AzTrials
AzTrials

Ovarian NeoplasmsNCT02334371

MR-PET for Staging and Assessment of Operability in Ovarian Cancer - a Feasibility Study

A study testing MR-PET in people with Ovarian Neoplasms, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The importance of selecting patients with ovarian cancer who will benefit from either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery has been acknowledged worldwide but the optimal diagnostic modality to serve in this matter remains to be discovered. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Ovarian Neoplasms
What is being tested?
MR-PET
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Apr 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Expected FIGO stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma
  • Scheduled for primary debulking or interval debulking surgery
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Patients estimated to have more benefit from chemotherapy
  • Ineligibility to undergo MR-PET examination (Non-MR compatible metallic implants or foreign bodies (ferromagnetic aneurysm clip, pacemaker, neurostimulation system, metal splinters etcetera) or claustrophobia)
  • Pregnant or lactating patients.
  • Incapacitated subjects

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site

  • Maastricht University Medical Centre

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

The importance of selecting patients with ovarian cancer who will benefit from either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery has been acknowledged worldwide but the optimal diagnostic modality to serve in this matter remains to be discovered. We believe that combined magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (MR-PET) can be of great clinical value in preoperative staging of patients with ovarian cancer.

Read the detailed description

Recently, the academic hospital Maastricht invested in an integrated MR-PET system (Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), ready to use for routine clinical application. Applications of this system are numerous and various types of cancer, including ovarian cancer, could benefit from the possibilities. The whole-body MR-PET system integrates the strengths of MRI and PET within a single examination. MRI provides anatomic detail in staging local tumor extent due to its high soft tissue resolution and advanced functional techniques such as DWI further enhance both local and distant lesion detection and characterisation. PET imaging complements this structural and functional information with molecular imaging technology useful in staging of adenopathy and metastatic spread. These characteristics contribute to a wide spectrum of possible clinical oncological applications, from primary tumor detection to local and distant staging, selection of patients for neoadjuvant therapy and assessment of response to chemotherapy and finally evaluation of recurrent disease.

The importance of selecting patients with ovarian cancer who will benefit from either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery has been acknowledged worldwide but the optimal diagnostic modality to serve in this matter remains to be discovered. We believe that combined magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (MR-PET) can be of great clinical value in preoperative staging of patients with ovarian cancer. Both positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have proved to be useful in ovarian cancer staging but understaging due to difficulties in depicting peritoneal dissemination remains a great problem. In conclusion, the best method for staging ovarian cancer and assessing operability remains to be discovered, hence this study.

Being tested
MR-PET
Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography
Medical subject headings
Ovarian Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MR-PETRadiation

    Also called MRI-PET, PET-MRI, PET-MR

    The MR-PET will be performed with the Biograph mMR system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). This system integrates a 3Tesla MRI and PET scan which makes simultaneous acquisition of whole-body MRI and PET images possible. The Biograph mMR holds the CE mark and was FDA approved in June 2011. The Biograph mMR is intended to be used in the Academical hospita! Maastricht for standard patient care. The radiotracer that will be used is 18F-Iabeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), according to standard PET -protocol.

Study groups in NCT02334371
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MR-PETOtherPreoperative whole-body MR-PET with 18F-FDG
Receives: Radiation: MR-PET

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic performance

    Diagnostic performance of MR-PET compared to CT for characterisation of primary tumour, detection of tumour sites in the peritoneal cavity, retroperitoneum or liver, detection of lymphadenopathy and distant metastases and assessment of tumour stage and operability.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02334371
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL50080.068.14
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
5 Jan 2015
Last updated
16 Mar 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Westphalen AC, Hricak H, Okuno WT, Powell B. Role of CT and MR imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction of newly diagnosed primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Feb;96(2):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.06.054.

    PubMed 15661212

  • Kumar Dhingra V, Kand P, Basu S. Impact of FDG-PET and -PET/CT imaging in the clinical decision-making of ovarian carcinoma: an evidence-based approach. Womens Health (Lond). 2012 Mar;8(2):191-203. doi: 10.2217/whe.11.91.

    PubMed 22375721

  • De Iaco P, Musto A, Orazi L, Zamagni C, Rosati M, Allegri V, Cacciari N, Al-Nahhas A, Rubello D, Venturoli S, Fanti S. FDG-PET/CT in advanced ovarian cancer staging: value and pitfalls in detecting lesions in different abdominal and pelvic quadrants compared with laparoscopy. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

    PubMed 20688446

  • Wakefield JC, Downey K, Kyriazi S, deSouza NM. New MR techniques in gynecologic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb;200(2):249-60. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8932.

    PubMed 23345344

  • Booth SJ, Turnbull LW, Poole DR, Richmond I. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option. BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):894-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01716.x.

    PubMed 18485169

  • Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kanasaki Y, Kanamori Y, Nakanishi J, Sugihara S, Kigawa J, Terakawa N, Ogawa T. Detection of peritoneal dissemination in gynecological malignancy: evaluation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0732-9. Epub 2007 Aug 14.

    PubMed 17701040

  • Partovi S, Kohan A, Rubbert C, Vercher-Conejero JL, Gaeta C, Yuh R, Zipp L, Herrmann KA, Robbin MR, Lee Z, Muzic RF Jr, Faulhaber P, Ros PR. Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar 20;4(2):202-12. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24753986

  • Michielsen K, Vergote I, Op de Beeck K, Amant F, Leunen K, Moerman P, Deroose C, Souverijns G, Dymarkowski S, De Keyzer F, Vandecaveye V. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):889-901. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3083-8. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

    PubMed 24322510

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MR-PET in people with Ovarian Neoplasms, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic performance (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02334371, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2016.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in