AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 3NCT02311881

A 12-Week Efficacy Study of Paracetamol 1000mg Sustained-release Tablets in Patients With Osteoarthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets and Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets in people with Pain, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 56 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether paracetamol 1000 mg sustained-release (SR) tablets administered orally, twice daily are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets and Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
960 participants
Where
56 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2015to Feb 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female participants between 40 and 80 years of age
  • Diagnosis of moderate to moderately-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of either the knee or hip with respect to the following:
  • Pain in one knee/hip over 3 months immediately before screening visit
  • Use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen (paracetamol) or any other analgesic for 3 or more days per week for at least 3 months prior to screening visit
  • Clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis of knee/hip for minimum 6 month duration prior to screening visit
  • Therapeutic benefit with acetaminophen use with a score of ≥ 1 on 5-point categorical scale
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Radiological evidence of ≥ Grade 2 osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic criteria
  • Increased WOMAC Pain Subscale score of at least 20 % following untreated run-in period
  • Moderate to moderately-severe self-reported pain on a 5-point categorical scale following untreated run-in period
  • Historical self-reported positive therapeutic benefit with paracetamol use for osteoarthritis pain relief

Who cannot join

  • History of surgery or major trauma to the study joint
  • Clinically significant signs or symptoms of inflammation upon completion of run-in period
  • Required ongoing use of analgesic therapy for other indications, anticoagulants, psychotherapeutic agents, aspirin at daily doses greater than 325 mg, statin-class hypolipidemic agents at doses that have not been stabilized, or other treatments know to interfere with pain perception
  • History of hepatic or renal or liver or biliary disease or gastrointestinal surgery
  • Participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times Upper Limit Normal (2xULN) and bilirubin > 1.5 times Upper Limit Normal (1.5xULN) (However, if direct bilirubin is <35% and fractioned, isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable)
  • Other arthritis type, fibromyalgia or collagen vascular disease or secondary OA of study joint or chronic pain condition

Trial locations and contacts

56 sites in 1 country.

56 sites in 1 country

United States56 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bellevue, Nebraska, 68005

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35242

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brandon, Florida, 33511

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11230

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buffalo, New York, 14223

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Carmichael, California, 95608

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chandler, Arizona, 85224

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60640

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45227

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45255

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Crestview Hills, Kentucky, 41017

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dayton, Ohio, 45424

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Edgewater, Florida, 32132

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Evanston, Illinois, 60201

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fresno, California, 93702

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hartsdale, New York

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hialeah, Florida, 33012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hialeah, Florida, 33016

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28601

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Homestead, Florida, 33030

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jupiter, Florida, 33458

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33155

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33185

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115

  • GSK Investigational Site

    North Hollywood, California, 91606-1559

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73119

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Oldsmar, Florida, 34677

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68134

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Oviedo, Florida, 32765

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Plano, Texas, 75075

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Port Orange, Florida, 32127

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prairie Village, Kansas, 66206

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78209

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Savannah, Georgia, 31406

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Smithfield, Pennsylvania, 15478

  • GSK Investigational Site

    South Miami, Florida, 33143

  • GSK Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63139

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toledo, Ohio, 43623

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85745

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472

  • GSK Investigational Site

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wichita, Kansas, 67203

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Efficacy and Safety Study of Sustained-release Paracetamol in Subjects With Osteoarthritis

The purpose of the study is to determine whether paracetamol 1000 mg sustained-release (SR) tablets administered orally, twice daily are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets, Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tabletsDrug

    Two paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets administered orally two times a day plus two placebo-matched paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets administered orally three times a day for 12 weeks.

  • Paracetamol 665 mg SR tabletsDrug

    Two paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets administered orally three times a day plus two placebo-matched paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets administered orally two times a day for 12 weeks.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Two placebo-matched paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets administered orally three times a day plus two placebo-matched paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets administered orally two times a day for 12 weeks.

Study groups in NCT02311881
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paracetamol 2000 mg twice daily (BID)ExperimentalParticipants will be instructed to take two active paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets twice daily (with 10-12 hours between adjacent doses) and two placebo to match paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets thrice daily (with 6-8 hours between adjacent doses) orally with approximately 8 ounces (~ 240 mL) of water/dose for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets
Paracetamol 1330 mg thrice daily (TID)Active comparatorParticipants will be instructed to take two active paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets orally thrice daily (with 6-8 hours between adjacent doses) and two placebo to match paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets orally twice daily (with 10-12 hours between adjacent doses) orally with approximately 8 ounces (~ 240 mL) of water/dose for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will be instructed to take two placebo to match paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets twice daily (with 10-12 hours between adjacent doses) and two placebo to match paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets thrice daily (with 6-8 hours between adjacent doses) orally with approximately 8 ounces (~ 240 mL) of water/dose for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC Pain was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 5 WOMAC Pain items: 1-walking on flat, 2-going up down stairs, 3-at night while in bed, 4-sitting or lying; 5-standing upright. Mean WOMAC Pain subscale score was calculated at each visit as the sum of 5 pain category scores divided by 5. Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as the mean WOMAC Pain subscale score minus the mean baseline WOMAC Pain subscale score. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change was calculated as the area under the curve of change from baseline divided by the nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

    Measured: Baseline up to week 12

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC Physical function was measured using VAS ranging from 0mm (no difficulty) to 100mm (extreme difficulty) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 17 WOMAC Physical function categories. Mean WOMAC Physical function was calculated for baseline and each time point (sum of scores for 17 physical function categories divided by 17). Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as mean WOMAC physical function subscale score minus mean baseline WOMAC physical function subscale score. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change was calculated as the area under the curve of change from baseline divided by the nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 12

  2. Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC stiffness was measured using VAS ranging from 0mm (no stiffness) to 100mm (maximum stiffness) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 2 WOMAC stiffness categories: 1- after awakening in the morning; 2- later in the day. Mean WOMAC stiffness was calculated for baseline and each time point (sum of scores for 2 stiffness categories divided by 2). Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as mean WOMAC stiffness subscale score at specific time point minus mean WOMAC stiffness subscale score at baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change from baseline was calculated as area under the curve of change from baseline divided by nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

    Measured: Baseline up to week 12

  3. Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Index Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. The Total Index Score included the WOMAC Pain Score (5 questions about pain where: 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain), the WOMAC Physical Function score (17 questions about the difficulty of daily activities where: 0=no difficulty to 100=extreme difficulty) and the WOMAC Stiffness Score (2 questions about stiffness where: 0=no stiffness to 100=extreme stiffness). WOMAC Total Index was calculated at baseline and each time point as sum of scores of all 24 WOMAC questions divided by 2400, ranging from 0 (no pain/difficulty/stiffness) to 1 (extreme pain/ difficulty/stiffness). Change from baseline was calculated as WOMAC Total Index at specific time point minus WOMAC Total Index at baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to week 12

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Global Patient Assessment of Arthritis (GPAOA)

    Participants performed an instantaneous GPAOA via a 0-100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (best ever) to 100 (worst ever) with respect to "With respect to your arthritis condition, how would you describe yourself now?" GPAOA was calculated periodically during the 12 week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  5. Number of Participants Classified as Responder

    A participant was considered a "responder" if his/her improvement from baseline (change from baseline at week 12) satisfied at least one of the two criteria high' or 'moderate' improvement as follows:- High improvement: 50% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC pain score or 60% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC physical function score. Moderate improvement: Fulfills two out of three criteria: 30% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC Pain score, 20% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC Physical Function score, 25% improvement from baseline in the last available GPAOA.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Pain, Daily Stiffness and Pain/Stiffness (Composite) at Week 12

    Participants assessed their daily pain and stiffness each morning (upon awakening) during the 12-week treatment period using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain / no stiffness) to 10 (extreme pain / extreme stiffness). Composite daily pain/stiffness score was calculated as sum of scores of pain and stiffness each morning divided by 2, ranging from 0 (no pain/stiffness) to 10 (extreme pain/stiffness). The mean of pain, mean of stiffness, and mean pain /stiffness composite score was calculated. Change from baseline was calculated as the difference between Daily Pain, stiffness and composite score each morning with that at baseline and was presented per week. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  7. Mean Number of Rescue Medication Pills Taken Per Day up to 12 Weeks

    Participants recorded use of rescue medication daily in their patient diary. The mean number of doses of rescue medications taken per day during the 12-week treatment period was calculated.

    Measured: every day up to 12 weeks

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI)

    Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI) was assessed, based on the three questions: CPSI-1-'Trouble falling asleep': How often the participant had trouble falling asleep? , CPSI-3-'Awakening due to pain at night': How often the subject was awakened by pain during the night, CPSI-4- Awakening due to pain in the morning': How often the participant was awakened by pain in the morning? The participants responded to these questions via 0-100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (never) to 100 (always). Sleep problem index (SPI) was calculated as mean of these three CPSI questions, ranging from 0 (never affected by pain during sleep) to 100 (always affected by pain during sleep).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  9. Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART)

    The PGART is a global assessment of the participant's response to therapy, was measured using on a 5 point Likert scale as follows: 0=None (no good at all, ineffective), 1= Poor (some effect, but unsatisfactory), 2= Fair (reasonable effect, but could be better), 3= Good (satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain and/or stiffness), 4= Excellent (ideal response, virtually pain-free). Mean PGART scores from 5 point Likert scale was calculated periodically (at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) for the 12 week treatment period.

    Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionFeb 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
960 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02311881
Sponsor's protocol ID
202195
Other IDs
RH02448
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
4 Dec 2014
Last updated
7 Apr 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets and Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets in people with Pain, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 56 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 56 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Through Week 12 of Treatment (time frame: Baseline up to week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in