AzTrials
AzTrials

Palmar HyperhidrosisETSNCT02321332

Unilateral Sequential Sympathectomy for Palmar Hyperhidrosis

A study testing bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy and unilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy. in people with Palmar Hyperhidrosis, run by Tmaer Youssef Mohamed.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparison between unilateral sequential and bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis on patients outcomes notably compensatory hyperhidrosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Palmar Hyperhidrosis
What is being tested?
bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy and unilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 2010to Jun 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients suffering palmar hyperhidrosis

Who cannot join

  • Patients with pleural adhesions, bleeding diathesis, local infection or previous operation for hyperhidrosis

About this study

Official title: Unilateral Sequential Versus Bilateral Simultaneous Sympathectomy for Palmar Hyperhidrosis: a Study of 407 Cases.

Comparison between unilateral sequential and bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis on patients outcomes notably compensatory hyperhidrosis.

Being tested
bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy, unilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy.
Keywords
Palmar hyperhidrosis, Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic symapthectomyProcedure or surgery

    Patients underwent bilateral simultaneous T2-T3 ganglionectomy using thoracoscopic approach.

  • unilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy.Procedure or surgery

    Patients underwent unilateral T2-T3 ganglionectomy of the dominant side followed by T2-T3 ganglionectomy of the other side after 2 months interval.

Study groups in NCT02321332
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
B-ETSActive comparatorBilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: bilateral simultaneous T2-T3 ganglionectomy.
Receives: Procedure: bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy
S-ETSActive comparatorunilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: unilateral T2-T3 ganglionectomy of the dominant side followed by T2-T3 ganglionectomy of the other side after 2 months interval
Receives: Procedure: unilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants developing compensatory hyperhidrosis (reflex sweating) following sympathectomy.

    Number pf patients developing compensatory hyperhidrosis (reflex sweating) following sympathectomy. Compensatory hyperhidrosis was graded as "severe" when the patient mentioned that sweating interfered with his or her normal activity, "moderate" when the patient indicated that his or her sweating was not bothersome and "mild" when the patient did not mention dampness or made only a brief reference.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of patients who will be satisfied or unsatisfied regarding the procedure.

    we measure patient satisfaction regarding the procedure by asking the patients to rate their level of satisfaction as very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied. Patients were considered satisfied if they reported being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied.

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02321332
Sponsor's protocol ID
MFM2010344
Acronym
ETS
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
11 Dec 2014
Last updated
22 Dec 2014
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing bilateral simultaneous endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy and unilateral sequential endoscopic thoracic symapthectomy. in people with Palmar Hyperhidrosis, run by Tmaer Youssef Mohamed.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants developing compensatory hyperhidrosis (reflex sweating) following sympathectomy. (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in