Acute Myeloid LeukaemiaPhase 2/3AML18NCT02272478
Trial to Test the Effects of Adding 1 of 2 New Treatment Agents to Commonly Used Chemotherapy Combinations
A Phase 2/3 study testing Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351, Arm B Vosaroxin and Decitabine and Arm D Small molecule or Not in people with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome, run by Cardiff University at 87 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The AML18 Trial will evaluate several relevant therapeutic questions in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), as defined by the WHO, and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome. The trial is primarily designed for patients over 60 years considered fit for an intensive chemotherapeutic approach, but younger patients who may not be… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351, Arm B Vosaroxin and Decitabine and Arm D Small molecule or Not
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,600 participants
- Where
- 87 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Oct 2014to Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients are eligible for the AML18 trial if:
- They have one of the forms of acute myeloid leukaemia, except Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia as defined by the WHO Classification (Appendix A) this can be any type of de novo or secondary AML - or high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, defined as greater than 10% marrow blasts (RAEB-2). (NB patients with prior MDS (>10% blasts, RAEB2) have received azacitidine are not eligible for the trial, but patients with <10% who have failed a hypomethylating agent and developed AML may enter the trial).
- Patients should normally be over the age of 60, but patients under this age are eligible if they are not considered eligible for the MRC AML19 trial please contact the trial team for further information.
- Patients entering the Vosaroxin/Decitabine arm must be over the age of 60 and have known adverse risk cytogenetics.
- They have given written informed consent.
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN (upper limit of normal)
- Sexually mature males must agree to use an adequate and medically accepted method of contraception throughout the study if their sexual partners are women of child bearing potential (WOCBP). Men should be advised to not father a child while receiving trial treatment. Similarly women must agree to adequate contraceptive measures and avoid becoming pregnant while on protocol treatment. In both males and females these measures must be in place for at least 3 months following completion of Decitabine and at least 6 months after the last administration of Cladribine. The time period following treatment with Decitabine where it is safe to become pregnant is unknown. In the event of pregnancy at any point during the trial, the IMPs should be immediately stopped and the Trial Team should be contacted and pregnancy reporting procedures followed.
- ECOG Performance Status of 0-2
Who cannot join
- Patients are not eligible for the AML18 trial if:
- They have previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy for AML [Hydroxycarbamide, or similar low-dose therapy, to control the white count prior to initiation of intensive therapy, is not an exclusion]
- They are in blast transformation of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)
- They have a concurrent active malignancy excluding basal cell carcinoma
- They are pregnant or lactating
- They have Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
Show all 29Show fewer
- Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Patients with prior cumulative anthracycline exposure (from prior treatment of a non AML cancer) of greater than 300 mg/m2 daunorubicin (or equivalent).
- History of myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack (CVA/TIA) within 3 months before entry
- Specific exclusion criteria for the Mylotarg Arm
- Pre-existing liver impairment with known cirrhosis
- Total bilirubin > 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2.5 x ULN
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 x ULN
- Specific exclusion criteria for the Vosaroxin/Decitabine Entry
- Total bilirubin > 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN),
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2.5 x ULN
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 x ULN
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% by multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram (ECHO)]
- Specific exclusion criteria for CPX-351 treatment
- Hypersensitivity to cytarabine, daunorubicin or liposomal products
- History of Wilson's disease or other copper-metabolism disorder
- Specific exclusion criteria for Cladribine
- Patient's serum creatinine must be within the local ULN to enter the randomisation. Patients for whom this is not the case can be randomised between the remaining options.
- In addition patients are not eligible for the AC220 randomisation if they have:
- Cardiovascular System Exclusion Criteria:
- Known serious cardiac illness or medical conditions, including but not limited to:
- Clinically unstable cardiac disease, including unstable atrial fibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, unstable congestive heart failure, active myocardial ischemia, or indwelling temporary pacemaker II. Ventricular tachycardia or a supraventricular tachycardia that requires treatment with a Class Ia antiarrhythmic drug (e.g., quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide) or Class III antiarrhythmic drug (e.g., sotalol, amiodarone, dofetilide). Use of other antiarrhythmic drugs is permitted.
- Use of medications that have been linked to the occurrence of torsades de pointes (see Appendix for the list of such medications) IV. Second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block unless treated with a permanent pacemaker V. Complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) VI. History of long QT Syndrome or a family member with this condition VII. Serum potassium, magnesium, and calcium levels not outside the laboratory's reference range VIII. QTc >450 ms (average of triplicate ECG recordings); a consistent method of QTc calculation must be used for each patient's QTc measurements. QTcF (Fridericia's formula) is preferred. Please see the trial website for QTcF calculator.
Trial locations and contacts
87 sites in 2 countries.
87 sites in 2 countries
United Kingdom81 sites, 81 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen
Dominic Culligan, MD
- Recruiting
Monklands Hospital
Airdrie
John Murphy, MD
- Recruiting
Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital
Bangor
Jim Seale, MD
- Recruiting
Royal United Hospital Bath
Bath
Chris Knechtli, MD
- Recruiting
Belfast City Hospital
Belfast
Mary McMullin, MD
- Recruiting
Birmingham Heartland Hospital
Birmingham
Manos Nikolousis, MD
- Recruiting
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham
Charles Craddock, DPhil
- Recruiting
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool
Paul Cahalin, MD
- Recruiting
Ysbyty Glan Clwyd
Bodelwyddan
Earnest Heartin, MD
- Recruiting
Pilgrim Hospital
Boston
Charlotte Kallmeyer, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Bournemouth General Hospital
Bournemouth
Joseph Chacko, MD
- Recruiting
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford
Sam Ackroyd, MD
- Recruiting
Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre
Bristol
Priyanka Mehta, MD
- Recruiting
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge
Kiran Tawana, MD
- Recruiting
UHW
Cardiff, CF14 4XN
Steve Knapper
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff
Steve Knapper, MD
- Recruiting
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham
Adam Rye, MD
- Recruiting
Countess of Chester Hospital
Chester
Arvind Pillai, MD
- Recruiting
St Richard's Hospital
Chichester
Santosh Narat, MD
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire
Coventry
Beth Harris, MD
- Recruiting
Derby Teaching Hospital
Derby
Ian Amott, MD
- Recruiting
Russell Hall
Dudley
Rupert Hipkins, MD
- Recruiting
Ninewells Hospital
Dundee
Sudhir Tauro, MD
- Recruiting
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh
Peter Johnson, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital
Exeter
Jason Coppell, MD
- Recruiting
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow
Mhairi Copland, MD
- Recruiting
Hairmyres Hospital
Glasgow
John Murphy, MD
- Recruiting
The New Victoria Hospital
Glasgow
Gail Loud, MD
- Recruiting
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Gloucester
Adam Rye, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Free Hospital
Hamstead
Panagiotis Kottaridis, MD
- Recruiting
Raigmore Hospital
Inverness
Caroline Duncan, MD
- Recruiting
Ipswich Hospital
Ipswich
Mahesh Prahladan, MD
- Recruiting
Crosshouse & Ayr Hospital
Irvine
William Gordon, MD
- Recruiting
Kettering General Hospital
Kettering
Mark Kwan, MD
- Recruiting
Victoria Hospital
Kirkcaldy
Victoria Campbell, MD
- Recruiting
Forth Valley Royal Hospital
Larbert
Hugh Edwards, MD
- Recruiting
St Jame's University Hospital
Leeds
Richard Kelly, MD
- Recruiting
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester
Katherine Hodgson, MD
- Recruiting
Lincoln County Hospital
Lincoln
Charlotte Kallmeyer, MD
- Recruiting
Aintree University Hospital
Liverpool
Vikram Singh, MD
- Recruiting
The Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool
Amit Patel, MD
- Recruiting
Guy's Hospital
London
Kavita Raj, MD
- Recruiting
St Bartholomew's Hospital
London
Mathew Smith, MD
- Recruiting
St George's Hospital
London
Matthias Klammer, MD
- Recruiting
The Royal Marsden
London
David Taussig, M.D
- Recruiting
University College London Hospital
London
A Khwaja, MD
- Recruiting
Maidstone District General Hospital
Maidstone
Evangelia Dimitriadou, MD
- Recruiting
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester
Eleni Tholouli, MD
- Recruiting
The Christie Hospital
Manchester
Mike Dennis, MD
- Recruiting
Arrowe Park Hospital
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral
Ranjit Dasgupta, MD
- Recruiting
The James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough
Ray Dang, MD
- Recruiting
Milton Keynes
Milton Keynes
Moez Dungarwalla, MD
- Recruiting
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle
Gail Jones, MD
- Recruiting
Northampton General Hospital
Northampton
Jane Parker, MD
- Recruiting
Norfolk & Norwich University
Norwich
Angela Collins, MD
- Recruiting
Nottingham University Hospital
Nottingham
Nigel Russell, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Oldham Hospital
Oldham
David Osborne, MD
- Recruiting
Churchill Hospital
Oxford
Paresh Vyas, MD
- Recruiting
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth
Patrick Medd, MD
- Recruiting
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth
Robert Corser, MD
- Recruiting
Whiston Hospital & St Helens
Prescot
Toby Nicholson, MD
- Recruiting
Queen's Hospital
Romford
Paul Greaves, MD
- Recruiting
Salford Royal Hospital
Salford
Rowena Thomas-Dewing, MD
- Recruiting
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury
Jonathan Cullis, MD
- Recruiting
Wexham Park Hospital
Slough
Mark Offer, MD
- Recruiting
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton
Deborah Richardon, MD
- Recruiting
Stafford Hospital
Stafford
Paul Revell, MD
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Royal Stoke
Stoke-on-Trent
Srivinas Pillai, MD
- Recruiting
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Sunderland
Shikha Chattree, MD
- Recruiting
St Helier Hospital
Sutton
Simon Stern, MD
- Recruiting
Singleton Hospital
Swansea
Unmesh Monite, MD
- Recruiting
Torbay District General Hospital
Torquay
Deborah Turner, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Cornwall Hospital
Truro
Bryson Pottinger, MD
- Recruiting
Hillingdon Hospital
Uxbridge
Richard Kaczmarski, MD
- Recruiting
Pinderfields Hospital
Wakefield
Paul Moreton, MD
- Recruiting
Sandwell Hospital
West Bromwich
Farooq Wandroo, MD
- Recruiting
Wishaw General Hospital
Wishaw
John Murphy, MD
- Recruiting
New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton
Richard Whitmill, MD
- Recruiting
Worcestershire Royal Hospital
Worcester
Nicholas Pemberton, MD
- Recruiting
Worthing Hospital
Worthing
Santosh Narat, MD
- Recruiting
York Hospital
York
Lee Bond, MD
Denmark6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg
Marianne Severinsen, MD
- Recruiting
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus
Hans B Ommen, MD
- Recruiting
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Copenhagen
Claudia Schöllkopf, MD
- Recruiting
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen
Ulrik M Overgaard, MD
- Recruiting
Odense University Hospital
Odense
Duruta Weber, MD
- Recruiting
Roskilde Hospital
Roskilde
Peter Møller
About this study
Official title: A Trial for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
The AML18 Trial will evaluate several relevant therapeutic questions in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), as defined by the WHO, and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome. The trial is primarily designed for patients over 60 years considered fit for an intensive chemotherapeutic approach, but younger patients who may not be considered suitable for the concurrent NCRI AML Trial for younger patients may also enter. Patients for whom intensive chemotherapy is not thought suitable may enter the concurrent NCRI trial of less intensive therapy (LI1). Approximately 1600 patients will be recruited.
At entry, a randomisation will compare a standard chemotherapy schedule DA (Daunorubicin/Ara-C) combined with 1 dose of Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin, or GO) in course 1 against CPX-351. Patients who have known adverse risk cytogenetics (using Grimwade 2010 classification favourable/intermediate/adverse) at diagnosis may enter a Phase 2 evaluation of the combination of Vosaroxin plus Decitabine. Patients who achieve complete remission (CR) and who are MRD negative by flow cytometry after course one of DA will receive one further course of DA, with a randomisation to receive, either a course of DA or intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC) as a third course. Patients who are MRD negative by flow cytometry after course one of CPX-351 will receive up to 2 further course of CPX. Patients who fail to achieve a CR after course 1 of DA or who are MRD positive by flow cytometry or for whom MRD information is not available, are eligible to be randomised to compare DA with DA plus Cladribine (DAC) or FLAG-Ida for up to two courses of therapy. Patients who fail to achieve a CR after course 1 of CPX-351 or who are MRD positive by flow cytometry or for whom MRD information is not available are eligible to be randomised between a second course of standard dose CPX versus a repeat of the course 1 schedule. Patients receiving Vosaroxin and Decitabine are excluded from these post course 1 randomisations .
Read more
Following the outcome of course 1, patients who received DA chemotherapy on course 1 will be randomised to receive further chemotherapy with the 2nd generation FLT3 inhibitor AC220. Patients randomised to AC220 will be allocated a maximum of 3 courses (short AC220) or 3 courses plus maintenance for 1 year (long AC220). Patients receiving Vosaroxin and Decitabine are excluded from this randomisation.
Patients will be eligible for a non-intensive allogeneic stem cell transplant if a suitable HLA matched donor is available.
Read the detailed description
AML18 is a trial primarily for older patients with AML and high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). It offers a randomised controlled Phase II/III trial which uses a factorial design for maximum efficiency to evaluate two induction options followed by treatment with small molecule beyond course 1, and dose intensification for patients without evidence of MRD negativity.
There are five randomised comparisons within the trial:
- At diagnosis: For patients not known to have adverse risk cytogenetics DA chemotherapy plus a single dose of 3 mg/m2 of Mylotarg versus CPX-351. Patients with abnormal LFTs can enter the randomisation but receive DA alone or CPX-351.
- For patients who received DA chemotherapy but are not in CR or who are MRD +ve, or for whom MRD is not assessable. DA versus DAC versus FLAG-Ida
- All patients at second course who have received DA and have not received Vosaroxin and Decitabine induction AC220 versus no AC220 for a maximum of 3 cycles; then with or without maintenance for 1 year for patients allocated AC220
- For patients who are in CR or CRi and MRD -ve post course1 and have completed 2 courses of DA DA versus intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC)
- For patients who received CPX-351 chemotherapy but are not in CR or who are MRD +ve, or for whom MRD is not assessable CPX-351 100 units/m2 x 3 doses versus CPX-351 100 units/m2 x 2 doses
The trial will also assess:
- Non-intensive allogeneic stem cell transplant for patients with matched sibling or matched unrelated donors.
- The combination of Vosaroxin and Decitabine for those with known adverse risk cytogenetics at diagnosis
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Being tested
- Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351, Arm B Vosaroxin and Decitabine, Arm D Small molecule or Not, Arm C DA V FLAG-Ida V DAC, Arm E CPX-351 (200 V 300)
- Keywords
- AML, MDS
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351Drug
Also called Mylotarg (GO), CPX-351
Patients not known to have adverse risk cytogenetics will enter a randomisation comparing DA with Mylotarg (GO) delivered at 3mg/m2 on day 1 of chemotherapy, with CPX-351 on days 1, 3 and 5.
Arm B Vosaroxin and DecitabineDrug
Also called Vosaroxin, Decitabine
If a patient is known to have adverse risk Cytogenetics at diagnosis they will enter a registration to receive up to 5 courses of Vosaroxin and Decitabine.
Arm D Small molecule or NotDrug
Also called No AC220
The randomisation to AC220 or not will take place immediately before course 2 of treatment for patients who have received DA induction +/- Mylotarg, irrespective of residual disease status. Patients allocated to receive AC220 will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to AC220 or no small molecule with a 1:1 randomisation in patients drawing AC220 between short and long therapy.
Arm C DA V FLAG-Ida V DACDrug
Also called DA, FLAG-Ida, DAC
If a patient is not in CR or CRi after course 1 or is MRD +ve/unknown by flow cytometry they will be eligible to be randomised in a 1:1:1 fashion between DA, FLAG-Ida (or mini FLAG-Ida if 70 years or older) and DAC.
Arm E CPX-351 (200 V 300)Drug
Also called CPX-351
If a patient is not in CR or CRi after course 1 or is MRD +ve/unknown by flow cytometry they will be eligible to be randomised in a 1:1 fashion between CPX given on days 1, 3 and 5 (3 doses) and CPX given on days 1 and 3 (2 doses).
Arm F DA V IDACDrug
Also called IDAC, DA
Following recovery from course 2, patients in the MRD-ve arm will be randomised between a further 5-day cycle of DA or a cycle of intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC) as the third chemotherapy course.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active comparator | Patients not known adverse karyotype
Randomise between
Daunorubicin 60mg/m2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1, 3 and 5 (3 doses) Cytosine Arabinoside 100mg/m2 12 hourly by i.v. push on days 1 - 10 inclusive (20 doses) Mylotarg (GO) 3mg/m2 on day 1 of DA chemotherapy
Versus
CPX-351 100 units/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 Receives: Drug: Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351 |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Patients with known adverse karyotype
5 cycles of Vosaroxin and Decitabine therapy Receives: Drug: Arm B Vosaroxin and Decitabine |
| Arm C | Active comparator | Prior to Course 2 - Patients receving DA plus GO in course 1 and MRD positive PC1
Randomise between
Daunorubicin 50mg/2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1, 3 and 5 (3 doses) Cytosine Arabinoside 100mg/m2 12 hourly by i.v.push on days 1 - 8 inclusive (16 doses)
Versus
Daunorubicin 50mg/m2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1, 3 and 5 Cytosine Arabinoside 100mg/m2 12 hourly by i.v. push on days 1 - 8 inclusive Cladribine 5mg/m2 daily on days 1 - 5 inclusive
Versus Patients aged 60-69 Fludarabine 30mg/m2 daily on i.v. on days 2 - 6 inclusive Cytosine Arabinoside 1g/m2 daily over 4 hours Fludarabine on days 2 - 6 inclusive
Patients aged 70+ Fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily i.v. on days 2 - 5 inclusive Cytosine Arabinoside 1g/m2 daily over 4 hours Fludarabine on days 2 - 5 inclusive Idarubicin 5mg/m2 i.v. daily on days 3, 4 and 5 (3 doses)
And Randomisation to receive AC220 or not Receives: Drug: Arm D Small molecule or Not; Drug: Arm C DA V FLAG-Ida V DAC |
| Arm D | Active comparator | Prior to Course 2 - Patients that received DA plus GO in course 1 and MRD negative PC1
Randomisation to receive AC220 or not Receives: Drug: Arm D Small molecule or Not |
| Arm E | Active comparator | Prior to Course 2 for patients receiving CPX in course 1 and MRD positive PC1
Randomisation between
CPX-351 100 units/m2 on days 1, and 3 (CPX 200) versus CPX-351 100 units/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 (CPX 300) Receives: Drug: Arm E CPX-351 (200 V 300) |
| Arm F | Active comparator | Prior to Course 3 - Patients that received DA plus GO in course 1 and MRD negative PC1
Randomise between Daunorubicin 50 mg/m2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1 and 3 (2 doses) Cytosine Arabinoside 100 mg/m2 12-hourly by i.v. push on days 1 - 5 inclusive (10 doses)
versus
Intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC) schedule Cytosine Arabinoside 1g/m2 daily by 4 hour infusion on days 1- 5 inclusive (5 doses) Receives: Drug: Arm F DA V IDAC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Measured: 1 year
Complete remission (CR + CRi) achievement and reasons for failure (for induction questions)
Measured: 1 month
Duration of remission, relapse rates and deaths in first CR
Measured: 1 month
Toxicity, both haematological and non-haematological
Measured: 1 month
Supportive care requirements (and other aspects of health economics)
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
The relevance of the presence of a cytogenetic abnormality in the bone marrow of patients in morphological remission
Measured: At study end
The relevance of molecular characteristics and response to treatment
Measured: 1 month
To store diagnostic tissue for future research in the AML Tissue Bank
Measured: 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start30 Oct 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukaemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiff University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cancer Research UK
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof Nigel Russell, Cardiff University
- Investigators
- Nigel Russell, Prof, Principal investigator, Nottingham University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02272478
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AML18
- Acronym
- AML18
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Knapper S, Dillon LW, Babu M, Thomas A, Thomas I, Hourigan CS, Andrew G, Dillon R, Gilkes A, Marquez Almuina N, King S, McCarthy N, Bahr R, Al-Ali RW, Stone L, Coats T, Byrne J, Green S, Overgaard UM, Sellar RS, Dennis M, Mehta P, Hills R, Freeman SD, Russell NH. CPX-351 vs daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in older adults with non-adverse-risk AML: the NCRI AML18 trial. Blood. 2026 Mar 5;147(10):1048-1057. doi: 10.1182/blood.2025031006.
PubMed 41237344
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Trial for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02272478
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AML18 / AML18
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Keywords
- AML, MDS
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiff UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cancer Research UK
- Study start
- 30 Oct 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The AML18 Trial will evaluate several relevant therapeutic questions in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), as defined by the WHO, and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome. The trial is primarily designed for patients over 60 years considered fit for an intensive chemotherapeutic approach, but younger patients who may not be considered suitable for the concurrent NCRI AML Trial for younger patients may also enter. Patients for whom intensive chemotherapy is not thought suitable may enter the concurrent NCRI trial of less intensive therapy (LI1). Approximately 1600 patients will be recruited.
At entry, a randomisation will compare a standard chemotherapy schedule DA (Daunorubicin/Ara-C) combined with 1 dose of Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin, or GO) in course 1 against CPX-351. Patients who have known adverse risk cytogenetics (using Grimwade 2010 classification favourable/intermediate/adverse) at diagnosis may enter a Phase 2 evaluation of the combination of Vosaroxin plus Decitabine. Patients who achieve complete remission (CR) and who are MRD negative by flow cytometry after course one of DA will receive one further course of DA, with a randomisation to receive, either a course of DA or intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC) as a third course. Patients who are MRD negative by flow cytometry after course one of CPX-351 will receive up to 2 further course of CPX. Patients who fail to achieve a CR after course 1 of DA or who are MRD positive by flow cytometry or for whom MRD information is not available, are eligible to be randomised to compare DA with DA plus Cladribine (DAC) or FLAG-Ida for up to two courses of therapy. Patients who fail to achieve a CR after course 1 of CPX-351 or who are MRD positive by flow cytometry or for whom MRD information is not available are eligible to be randomised between a second course of standard dose CPX versus a repeat of the course 1 schedule. Patients receiving Vosaroxin and Decitabine are excluded from these post course 1 randomisations .
Following the outcome of course 1, patients who received DA chemotherapy on course 1 will be randomised to receive further chemotherapy with the 2nd generation FLT3 inhibitor AC220. Patients randomised to AC220 will be allocated a maximum of 3 courses (short AC220) or 3 courses plus maintenance for 1 year (long AC220). Patients receiving Vosaroxin and Decitabine are excluded from this randomisation.
Patients will be eligible for a non-intensive allogeneic stem cell transplant if a suitable HLA matched donor is available.
Detailed description
AML18 is a trial primarily for older patients with AML and high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). It offers a randomised controlled Phase II/III trial which uses a factorial design for maximum efficiency to evaluate two induction options followed by treatment with small molecule beyond course 1, and dose intensification for patients without evidence of MRD negativity.
There are five randomised comparisons within the trial:
- At diagnosis: For patients not known to have adverse risk cytogenetics DA chemotherapy plus a single dose of 3 mg/m2 of Mylotarg versus CPX-351. Patients with abnormal LFTs can enter the randomisation but receive DA alone or CPX-351.
- For patients who received DA chemotherapy but are not in CR or who are MRD +ve, or for whom MRD is not assessable. DA versus DAC versus FLAG-Ida
- All patients at second course who have received DA and have not received Vosaroxin and Decitabine induction AC220 versus no AC220 for a maximum of 3 cycles; then with or without maintenance for 1 year for patients allocated AC220
- For patients who are in CR or CRi and MRD -ve post course1 and have completed 2 courses of DA DA versus intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC)
- For patients who received CPX-351 chemotherapy but are not in CR or who are MRD +ve, or for whom MRD is not assessable CPX-351 100 units/m2 x 3 doses versus CPX-351 100 units/m2 x 2 doses
The trial will also assess:
- Non-intensive allogeneic stem cell transplant for patients with matched sibling or matched unrelated donors.
- The combination of Vosaroxin and Decitabine for those with known adverse risk cytogenetics at diagnosis
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active comparator | Drug: Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351Patients not known adverse karyotype Randomise between Daunorubicin 60mg/m2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1, 3 and 5 (3 doses) Cytosine Arabinoside 100mg/m2 12 hourly by i.v. push on days 1 - 10 inclusive (20 doses) Mylotarg (GO) 3mg/m2 on day 1 of DA chemotherapy Versus CPX-351 100 units/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Drug: Arm B Vosaroxin and DecitabinePatients with known adverse karyotype 5 cycles of Vosaroxin and Decitabine therapy |
| Arm C | Active comparator | Drug: Arm D Small molecule or Not, Drug: Arm C DA V FLAG-Ida V DACPrior to Course 2 - Patients receving DA plus GO in course 1 and MRD positive PC1 Randomise between Daunorubicin 50mg/2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1, 3 and 5 (3 doses) Cytosine Arabinoside 100mg/m2 12 hourly by i.v.push on days 1 - 8 inclusive (16 doses) Versus Daunorubicin 50mg/m2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1, 3 and 5 Cytosine Arabinoside 100mg/m2 12 hourly by i.v. push on days 1 - 8 inclusive Cladribine 5mg/m2 daily on days 1 - 5 inclusive Versus Patients aged 60-69 Fludarabine 30mg/m2 daily on i.v. on days 2 - 6 inclusive Cytosine Arabinoside 1g/m2 daily over 4 hours Fludarabine on days 2 - 6 inclusive Patients aged 70+ Fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily i.v. on days 2 - 5 inclusive Cytosine Arabinoside 1g/m2 daily over 4 hours Fludarabine on days 2 - 5 inclusive Idarubicin 5mg/m2 i.v. daily on days 3, 4 and 5 (3 doses) And Randomisation to receive AC220 or not |
| Arm D | Active comparator | Drug: Arm D Small molecule or NotPrior to Course 2 - Patients that received DA plus GO in course 1 and MRD negative PC1 Randomisation to receive AC220 or not |
| Arm E | Active comparator | Drug: Arm E CPX-351 (200 V 300)Prior to Course 2 for patients receiving CPX in course 1 and MRD positive PC1 Randomisation between CPX-351 100 units/m2 on days 1, and 3 (CPX 200) versus CPX-351 100 units/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 (CPX 300) |
| Arm F | Active comparator | Drug: Arm F DA V IDACPrior to Course 3 - Patients that received DA plus GO in course 1 and MRD negative PC1 Randomise between Daunorubicin 50 mg/m2 daily by i.v. infusion on days 1 and 3 (2 doses) Cytosine Arabinoside 100 mg/m2 12-hourly by i.v. push on days 1 - 5 inclusive (10 doses) versus Intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC) schedule Cytosine Arabinoside 1g/m2 daily by 4 hour infusion on days 1- 5 inclusive (5 doses) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- They have one of the forms of acute myeloid leukaemia, except Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia as defined by the WHO Classification (Appendix A) this can be any type of de novo or secondary AML - or high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, defined as greater than 10% marrow blasts (RAEB-2). (NB patients with prior MDS (>10% blasts, RAEB2) have received azacitidine are not eligible for the trial, but patients with <10% who have failed a hypomethylating agent and developed AML may enter the trial).
- Patients should normally be over the age of 60, but patients under this age are eligible if they are not considered eligible for the MRC AML19 trial please contact the trial team for further information.
- Patients entering the Vosaroxin/Decitabine arm must be over the age of 60 and have known adverse risk cytogenetics.
- They have given written informed consent.
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN (upper limit of normal)
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- They have previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy for AML [Hydroxycarbamide, or similar low-dose therapy, to control the white count prior to initiation of intensive therapy, is not an exclusion]
- They are in blast transformation of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)
- They have a concurrent active malignancy excluding basal cell carcinoma
- They are pregnant or lactating
- They have Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351Also: Mylotarg (GO), CPX-351Patients not known to have adverse risk cytogenetics will enter a randomisation comparing DA with Mylotarg (GO) delivered at 3mg/m2 on day 1 of chemotherapy, with CPX-351 on days 1, 3 and 5. | Drug | Arm A |
| Arm B Vosaroxin and DecitabineAlso: Vosaroxin, DecitabineIf a patient is known to have adverse risk Cytogenetics at diagnosis they will enter a registration to receive up to 5 courses of Vosaroxin and Decitabine. | Drug | Arm B |
| Arm D Small molecule or NotAlso: No AC220The randomisation to AC220 or not will take place immediately before course 2 of treatment for patients who have received DA induction +/- Mylotarg, irrespective of residual disease status. Patients allocated to receive AC220 will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to AC220 or no small molecule with a 1:1 randomisation in patients drawing AC220 between short and long therapy. | Drug | Arm C, Arm D |
| Arm C DA V FLAG-Ida V DACAlso: DA, FLAG-Ida, DACIf a patient is not in CR or CRi after course 1 or is MRD +ve/unknown by flow cytometry they will be eligible to be randomised in a 1:1:1 fashion between DA, FLAG-Ida (or mini FLAG-Ida if 70 years or older) and DAC. | Drug | Arm C |
| Arm E CPX-351 (200 V 300)Also: CPX-351If a patient is not in CR or CRi after course 1 or is MRD +ve/unknown by flow cytometry they will be eligible to be randomised in a 1:1 fashion between CPX given on days 1, 3 and 5 (3 doses) and CPX given on days 1 and 3 (2 doses). | Drug | Arm E |
| Arm F DA V IDACAlso: IDAC, DAFollowing recovery from course 2, patients in the MRD-ve arm will be randomised between a further 5-day cycle of DA or a cycle of intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC) as the third chemotherapy course. | Drug | Arm F |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 1 year
Complete remission (CR + CRi) achievement and reasons for failure (for induction questions)
Time frame: 1 month
Duration of remission, relapse rates and deaths in first CR
Time frame: 1 month
Toxicity, both haematological and non-haematological
Time frame: 1 month
Supportive care requirements (and other aspects of health economics)
Time frame: 6 months
3 secondary outcomes
The relevance of the presence of a cytogenetic abnormality in the bone marrow of patients in morphological remission
Time frame: At study end
The relevance of molecular characteristics and response to treatment
Time frame: 1 month
To store diagnostic tissue for future research in the AML Tissue Bank
Time frame: 6 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41237344Knapper S, Dillon LW, Babu M, Thomas A, Thomas I, Hourigan CS, Andrew G, Dillon R, Gilkes A, Marquez Almuina N, King S, McCarthy N, Bahr R, Al-Ali RW, Stone L, Coats T, Byrne J, Green S, Overgaard UM, Sellar RS, Dennis M, Mehta P, Hills R, Freeman SD, Russell NH. CPX-351 vs daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in older adults with non-adverse-risk AML: the NCRI AML18 trial. Blood. 2026 Mar 5;147(10):1048-1057. doi: 10.1182/blood.2025031006.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nigel Russell, Prof principal investigator
Nottingham University
87 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Arm A Mylotarg plus DA Versus CPX-351, Arm B Vosaroxin and Decitabine and Arm D Small molecule or Not in people with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome, run by Cardiff University at 87 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 87 sites in United Kingdom, Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sophie King (02922510527, aml18@cardiff.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02272478, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2020.