Low Back PainNCT02261233
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Postural Control: Systems Engineering Approach
A study testing Osteopathic manipulative treatment in people with Low Back Pain, run by Michigan State University at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The overall goal of this project is to develop sensitive and objective clinical research tools for the assessment of postural control of the trunk. In order to accomplish this goal, we aim to quantify balance performance in an unstable seated task. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2014to 31 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All participants must meet all of the inclusion criteria to participate in the study. Below is a list of inclusion criteria for LBP participants:
- Age 21-65 years
- Independently ambulatory
- Able to speak and read English
- Able to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.
- Willing to be randomized to either immediate or delayed treatment group.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Musculoskeletal pain - primarily in the low back region
- Pain rating equal to or greater than 3 out of10 as indicated on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain
- Disability equal to or greater than 26% as indicated on the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
Who cannot join
- All candidates meeting any of the exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation. Exclusion criteria will be self-reported. However, during each treatment session, the physicians will be watching for clinical signs and symptoms not consistent with physical findings that are suggestive of the presence of any of the exclusion criteria. In such a case, further treatment will be discontinued and the subject will be excluded.
- Below is a list of exclusion criteria:
- Inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent.
- Physical therapy or any other form of manual medicine (e.g., Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Chiropractic Manipulation, etc.), acupuncture or spinal injections within one month prior to study enrollment
- Workers' compensation benefits in the past 3 months or ongoing medical legal issues
- Possibly pregnant
Show all 35Show fewer
- Obesity (BMI>32)
- Currently using electrical implants (e.g., cardiac pacemakers, drug delivery pumps, etc.)
- History of:
- Spinal surgery
- Spinal fracture
- Spinal infection (e.g., osteomyelitis)
- Cancer
- Unresolved symptoms from:
- Head trauma
- Inner ear infection with associated balance and coordination problems
- Orthostatic hypotension
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Vestibular disorder (e.g. vertigo)
- Current diagnosis of:
- Significant spinal deformity (e.g., scoliosis > 20 degrees, torticollis)
- Ankylosing spondylitis
- Spondylolisthesis grades III or IV
- Cauda equine syndrome
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Osteoporosis
- Angina or congestive heart failure symptoms
- Active bleeding or infection in the back
- Blindness
- Seizures
- Neurologic disease (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke or transient ischemic attack in the past year, cervical dystonia)
- Conditions recognized by a physician any time during the study:
- Significant or worsening signs of neurologic deficit
- Symptoms are not consistent with mechanical findings
- Other conditions impeding protocol implementation
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
MSU Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine
East Lansing, Michigan, 48823
MSU Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Lansing, Michigan, 48891
Michigan State University Center for Orthopedic Research
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
About this study
The overall goal of this project is to develop sensitive and objective clinical research tools for the assessment of postural control of the trunk. In order to accomplish this goal, we aim to quantify balance performance in an unstable seated task. Specifically, the investigators will quantify balance performance in low back pain participants before and after osteopathic manipulative treatment. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a significant improvement in balance performance after a single session of osteopathic manipulative treatment as well as after 4 sessions of osteopathic manipulative treatment and this improvement will be greater than any learning effect.
A secondary objective of this study is to quantify differences in patient-oriented outcome measures (e.g., self-reported pain, disability) in low back pain participants before and after osteopathic manipulative treatment. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a significant improvement in these self-reported outcomes following osteopathic manipulative treatment. The association between improvement in postural control parameters and patient-oriented measures will also be explored.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Osteopathic manipulative treatmentProcedure or surgery
Up to 4 sessions of osteopathic manipulative treatment (once per week)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate treatment | Experimental | This arm receives osteopathic manipulative treatment shortly after enrollment Receives: Procedure: Osteopathic manipulative treatment |
| Delayed treatment | Experimental | This arm receives osteopathic manipulative treatment approximately 4 weeks after enrollment Receives: Procedure: Osteopathic manipulative treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in postural control
Postural control will be assessed in an unstable seated task, in which subjects will be asked to balance on a specially designed seat. The average deviations from the neutral seat position will be measured in degrees.
Measured: Change from baseline to shortly after first treatment (1-2 days), from baseline to an expected average of week 4, and from week 4 to an expected average of week 8.
Change in trunk muscle reflex latency
Subjects will be pulling with their trunk on a cable held by an electromagnet. The electromagnet will be suddenly released. Trunk muscle response to sudden load release will be measured on electromyographical recordings in milliseconds.
Measured: Change from baseline to shortly after first treatment (1-2 days), from baseline to an expected average of week 4, and from week 4 to an expected average of week 8.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Assesses weekly changes in physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, satisfaction with social role, and pain with PROMIS-29 questionnaire.
Measured: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).
Change in concomitant medication
Assesses weekly changes in the use of medication for treating low back pain, including the type of medication and the quantity of medication (i.e., number of pills) with a questionnaire.
Measured: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).tcome measure until the end, an expected average of 8 weeks.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index
Assesses weekly changes in functional activities related to low back disability with the Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire.
Measured: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).
Change in fear avoidance behavior
Assesses weekly changes in fear avoidance behavior using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs questionnaire.
Measured: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2014
- Primary completion31 Aug 2018
- Study completion31 Aug 2018
Why it stopped: Funding for this project ended as of August 31, 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michigan State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacek Cholewicki, Michigan State University
- Investigators
- Jacek Cholewicki, PhD, Principal investigator, Michigan State UniversityNorman P Reeves, PhD, Principal investigator, Michigan State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02261233
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCCAM U19 AT006057 Project 1
- Other IDs
- 5U19AT006057-02
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, Greene HS. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 1;26(7):724-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104010-00004.
PubMed 11295888
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Postural Control: Systems Engineering Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02261233
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCCAM U19 AT006057 Project 1
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Funding for this project ended as of August 31, 2018
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Michigan State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall goal of this project is to develop sensitive and objective clinical research tools for the assessment of postural control of the trunk. In order to accomplish this goal, we aim to quantify balance performance in an unstable seated task. Specifically, the investigators will quantify balance performance in low back pain participants before and after osteopathic manipulative treatment. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a significant improvement in balance performance after a single session of osteopathic manipulative treatment as well as after 4 sessions of osteopathic manipulative treatment and this improvement will be greater than any learning effect.
A secondary objective of this study is to quantify differences in patient-oriented outcome measures (e.g., self-reported pain, disability) in low back pain participants before and after osteopathic manipulative treatment. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a significant improvement in these self-reported outcomes following osteopathic manipulative treatment. The association between improvement in postural control parameters and patient-oriented measures will also be explored.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate treatment | Experimental | Procedure: Osteopathic manipulative treatmentThis arm receives osteopathic manipulative treatment shortly after enrollment |
| Delayed treatment | Experimental | Procedure: Osteopathic manipulative treatmentThis arm receives osteopathic manipulative treatment approximately 4 weeks after enrollment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- All participants must meet all of the inclusion criteria to participate in the study. Below is a list of inclusion criteria for LBP participants:
- Age 21-65 years
- Independently ambulatory
- Able to speak and read English
- Able to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (35 listed)
- All candidates meeting any of the exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation. Exclusion criteria will be self-reported. However, during each treatment session, the physicians will be watching for clinical signs and symptoms not consistent with physical findings that are suggestive of the presence of any of the exclusion criteria. In such a case, further treatment will be discontinued and the subject will be excluded.
- Inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent.
- Physical therapy or any other form of manual medicine (e.g., Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Chiropractic Manipulation, etc.), acupuncture or spinal injections within one month prior to study enrollment
- Workers' compensation benefits in the past 3 months or ongoing medical legal issues
- Possibly pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Osteopathic manipulative treatmentUp to 4 sessions of osteopathic manipulative treatment (once per week) | Procedure or surgery | Delayed treatment, Immediate treatment |
Primary outcome
Change in postural control
Time frame: Change from baseline to shortly after first treatment (1-2 days), from baseline to an expected average of week 4, and from week 4 to an expected average of week 8.
Postural control will be assessed in an unstable seated task, in which subjects will be asked to balance on a specially designed seat. The average deviations from the neutral seat position will be measured in degrees.
Change in trunk muscle reflex latency
Time frame: Change from baseline to shortly after first treatment (1-2 days), from baseline to an expected average of week 4, and from week 4 to an expected average of week 8.
Subjects will be pulling with their trunk on a cable held by an electromagnet. The electromagnet will be suddenly released. Trunk muscle response to sudden load release will be measured on electromyographical recordings in milliseconds.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time frame: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).
Change in concomitant medication
Time frame: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).tcome measure until the end, an expected average of 8 weeks.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).
Change in fear avoidance behavior
Time frame: The expected average is weekly for this outcome measure until the end (expected average of 8 weeks).
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding for this project ended as of August 31, 2018). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2019.
- Background: PubMed 11295888Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, Greene HS. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 1;26(7):724-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104010-00004.
- Website for Michigan State University Center for Orthopedic ResearchLink provided by the sponsor.
- Website for the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Sponsor)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Trans-arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Facet Pain Due to Facet Arthropathy
Facet Joint Arthropathy, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor-Core Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Chronic Low Back Pain, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Meditation for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacek Cholewicki, PhD principal investigator
Michigan State University
Norman P Reeves, PhD principal investigator
Michigan State University
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Osteopathic manipulative treatment in people with Low Back Pain, run by Michigan State University at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 35 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding for this project ended as of August 31, 2018). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in postural control (time frame: Change from baseline to shortly after first treatment (1-2 days), from baseline to an expected average of week 4, and from week 4 to an expected average of week 8.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02261233, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2019.