Small Bowel DiseasesPhase 4NCT02334631
High Volume Simethicone VCE Clinical Trial
A Phase 4 study testing High Volume Simethicone and Standard Volume Simethicone in people with Small Bowel Diseases, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a procedure where a small camera is swallowed to examine the small bowel. Although the procedure is useful for diagnosing small bowel diseases, air bubbles can obscure the recorded images. Simethicone is a medication that can be used to disperse the air bubbles. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Small Bowel Diseases
- What is being tested?
- High Volume Simethicone and Standard Volume Simethicone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 159 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Oct 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Patients undergoing small bowel video capsule endoscopy
Who cannot join
- Patients with a contraindication to VCE (small bowel strictures, oropharyngeal dysphagia, pregnancy, patients who are not surgical candidates)
- Endoscopic insertion of video capsule endoscope
- Inpatient procedures for active GI bleeding
- Patients with fluid restriction or who are unable to drink up to 900 ml of fluid within 10 minutes prior to the VCE
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
London Health Sciences Centre- Victoria Campus
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9
About this study
Official title: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of High Volume Simethicone to Improve Visualization During Capsule Endoscopy
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a procedure where a small camera is swallowed to examine the small bowel. Although the procedure is useful for diagnosing small bowel diseases, air bubbles can obscure the recorded images. Simethicone is a medication that can be used to disperse the air bubbles. However, prior studies using this medication have shown only a modest benefit. In our study, we would like to investigate whether increasing the amount of medication will improve the recorded images further.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
While VCE has become an important diagnostic tool for clinical practice, optimal preparation for VCE has yet to be determined.(13) The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends bowel preparation but does not provide further details.(2) The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American College of Gastroenterology, and American Gastroenterological Association make no specific recommendation. Many studies have addressed this knowledge gap, testing various regimens of purgatives.(14-18) A meta-analysis found that polyethylene glycol provided adequate visual quality in 68% of patients compared to 48% with fasting alone, while diagnostic yield climbed from 36% to 46%.(4) In contrast, oral preparation for colonoscopy produces adequate visualization in greater than 90% of patients.(19)
Intraluminal debris, bile, and air bubbles impair the visibility of small bowel mucosa during VCE. Simethicone, an anti-foaming agent, has been used with mixed success to improve image quality. Three studies investigated the addition of simethicone (30 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg) to overnight fast, PEG, or mannitol demonstrated improvement in visualization with high preparation scores favouring the addition of simethicone.(7-9) In contrast, Wei and colleagues (10) compared simethicone (300 mg) + PEG with PEG alone and found that although simethicone improved visualization, adequate visualization was achieved in only 63% of patients. Similarly, Ge et al. (11) compared simethicone (300 mg) against fasting alone and found improvement in visualization with simethicone but this was limited to the proximal half of the small bowel and adequate visualization was limited to 55% of cases. Lastly, Rosa et al. (12) compared simethicone (100 mg) + PEG with PEG alone and did not find a difference in visualization score.
A potential reason for inconsistent improvement in small bowel visualization may be due to an inadequate volume of simethicone being delivered into the small bowel, especially the distal portions. Prior volumes of simethicone were small (<200 ml) and may have pooled in the stomach and become diluted by gastric juices before being delivered into the duodenum. Our hypothesis is that high volume simethicone may overcome this problem and improve small bowel cleansing to facilitate improved visualization during VCE.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a double blind randomized clinical trial evaluating high volume simethicone (750 ml at 1.5 mg/ml) versus standard volume simethicone (200 ml at 1.5 mg/ml) for CE. Randomization will be performed in blocks of varying sizes through a web based interface, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), to ensure concealed allocation. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors will be blinded to randomization allocation.
INTERVENTION:
All patients will take a standard small bowel preparation consisting of the following starting the day before the procedure: clear fluids starting at lunch, two liters of PEG at 8 PM, and fasting starting at midnight. Patients arrive in the endoscopy unit at 6:45 AM the following morning. Randomization is performed via REDCap and simethicone given as follows: those randomized to high volume simethicone will drink a 750 ml solution (1125 mg simethicone diluted in 750 ml of water, 1.5 mg/ml) and those randomized to standard volume simethicone will drink a 200 ml solution (300 mg simethicone diluted in 200 ml of water, 1.5 mg/ml) in identical non-transparent lidded cups sealed with tamper tape prepared by the hospital's Clinical Trials Pharmacy and administered to the patient by the research nurse. Regardless of randomization results, the solution will be consumed over a 5 minute period and the patient instructed to resume fasting for 30 minutes before swallowing the capsule. Adherence will be assessed by collection of the cups after ingestion.
After swallowing the capsule, the patient is discharged from the endoscopy unit, encouraged to remain active for the day, allowed to have clear fluids in 2 hours, a light meal in 4 hours, and to return the CE recorder to the endoscopy unit at 5 PM. Once the CE recorder is returned, the patient is discharged from the endoscopy unit and has completed the study. Subjects will be called by the study nurse 7 days later to assess for adverse events.
CE will be performed with the Given Imaging SB3 capsule and reviewed with the accompanying software, RAPID v8.3. Videos will be reviewed in a blinded fashion without knowledge of randomization results using the Park score.(41)
- Conditions
- Small Bowel Diseases
- Being tested
- High Volume Simethicone, Standard Volume Simethicone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Volume SimethiconeDrug
High volume simethicone is defined as 1125 mg simethicone in 750 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml).
Standard Volume SimethiconeDrug
Standard volume simethicone is defined as 300 mg simethicone in 200 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High volume simethicone | Experimental | High volume simethicone is defined as 1125 mg simethicone in 750 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml). Receives: Drug: High Volume Simethicone |
| Standard volume simethicone | Active comparator | Standard volume simethicone is defined as 300 mg simethicone in 200 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml). Receives: Drug: Standard Volume Simethicone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visualization quality
Visualization quality will be scored in a blinded fashion using a validated score developed by Park et al. (World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(7):875-80.) Representative images from the small bowel will be serially selected at five-minute intervals. Each image is evaluated for two parameters: the proportion of visualized mucosa (VM) and degree of obscuration (DO) by bubbles, debris etc. The proportion of visualized mucosa is scored on a three- point scale: > 75% = 3, 50% to 75% = 2, 25% to 50% = 1, <25% = 0. The degree of obscuration is also scored in a three point scale: < 5 % = 3, 5% to 25% = 2, 25% to 50% = 1, > 50 % = 0. Mean scores for each parameter are obtained by dividing the sum of all images scored by the number of images. Finally the average of the two parameters is calculated. Both the whole, proximal, and distal small bowel will be scored separately. The first half of the small bowel will be considered proximal while the second half will be considered distal.
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Secondary outcomes (7)
Visualized mucosa sub-score
The 'Visualized Mucosa' sub-score of the visualization quality score described above.
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Degree of obscuration sub-score
The 'Degree of Obstruction' sub-score of the visualization quality score described above.
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Diagnostic Yield
A.The study will be considered 'diagnostic' if a clinically relevant lesion is found.
- The lesion may be clinically related to the referral indication or incidental.
- Lesions will be classified into: angioectasia, ulceration, stricture, polyp, mass, or other.
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Study Completion Rate
Study will be considered complete if the capsule passes into the cecum.
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Gastric Emptying Time
Defined as the time from the first gastric image until the first duodenal image.
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Small Bowel Transit Time
Defined as the time from the first duodenum image until the first cecal image
Measured: Once during review of capsule images
Adverse Events
Adverse events will be defined as new abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, bloating, and other between 0-7 days after the procedure that is different than pre-existing symptoms.
Measured: Once 7 days after the procedure.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionAug 2019
- Study completionOct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Small Bowel DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 159 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Sai Lai Sey, MD, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Michael SL Sey, MD, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02334631
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7339
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Sey M, Yan B, McDonald C, Segal D, Friedland J, Puka K, Jairath V. A randomized controlled trial of high volume simethicone to improve visualization during capsule endoscopy. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249490. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33793636
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of High Volume Simethicone to Improve Visualization During Capsule Endoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02334631
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 7339
- Conditions
- Small Bowel Diseases
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 159 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a procedure where a small camera is swallowed to examine the small bowel. Although the procedure is useful for diagnosing small bowel diseases, air bubbles can obscure the recorded images. Simethicone is a medication that can be used to disperse the air bubbles. However, prior studies using this medication have shown only a modest benefit. In our study, we would like to investigate whether increasing the amount of medication will improve the recorded images further.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
While VCE has become an important diagnostic tool for clinical practice, optimal preparation for VCE has yet to be determined.(13) The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends bowel preparation but does not provide further details.(2) The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American College of Gastroenterology, and American Gastroenterological Association make no specific recommendation. Many studies have addressed this knowledge gap, testing various regimens of purgatives.(14-18) A meta-analysis found that polyethylene glycol provided adequate visual quality in 68% of patients compared to 48% with fasting alone, while diagnostic yield climbed from 36% to 46%.(4) In contrast, oral preparation for colonoscopy produces adequate visualization in greater than 90% of patients.(19)
Intraluminal debris, bile, and air bubbles impair the visibility of small bowel mucosa during VCE. Simethicone, an anti-foaming agent, has been used with mixed success to improve image quality. Three studies investigated the addition of simethicone (30 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg) to overnight fast, PEG, or mannitol demonstrated improvement in visualization with high preparation scores favouring the addition of simethicone.(7-9) In contrast, Wei and colleagues (10) compared simethicone (300 mg) + PEG with PEG alone and found that although simethicone improved visualization, adequate visualization was achieved in only 63% of patients. Similarly, Ge et al. (11) compared simethicone (300 mg) against fasting alone and found improvement in visualization with simethicone but this was limited to the proximal half of the small bowel and adequate visualization was limited to 55% of cases. Lastly, Rosa et al. (12) compared simethicone (100 mg) + PEG with PEG alone and did not find a difference in visualization score.
A potential reason for inconsistent improvement in small bowel visualization may be due to an inadequate volume of simethicone being delivered into the small bowel, especially the distal portions. Prior volumes of simethicone were small (<200 ml) and may have pooled in the stomach and become diluted by gastric juices before being delivered into the duodenum. Our hypothesis is that high volume simethicone may overcome this problem and improve small bowel cleansing to facilitate improved visualization during VCE.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a double blind randomized clinical trial evaluating high volume simethicone (750 ml at 1.5 mg/ml) versus standard volume simethicone (200 ml at 1.5 mg/ml) for CE. Randomization will be performed in blocks of varying sizes through a web based interface, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), to ensure concealed allocation. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors will be blinded to randomization allocation.
INTERVENTION:
All patients will take a standard small bowel preparation consisting of the following starting the day before the procedure: clear fluids starting at lunch, two liters of PEG at 8 PM, and fasting starting at midnight. Patients arrive in the endoscopy unit at 6:45 AM the following morning. Randomization is performed via REDCap and simethicone given as follows: those randomized to high volume simethicone will drink a 750 ml solution (1125 mg simethicone diluted in 750 ml of water, 1.5 mg/ml) and those randomized to standard volume simethicone will drink a 200 ml solution (300 mg simethicone diluted in 200 ml of water, 1.5 mg/ml) in identical non-transparent lidded cups sealed with tamper tape prepared by the hospital's Clinical Trials Pharmacy and administered to the patient by the research nurse. Regardless of randomization results, the solution will be consumed over a 5 minute period and the patient instructed to resume fasting for 30 minutes before swallowing the capsule. Adherence will be assessed by collection of the cups after ingestion.
After swallowing the capsule, the patient is discharged from the endoscopy unit, encouraged to remain active for the day, allowed to have clear fluids in 2 hours, a light meal in 4 hours, and to return the CE recorder to the endoscopy unit at 5 PM. Once the CE recorder is returned, the patient is discharged from the endoscopy unit and has completed the study. Subjects will be called by the study nurse 7 days later to assess for adverse events.
CE will be performed with the Given Imaging SB3 capsule and reviewed with the accompanying software, RAPID v8.3. Videos will be reviewed in a blinded fashion without knowledge of randomization results using the Park score.(41)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High volume simethicone | Experimental | Drug: High Volume SimethiconeHigh volume simethicone is defined as 1125 mg simethicone in 750 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml). |
| Standard volume simethicone | Active comparator | Drug: Standard Volume SimethiconeStandard volume simethicone is defined as 300 mg simethicone in 200 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Patients undergoing small bowel video capsule endoscopy
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with a contraindication to VCE (small bowel strictures, oropharyngeal dysphagia, pregnancy, patients who are not surgical candidates)
- Endoscopic insertion of video capsule endoscope
- Inpatient procedures for active GI bleeding
- Patients with fluid restriction or who are unable to drink up to 900 ml of fluid within 10 minutes prior to the VCE
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Volume SimethiconeHigh volume simethicone is defined as 1125 mg simethicone in 750 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml). | Drug | High volume simethicone |
| Standard Volume SimethiconeStandard volume simethicone is defined as 300 mg simethicone in 200 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml). | Drug | Standard volume simethicone |
Primary outcome
Visualization quality
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Visualization quality will be scored in a blinded fashion using a validated score developed by Park et al. (World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(7):875-80.) Representative images from the small bowel will be serially selected at five-minute intervals. Each image is evaluated for two parameters: the proportion of visualized mucosa (VM) and degree of obscuration (DO) by bubbles, debris etc. The proportion of visualized mucosa is scored on a three- point scale: > 75% = 3, 50% to 75% = 2, 25% to 50% = 1, <25% = 0. The degree of obscuration is also scored in a three point scale: < 5 % = 3, 5% to 25% = 2, 25% to 50% = 1, > 50 % = 0. Mean scores for each parameter are obtained by dividing the sum of all images scored by the number of images. Finally the average of the two parameters is calculated. Both the whole, proximal, and distal small bowel will be scored separately. The first half of the small bowel will be considered proximal while the second half will be considered distal.
7 secondary outcomes
Visualized mucosa sub-score
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Degree of obscuration sub-score
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Diagnostic Yield
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Study Completion Rate
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Gastric Emptying Time
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Small Bowel Transit Time
Time frame: Once during review of capsule images
Adverse Events
Time frame: Once 7 days after the procedure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33793636Sey M, Yan B, McDonald C, Segal D, Friedland J, Puka K, Jairath V. A randomized controlled trial of high volume simethicone to improve visualization during capsule endoscopy. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249490. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Small Bowel Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Women With Endometriosis
SIBO, Endometriosis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ERAS-0015 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumors
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruiting
RAPID for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases
Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRCLM), Colorectal Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of RAS(ON) Inhibitors in Combination With Ivonescimab in Patients With Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Solid Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael SL Sey, MD principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing High Volume Simethicone and Standard Volume Simethicone in people with Small Bowel Diseases, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visualization quality (time frame: Once during review of capsule images). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02334631, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2020.