AzTrials
AzTrials

Meibomian Gland DysfunctionPhase 4MGPNCT02256969

Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing Trial

A Phase 4 study testing Blephamide, GenTeal PM Night-Time and Meibomian Gland Probing in people with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, run by Joseph B. Ciolino, MD at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this research study, the investigators are looking at the effects of Meibomian Gland Probing (MGP) versus a sham (fake) procedure in patients with refractory MGD who have already tried traditional management with no success in resolving their clinical signs (as seen by their ophthalmologist) or their symptoms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 89 years
Conditions the study is for
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
What is being tested?
Blephamide, GenTeal PM Night-Time and Meibomian Gland Probing
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2014to Aug 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-89 years
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Willing and able to comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
  • Diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)
  • Symptoms of MGD such as foreign body sensation, burning, stinging, light sensitivity for at least 3 months
  • Persistent symptoms despite at least 3 months of medical management including lid hygiene, warm compress, and use of topical and systemic therapy, or contraindication to systemic therapy
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Presence of lid tenderness on the upper lids in both eyes
  • Tear break-up time (TBUT) of <10 seconds
  • In good stable overall health

Who cannot join

  • Active allergies to steroids, sulfacetamide, GenTeal PM Night-Time ointment, or lidocaine
  • Intraocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within 1 month before enrollment
  • History of ocular infection within 1 month before enrollment.
  • History of increased intraocular pressure after using topical steroids (steroid responsive)
  • Any condition (including language barrier) that precludes subject's ability to comply with study requirements including completion of study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Meibomian Gland Probing Versus Sham Procedure for Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

In this research study, the investigators are looking at the effects of Meibomian Gland Probing (MGP) versus a sham (fake) procedure in patients with refractory MGD who have already tried traditional management with no success in resolving their clinical signs (as seen by their ophthalmologist) or their symptoms.

The investigators are also evaluating the effects of using two (2) post-procedural medication treatments: Blephamide or GenTeal PM Night-Time to determine if treatment after the MGP procedure has an effect on its outcome.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye disease is one of the most common conditions seen in ophthalmic practice and is associated with significant patient distress. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is among the most prevalent causes of dry eye disease. This condition, which is often due to obstruction of the meibomian gland orifices, may result in significant ocular irritation. Traditionally, management of MGD includes warm compress, lid hygiene, and anti-inflammatory medications. This randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the effects of meibomian gland probing versus sham procedure in cases with refractory MGD that do not respond to traditional treatments. Moreover, the effects of postoperative regimen will also be investigated using two different regimens. In addition to symptoms, the changes will also be evaluated in terms of clinical signs as well as in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) which allows study at the cellular level.

Being tested
Blephamide, GenTeal PM Night-Time, Meibomian Gland Probing, Sham Meibomian Gland Probing
Medical subject headings
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BlephamideDrug

    Also called sulfacetamide sodium 10%/prednisolone acetate 0.2%, Allergan, Inc.

  • GenTeal PM Night-TimeDrug

    Also called GenTeal PM Night-Time Ophthalmic Ointment Alcon

  • Meibomian Gland ProbingProcedure or surgery

    For anesthesia, topical 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (Akron) was applied directly with sterile cotton-tipped applicator to the lid margin for 3 times every 10 minutes before the procedure. If necessary, 2% lidocaine was injected into the lid margin during the procedure to provide additional comfort. After obtaining adequate anesthesia, the solid stainless steel probes (Maskin® Meibomian Gland Intraductal Probes, Rhein Medical Inc.) were used to probe all the meibomian glands of upper lids of both eyes at the slit lamp. All patients were initially be probed with a 1-mm probe followed by a 2-mm probe for all glands.

  • Sham Meibomian Gland ProbingProcedure or surgery

    For anesthesia, topical 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (Akron) was applied directly with sterile cotton-tipped applicator to the lid margin for 3 times every 10 minutes before the procedure. If necessary, 2% lidocaine was injected into the lid margin during the procedure to provide additional comfort. The patient's lid margin was touched with the probes without actual probing of the meibomian gland orifices.

Study groups in NCT02256969
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Meibomian Gland Probing plus lubricantOtherMeibomian Gland Probing: Stainless steel probes were used to probe all the meibomian glands of upper lids of both eyes at the slit lamp. All patients were probed with a 1-mm probe followed by a 2-mm probe for all glands. Lubricant: GenTeal PM Night-Time Ointment (Alcon), a sterile ophthalmic lubricant that is commonly used to relieve symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, was applied topically to both eyes for 4 weeks with the following regimen: twice daily for 2 weeks and then once daily for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: GenTeal PM Night-Time; Procedure: Meibomian Gland Probing
Sham Meibomian Gland Probing plus lubricantOtherSham Meibomian Gland Probing: The patient's the lid margin was touched with the probes without actual probing occurring. Lubricant: GenTeal PM Night-Time Ointment, ophthalmic lubricant used to relieve symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, was applied topically to both eyes for 4 weeks: twice daily for 2 weeks and then once daily for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: GenTeal PM Night-Time; Procedure: Sham Meibomian Gland Probing
Meibomian Gland Probing plus BlephamideActive comparatorMeibomian Gland Probing: Stainless steel probes were used to probe all the meibomian glands of upper lids of both eyes at the slit lamp. All patients were probed with a 1-mm probe followed by a 2-mm probe for all glands. Blephamide: is a combination of an antibiotic and an anti-inflammatory agent commonly used to treat various ocular conditions. Blephamide was applied topically to both eyes for 4 weeks with a regimen of: twice daily for 2 weeks and then once daily for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Blephamide; Procedure: Meibomian Gland Probing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

    A 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms.

    Measured: 4 week Time Point

  2. Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE)

    A two-item survey used to assess the frequency and severity of dry eye disease. The SANDE score is calculated by taking the square root of the product of the frequency of symptoms score and the severity of symptoms score. The SANDE scale ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the maximal amount of dry eye symptoms and 0 being the minimal amount of dry eye symptoms.

    Measured: 4 week Time Point

  3. Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS)

    Is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of epitheliopathy.

    Measured: 4 week Time Point

  4. Tear Break Up Time (TBUT)

    TBUT measures the amount of time, in seconds, a dry spot appears in the tear film after each blink. Values less than 10 seconds are considered abnormal.

    Measured: 4 week Time Point

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionAug 2015
  4. Study completionAug 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02256969
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-059H
Acronym
MGP
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
13 Aug 2014
Last updated
19 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kheirkhah A, Kobashi H, Girgis J, Jamali A, Ciolino JB, Hamrah P. A randomized, sham-controlled trial of intraductal meibomian gland probing with or without topical antibiotic/steroid for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Ocul Surf. 2020 Oct;18(4):852-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

    PubMed 32882429

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Blephamide, GenTeal PM Night-Time and Meibomian Gland Probing in people with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, run by Joseph B. Ciolino, MD at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) (time frame: 4 week Time Point). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02256969, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in