PainPhase 4KETAFAPNCT02306759
Ketamine For Acute Treatment of Pain in Emergency Department
A Phase 4 study testing Ketamine in people with Pain, run by The Brooklyn Hospital Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The investigators are also interested to investigate whether low-dose ketamine is a safe and effective alternative option to opioids for the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Ketamine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years old and older presenting with acute generalized pain
- Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 3 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- Provides informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients who are admitted to the hospital
- Severe hypertension(≥180/100)
- Presence of or suspected for traumatic head injury with or without loss of consciousness
- Presence of or suspected for myocardial ischemia
- Presence of or suspected alcohol intoxication
- Hemodynamic instability
Show all 16Show fewer
- History of schizophrenia
- History of Sickle cell crisis / presenting with acute sickle cell crisis
- History of or suspected recreational substance abuse
- History of or suspected diagnosis of headache or migraine
- History of or suspected diagnosis increase in intracranial/intraocular pressure
- Known or suspected pregnancy
- Allergy to ketamine or morphine
- Administration of opioids in previous 4 hours
- Patients with language barriers or in altered mental status who are unable to describe pain
- Patients weighing over 166kg
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
About this study
The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The investigators are also interested to investigate whether low-dose ketamine is a safe and effective alternative option to opioids for the acute treatment of pain in the Emergency Department.
The agents that are available in the department includes acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDS) and opioids. In most cases, acetaminophen and NSAIDS are not adequate to manage acute pain crisis. There is also heightening concerns for increased opioid use or abuse by patients. Since the HCAPHS survey includes various questions which inquires about patient perception of pain management in the department, the investigators are interested in investigating the safety and efficacy of low-dose ketamine to as an alternative method to opioids for the acute management of pain. There has been limited, mostly observational pilot studies, published in the literature. Limited data in the literature have reported the incidence of nausea and vomiting ranged from 3-13%. All published literature administered low-dose ketamine as an intravenous push. To the best of our knowledge our study would be the first study to administer low-dose ketamine as a short bolus infusion to mitigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The investigators believe our study would provide important scientific data to fill the theoretical gap that low-dose ketamine at 0.3mg/kg/dose may be a safe and effective agent for acute pain management in an ED that is located in the center of a densely populated urban area.
Read the detailed description
The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The is a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial to investigate the effects of low dose ketamine and morphine versus placebo and morphine for the management of acute pain in the ED.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
KetamineDrug
Ketamine 0.3mg/kg in 50ml normal saline, administered over 15 minutes
PlaceboDrug
Normal saline 50ml, administered over 15 minutes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Ketamine 0.3mg/kg intravenous piggyback (IVPB) in 50ml NS over 15 minutes Morphine 0.1mg/kg intravenous push (IVP) PRN at designated intervals Receives: Drug: Ketamine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Normal saline 50ml intravenous piggyback (IVPB) over 15 minutes Morphine 0.1mg/kg intravenous push (IVP) PRN at designated intervals Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes
Change from Baseline of Pain as described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [minimum:0, maximum 10] at 15 minutes. Lower values indicate worst outcomes while higher values indicate better outcomes.
Measured: 15 minutes after administration of study intervention
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Incidence or number of participants with adverse events.
Measured: during the study period
Patient Satisfaction of Pain Control Based on a Likert Scale
Patient satisfaction of pain control based on a Likert Scale at the end of study completion, an average of 90 minutes. Scores reported out of scale of 10, 10 being most satisfied and 1 being least satisfied.
Measured: At the end of study period
Mean Consumption of Rescue Analgesia
Measured: at designated intervals during study period (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 minutes)
ED Length of Stay (Minutes)
ED Length of stay (minutes) throughout study period
Measured: throughout study completion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionNov 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Brooklyn Hospital Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Billy Sin, The Brooklyn Hospital Center
- Investigators
- Billy Sin, Pharm.D., Principal investigator, The Brooklyn Hospital Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02306759
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 669443-1
- Acronym
- KETAFAP
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Galinski M, Dolveck F, Combes X, Limoges V, Smail N, Pommier V, Templier F, Catineau J, Lapostolle F, Adnet F. Management of severe acute pain in emergency settings: ketamine reduces morphine consumption. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 May;25(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.11.016.
PubMed 17499654Gurnani A, Sharma PK, Rautela RS, Bhattacharya A. Analgesia for acute musculoskeletal trauma: low-dose subcutaneous infusion of ketamine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Feb;24(1):32-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400106.
PubMed 8669651Yeaman F, Oakley E, Meek R, Graudins A. Sub-dissociative dose intranasal ketamine for limb injury pain in children in the emergency department: a pilot study. Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Apr;25(2):161-7. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12059. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
PubMed 23560967Yeaman F, Meek R, Egerton-Warburton D, Rosengarten P, Graudins A. Sub-dissociative-dose intranasal ketamine for moderate to severe pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Jun;26(3):237-42. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12173. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
PubMed 24712757Ahern TL, Herring AA, Stone MB, Frazee BW. Effective analgesia with low-dose ketamine and reduced dose hydromorphone in ED patients with severe pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 May;31(5):847-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
PubMed 23602757Andolfatto G, Willman E, Joo D, Miller P, Wong WB, Koehn M, Dobson R, Angus E, Moadebi S. Intranasal ketamine for analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective observational series. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):1050-4. doi: 10.1111/acem.12229.
PubMed 24127709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ketamine For Acute Treatment of Pain in Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02306759
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KETAFAP / 669443-1
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- analgesia, ketamine, pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Brooklyn Hospital CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Jun 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The investigators are also interested to investigate whether low-dose ketamine is a safe and effective alternative option to opioids for the acute treatment of pain in the Emergency Department.
The agents that are available in the department includes acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDS) and opioids. In most cases, acetaminophen and NSAIDS are not adequate to manage acute pain crisis. There is also heightening concerns for increased opioid use or abuse by patients. Since the HCAPHS survey includes various questions which inquires about patient perception of pain management in the department, the investigators are interested in investigating the safety and efficacy of low-dose ketamine to as an alternative method to opioids for the acute management of pain. There has been limited, mostly observational pilot studies, published in the literature. Limited data in the literature have reported the incidence of nausea and vomiting ranged from 3-13%. All published literature administered low-dose ketamine as an intravenous push. To the best of our knowledge our study would be the first study to administer low-dose ketamine as a short bolus infusion to mitigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The investigators believe our study would provide important scientific data to fill the theoretical gap that low-dose ketamine at 0.3mg/kg/dose may be a safe and effective agent for acute pain management in an ED that is located in the center of a densely populated urban area.
Detailed description
The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The is a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial to investigate the effects of low dose ketamine and morphine versus placebo and morphine for the management of acute pain in the ED.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Drug: KetamineKetamine 0.3mg/kg intravenous piggyback (IVPB) in 50ml NS over 15 minutes Morphine 0.1mg/kg intravenous push (IVP) PRN at designated intervals |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboNormal saline 50ml intravenous piggyback (IVPB) over 15 minutes Morphine 0.1mg/kg intravenous push (IVP) PRN at designated intervals |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients 18 years old and older presenting with acute generalized pain
- Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 3 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- Provides informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patients who are admitted to the hospital
- Severe hypertension(≥180/100)
- Presence of or suspected for traumatic head injury with or without loss of consciousness
- Presence of or suspected for myocardial ischemia
- Presence of or suspected alcohol intoxication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| KetamineKetamine 0.3mg/kg in 50ml normal saline, administered over 15 minutes | Drug | Treatment |
| PlaceboNormal saline 50ml, administered over 15 minutes | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes
Time frame: 15 minutes after administration of study intervention
Change from Baseline of Pain as described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [minimum:0, maximum 10] at 15 minutes. Lower values indicate worst outcomes while higher values indicate better outcomes.
4 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: during the study period
Patient Satisfaction of Pain Control Based on a Likert Scale
Time frame: At the end of study period
Mean Consumption of Rescue Analgesia
Time frame: at designated intervals during study period (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 minutes)
ED Length of Stay (Minutes)
Time frame: throughout study completion
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17499654Galinski M, Dolveck F, Combes X, Limoges V, Smail N, Pommier V, Templier F, Catineau J, Lapostolle F, Adnet F. Management of severe acute pain in emergency settings: ketamine reduces morphine consumption. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 May;25(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.11.016.
- Background: PubMed 8669651Gurnani A, Sharma PK, Rautela RS, Bhattacharya A. Analgesia for acute musculoskeletal trauma: low-dose subcutaneous infusion of ketamine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Feb;24(1):32-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400106.
- Background: PubMed 23560967Yeaman F, Oakley E, Meek R, Graudins A. Sub-dissociative dose intranasal ketamine for limb injury pain in children in the emergency department: a pilot study. Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Apr;25(2):161-7. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12059. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 24712757Yeaman F, Meek R, Egerton-Warburton D, Rosengarten P, Graudins A. Sub-dissociative-dose intranasal ketamine for moderate to severe pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Jun;26(3):237-42. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12173. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 23602757Ahern TL, Herring AA, Stone MB, Frazee BW. Effective analgesia with low-dose ketamine and reduced dose hydromorphone in ED patients with severe pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 May;31(5):847-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
- Background: PubMed 24127709Andolfatto G, Willman E, Joo D, Miller P, Wong WB, Koehn M, Dobson R, Angus E, Moadebi S. Intranasal ketamine for analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective observational series. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):1050-4. doi: 10.1111/acem.12229.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Billy Sin, Pharm.D. principal investigator
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ketamine in people with Pain, run by The Brooklyn Hospital Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes (time frame: 15 minutes after administration of study intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02306759, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2017.