IntubationVAVLNCT02277418
Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope
A study testing VAVL and MIL in people with Intubation and Resuscitation, run by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the Venner a.p. advance video laryngoscope to Miller laryngoscope during resuscitation with and without chest compressions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Intubation, Resuscitation
- What is being tested?
- VAVL and MIL
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 112 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine
- experienced emergency medical personnel (paramedics, nurses, physicians
Who cannot join
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Warsaw, Masovia, 03-122
About this study
Official title: Intubation of Child and Infant Manikins During Resuscitation. Does the Venner™ A.P. Advance™ Video Laryngoscope Improve Nurses' Performance?
The purpose of this study was to compare the Venner a.p. advance video laryngoscope to Miller laryngoscope during resuscitation with and without chest compressions.
Read the detailed description
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a life-saving procedure performed daily in emergency medicine. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines suggest that intubators should be able to secure the airway without interrupting chest compression. However, ETI with uninterrupted chest compression in patients can be a very difficult skill to acquire.
- Conditions
- Intubation, Resuscitation
- Being tested
- VAVL, MIL
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VAVLDevice
Also called Venner a.p. advance video laryngoscope
Videolaryngoscope
MILDevice
Also called Miller Laryngoscope
Direct laryngoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Child ETI withoutchest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. Receives: Device: VAVL; Device: MIL |
| Child ETI with chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). Receives: Device: VAVL; Device: MIL |
| Infant ETI with chest compressions | Experimental | endotracheal intubation (ETI) during infant mannikin resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. Receives: Device: VAVL; Device: MIL |
| Infant ETI without chest compressions | Experimental | Endotracheal intubation of infant mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. Receives: Device: VAVL; Device: MIL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to intubation
time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (4)
Success of intubation
effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
Measured: 1 day
POGO score
self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score
Measured: 1 day
VAS score
participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
Measured: 1 day
Cormack-Lehan scale
self reported Cormack-Lehan scale during intubation
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for IntubationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lukasz Szarpak, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
- Investigators
- Lukasz Szarpak, Principal investigator, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02277418
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ETI/2014/05
- Acronym
- VAVL
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intubation of Child and Infant Manikins During Resuscitation. Does the Venner™ A.P. Advance™ Video Laryngoscope Improve Nurses' Performance?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02277418
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VAVL / ETI/2014/05
- Conditions
- Intubation, Resuscitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and EducationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the Venner a.p. advance video laryngoscope to Miller laryngoscope during resuscitation with and without chest compressions.
Detailed description
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a life-saving procedure performed daily in emergency medicine. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines suggest that intubators should be able to secure the airway without interrupting chest compression. However, ETI with uninterrupted chest compression in patients can be a very difficult skill to acquire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Child ETI withoutchest compressions | Experimental | Device: VAVL, Device: MILEndotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. |
| Child ETI with chest compressions | Experimental | Device: VAVL, Device: MILEndotracheal intubation of mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). |
| Infant ETI with chest compressions | Experimental | Device: VAVL, Device: MILendotracheal intubation (ETI) during infant mannikin resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. |
| Infant ETI without chest compressions | Experimental | Device: VAVL, Device: MILEndotracheal intubation of infant mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine
- experienced emergency medical personnel (paramedics, nurses, physicians
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VAVLAlso: Venner a.p. advance video laryngoscopeVideolaryngoscope | Device | Child ETI with chest compressions, Child ETI withoutchest compressions, Infant ETI with chest compressions, Infant ETI without chest compressions |
| MILAlso: Miller LaryngoscopeDirect laryngoscopy | Device | Child ETI with chest compressions, Child ETI withoutchest compressions, Infant ETI with chest compressions, Infant ETI without chest compressions |
Primary outcome
Time to intubation
Time frame: 1 day
time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
4 secondary outcomes
Success of intubation
Time frame: 1 day
POGO score
Time frame: 1 day
VAS score
Time frame: 1 day
Cormack-Lehan scale
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2014.
Related trials for Intubation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sniper Intubation for Training of Undergraduate Medical Student
Intubation;Difficult
Enrolling by invitation
Pediatric Intubation Simulations With Bougie
Difficult Airway Intubation
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Educational Intervention on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure
Intubation, Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure
Recruiting
Hyperangulated vs Standard Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
Endobronchial Intubation, Double Lumen Tube Intubation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
LeHeR Maneuver vs Sniffing Position During Video Laryngoscopy in Predicted Difficult Airway
Difficult Airway, Difficult Intubation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lukasz Szarpak principal investigator
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VAVL and MIL in people with Intubation and Resuscitation, run by International Institute of Rescue Research and Education at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to intubation (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.