hemont CAF, Mirallie SM, Cheillan D, Rimbert MGM, Le Thuaut AM, Sebille-Rivain VA, Prat A, Pinel EMQ, Divry E, Dert CGL, Fournier MAG, Thomas CJC. Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Analytic and Clinical Performance of the T Cell Receptor Excision Circle Assay in France (DEPISTREC Study). J Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct;38(7):778-786. doi: 10.1007/s10875-018-0550-7. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

    PubMed 30251145

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SCID screening in people with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical, run by Nantes University Hospital at 51 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 51 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02244450, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in