AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerNCT02332863

Comparison of Back-loaded vs Preloaded Fiducial Needles in EUS-guided Fiducial Marker Placement in Pancreatic Cancer.

A study testing Back-loaded Needle (Device) and Preloaded Needle (Device) in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been pivotal in accomplishing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in patients with pancreatic cancer by allowing precise contouring and identification of target lesions in the pancreas via placement of fiducials using fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Cancer
What is being tested?
Back-loaded Needle (Device) and Preloaded Needle (Device)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
3 Aug 2016to 1 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer referred for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT)

Who cannot join

  • Age <18
  • Inability to consent
  • Known coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia (INR >1.5, platelets <75)
  • Patients on antiplatelet/anticoagulant medication that cannot safely be discontinued 5-7 days prior to the procedure
  • Gold allergy
  • Current infection
  • EUS evidence of vessel interfering with path of fiducial marker
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Colorado Hospital

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Traditional Back-loaded Fiducial Needles With Preloaded Fiducial Needles in EUS-guided Fiducial Marker Placement for Image-guided Radiation Therapy in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been pivotal in accomplishing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in patients with pancreatic cancer by allowing precise contouring and identification of target lesions in the pancreas via placement of fiducials using fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles. Currently, back-loading the fiducials is the only option for preparing delivery of fiducials via the EUS approach. A prototype 22-Gauge EUS needle preloaded with four fiducials has recently been developed, and used in a porcine models with successful results. There are no randomized controlled trials comparing total duration of time needed for placement of fiducials using technical success of the traditional back- loading technique of fiducial markers to the new preloaded needles in regards to EUS based fiducial marker placement for IGRT in pancreatic cancer.

Hypotheses

Read more

Use of a 22 G preloaded needle for EUS guided fiducial marker placement in patients with pancreatic cancer will:

  1. Be delivered in at least require 60% less of the procedure time that it takes for traditional back-loaded 22G needles
  2. Improve overall procedure efficiency
  3. Maintain comparable technical success and adverse event rates.

Primary Aims

  1. To compare the procedure time of 22G needle placement of three Visicoil (brand of flexible linear back-loaded fiducial markers) fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers.

Secondary Aims

  1. To compare adverse event rates in 22G needle placement of Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers
  2. To compare endpoints of technical success defined as proper placement of two to three fiducial markers in a pancreatic neoplasm in 22G needle placement of Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers.
Read the detailed description

Pancreatic cancer is the twelfth most common cancer worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma has become standard of care and is associated with higher rates of complete resection ultimately with improvement of overall survival in this patient population. Radiation therapy to a soft tissue organ such as the pancreas can be difficult, as it is not readily visualized radiographically. Image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is a commonly implemented modality for delivering high doses of radiation directed at cancer tissue, while reducing collateral damage to adjacent healthy tissue. Fiducials, which are inert radiographic markers typically made from gold or carbon, can be placed in and around the tumor to delineate tumor margins to allow for IGRT Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been pivotal in accomplishing IGRT by allowing precise contouring and identification of target lesions in the pancreas via placement of fiducials. This has traditionally been accomplished with the use of 19-gauge or 22-gauge fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles. To prepare the needle for fiducial placement, one to two fiducials are manually back-loaded into the tip of the needle after the stylet has been removed. In order to hold the fiducials within the needle, sterile lubrication or bone wax can be applied. Once the pancreatic mass has been targeted, fiducial injection can be accomplished via stylet reinsertion or sterile water injection. Currently, back-loading the fiducials is the only option for preparing delivery of fiducials via the EUS approach. Difficulties associated with fiducial loading and deployment can increase procedure duration due to cumbersome fiducial back-loading, fiducial misplacement \& migration, as well as inability to pass the fiducial marker through the needle due to endoscope angulation. Observational studies have sited a technical success rate of 86-100% using 19 and/or 22 gauge needles with average procedure time between 7-12 minutes using the fiducial back-loading technique.

A new mode of fiducial delivery has recently been developed that hopes to circumvent some of the technical issues inherent to traditional fiducial marker loading and deployment. A prototype 22-Gauge EUS needle preloaded with four fiducials has been used in a porcine models with successful deployment 95.6% of the time all accurate on predetermined targets. They were deemed easy to pass, relatively easy to deploy, and easily visualized on EUS, with excellent fluoroscopic and CT visualization. In addition, time for deployment was on average less than 60 seconds.

To date, there is no randomized controlled trials comparing total duration of time needed for placement of fiducials using technical success of the traditional back- loading technique of fiducial markers to the new preloaded needles in regards to EUS based fiducial marker placement for IGRT in pancreatic cancer.

This will be a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Randomization be performed and patients will undergo Linear EUS and have fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G back-loaded needle (Visicoil) or the new 22G preloaded needle (PreLoad4). Multiple endpoints will be recorded, including total length of procedure, how many markers are successfully deployed, and technical success (Ease of passage of delivery system, ease of deployment of fiducials, EUS visualization of delivery system needle, EUS visual appearance of fiducials, and time for fiducial placement defined as starting at time of removing the needle from its packaging and ending time as removal of needle after final marker deployment). Fiducial marker location will be confirmed via fluoroscopy at time of placement and on 4D treatment planning CT ordered by the radiation oncologist for simulation. Patients will be discharged home after post procedure recovery. Patients will be contacted at home by a research coordinator or endoscopy staff 24-48 hours and 7-10 days after the procedure to document any immediate and delayed complications. Patients will return for their IGRT visit, and any evidence of fiducial marker migration will be recorded by the radiation oncologist.

Hypotheses

Use of a 22 G preloaded needle for EUS guided fiducial marker placement in patients with pancreatic cancer will:

  1. Be delivered in at least require 60% less of the procedure time that it takes for traditional back-loaded 22G needles
  2. Improve overall procedure efficiency
  3. Maintain comparable technical success and adverse event rates.

Primary Aims

  1. To compare the procedure time of 22G needle placement of three Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers.

Secondary Aims

  1. To compare adverse event rates in 22G needle placement of Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers
  2. To compare endpoints of technical success defined as proper placement of two to three fiducial markers in a pancreatic neoplasm in 22G needle placement of Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers.
Being tested
Back-loaded Needle (Device), Preloaded Needle (Device)
Keywords
Pancreatic cancer, Image guided radiation therapy, Fiducial marker placement, Endoscopic ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Back-loaded Needle (Device)Device

    Fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G back-loaded needle will be performed with multiple endpoints recorded:

    • total length of procedure
    • how many markers are successfully deployed
    • technical success

    Fiducial marker location will be confirmed via fluoroscopy at time of placement and on 4D treatment planning CT ordered by the radiation oncologist for simulation.

  • Preloaded Needle (Device)Device

    Fiducial marker placement via a novel 22G preloaded needle will be performed with multiple endpoints recorded:

    • total length of procedure
    • how many markers are successfully deployed
    • technical success

    Fiducial marker location will be confirmed via fluoroscopy at time of placement and on 4D treatment planning CT ordered by the radiation oncologist for simulation.

Study groups in NCT02332863
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Back-loaded needleActive comparatorThe patients will undergo Linear EUS and have fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G back-loaded needle. CRFs will be used to record data for primary and secondary endpoints.
Receives: Device: Back-loaded Needle (Device)
Preloaded NeedleExperimentalThe patients will undergo Linear EUS and have fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G preloaded needle. CRFs will be used to record data for primary and secondary endpoints.
Receives: Device: Preloaded Needle (Device)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedure Duration Required for Placing the Fiducial Markers

    Duration of procedure for placing fiducial markers including: Fiducial package was opened start time (start stop watch) + Fiducial placement end time (end stop watch) = Placing Fiducial Markers Time

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Total Procedure Time

    Total procedure time will be recorded during the procedure using a case report form (CRF) for Procedure Time

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)

  2. Number of Participants With Technical Success EUS Needle Visualization

    EUS needle visualization during the procedure will be recorded on a CRF for Scale of Technical Success.

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)

  3. Technical Success

    Defined as the proper placement of 3 fiducial markers in a pancreatic neoplasm in 2 different planes

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)

  4. Number of Participants With Visualization of Fiducials as Assessed by Radiation Oncology

    Fiducial location on CT scan will be assessed at patient's radiation oncology appointments for IGRT.

    Measured: Several hours to 7 days after fiducial marker deployment

  5. Number of Participants With Inadvertent Deployment of Fiducials

    Whether inadvertent deployment of fiducials occurs will be recorded on a CRF for Data Acquisition

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)

  6. Number of Participants With Ease of Passage of Delivery System

    Ease of needle device passage through EUS will be recorded on a CRF form for technical success.

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)

  7. Number of Fiducials Placed

    Number of fiducials placed will be recorded during the procedure using a case report form (CRF) for Fiducial Placement Data

    Measured: During scheduled procedure (about 90 minutes)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completionApr 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02332863
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-1711.cc
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
22 Sep 2014
Last updated
9 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Colbert LE, Hall WA, Nickleach D, Switchenko J, Kooby DA, Liu Y, Gillespie T, Lipscomb J, Kauh J, Landry JC. Chemoradiation therapy sequencing for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2014 Feb 15;120(4):499-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28530. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

    PubMed 24390739
  • Fuss M, Wong A, Fuller CD, Salter BJ, Fuss C, Thomas CR. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2007 Jan;1(1):2-11.

    PubMed 19262697
  • Reese AS, Lu W, Regine WF. Utilization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer: is it beneficial? Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Apr;24(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.11.003.

    PubMed 24635870
  • Javed S, Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2013 Dec;59(4):377-86.

    PubMed 24212355
  • Kooby DA, Gillespie TW, Liu Y, Byrd-Sellers J, Landry J, Bian J, Lipscomb J. Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival after pancreatic cancer resection: an appraisal of data from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3634-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3047-x. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

    PubMed 23771249
  • Suzuki R, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided oncologic therapy for pancreatic cancer. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:157581. doi: 10.1155/2013/157581. Epub 2013 Feb 24.

    PubMed 23533319
  • Khashab MA, Kim KJ, Tryggestad EJ, Wild AT, Roland T, Singh VK, Lennon AM, Shin EJ, Ziegler MA, Sharaiha RZ, Canto MI, Herman JM. Comparative analysis of traditional and coiled fiducials implanted during EUS for pancreatic cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Nov;76(5):962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.006.

    PubMed 23078921
  • Ammar T, Cote GA, Creach KM, Kohlmeier C, Parikh PJ, Azar RR. Fiducial placement for stereotactic radiation by using EUS: feasibility when using a marker compatible with a standard 22-gauge needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.023.

    PubMed 20189527
  • Park WG, Yan BM, Schellenberg D, Kim J, Chang DT, Koong A, Patalano C, Van Dam J. EUS-guided gold fiducial insertion for image-guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer: 50 successful cases without fluoroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.030.

    PubMed 20189509
  • Davila Fajardo R, Lekkerkerker SJ, van der Horst A, Lens E, Bergman JJ, Fockens P, Bel A, van Hooft JE. EUS-guided fiducial markers placement with a 22-gauge needle for image-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.12.027. Epub 2014 Feb 8. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24518121
  • DiMaio CJ, Nagula S, Goodman KA, Ho AY, Markowitz AJ, Schattner MA, Gerdes H. EUS-guided fiducial placement for image-guided radiation therapy in GI malignancies by using a 22-gauge needle (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.003.

    PubMed 20598247
  • Owens DJ, Savides TJ. EUS placement of metal fiducials by using a backloaded technique with bone wax seal. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):972-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.052. Epub 2009 Jan 18. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19152903
  • Khara HS, Pineda-Bonilla JJ, Chaput KJ, Johal AS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of fiducial markers using a novel "wet-fill technique" without a bone wax seal. Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E426-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358809. Epub 2013 Dec 13. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24338173
  • Pishvaian AC, Collins B, Gagnon G, Ahlawat S, Haddad NG. EUS-guided fiducial placement for CyberKnife radiotherapy of mediastinal and abdominal malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.01.048.

    PubMed 16923491
  • Varadarajulu S, Trevino JM, Shen S, Jacob R. The use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gold markers in image-guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancers: a case series. Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):423-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243989. Epub 2010 Mar 15.

    PubMed 20232282

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Back-loaded Needle (Device) and Preloaded Needle (Device) in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedure Duration Required for Placing the Fiducial Markers (time frame: During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02332863, which also lists 19 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in