AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound InfectionNCT02331485

Randomised Control Study to Asses the Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in the Management of Wound in Surgical Patient

A study testing PICO + Acticoat group in people with Wound Infection and Wound Complication, run by St James Connolly Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim of the study is to assess the role of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of the complication of the laparotomy wound in the high risk patients group. Primary outcome: Reduction in wound infection rate by 50% Secondary outcome: Reduction of the length of hospital stay Decrease of using abx. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Wound Infection, Wound Complication
What is being tested?
PICO + Acticoat group
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteIreland
Study dates
Aug 2014to Sep 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • One from below:
  • High BMI
  • Malignancy
  • Malnutrition
  • T2 DM
  • Emergency surgery
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Post radio chemotherapy
  • On steroids
  • Open colorectal resection
  • At least two from below:
  • Smoking
  • Age>75
  • Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries

Who cannot join

  • Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
  • Age < 18

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sebastian Krzysztof Smolarek, M.D contact

00353857401990

sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com

Michal Kazanowski, M.D contact

0035385241368

mikazanowski@gmail.com

Ireland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Connolly Hospital

    Dublin, 16

    Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D, 0857401990, sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com

    Michal Kazanowski, M.D, mikazanowski@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: RANDOMISED CONTROL STUDY TO ASSES THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WOUND IN SURGICAL PATIENT

Aim of the study is to assess the role of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of the complication of the laparotomy wound in the high risk patients group.

Primary outcome: Reduction in wound infection rate by 50%

Secondary outcome: Reduction of the length of hospital stay Decrease of using abx. for wound management Decrease cost of patient treatment

Read the detailed description

Wound complications are common in general surgical patients after laparotomy. The rate of Surgical Site Infections after elective surgery ranges between 3-30%, depending of the study.

There are subgroups of patients with co-morbid conditions that put them at high risk of wound complications. These co-morbid conditions include increase BMI, known malignancy, diabetes mellitus, emergency surgery, malnutrition, smoking and diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries. Management of these complicated wounds are a significant source of psychological trauma to patients and significantly increases hospital stay and cost.

Since its introduction, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been used mainly to deal with chronic wounds. Mechanism of action of NPWT includes protection of wound bed, splinting of soft tissues, reduction of oedema, increasing blood perfusion of wound and enhancing granulation tissue. Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to prevent wound complications is a new concept, which has been successfully applied in acute wounds in orthopaedics, gynecological and cardiothoracic surgery patients.

There is limited data about the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in high risk general surgical patients with acute wounds, but available studies suggest significant reduction in wound complication rate and hospital costs. There is a need for a randomised controlled study to assess the reduction of wound complication ratio.

Patient will be randomized to two groups:

Group 1. Standard wound treatment, Group 2. Treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis.

Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith \& Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination.

Participants will be recruited from patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in Connolly Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, St Vincent University Hospital and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital based on inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. One from below:
  • High BMI
  • Malignancy
  • Malnutrition
  • T2 DM
  • Emergency surgery
  • Post radio chemotherapy
  • On steroids
  • Open colorectal resection
  1. At least two from below:
  • Smoking
  • Age>75
  • Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries

Exclusion criteria:

  • Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
  • Age < 18

Patient who fulfills inclusion criteria will be contacted prior to surgery by a research team member. Details of the study and risks and benefits will be explained to the patient. After obtaining consent the patient will be randomized to one of two groups - standard wound treatment or negative pressure treatment - by senior research team member. depending on the randomisation patient will recived appropriate dressing. Surgical wound will be asses on day 2 to 4, on day 7 and on day 30. Prior to first dressing application, after 2-4 days and on day 30 a wound swap will be obtain for C\&S. Any wound complication will be recorded in research evaluation form.

Being tested
PICO + Acticoat group
Keywords
Prevention of wound infection and wound complication
Medical subject headings
Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PICO + Acticoat groupDevice

    Also called PICO, Acticoat Flexi 7 dressing

    Comparison between Pico and Acticoat dressing change after 3 and 7 days with standard Mepor dressing change on daily basis.

Study groups in NCT02331485
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PICO + Acticoat groupExperimentalPatients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith \& Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination.
Receives: Device: PICO + Acticoat group
Standard Wound managementActive comparatorIf a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis.
Receives: Device: PICO + Acticoat group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction in wound infection by 50%

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Reduction of the length of hospital stay

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Decrease antibiotics use in a wound infection management

    Measured: 1 year

  3. To decrease the cost of patient treatment

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02331485
Sponsor's protocol ID
NPWT Ireland
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
4 Aug 2014
Last updated
6 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lewis LS, Convery PA, Bolac CS, Valea FA, Lowery WJ, Havrilesky LJ. Cost of care using prophylactic negative pressure wound vacuum on closed laparotomy incisions. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

    PubMed 24440649
  • Ousey KJ, Atkinson RA, Williamson JB, Lui S. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for spinal wounds: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

    PubMed 23981819
  • Hansen E, Durinka JB, Costanzo JA, Austin MS, Deirmengian GK. Negative pressure wound therapy is associated with resolution of incisional drainage in most wounds after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3230-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2937-3.

    PubMed 23539123
  • Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

    PubMed 23111014
  • Stoffan AP, Ricca R, Lien C, Quigley S, Linden BC. Use of negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal wounds in neonates and infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug;47(8):1555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.014.

    PubMed 22901916

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PICO + Acticoat group in people with Wound Infection and Wound Complication, run by St James Connolly Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sebastian Krzysztof Smolarek, M.D (00353857401990, sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction in wound infection by 50% (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02331485, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in