AzTrials
AzTrials

HypersplenismNCT02261584

Microwave Ablation and Partial Splenic Embolization in the Management of Hypersplenism

A study testing Microwave Thermal Coagulation and Partial Splenic Embolization in people with Hypersplenism, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare microwave thermal coagulation and partial splenic embolization in the management of hypersplenism in patients with cirrhosis. This study will be conducted on 40 patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly and hypersplenism. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypersplenism
What is being tested?
Microwave Thermal Coagulation and Partial Splenic Embolization
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Aug 2014to Feb 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Liver Cirrhosis
  • Hypersplenism

Who cannot join

  • Patients with bad performance scale.
  • Patients with hepatic encephalopathy and tense ascites.
  • Patient with active esophageal variceal bleeding .
  • Patients with hypocellular bone marrow (BM).
  • Patients with renal failure.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Asem A Elfert, MD contact

+20-122-437-8188

asem1967@yahoo.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate

    Asem A Elfert, MD, +20-122-437-8188, asem1967@yahoo.com

    Asem A Elfert, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study of Microwave Ablation and Partial Splenic Embolization in the Management of Hypersplenism

The aim of this study is to compare microwave thermal coagulation and partial splenic embolization in the management of hypersplenism in patients with cirrhosis.

This study will be conducted on 40 patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly and hypersplenism. The study will be done at the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute.

Read the detailed description

Liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension is frequently associated with congestive splenomegaly resulting in hypersplenism.

Hypersplenism can be defined as anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or a combination of these resulting from excessive, splenic sequestration or pooling of blood cells, usually associated with clinical splenomegaly and always ameliorated by splenectomy.

Partial splenic embolization (PSE), which was first performed by Spigos et al in 1979, has been considered first-line therapy for hypersplenism in many institutions, and has been proposed as an effective alternative to splenectomy for improving peripheral blood cell counts. However, PSE is associated with many complications, including intermittent fever, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, post-embolization syndrome, splenic abscess, splenic rupture, pneumonia, refractory ascites, pleural effusion and gastrointestinal bleeding. To ensure a sustained and long-term increase in platelet and leucocytic counts, the splenic infarction rate needs to be greater than 50%. Thus, severe complications can ensue.

Thermal ablation methods using different energy sources, such as radiofrequency (RF), microwave (MW), or laser, were developed rapidly as minimally invasive techniques for the eradication of local tumor tissue within solid organs. There have been reports of the use of radiofrequency to ablate normal spleen, splenic injury, and splenomegaly.

Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) had comparable efficacy and a better safety than PSE in the treatment of hypersplenism in patients with post hepatitis c cirrhosis.

MW ablation performed either laparoscopically or percutaneously is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive technique for the management of hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis. It may significantly increase platelet count and white blood cells (WBC) count and improve hepatic blood supply with fewer complications. Ablating more than 40% of the splenic parenchyma may yield better long term results. This method may provide a new and promising minimally invasive alternative for treating hypersplenism.

The aim of this study is to compare microwave thermal coagulation and partial splenic embolization in the management of hypersplenism in patients with cirrhosis.

This study will be conducted on 40 patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly and hypersplenism. The study will be done at the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute.

All patients will be subjected to thorough history taking, full clinical, lab, ultrasound/doppler, and upper endoscopic examination. Diagnosis has been based on peripheral blood count and confirmed with bone marrow examination.

Preoperative antibiotics will be given and correction of bleeding tendency with plasma and platelet transfusion will be done as required to get a prothrombin concentration more than 65% and platelet count more than 100,000.

Conditions
Hypersplenism
Being tested
Microwave Thermal Coagulation, Partial Splenic Embolization
Medical subject headings
Hypersplenism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microwave Thermal CoagulationDevice

    Also called Microwave

    Microwave thermal coagulation of splenic parenchyma.

  • Partial Splenic EmbolizationDevice

    Also called PSE

    Femoral artery approach will be used for splenic artery catheterization with the tip of the catheter always well advanced selectively into the splenic artery. Embolizing agent will be injected in small increments. Arteriography in between divided doses will be done to document the extent of devascularization.

Study groups in NCT02261584
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microwave Thermal CoagulationExperimentalMW ablation performed either laparoscopically or percutaneously is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive technique for the management of hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis. It may significantly increase platelet count and white blood cell (WBC) count and improve hepatic blood supply with fewer complications. Ablating more than 40% of the splenic parenchyma may yield better long term results. This method may provide a new and promising minimally invasive alternative for treating hypersplenism.
Receives: Device: Microwave Thermal Coagulation
Partial Splenic Embolization CatheterExperimentalPartial splenic embolization (PSE), which was first performed by Spigos et al in 1979, has been considered first-line therapy for hypersplenism in many institutions, and has been proposed as an effective alternative to splenectomy for improving peripheral blood cell counts. However, PSE is associated with many complications, including intermittent fever, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, post-embolization syndrome, splenic abscess, splenic rupture, pneumonia, refractory ascites, pleural effusion and gastrointestinal bleeding. To ensure a sustained and long-term increase in platelet and leucocytic counts, the splenic infarction rate needs to be greater than 50% (8). Thus, severe complications can ensue.
Receives: Device: Partial Splenic Embolization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of participants with improvement of hypersplenism after microwave thermal coagulation of the spleen compared with partial splenic embolization.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02261584
Sponsor's protocol ID
Microwave vs PSE
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
26 Sep 2014
Last updated
10 Oct 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Pursnani KG, Sillin LF, Kaplan DS. Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on secondary hypersplenism. Am J Surg. 1997 Mar;173(3):169-73. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00006-8.

    PubMed 9124620
  • Spigos DG, Jonasson O, Mozes M, Capek V. Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of hypersplenism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979 May;132(5):777-82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.132.5.777.

    PubMed 107745
  • Tajiri T, Onda M, Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Kumazaki T. Long-term hematological and biochemical effects of partial splenic embolization in hepatic cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Sep-Oct;49(47):1445-8.

    PubMed 12239963
  • Sangro B, Bilbao I, Herrero I, Corella C, Longo J, Beloqui O, Ruiz J, Zozaya JM, Quiroga J, Prieto J. Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of hypersplenism in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1993 Aug;18(2):309-14.

    PubMed 8340060
  • N'Kontchou G, Seror O, Bourcier V, Mohand D, Ajavon Y, Castera L, Grando-Lemaire V, Ganne-Carrie N, Sellier N, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M. Partial splenic embolization in patients with cirrhosis: efficacy, tolerance and long-term outcome in 32 patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Feb;17(2):179-84. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200502000-00008.

    PubMed 15674095
  • Hayashi H, Beppu T, Okabe K, Masuda T, Okabe H, Baba H. Risk factors for complications after partial splenic embolization for liver cirrhosis. Br J Surg. 2008 Jun;95(6):744-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6081.

    PubMed 18412294
  • Zhu K, Meng X, Qian J, Huang M, Li Z, Guan S, Jiang Z, Shan H. Partial splenic embolization for hypersplenism in cirrhosis: a long-term outcome in 62 patients. Dig Liver Dis. 2009 Jun;41(6):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

    PubMed 19070555
  • Matsuoka T, Yamamoto A, Okuma T, Oyama Y, Nakamura K, Inoue Y. CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of spleen: a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Apr;188(4):1044-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0641.

    PubMed 17377043
  • Felekouras E, Kontos M, Pissanou T, Pikoulis E, Drakos E, Papalambros E, Diamantis T, Bastounis E. A new spleen-preserving technique using radiofrequency ablation technology. J Trauma. 2004 Dec;57(6):1225-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000145072.31725.52.

    PubMed 15625453
  • Liu Q, Ma K, He Z, Dong J, Hua X, Huang X, Qiao L. Radiofrequency ablation for hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis: a pilot study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 May-Jun;9(5):648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.11.006.

    PubMed 15862259
  • Wasfi et al., Prospective randomized controlled study of Radiofrequency Ablation and Partial Splenic Embolization in the Treatment of Hypersplenism in patients with post-hepatitis C cirrhosis. AASLD poster DDW 2014, Chicago, USA

  • Liang P, Gao Y, Zhang H, Yu X, Wang Y, Duan Y, Shi W. Microwave ablation in the spleen for treatment of secondary hypersplenism: a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):692-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4193.

    PubMed 21343515
  • Rasekhi AR, Naderifar M, Bagheri MH, Shahriari M, Foroutan H, Karimi M, Nabavizadeh SA. Radiofrequency ablation of the spleen in patients with thalassemia intermedia: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1425-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1382.

    PubMed 19380572
  • Crooks V, Waller S, Smith T, Hahn TJ. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):M139-44. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139.

    PubMed 2071835

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microwave Thermal Coagulation and Partial Splenic Embolization in people with Hypersplenism, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Asem A Elfert, MD (+20-122-437-8188, asem1967@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of participants with improvement of hypersplenism after microwave thermal coagulation of the spleen compared with partial splenic embolization. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02261584, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in