Wound InfectionNCT02331485
Randomised Control Study to Asses the Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in the Management of Wound in Surgical Patient
A study testing PICO + Acticoat group in people with Wound Infection and Wound Complication, run by St James Connolly Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
Aim of the study is to assess the role of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of the complication of the laparotomy wound in the high risk patients group. Primary outcome: Reduction in wound infection rate by 50% Secondary outcome: Reduction of the length of hospital stay Decrease of using abx. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound Infection, Wound Complication
- What is being tested?
- PICO + Acticoat group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- One from below:
- High BMI
- Malignancy
- Malnutrition
- T2 DM
- Emergency surgery
Show all 13Show fewer
- Post radio chemotherapy
- On steroids
- Open colorectal resection
- At least two from below:
- Smoking
- Age>75
- Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries
Who cannot join
- Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
- Age < 18
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ireland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Connolly Hospital
Dublin, 16
Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D, 0857401990, sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com
Michal Kazanowski, M.D, mikazanowski@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: RANDOMISED CONTROL STUDY TO ASSES THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WOUND IN SURGICAL PATIENT
Aim of the study is to assess the role of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of the complication of the laparotomy wound in the high risk patients group.
Primary outcome: Reduction in wound infection rate by 50%
Secondary outcome: Reduction of the length of hospital stay Decrease of using abx. for wound management Decrease cost of patient treatment
Read the detailed description
Wound complications are common in general surgical patients after laparotomy. The rate of Surgical Site Infections after elective surgery ranges between 3-30%, depending of the study.
There are subgroups of patients with co-morbid conditions that put them at high risk of wound complications. These co-morbid conditions include increase BMI, known malignancy, diabetes mellitus, emergency surgery, malnutrition, smoking and diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries. Management of these complicated wounds are a significant source of psychological trauma to patients and significantly increases hospital stay and cost.
Since its introduction, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been used mainly to deal with chronic wounds. Mechanism of action of NPWT includes protection of wound bed, splinting of soft tissues, reduction of oedema, increasing blood perfusion of wound and enhancing granulation tissue. Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to prevent wound complications is a new concept, which has been successfully applied in acute wounds in orthopaedics, gynecological and cardiothoracic surgery patients.
There is limited data about the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in high risk general surgical patients with acute wounds, but available studies suggest significant reduction in wound complication rate and hospital costs. There is a need for a randomised controlled study to assess the reduction of wound complication ratio.
Patient will be randomized to two groups:
Group 1. Standard wound treatment, Group 2. Treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis.
Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith \& Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination.
Participants will be recruited from patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in Connolly Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, St Vincent University Hospital and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital based on inclusion or exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
- One from below:
- High BMI
- Malignancy
- Malnutrition
- T2 DM
- Emergency surgery
- Post radio chemotherapy
- On steroids
- Open colorectal resection
- At least two from below:
- Smoking
- Age>75
- Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries
Exclusion criteria:
- Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
- Age < 18
Patient who fulfills inclusion criteria will be contacted prior to surgery by a research team member. Details of the study and risks and benefits will be explained to the patient. After obtaining consent the patient will be randomized to one of two groups - standard wound treatment or negative pressure treatment - by senior research team member. depending on the randomisation patient will recived appropriate dressing. Surgical wound will be asses on day 2 to 4, on day 7 and on day 30. Prior to first dressing application, after 2-4 days and on day 30 a wound swap will be obtain for C\&S. Any wound complication will be recorded in research evaluation form.
- Conditions
- Wound Infection, Wound Complication
- Being tested
- PICO + Acticoat group
- Keywords
- Prevention of wound infection and wound complication
- Medical subject headings
- Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PICO + Acticoat groupDevice
Also called PICO, Acticoat Flexi 7 dressing
Comparison between Pico and Acticoat dressing change after 3 and 7 days with standard Mepor dressing change on daily basis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PICO + Acticoat group | Experimental | Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith \& Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination. Receives: Device: PICO + Acticoat group |
| Standard Wound management | Active comparator | If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis. Receives: Device: PICO + Acticoat group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction in wound infection by 50%
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Reduction of the length of hospital stay
Measured: 1 year
Decrease antibiotics use in a wound infection management
Measured: 1 year
To decrease the cost of patient treatment
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completionSep 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wound InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St James Connolly Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sebastian Smolarek, St James Connolly Memorial Hospital
- Investigators
- Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D, Principal investigator, Connolly Hospital/Mater Misericordiae University HospitalThomas N Walsh, Professor, M.D, FRCSI, Study chair, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02331485
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NPWT Ireland
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lewis LS, Convery PA, Bolac CS, Valea FA, Lowery WJ, Havrilesky LJ. Cost of care using prophylactic negative pressure wound vacuum on closed laparotomy incisions. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PubMed 24440649Ousey KJ, Atkinson RA, Williamson JB, Lui S. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for spinal wounds: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
PubMed 23981819Hansen E, Durinka JB, Costanzo JA, Austin MS, Deirmengian GK. Negative pressure wound therapy is associated with resolution of incisional drainage in most wounds after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3230-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2937-3.
PubMed 23539123Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
PubMed 23111014Stoffan AP, Ricca R, Lien C, Quigley S, Linden BC. Use of negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal wounds in neonates and infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug;47(8):1555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.014.
PubMed 22901916
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RANDOMISED CONTROL STUDY TO ASSES THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WOUND IN SURGICAL PATIENT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02331485
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NPWT Ireland
- Conditions
- Wound Infection, Wound Complication
- Keywords
- Prevention of wound infection and wound complication
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- St James Connolly Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of the study is to assess the role of negative pressure therapy in the prevention of the complication of the laparotomy wound in the high risk patients group.
Primary outcome: Reduction in wound infection rate by 50%
Secondary outcome: Reduction of the length of hospital stay Decrease of using abx. for wound management Decrease cost of patient treatment
Detailed description
Wound complications are common in general surgical patients after laparotomy. The rate of Surgical Site Infections after elective surgery ranges between 3-30%, depending of the study.
There are subgroups of patients with co-morbid conditions that put them at high risk of wound complications. These co-morbid conditions include increase BMI, known malignancy, diabetes mellitus, emergency surgery, malnutrition, smoking and diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries. Management of these complicated wounds are a significant source of psychological trauma to patients and significantly increases hospital stay and cost.
Since its introduction, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been used mainly to deal with chronic wounds. Mechanism of action of NPWT includes protection of wound bed, splinting of soft tissues, reduction of oedema, increasing blood perfusion of wound and enhancing granulation tissue. Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to prevent wound complications is a new concept, which has been successfully applied in acute wounds in orthopaedics, gynecological and cardiothoracic surgery patients.
There is limited data about the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in high risk general surgical patients with acute wounds, but available studies suggest significant reduction in wound complication rate and hospital costs. There is a need for a randomised controlled study to assess the reduction of wound complication ratio.
Patient will be randomized to two groups:
Group 1. Standard wound treatment, Group 2. Treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). If a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis.
Patients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith \& Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination.
Participants will be recruited from patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in Connolly Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, St Vincent University Hospital and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital based on inclusion or exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
- One from below:
- High BMI
- Malignancy
- Malnutrition
- T2 DM
- Emergency surgery
- Post radio chemotherapy
- On steroids
- Open colorectal resection
- At least two from below:
- Smoking
- Age>75
- Diffuse atherosclerotic disease involving arteries
Exclusion criteria:
- Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
- Age < 18
Patient who fulfills inclusion criteria will be contacted prior to surgery by a research team member. Details of the study and risks and benefits will be explained to the patient. After obtaining consent the patient will be randomized to one of two groups - standard wound treatment or negative pressure treatment - by senior research team member. depending on the randomisation patient will recived appropriate dressing. Surgical wound will be asses on day 2 to 4, on day 7 and on day 30. Prior to first dressing application, after 2-4 days and on day 30 a wound swap will be obtain for C\&S. Any wound complication will be recorded in research evaluation form.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PICO + Acticoat group | Experimental | Device: PICO + Acticoat groupPatients randomized to negative pressure group will received negative pressure dressing (Pico Wound Management System - manufacture by Smith \& Nephew) associated with Acticoat Flex dressing which will be applied immediately after skin closure in a conventional way and left in place for 7 days. Negative pressure dressing will be changed once during 7 days period - after day 2 to 4. Wound complications within first 30 days of surgery will be recorded on clinical examination. |
| Standard Wound management | Active comparator | Device: PICO + Acticoat groupIf a patient is randomized to standard wound treatment group - he/she will receive standard skin closure and standard Mepore dressing, which will be changed on a daily basis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- One from below:
- At least two from below:
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Low risk laparotomy wound (none of the above criteria)
- Age < 18
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PICO + Acticoat groupAlso: PICO, Acticoat Flexi 7 dressingComparison between Pico and Acticoat dressing change after 3 and 7 days with standard Mepor dressing change on daily basis. | Device | PICO + Acticoat group, Standard Wound management |
Primary outcome
Reduction in wound infection by 50%
Time frame: 1 year
3 secondary outcomes
Reduction of the length of hospital stay
Time frame: 1 year
Decrease antibiotics use in a wound infection management
Time frame: 1 year
To decrease the cost of patient treatment
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2015.
- Background: PubMed 24440649Lewis LS, Convery PA, Bolac CS, Valea FA, Lowery WJ, Havrilesky LJ. Cost of care using prophylactic negative pressure wound vacuum on closed laparotomy incisions. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 23981819Ousey KJ, Atkinson RA, Williamson JB, Lui S. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for spinal wounds: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
- Background: PubMed 23539123Hansen E, Durinka JB, Costanzo JA, Austin MS, Deirmengian GK. Negative pressure wound therapy is associated with resolution of incisional drainage in most wounds after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3230-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2937-3.
- Background: PubMed 23111014Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
- Background: PubMed 22901916Stoffan AP, Ricca R, Lien C, Quigley S, Linden BC. Use of negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal wounds in neonates and infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug;47(8):1555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.014.
Related trials for Wound Infection
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sebastian K Smolarek, M.D principal investigator
Connolly Hospital/Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Thomas N Walsh, Professor, M.D, FRCSI study chair
Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PICO + Acticoat group in people with Wound Infection and Wound Complication, run by St James Connolly Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sebastian Krzysztof Smolarek, M.D (00353857401990, sebastian.smolarek79@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction in wound infection by 50% (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02331485, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2015.