AzTrials
AzTrials

Adverse EventsNCT02268331

Comparison of Active vs. Passive Surveillance to Collect Adverse Events

A study testing Active Surveillance and Passive Surveillance in people with Adverse Events, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cluster randomized trial will be the first to specifically evaluate passive versus active surveillance methods collection of adverse events (AEs). The evaluation of these methods will be performed within the chiropractic healthcare profession, specifically among those who treat children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Adverse Events
What is being tested?
Active Surveillance and Passive Surveillance
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Oct 2014to Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Licensed doctors of chiropractic who provide manual therapy in US or Canada
  • Willing to collect data per protocol for 60 consecutive pediatric (13 years of age and younger) patients

Who cannot join

  • Doctors of chiropractic and patient participation will be limited to those that speak / read English.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • CARE

    Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 0L4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Active vs. Passive Surveillance to Collect Adverse Events After Chiropractic Manual Therapy in the Children

This cluster randomized trial will be the first to specifically evaluate passive versus active surveillance methods collection of adverse events (AEs). The evaluation of these methods will be performed within the chiropractic healthcare profession, specifically among those who treat children. To date there is no mandatory reporting and learning as part of their profession. In Europe, a passive (voluntary) reporting and learning online system (CPiRLS) has been created and will be utilized in this study for the passive reporting and learning arm.

Manual therapy is the most common intervention provided by the chiropractic profession and is the most commonly sought provider-administrated complementary and alternative therapy in the United States pediatric population. This study will randomize participating doctors of chiropractic who often treat children, to of one of two arms (active vs. passive reporting and learning) to evaluate the quantity and quality of AE data collected.

Conditions
Adverse Events
Being tested
Active Surveillance, Passive Surveillance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active SurveillanceOther

  • Passive SurveillanceOther

Study groups in NCT02268331
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active SurveillanceExperimentalFor 60 consecutive pediatric visits, patients will be asked to complete a PRE \& POST form to capture adverse events (AEs) that occur up to 1 week after treatment. The PRE-treatment form will be completed prior to the start of the visit. The POST-treatment form will be completed after the treatment visit and mailed directly to the investigative team. The providers will collect data on the treatment provided on the same 60 pediatric patients. The treatment provided is at the discretion of the doctors. If a moderate, serious, or severe AE occurs, the provider will complete the AE form with detailed information about potential risk factors and patient outcomes.
Receives: Other: Active Surveillance
Passive SurveillanceActive comparatorAll doctors allocated to this arm will be provided with a username and password with an established chiropractic passive surveillance reporting and learning online system (CPiRLS) in the UK. If a patient safety incident occurs in their office or an adverse event (AE), the provider will complete a report on the CPiRLS website. The providers can record events that occur during the time period of 60 pediatric visits. Treatment provided during these treatments is at the doctor's discretion.
Receives: Other: Passive Surveillance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adverse event occurring after treatment

    Measured: Up to one week after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionJul 2017
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02268331
Sponsor's protocol ID
Surveillance
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
10 Oct 2014
Last updated
25 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Pohlman KA, Carroll L, Tsuyuki RT, Hartling L, Vohra S. Active versus passive adverse event reporting after pediatric chiropractic manual therapy: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Dec 1;18(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2301-0.

    PubMed 29191232

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Surveillance and Passive Surveillance in people with Adverse Events, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adverse event occurring after treatment (time frame: Up to one week after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02268331, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in