AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyNCT02293187

Impact of Vitamin D on 25-hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Physical Function

A study testing vitamin D3 in people with Vitamin D Deficiency and Sarcopenia, run by Tufts University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This one-year study will test the hypothesis that supplementation with vitamin D will improve lower extremity muscle performance in older men and women with vitamin D insufficiency. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency, Sarcopenia
What is being tested?
vitamin D3
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 Mar 2015to 31 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and postmenopausal women age 60 years and older
  • Women must be at least 1 year since last menses.
  • Subjects must agree not to take their own vitamin D in amounts >600 IU/day (for ages 51-70 years) or >800 IU/day (for ages 71 - 80 years) or more than 600 mg/day of supplemental calcium.
  • Subjects must agree not to have had more than 30 minutes/day of sun exposure at a southern latitude (< 34 degrees N) in the 2-month period prior to screening and not to travel south and be exposed to sunshine in the 3-month period prior to their final visit.
  • They will agree not to use tanning salons during the study.
  • Screening serum 25OHD of 20 to 50 nmol/L (8.0 to 20 ng/ml).

Who cannot join

  • Kidney stones - in the last 3 years
  • Calculated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min
  • Screening fasting spot urinary calcium:creatinine ratio (Ca:Cr) > 0.325 (corresponding to a 24-hr urine calcium of 350 mg)
  • Serum calcium exceeding upper normal limit (reference range 8.3 -10.2 mg/dl)
  • Other abnormalities in screening labs, at the discretion of the study physician (PI)
  • Sarcoidosis
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Evidence of chronic liver disease, including alcoholism
  • Cancer treatment in the last year (except basal cell carcinoma) or terminal illness
  • Treatment in the last 6 months with estrogen, raloxifene, calcitonin, or testosterone (vaginal estrogen use okay)
  • High dose thiazide therapy (>37.5 mg).
  • Treatment in the last year with teriparatide or denosumab
  • Treatment in the lsat 2 years with bisphosphonates
  • Oral corticosteroid therapy for over 3 weeks within the last 6 months
  • Anticonvulsant therapy
  • Physical conditions such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, heart failure or hemiplegia severe enough to prevent reasonable physical activity.
  • Non-English speaking subjects (We can't be confident that non-English speaking subjects could accurately identify intakes of calcium and vitamin D from non-study sources and this could increase their risk of toxicity from study drug.
  • Other abnormalities in screening labs, at the discretion of the study physician (the PI)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Supplemental Vitamin D on Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Short Term Indicators of Physical Function

This one-year study will test the hypothesis that supplementation with vitamin D will improve lower extremity muscle performance in older men and women with vitamin D insufficiency.

Read the detailed description

Vitamin D may have favorable effects on muscle but evidence is mixed. It appears that subjects with low starting levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) who receive adequate doses of vitamin D are the most likely to benefit. Vitamin D supplements are being widely recommended, however the amount of vitamin D needed to achieve the desired level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the circulation varies widely among individuals. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we will determine whether treating older adults with low starting 25OHD levels for one year with up to 1600 IU per day of vitamin D3 will improve muscle performance (e.g., lower extremity muscle power) and reduce muscle wasting (defined as reducing nitrogen excretion). Subjects in the vitamin D group will initially take 800 IU of vitamin D3 daily. If they have not achieved the desired level of 70 nmol/L after 4 mo, their dose will be doubled to 1600 IU per day for the remainder of the one-year study. The maximal dose of vitamin D3 to be taken in this study,1600 IU per day, is lower than the current safe upper limit of 4,000 IU per day set by the Institute of Medicine. Up to 100 healthy men and women, age 60 years and older will participate in this study. This investigation should increase our understanding of the impact of supplemental vitamin D on muscle performance.

Being tested
vitamin D3, Placebo
Keywords
vitamin D, muscle performance, falls
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency, Sarcopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vitamin D3Dietary supplement

    Also called cholecalciferol

    Dose for intervention arm is 800 IU/day for first 4 months. At 4 months, if vitamin D level <70 nmol/L, a second 800 IU capsule will be added to regimen (total of 1600 IU/d) for remainder of study.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called microcystalline cellulose

    Those in the placebo group will receive 1 capsule for first 4 months. At 4 month visit, one capsule will be added to regimen to be taken throughout the remainder of the study.

Study groups in NCT02293187
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vitamin D3Active comparatorVitamin D3, 800 IU will be given initially; after 4 months if D level < 70 nmol/L, increase dose to 1600 IU for remainder of study.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: vitamin D3
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo, microcrystalline cellulose
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The effect of supplemental vitamin D3 vs placebo on leg power and nitrogen excretion.

    Aim of the study is to look at the effect of supplemental vitamin D3 vs placebo on leg power and nitrogen excretion.To determine Vitamin D will improve leg power and reduce muscle wasting, as measured by 24-hr nitrogen excretion.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To describe the safety (assessed by serum calcium) of the administered doses of vitamin D3.

    To describe the safety (assessed by serum calcium) of the administered doses of vitamin D3.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Mar 2015
  3. Primary completion13 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02293187
Sponsor's protocol ID
2710
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
23 Jul 2014
Last updated
21 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Shea MK, Fielding RA, Dawson-Hughes B. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on lower-extremity power and function in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb 1;109(2):369-379. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy290.

    PubMed 30715090

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vitamin D3 in people with Vitamin D Deficiency and Sarcopenia, run by Tufts University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The effect of supplemental vitamin D3 vs placebo on leg power and nitrogen excretion. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02293187, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in