Knee OsteoarthritisNCT02254473
Evaluating the Efficacy of Lateral Heel Wedges of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
A study testing Wedge Insert and Flat Insert in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by HealthPartners Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is looking at the efficacy of a sloped insole in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Regularly wearing a sloped insole over the course of one year will result in a wider joint space by x-ray in 60% of the subjects, a significant decrease in knee pain, decreased use of over the counter analgesics, and a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Wedge Insert and Flat Insert
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to Jun 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients 30 years or older with medial compartment knee Osteoarthritis (unilateral) and Grade 4 Kellgren-Lawrence39 radiographic changes presenting for treatment of knee pain.
- Range of motion knee-flexion beyond 100 degrees and not lacking more than 15 degrees of extension.
- Subtalar and forefoot motion permitting foot/ankle eversion with weight bearing.
- Sufficient shoe toe box height to allow space for the insole and therefore comfort and compliance.
- Passive laxity of medial capsule and collateral ligament by knee extension test.
Who cannot join
- All other forms of knee arthritis other than OA.
- Knee Instability- medial pseudo-opening of greater than grade 1 or detectable Anterior-posterior instability.
- Less than Grade 4 Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic changes in the medial compartment of the knee39.
- Grade 2 or greater Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic39 involvement of the patellofemoral or lateral compartment.
- Inadequate knee range of motion
- Balance problems requiring the use of a walker or wheel chair - ambulation with aid
Show all 13Show fewer
- Diabetics with peripheral neuropathy
- Knee surgery within the past year
- Intraarticular steroid injection or visco supplementation within 6 months
- Stiff subtalar or forefoot joints - clinical test
- Inadequate shoe toe box depth to accommodate the test or control inserts
- Charcot joint
- Fixed contracture of the medial capsule and/or collateral ligament- clinical test
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
TRIA Orthopaedic Center
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431
About this study
This study is looking at the efficacy of a sloped insole in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Regularly wearing a sloped insole over the course of one year will result in a wider joint space by x-ray in 60% of the subjects, a significant decrease in knee pain, decreased use of over the counter analgesics, and a clinically important improvement in the Womac pain and stiffness scale.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Wedge Insert, Flat Insert
- Keywords
- Knee, Osteoarthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Wedge InsertOther
Flat InsertOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Wedge Insert | Experimental | Patients will receive a wedge insert Receives: Other: Wedge Insert |
| Flat insert | Placebo comparator | Patients will receive a flat insert Receives: Other: Flat Insert |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Measured: Baseline
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Measured: 6 weeks
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Measured: 3 months
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Measured: 6 months
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Measured: 9 months
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Kellgren and Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis of Knee
X-Ray used to measure Kellgren and Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis of Knee (joint space in the knee).
Measured: Baseline
Kellgren and Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis of Knee
X-Ray used to measure Kellgren and Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis of Knee (joint space in the knee).
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionJun 2017
Why it stopped: Low enrollment.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- HealthPartners Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Minnesota, Minnesota Medical Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02254473
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1405M50501
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 29 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Lateral Heel Wedges of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02254473
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1405M50501
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Knee, Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Low enrollment.
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- HealthPartners InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Minnesota, Minnesota Medical Foundation
- Study start
- Aug 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is looking at the efficacy of a sloped insole in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Regularly wearing a sloped insole over the course of one year will result in a wider joint space by x-ray in 60% of the subjects, a significant decrease in knee pain, decreased use of over the counter analgesics, and a clinically important improvement in the Womac pain and stiffness scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Wedge Insert | Experimental | Other: Wedge InsertPatients will receive a wedge insert |
| Flat insert | Placebo comparator | Other: Flat InsertPatients will receive a flat insert |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult patients 30 years or older with medial compartment knee Osteoarthritis (unilateral) and Grade 4 Kellgren-Lawrence39 radiographic changes presenting for treatment of knee pain.
- Range of motion knee-flexion beyond 100 degrees and not lacking more than 15 degrees of extension.
- Subtalar and forefoot motion permitting foot/ankle eversion with weight bearing.
- Sufficient shoe toe box height to allow space for the insole and therefore comfort and compliance.
- Passive laxity of medial capsule and collateral ligament by knee extension test.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- All other forms of knee arthritis other than OA.
- Knee Instability- medial pseudo-opening of greater than grade 1 or detectable Anterior-posterior instability.
- Less than Grade 4 Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic changes in the medial compartment of the knee39.
- Grade 2 or greater Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic39 involvement of the patellofemoral or lateral compartment.
- Inadequate knee range of motion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Wedge Insert | Other | Wedge Insert |
| Flat Insert | Other | Flat insert |
Primary outcome
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Time frame: Baseline
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Time frame: 6 weeks
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Time frame: 3 months
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Time frame: 6 months
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Time frame: 9 months
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
Patient Reported Function and Pain
Time frame: 12 months
Tegner: Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The scale is 0 to 10 where 10 corresponds to normal function and 0 to unable to perform.
2 secondary outcomes
Kellgren and Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis of Knee
Time frame: Baseline
Kellgren and Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis of Knee
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Wedge Insert and Flat Insert in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by HealthPartners Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Reported Function and Pain (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2019.