AbscessNCT02264392
US Guided Versus BlindI&D for Treatment of Soft Tissue Abscesses in the ED
A study testing Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage and Blind Incision and Drainage in people with Abscess, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Standard treatment for a soft tissue abscess involves incision over the area of maximum fluctuance with drainage of purulence from the abscess cavity. The use of bedside ultrasound to guide this drainage has the potential to improve treatment outcomes by ensuring complete drainage of the cavity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Abscess
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage and Blind Incision and Drainage
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 124 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Soft tissue abscess suspected by patient history and physical exam and confirmed by bedside ultrasound
- Able to provide written consent/ assent
- Incision and drainage to be performed by ED physician
Who cannot join
- Peritonsillar abscess
- Pilonidal cyst, genital or perirectal abscess
- Post-surgical wound infections
- Pregnant
- Prisoners
- Previous incision and drainage for current abscess
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UMASS Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: Ultrasound Guided Versus Blind Incision and Drainage for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Abscesses in the Emergency Department
Standard treatment for a soft tissue abscess involves incision over the area of maximum fluctuance with drainage of purulence from the abscess cavity. The use of bedside ultrasound to guide this drainage has the potential to improve treatment outcomes by ensuring complete drainage of the cavity.
Our hypothesis is that the use of ultrasound for guidance of incision and drainage of soft tissue abscesses will decrease treatment failure rate compared to standard blind incision and drainage.
This hypothesis will be tested utilizing a blinded, randomized trial comparing standard incision and drainage to ultrasound guided incision and drainage.
Read the detailed description
- Background* The incidence of soft tissue infections is increasing, representing over 30 million emergency department visits per year. While there has been extensive research in recent years surrounding the use of antibiotics for soft tissue abscesses, the surgical management remains unchanged with standard therapy consisting of blind incision and drainage of the abscess cavity.
Despite incision and drainage and a spectrum of antibiotic coverage, treatment failure rates for these infections range from 5-20%. It is possible that part of this treatment failure can be attributed to inadequate abscess cavity evacuation. With blind drainage, it is possible that residual purulence or unforeseen satellite abscess cavities contribute to the persistence of the infection.
Ultrasound has been shown to aid in the identification of soft tissue abscesses and to help differentiate cellulitis from an abscess. Over the last decade, clinician performed bedside ultrasound has become a standard in the practice of emergency medicine with proficiency requirements now in place for graduating emergency medicine residents. While many practitioners have in fact adopted ultrasound in its use for the identification of abscesses, few subsequently use the ultrasound for procedural guidance.
We are specifically interested in studying the use of ultrasound for identifying the ideal location for initial incision as well as use of post procedural ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation of abscess purulence.
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria*
Subjects enrolled in this study will include patients presenting to the emergency department with a diagnosis of soft tissue abscess. This includes patients of all ages and gender but will exclude individuals who cannot give consent or are prisoners (as they cannot return for follow up or be contacted for follow up).
Inclusion Criteria:
- Soft tissue abscess suspected by patient history and physical exam and confirmed by bedside ultrasound
- Able to provide written consent/ assent
- Incision and drainage to be performed by ED physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Peritonsillar abscess
- Pilonidal cyst, genital or perirectal abscess
- Post-surgical wound infections
- Pregnant
- Prisoners
- Previous incision and drainage for current abscess
- Study-Wide Number of Subjects* N/A - Not a multi center study.
- Study-Wide Recruitment Methods* Study subjects will be recruited from the patient population of the emergency departments on the Memorial and University campuses of UMASSMemorial Medical Center. Patients with signs and symptoms of soft tissue abscess confirmed by bedside ultrasound will be identified and enrolled by treating physicians. This will occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
- Study Timelines* A study subject's participation in the study will last for 1 week from the time of enrollment. This will consist of the initial study visit (emergency department encounter for treatment of the abscess), a follow-up visit at 2-3 days for wound evaluation and wick removal, and a telephone encounter at 1 week to 10 days.
Based on previous studies conducted by our group with a similar patient population and study protocol, we anticipate enrollment of 274 patients will take 2 years.
- Study Endpoints*
The primary endpoint is failure of treatment at 7 days. This is defined as any of the following:
- Need for repeat incision and drainage
- Need for additional antibiotic coverage
- Hospital Admission for intravenous antibiotics following the initial encounter 10) Procedures Involved* Patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected superficial abscesses that require an incision and drainage will be eligible for enrollment. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: 1) Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage and 2) Standard Incision and Drainage. As a patient is identified for enrollment, the investigator will open a study packet containing standardized data collection sheet, consent documents and random designation for treatment group.
Group 1 Protocol: Ultrasound-guided Incision and Drainage Patients will be identified that require Incision and Drainage. An initial ultrasound will be performed to localize the abscess cavity. Anesthetic will be provided in the standard fashion by injected into the skin around the abscess. Incision of the skin overlying the abscess cavity and drainage of the purulent material will be followed by a repeat ultrasound to assess for complete drainage. Any additional pockets identified will be targeted for drainage until repeated ultrasound imaging demonstrates that the abscess cavity is completely drained. This post procedural ultrasound is performed on all patients currently undergoing ultrasound guided drainage of a superficial abscess. In patients where drainage cannot be completed, surgery will be consulted. The procedure will then be completed with placement of an iodoform wick and bulky dressing. Patients will be placed on oral antibiotics at the discretion of the treating attending physician and instructed to return in 2-3 days to the emergency department for re-evaluation and wick removal or sooner if problems arise. If necessary, additional drainage maybe performed. Additional I\&D will be performed with or without ultrasound at the discretion of the attending physician.
A telephone follow-up 7-10 days post-procedure will be performed. Questions asked in follow up are located on the follow-up data sheet. See attachments or addendum. Blinding to the treatment group is accomplished by having follow up to determine the outcome of the treatment performed by an individual who is blinded to the initial ultrasound findings or treatment group.
Group 2 Protocol: Standard Incision and Drainage Patients will be identified that require Incision and Drainage*. Anesthetic will be provided in the standard fashion by injection in the skin around the abscess. Incision of the skin overlying the abscess cavity and drainage of the purulent material will be followed by placement of an iodoform wick and bulky dressing. Patients will be placed on oral antibiotics at the discretion of the treating attending physician and instructed to return in 2 days to the emergency department for re-evaluation and wick removal or sooner if problems arise. If necessary, additional drainage maybe performed. Additional I\&D will be performed with or without ultrasound at the discretion of the attending physician.
A telephone follow-up 7 days post-procedure will be performed. This is the same follow up as in group 1. The research personnel will introduce themselves as research personnel from UMASS and will inform the subject that they are following up from their recent visit to the ED. They will ask the questions from the telephone follow-up data sheet and will refer to it as they conduct the follow up.
Blinding to the treatment group is accomplished by having follow up to determine the outcome of the treatment performed by an individual who is blinded to the initial ultrasound findings or treatment group.
*This decision may be made solely based on history and physical exam or by inital identification with ultrasound. If the presence of an abscess is initially identified without ultrasound, the original treating physician can continue to perform the Incision and Drainage procedure. If the presence of an abscess is initially identified with an ultrasound then another physician will need to perform the standard Incision and Drainage. The second physician is at liberty to perform the standard history and physical to assess the presence of the abscess prior to drainage. The second physician may be another resident or the attending physician overseeing the patient's care, provided they are blinded to the initial ultrasound identifying the presence of the abscess.
A standardized data sheet will record patient information, results of the procedure, time to perform the procedure, need for additional drainage and post-procedure recurrence of the abscess, need for change in oral antibiotic coverage and need for admission to the for intravenous antibiotics.
- Data Management* Power Calcuation - Assuming an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.2 and projected failure rate in the blind incision and drainage group of 20%, 119 subjects in each group will be required to detect a 20% reduction in treatment failure. Accounting for a 15% loss to follow-up will require a total number of subjects of 274 subjects. Patients assigned to each group will undergo analysis using the intention to treat principles.
Data will be stored on a password-protected computer in the locked offices of the department of emergency medicine on the University Campus of UMASSMemorial Medical Center. Only study personnel and the UMASS IRB will have access to the data.
Descriptive data will be analyzed using mean and standard deviation. Comparison between groups will be performed using Chi square analysis (categorical data) and Student's T-test (continuous data).
- Conditions
- Abscess
- Being tested
- Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage, Blind Incision and Drainage
- Medical subject headings
- Abscess
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasound Guided Incision and DrainageProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound guidance of the abscess drainage
Blind Incision and DrainageProcedure or surgery
Also called I&D
Incision and drainage of abscess guided by physical exam alone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guided | Active comparator | Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage- Patients will undergo ultrasound guided drainage of the abscess using bedside ultrasound Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage |
| Blind I&D | Active comparator | Blind Incision and Drainage- Patients will undergo drainage of the abscess using physical exam. Receives: Procedure: Blind Incision and Drainage |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Failure of Therapy
Patient with a reoccurrence of the abscess
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completion30 Aug 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AbscessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Massachusetts, WorcesterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Romolo Gaspari, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Investigators
- Romolo Gaspari, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, UMass Memorial Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02264392
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UMASSEDUS4
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gaspari RJ, Sanseverino A, Gleeson T. Abscess Incision and Drainage With or Without Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;73(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
PubMed 30126754
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound Guided Versus Blind Incision and Drainage for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Abscesses in the Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02264392
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UMASSEDUS4
- Conditions
- Abscess
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, WorcesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Standard treatment for a soft tissue abscess involves incision over the area of maximum fluctuance with drainage of purulence from the abscess cavity. The use of bedside ultrasound to guide this drainage has the potential to improve treatment outcomes by ensuring complete drainage of the cavity.
Our hypothesis is that the use of ultrasound for guidance of incision and drainage of soft tissue abscesses will decrease treatment failure rate compared to standard blind incision and drainage.
This hypothesis will be tested utilizing a blinded, randomized trial comparing standard incision and drainage to ultrasound guided incision and drainage.
Detailed description
- Background* The incidence of soft tissue infections is increasing, representing over 30 million emergency department visits per year. While there has been extensive research in recent years surrounding the use of antibiotics for soft tissue abscesses, the surgical management remains unchanged with standard therapy consisting of blind incision and drainage of the abscess cavity.
Despite incision and drainage and a spectrum of antibiotic coverage, treatment failure rates for these infections range from 5-20%. It is possible that part of this treatment failure can be attributed to inadequate abscess cavity evacuation. With blind drainage, it is possible that residual purulence or unforeseen satellite abscess cavities contribute to the persistence of the infection.
Ultrasound has been shown to aid in the identification of soft tissue abscesses and to help differentiate cellulitis from an abscess. Over the last decade, clinician performed bedside ultrasound has become a standard in the practice of emergency medicine with proficiency requirements now in place for graduating emergency medicine residents. While many practitioners have in fact adopted ultrasound in its use for the identification of abscesses, few subsequently use the ultrasound for procedural guidance.
We are specifically interested in studying the use of ultrasound for identifying the ideal location for initial incision as well as use of post procedural ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation of abscess purulence.
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria*
Subjects enrolled in this study will include patients presenting to the emergency department with a diagnosis of soft tissue abscess. This includes patients of all ages and gender but will exclude individuals who cannot give consent or are prisoners (as they cannot return for follow up or be contacted for follow up).
Inclusion Criteria:
- Soft tissue abscess suspected by patient history and physical exam and confirmed by bedside ultrasound
- Able to provide written consent/ assent
- Incision and drainage to be performed by ED physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Peritonsillar abscess
- Pilonidal cyst, genital or perirectal abscess
- Post-surgical wound infections
- Pregnant
- Prisoners
- Previous incision and drainage for current abscess
- Study-Wide Number of Subjects* N/A - Not a multi center study.
- Study-Wide Recruitment Methods* Study subjects will be recruited from the patient population of the emergency departments on the Memorial and University campuses of UMASSMemorial Medical Center. Patients with signs and symptoms of soft tissue abscess confirmed by bedside ultrasound will be identified and enrolled by treating physicians. This will occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
- Study Timelines* A study subject's participation in the study will last for 1 week from the time of enrollment. This will consist of the initial study visit (emergency department encounter for treatment of the abscess), a follow-up visit at 2-3 days for wound evaluation and wick removal, and a telephone encounter at 1 week to 10 days.
Based on previous studies conducted by our group with a similar patient population and study protocol, we anticipate enrollment of 274 patients will take 2 years.
- Study Endpoints*
The primary endpoint is failure of treatment at 7 days. This is defined as any of the following:
- Need for repeat incision and drainage
- Need for additional antibiotic coverage
- Hospital Admission for intravenous antibiotics following the initial encounter 10) Procedures Involved* Patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected superficial abscesses that require an incision and drainage will be eligible for enrollment. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: 1) Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage and 2) Standard Incision and Drainage. As a patient is identified for enrollment, the investigator will open a study packet containing standardized data collection sheet, consent documents and random designation for treatment group.
Group 1 Protocol: Ultrasound-guided Incision and Drainage Patients will be identified that require Incision and Drainage. An initial ultrasound will be performed to localize the abscess cavity. Anesthetic will be provided in the standard fashion by injected into the skin around the abscess. Incision of the skin overlying the abscess cavity and drainage of the purulent material will be followed by a repeat ultrasound to assess for complete drainage. Any additional pockets identified will be targeted for drainage until repeated ultrasound imaging demonstrates that the abscess cavity is completely drained. This post procedural ultrasound is performed on all patients currently undergoing ultrasound guided drainage of a superficial abscess. In patients where drainage cannot be completed, surgery will be consulted. The procedure will then be completed with placement of an iodoform wick and bulky dressing. Patients will be placed on oral antibiotics at the discretion of the treating attending physician and instructed to return in 2-3 days to the emergency department for re-evaluation and wick removal or sooner if problems arise. If necessary, additional drainage maybe performed. Additional I\&D will be performed with or without ultrasound at the discretion of the attending physician.
A telephone follow-up 7-10 days post-procedure will be performed. Questions asked in follow up are located on the follow-up data sheet. See attachments or addendum. Blinding to the treatment group is accomplished by having follow up to determine the outcome of the treatment performed by an individual who is blinded to the initial ultrasound findings or treatment group.
Group 2 Protocol: Standard Incision and Drainage Patients will be identified that require Incision and Drainage*. Anesthetic will be provided in the standard fashion by injection in the skin around the abscess. Incision of the skin overlying the abscess cavity and drainage of the purulent material will be followed by placement of an iodoform wick and bulky dressing. Patients will be placed on oral antibiotics at the discretion of the treating attending physician and instructed to return in 2 days to the emergency department for re-evaluation and wick removal or sooner if problems arise. If necessary, additional drainage maybe performed. Additional I\&D will be performed with or without ultrasound at the discretion of the attending physician.
A telephone follow-up 7 days post-procedure will be performed. This is the same follow up as in group 1. The research personnel will introduce themselves as research personnel from UMASS and will inform the subject that they are following up from their recent visit to the ED. They will ask the questions from the telephone follow-up data sheet and will refer to it as they conduct the follow up.
Blinding to the treatment group is accomplished by having follow up to determine the outcome of the treatment performed by an individual who is blinded to the initial ultrasound findings or treatment group.
*This decision may be made solely based on history and physical exam or by inital identification with ultrasound. If the presence of an abscess is initially identified without ultrasound, the original treating physician can continue to perform the Incision and Drainage procedure. If the presence of an abscess is initially identified with an ultrasound then another physician will need to perform the standard Incision and Drainage. The second physician is at liberty to perform the standard history and physical to assess the presence of the abscess prior to drainage. The second physician may be another resident or the attending physician overseeing the patient's care, provided they are blinded to the initial ultrasound identifying the presence of the abscess.
A standardized data sheet will record patient information, results of the procedure, time to perform the procedure, need for additional drainage and post-procedure recurrence of the abscess, need for change in oral antibiotic coverage and need for admission to the for intravenous antibiotics.
- Data Management* Power Calcuation - Assuming an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.2 and projected failure rate in the blind incision and drainage group of 20%, 119 subjects in each group will be required to detect a 20% reduction in treatment failure. Accounting for a 15% loss to follow-up will require a total number of subjects of 274 subjects. Patients assigned to each group will undergo analysis using the intention to treat principles.
Data will be stored on a password-protected computer in the locked offices of the department of emergency medicine on the University Campus of UMASSMemorial Medical Center. Only study personnel and the UMASS IRB will have access to the data.
Descriptive data will be analyzed using mean and standard deviation. Comparison between groups will be performed using Chi square analysis (categorical data) and Student's T-test (continuous data).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guided | Active comparator | Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Incision and DrainageUltrasound Guided Incision and Drainage- Patients will undergo ultrasound guided drainage of the abscess using bedside ultrasound |
| Blind I&D | Active comparator | Procedure: Blind Incision and DrainageBlind Incision and Drainage- Patients will undergo drainage of the abscess using physical exam. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Soft tissue abscess suspected by patient history and physical exam and confirmed by bedside ultrasound
- Able to provide written consent/ assent
- Incision and drainage to be performed by ED physician
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Peritonsillar abscess
- Pilonidal cyst, genital or perirectal abscess
- Post-surgical wound infections
- Pregnant
- Prisoners
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guided Incision and DrainageUltrasound guidance of the abscess drainage | Procedure or surgery | Ultrasound Guided |
| Blind Incision and DrainageAlso: I&DIncision and drainage of abscess guided by physical exam alone | Procedure or surgery | Blind I&D |
Primary outcome
Failure of Therapy
Time frame: 7 days
Patient with a reoccurrence of the abscess
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30126754Gaspari RJ, Sanseverino A, Gleeson T. Abscess Incision and Drainage With or Without Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;73(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Related trials for Abscess
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy of Methylene Blue Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Deep Tissue Abscesses
Abscess
RecruitingPhase 4
A Single Dose of Intravenous Penicillin as an Adjunct to Oral Penicillin in the Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis, Peritonsillar Phlegmon, and Peritonsillar Abscess
Acute Tonsillitis, Peritonsillar Abscess
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Amicidin-β Topical Solution for Patients With a Contaminated or Infected Surgical or Traumatic Wound or Cutaneous Abscess
Surgical Wound Infection, Traumatic Wound Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Non-Surgical Treatment of Periapical Inflammatory Lesions With Vitapex Paste
Periapical Periodontitis, Periapical Abscess
RecruitingPhase 2
Prospective Evaluation Of High-Dose Systemic Methotrexate In Patients With Breast Cancer And Leptomeningeal Metastasis
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Leptomeningeal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Romolo Gaspari, MD, PhD principal investigator
UMass Memorial Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound Guided Incision and Drainage and Blind Incision and Drainage in people with Abscess, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Failure of Therapy (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02264392, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2018.