Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, AtypicalDEPISTRECNCT02244450
Generalized Neonatal Screening of Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies
A study testing SCID screening in people with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical, run by Nantes University Hospital at 51 sites in France.
Trial summary
Severe combined Immunodeficiencies ( SCID ) are a group of inherited diseases of the immune system by characterised profound abnormalities of T cell development . Infants with SCID require prompt clinical response to Prevent life -threatening infection and studies show significantly improved survival in babies… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 days to 18 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical
- What is being tested?
- SCID screening
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 190,539 participants
- Where
- 51 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to 28 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 days to 18 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Screening Group: Newborn on day 3 of birth (premature and non premature)
- Control group: Patients diagnosed with SCID without screening at participating centers
Who cannot join
- Lack of parental consent
- Children whose parents are adults under guardianship,
- Children without health insurance, for the screening group:
- The early exit of the child from the maternity hospital
Trial locations and contacts
51 sites in 1 country.
51 sites in 1 country
France51 sites
Angers Private Hospital Clinique de l'Anjou
Angers
Angers University Hospital
Angers
Argenteuil Hospital
Argenteuil
Aulnay-sous-Bois Hospital CHI Robert Ballanger
Aulnay-sous-Bois
Bordeaux Maison de Santé Protestante Bordeaux Bagatelle
Bordeaux
Bordeaux Private Hospital Polyclinique Bordeuax Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux
Bordeaux University Hospital
Bordeaux
Corbeil Essonnes Hospital Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes
Créteil Hospital
Créteil
Dijon University Hospital
Dijon
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble
Le Blanc Mesnil Private Hospital
Le Blanc-Mesnil
Lens Hospital
Lens
Libourne Maternity Hospital
Libourne
Lille University Hospital
Lille
Lormont Maternity Hospital Rive Droite
Lormont
Lyon Maternity Hospital
Lyon
Lyon University Hospital
Lyon
Marseille Saint-Joseph Hospital
Marseille
Marseille University Hospital La Conception
Marseille
Marseille University Hospital Nord
Marseille
Marseille University Hospital
Marseille
Meaux Hospital
Meaux
Montreuil Hospital CHI André Grégroie
Montreuil
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, 44000
Nantes Private Hospital Clinique Jules Verne
Nantes
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes
Paris Hospital Saint-Joseph
Paris
Paris Necker University Hospital
Paris
Paris University Hospital Armand-Trousseau
Paris
Paris University Hospital Bichat
Paris
Paris University Hospital Bicêtre
Paris
Paris University Hospital Béclère
Paris
Paris University Hospital Jean Verdier
Paris
Paris University Hospital La Pitié Salpétrière
Paris
Paris University Hospital Louis Mourier
Paris
Paris University Hospital Necker
Paris
Poissy Hospital CHI Poissy-Saint-Germain
Poissy
Pontoise Hospital René Dubos
Pontoise
Rennes Private Hospital Clinique Mutualiste La Sagesse
Rennes
Rennes University Hospital
Rennes
Saint-Grégoire Private Hospital
Rennes
Roubaix Hospital
Roubaix
Saint-Herblain Private Hospital Polyclinique de l'Atlantique
Saint-Herblain
Saint-Mande Army Hospital Begin
Saint-Mandé
Saint-Martin-d'Hère Private Hospital Clinique Belledonne
Saint-Martin-d'Hères
Strasbourg Private Hospital Clinique Adassa
Strasbourg
Strasbourg University Hospital
Strasbourg
Toulouse Private Hospital Clinique Sarrus Teinturiers
Toulouse
Toulouse University Hospital P. DE VIGUIER
Toulouse
Toulouse University Hospital
Toulouse
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Clinical Utility and Cost Effectiveness Ratio of Generalized Neonatal Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies (SCID) by Quantification of TRECs on Guthrie Cards
Severe combined Immunodeficiencies ( SCID ) are a group of inherited diseases of the immune system by characterised profound abnormalities of T cell development . Infants with SCID require prompt clinical response to Prevent life -threatening infection and studies show significantly improved survival in babies Diagnosed at birth as a result of previous family history . SCID follows criteria for population -based newborn screening since it is asymptomatic at birth and fatal within the first year of life, the confirmation of the disease is easy, there is a curative treatment , and it is known that early stem cell transplantation improves survival . Quantification of TRECs (T- cell receptor excision circles ) in DNA extracted from Guthrie samples is a sensitive screening test for Specific and SCID .
The investigators propose in this study to perform a neonatal screening of SCID , in a population of 200,000 babies over a period of two years .
The investigators propose to study the clinical utility and cost effectiveness ratio, and SCID screening to demonstrate that could result in a broad benefit to Individuals detected , making screening relatively cost-effective in spite of the low incidence of the disease .
Read the detailed description
The project proposes to study the feasibility and cost-effectiveness ratio ( time management and life expectancy to 10 years) of generalized neonatal screening for SCID children by offering this screening to 200 000 children (100 000 children per year) over the entire territory. Prospective control group consists of children diagnosed with SCID out of 700,000 annual births who do not benefit from screening.
The protocol will be leant against the existing newborn screening , that is to say two more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. Eleven newborn screening regional associations will be involved with the inclusion of children in about 50 maternity hospitals. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized in two laboratories instead of eleven laboratories assigned to RA . Investigative Regional Associations (RAs) represent nearly 600,000 births / year and the amount of 200,000 children will be achieved in two years (duration of inclusion) . All children born in the participating maternity may be included if they meet the inclusion criteria. The result of the screening test for SCID will be available within 21 days after birth, provided that there is no need to request a new sample.
At each of eleven RA is associated a pediatrician referent for immune deficiencies, member of the french reference center (CEREDIH) and who will be responsible to call the parents, offer them a consultation and further exploration if the result of screening is assumed positive.
Analysis of cards from 200,000 children will give the following information:
- Number of children with a presumptive positive screening , requiring a call by the referent pediatrician, consultation and exploration of lymphocyte subpopulations
- Number of children with a negative screening
- Number of children with an inconclusive screening (lack of TRECs and lack of amplification of the reference gene) and requiring a new card,
A micro- costing study will be conducted to assess the cost of testing .
This group of 200,000 children is the experimental group to assess the cost of screening , acceptability by parents (participation rate), the recall rate for abnormal or inconclusive result, the rate of follow-up time for results , the incidence of disease . It will also allow to calculate the specificity of the method .
At the end of the inclusions, the vital status at 18 months with cause of death will be sought for the 200 000 children included , with the CESP ( Centre de Recherche en Epidemiologie et Santé des Populations) via RNIPP (Répertoire National d'Identification des Personnes Physiques) and CepiDc ( Centre d'Epidémiologie sur les causes médicales de décès) . This will establish whether there are SCID in this population which were not detected at birth. Furthermore, the investigators include in the study SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP (including Necker main transplant center) . This will enable to approach the sensitivity of the method . All these data allow the calculation of the predictive values of the test.
In this experimental group will be isolated a group of individuals who screened positive and diagnosed as true SCID . Clinical data for these patients will be collected in an electronic CRF ( CRF ) by the pediatrician referral protocol (Dr Thomas C ) , including:
- The dates and results of explorations : lymphocyte subpopulations , blood count, determination of immunoglobulin levels
- The diagnosis made with identification of the genetic defect
- The date of care before curative treatment ( protected area isolation , anti -infective drugs )
- , Bacterial , fungal anti -viral treatments , and other
- The date of transplant, type of transplant or other treatment ... ...
- Being tested
- SCID screening
- Keywords
- Neonatal screening, severe combined immunodeficiency, T-cell Receptor Excision Circle
- Medical subject headings
- Severe combined immunodeficiency, atypical, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SCID screeningBiological
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Screened patients | Experimental | SCID screening: more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized to determine the presence of SCID. Receives: Biological: SCID screening |
| Control group | No intervention | SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth
Efficacy endpoint: number of children receiving early therapeutic suitable for curative ( transplant, enzyme treatment or gene therapy)
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth
Efficacy endpoint: life expectancy of children modeled from the results of the study and data from the literature
Measured: 10 years
The cost of care during the first 18 months of life per child enjoying an early curative treatment in the first 4 months of life.
Costs of care will be estimated during the first 18 months of life of the child.
Measured: 18 months
Length of hospitalization of children with SCID in the first 18 months of life
Measured: 18 months
number of avoided deaths
Measured: 18 months
number of detected SCID patients
Measured: 18 months
number of patients detected with other T lymphopenia (SCID variants , DiGeorge , severe T lymphopenia non SCID ... )
Measured: 18 months
number of false negative and false positive results
False negative results : patients from the control group diagnosed with SCID without screening who would have a negative screening or patients from the screening group died from a SCID and with a negative screening False positive: patients from the screening group with a positive screening but without SCID
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completion28 Apr 2018
- Study completion28 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, AtypicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190,539 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Caroline THOMAS, MD, Principal investigator, Nantes University HospitalMarie AUDRAIN, MD, Study director, Nantes University HospitalSophie MIRALLIE, Principal investigator, Nantes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02244450
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC14_0030
- Acronym
- DEPISTREC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Thomas C, Durand-Zaleski I, Frenkiel J, Mirallie S, Leger A, Cheillan D, Picard C, Mahlaoui N, Riche VP, Roussey M, Sebille V, Rabetrano H, Dert C, Fischer A, Audrain M. Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results. Clin Immunol. 2019 May;202:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
PubMed 30946917Audrain MAP, Leger AJC, Hemont CAF, Mirallie SM, Cheillan D, Rimbert MGM, Le Thuaut AM, Sebille-Rivain VA, Prat A, Pinel EMQ, Divry E, Dert CGL, Fournier MAG, Thomas CJC. Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Analytic and Clinical Performance of the T Cell Receptor Excision Circle Assay in France (DEPISTREC Study). J Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct;38(7):778-786. doi: 10.1007/s10875-018-0550-7. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
PubMed 30251145
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Clinical Utility and Cost Effectiveness Ratio of Generalized Neonatal Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies (SCID) by Quantification of TRECs on Guthrie Cards
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02244450
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEPISTREC / RC14_0030
- Keywords
- Neonatal screening, severe combined immunodeficiency, T-cell Receptor Excision Circle
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 190,539 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Severe combined Immunodeficiencies ( SCID ) are a group of inherited diseases of the immune system by characterised profound abnormalities of T cell development . Infants with SCID require prompt clinical response to Prevent life -threatening infection and studies show significantly improved survival in babies Diagnosed at birth as a result of previous family history . SCID follows criteria for population -based newborn screening since it is asymptomatic at birth and fatal within the first year of life, the confirmation of the disease is easy, there is a curative treatment , and it is known that early stem cell transplantation improves survival . Quantification of TRECs (T- cell receptor excision circles ) in DNA extracted from Guthrie samples is a sensitive screening test for Specific and SCID .
The investigators propose in this study to perform a neonatal screening of SCID , in a population of 200,000 babies over a period of two years .
The investigators propose to study the clinical utility and cost effectiveness ratio, and SCID screening to demonstrate that could result in a broad benefit to Individuals detected , making screening relatively cost-effective in spite of the low incidence of the disease .
Detailed description
The project proposes to study the feasibility and cost-effectiveness ratio ( time management and life expectancy to 10 years) of generalized neonatal screening for SCID children by offering this screening to 200 000 children (100 000 children per year) over the entire territory. Prospective control group consists of children diagnosed with SCID out of 700,000 annual births who do not benefit from screening.
The protocol will be leant against the existing newborn screening , that is to say two more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. Eleven newborn screening regional associations will be involved with the inclusion of children in about 50 maternity hospitals. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized in two laboratories instead of eleven laboratories assigned to RA . Investigative Regional Associations (RAs) represent nearly 600,000 births / year and the amount of 200,000 children will be achieved in two years (duration of inclusion) . All children born in the participating maternity may be included if they meet the inclusion criteria. The result of the screening test for SCID will be available within 21 days after birth, provided that there is no need to request a new sample.
At each of eleven RA is associated a pediatrician referent for immune deficiencies, member of the french reference center (CEREDIH) and who will be responsible to call the parents, offer them a consultation and further exploration if the result of screening is assumed positive.
Analysis of cards from 200,000 children will give the following information:
- Number of children with a presumptive positive screening , requiring a call by the referent pediatrician, consultation and exploration of lymphocyte subpopulations
- Number of children with a negative screening
- Number of children with an inconclusive screening (lack of TRECs and lack of amplification of the reference gene) and requiring a new card,
A micro- costing study will be conducted to assess the cost of testing .
This group of 200,000 children is the experimental group to assess the cost of screening , acceptability by parents (participation rate), the recall rate for abnormal or inconclusive result, the rate of follow-up time for results , the incidence of disease . It will also allow to calculate the specificity of the method .
At the end of the inclusions, the vital status at 18 months with cause of death will be sought for the 200 000 children included , with the CESP ( Centre de Recherche en Epidemiologie et Santé des Populations) via RNIPP (Répertoire National d'Identification des Personnes Physiques) and CepiDc ( Centre d'Epidémiologie sur les causes médicales de décès) . This will establish whether there are SCID in this population which were not detected at birth. Furthermore, the investigators include in the study SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP (including Necker main transplant center) . This will enable to approach the sensitivity of the method . All these data allow the calculation of the predictive values of the test.
In this experimental group will be isolated a group of individuals who screened positive and diagnosed as true SCID . Clinical data for these patients will be collected in an electronic CRF ( CRF ) by the pediatrician referral protocol (Dr Thomas C ) , including:
- The dates and results of explorations : lymphocyte subpopulations , blood count, determination of immunoglobulin levels
- The diagnosis made with identification of the genetic defect
- The date of care before curative treatment ( protected area isolation , anti -infective drugs )
- , Bacterial , fungal anti -viral treatments , and other
- The date of transplant, type of transplant or other treatment ... ...
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Screened patients | Experimental | Biological: SCID screeningSCID screening: more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized to determine the presence of SCID. |
| Control group | No intervention | –SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 days to 18 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Screening Group: Newborn on day 3 of birth (premature and non premature)
- Control group: Patients diagnosed with SCID without screening at participating centers
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Lack of parental consent
- Children whose parents are adults under guardianship,
- Children without health insurance, for the screening group:
- The early exit of the child from the maternity hospital
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SCID screening | Biological | Screened patients |
Primary outcome
cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth
Time frame: 18 months
Efficacy endpoint: number of children receiving early therapeutic suitable for curative ( transplant, enzyme treatment or gene therapy)
7 secondary outcomes
Cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth
Time frame: 10 years
The cost of care during the first 18 months of life per child enjoying an early curative treatment in the first 4 months of life.
Time frame: 18 months
Length of hospitalization of children with SCID in the first 18 months of life
Time frame: 18 months
number of avoided deaths
Time frame: 18 months
number of detected SCID patients
Time frame: 18 months
number of patients detected with other T lymphopenia (SCID variants , DiGeorge , severe T lymphopenia non SCID ... )
Time frame: 18 months
number of false negative and false positive results
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30946917Thomas C, Durand-Zaleski I, Frenkiel J, Mirallie S, Leger A, Cheillan D, Picard C, Mahlaoui N, Riche VP, Roussey M, Sebille V, Rabetrano H, Dert C, Fischer A, Audrain M. Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results. Clin Immunol. 2019 May;202:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30251145Audrain MAP, Leger AJC, Hemont CAF, Mirallie SM, Cheillan D, Rimbert MGM, Le Thuaut AM, Sebille-Rivain VA, Prat A, Pinel EMQ, Divry E, Dert CGL, Fournier MAG, Thomas CJC. Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Analytic and Clinical Performance of the T Cell Receptor Excision Circle Assay in France (DEPISTREC Study). J Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct;38(7):778-786. doi: 10.1007/s10875-018-0550-7. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Caroline THOMAS, MD principal investigator
Nantes University Hospital
Marie AUDRAIN, MD study director
Nantes University Hospital
Sophie MIRALLIE principal investigator
Nantes University Hospital
51 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SCID screening in people with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical, run by Nantes University Hospital at 51 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 51 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02244450, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2018.