Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 2EUROPENCT02335268
Validation of a Predictive Model of Response to Romiplostim in Patients With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk MDS and Thrombocytopenia
A Phase 2 study testing N-Plate / romiplostim in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbH at 36 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- N-Plate / romiplostim
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 36 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 21 May 2015to 1 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must meet the following inclusion/exclusion criteria to be eligible for the study.
- Must understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form
- Age older 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
- Diagnosis of MDS using the 2008 WHO classification for myeloid neoplasms as assessed during the screening period
- Per MDS IPSS, low or intermediate-1 risk MDS as assessed during the screening period
Show all 16Show fewer
- The mean of the 2 platelet counts taken within 4 weeks prior to stratification must be:
- ≤ 30 x 109/L (with no individual count > 30 x 109/L during the screening period), with or without a history of bleeding associated with the diagnosis of MDS, OR
- < 50 x 109/L (with no individual count >60 x 109/L during the screening period), with a history of bleeding associated with the diagnosis of MDS (A standard of care platelet count taken prior to Informed consent may be used as 1 of the 2 counts taken within 4 weeks prior to stratification)
- Adequate liver function, as evidenced by ALT ≤ 3 times the laboratory normal range, AST ≤ 3 times the laboratory normal range and total bilirubin ≤ 2 times the laboratory normal range
- Bone marrow aspirate (central diagnostics) with cytogenetics (local) within 8 weeks of starting first dose of investigational product
- Female subjects of childbearing potential† must:
- Agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 4 weeks before starting study drug, throughout study drug therapy and for 4 weeks after the end of study drug therapy, even if she has amenorrhoea. This applies unless the subject commits to absolute and continued abstinence confirmed on a monthly basis. Male patients who wish to participate in the study and their partner may become pregnant must agree also to reliable contraception during the study and for three months thereafter.
- The following are effective methods of contraception
- Implant, - Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), Medroxyprogesterone acetate depot, Tubal sterilization, Sexual intercourse with a vasectomised male partner only; Ovulation inhibitory progesterone-only pills (i.e., desogestrel)
- Agree to have a medically supervised pregnancy test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 mIU/ml not more than 3 days before the start of study medication once the subject has been on effective contraception for at least 4 weeks. This requirement also applies to women of childbearing potential who practice complete and continued abstinence.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating females
- IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk
- ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow as determined by central morphology during screening
- Previous treatment with any thrombopoietic growth factor
- Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, leukemia, aplastic anemia or other non-MDS related bone marrow stem cell disorder
- Active or uncontrolled disease including infections or cancer
Show all 17Show fewer
- Unstable angina, congestive heart failure (NYHA > class II), uncontrolled hypertension
- History of arterial thrombosis (e.g., stroke or transient ischemic attack) within the past year
- History of venous thrombosis that currently requires anti-coagulation therapy
- Prior use of sc or iv AZA.
- Receipt of G-CSF, peg-G-CSF, or GM-CSF,IL-11, ESA or LEN within 4 weeks of the first dose of romiplostim
- Planned receipt of peg-G-CSF or GM-CSF after the first dose of investigational product
- Subjects of reproductive potential who are not using adequate contraceptive precautions, in the judgment of the investigator. A double barrier method is defined as 2 methods of contraception, for example 2 actual barrier methods, or 1 actual barrier method and 1 hormonal method.
- Known hypersensitivity to any recombinant E. coli-derived product (eg, Nplate, Infergen, Neupogen, Somatropin, and Actimmune)
- Inability to comply with study procedures.
- Subject currently is enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending other investigational device or drug study(s)
- Any serious medical condition or psychiatric illness that will prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form or will place the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she participates in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
36 sites in 2 countries.
36 sites in 2 countries
France22 sites
CH
Annecy
CH Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil
CH Henri Duffaut
Avignon
CHU de Haut Lévèque
Bordeaux
CHRU Côte de Nacre
Caen
CHU Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand
CHU
Grenoble
CH
Le Mans
CHRU
Limoges
CH Lyon sud
Lyon
IPC
Marseille
CH
Meaux
Clinique Beausoleil
Montpellier
CHU Brabois
Nancy
Centre Catherine de Sienne
Nantes
Polyclinique Le Languedoc
Narbonne
CHR
Orléans
Hôpital Cochin
Paris
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris
CHU
Poitiers
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen
Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours
Germany14 sites
MVZ Onkologischer Schwerpunkt am Oskar-Helene-Heim
Berlin
Vivantes Klinikum am Urban / Hämatologie Onkologie
Berlin
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH / Klinik für Innere Medizin III
Chemnitz, 09116
Universitätsklinikum Dresden / Medizinische Klinik I
Dresden, 01307
Marienhospital Düsseldorf GmbH / Innere Medizin u. Hämatologie
Düsseldorf
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) / Klinik für Innere Medizin IV
Halle, 06120
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf /Onkologisches Zentrum
Hamburg, 20246
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover / Hämatologie u. Onkologie
Hanover
Universitätsklinikum Mannheim / Klinik III / Hämatologie, Onkologie
Mannheim
Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Tumortherapiezentrum
München
MVZ für Blut u. Krebserkrankungen
Potsdam
Universitätsklinikum Ulm / Klinik Innere Medizin III
Ulm
Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Weilheim
Rems-Murr-Kliniken Winnenden / Hämatologie, Onkologie
Winnenden
About this study
Official title: Prospective Validation of a Predictive Model of Response to Romiplostim in Patients With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Thrombocytopenia - the EUROPE-trial
There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model. The current prospective study has the aim to explore whether both pretreatment variables (endogenous TPO, TPO-level, platelet transfusion history) can predict the response to subsequent short-term treatment with romiplostim.
Read the detailed description
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells characterized by clonal hematopoiesis, progressive bone marrow failure, and the propensity to transform to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Malcovati et al., 2013).
There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model.
Classically, MDS is associated with apoptosis and excessive proliferation, resulting in a combination of a hyper-cellular marrow and peripheral cytopenia. The rationale for using romiplostim in MDS is to stimulate normal progenitor cells to increase platelet counts. Upon correction of thrombocytopenia, responding MDS patients should have a decreased risk of bleeding and a reduction in platelet transfusions (Giagounidis et al., 2014). This reduction in platelet transfusions may in turn decrease the risks of alloimmunization and the resultant morbidity and costs associated with that condition.
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- N-Plate / romiplostim
- Keywords
- MDS classified as IPSS low/int-1
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
N-Plate / romiplostimDrug
medical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Stratification into group 1 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are +3
TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014 Receives: Drug: N-Plate / romiplostim |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Stratification into group 2 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -1 or -2
TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014 Receives: Drug: N-Plate / romiplostim |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Stratification into group 3 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -6
TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014 Receives: Drug: N-Plate / romiplostim |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hematologic Improvement of Platelets (HI-P) After 4 Months on Therapy
The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of HI-P defined as an absolute increase of platelet count to ≥ 30/nL for patients starting at > 20/nL or an increase of platelets from < 20/nL to > 20/nL and by at least 100%, according to IWG 2006 criteria lasting for ≥ 8 weeks after at least 16 Weeks of romiplostim treatment.
Measured: after 4 months on therapy (week 16)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Cumulative Hematologic Improvement
Cumulative rate of hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P), erythrocytes (HI-E) and neutrophil granulocytes (HI-N).
None of the patients achieved simultaneous response of HI-P, HI-E and HI-N.
Measured: week 16
The Incidence of Disease Progression to Higher Stage MDS or AML
The incidence of disease progression to higher stage MDS or AML according to WHO (increase in blast percentage of ≥ 20 %)
Measured: week 16
Increase of Peripheral Blasts During Therapy
Measured: week 16
Association of the Presence of Certain Mutations With Disease Progression in a Retrospective Analysis
Measured: week 16
Incidence of Bleeding Events
Measured: up to 12 months
Type, Incidence and Severity of All Adverse Events Including Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Values
Measured: up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study start21 May 2015
- Primary completion1 Jul 2021
- Study completion1 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbH
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Uwe Platzbecker, Prof. Dr., Study director, University of DresdenLionel Ades, Prof. Dr., Study director, Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02335268
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 440/47
- Acronym
- EUROPE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Validation of a Predictive Model of Response to Romiplostim in Patients With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Thrombocytopenia - the EUROPE-trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02335268
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EUROPE / 440/47
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- MDS classified as IPSS low/int-1
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbHUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Study start
- 21 May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model. The current prospective study has the aim to explore whether both pretreatment variables (endogenous TPO, TPO-level, platelet transfusion history) can predict the response to subsequent short-term treatment with romiplostim.
Detailed description
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells characterized by clonal hematopoiesis, progressive bone marrow failure, and the propensity to transform to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Malcovati et al., 2013).
There are currently no licensed drugs in the EU to treat thrombocytopenia in MDS patients classified as IPSS low/int-1. Prior studies with romiplostim (a TPO receptor agonist) in MDS found that baseline concentration of TPO as well as transfusion history were predictive of subsequent response in a retrospective model.
Classically, MDS is associated with apoptosis and excessive proliferation, resulting in a combination of a hyper-cellular marrow and peripheral cytopenia. The rationale for using romiplostim in MDS is to stimulate normal progenitor cells to increase platelet counts. Upon correction of thrombocytopenia, responding MDS patients should have a decreased risk of bleeding and a reduction in platelet transfusions (Giagounidis et al., 2014). This reduction in platelet transfusions may in turn decrease the risks of alloimmunization and the resultant morbidity and costs associated with that condition.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Drug: N-Plate / romiplostimStratification into group 1 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are +3 TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014 |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Drug: N-Plate / romiplostimStratification into group 2 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -1 or -2 TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014 |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Drug: N-Plate / romiplostimStratification into group 3 if Score (Baseline-TPO Level and previous thrombocyte transfusions) are -6 TPO based model to predict subsequent response to romiplostim in MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1 according to a model developed by Sekeres et. al./ BJH 2014 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subjects must meet the following inclusion/exclusion criteria to be eligible for the study.
- Must understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form
- Age older 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
- Diagnosis of MDS using the 2008 WHO classification for myeloid neoplasms as assessed during the screening period
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating females
- IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk
- ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow as determined by central morphology during screening
- Previous treatment with any thrombopoietic growth factor
- Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, leukemia, aplastic anemia or other non-MDS related bone marrow stem cell disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| N-Plate / romiplostimmedical intervention in 3 patient groups (MDS patients with IPSS Low/Int-1) that are stratified according to their baseline TPO-Level and previous transfusions | Drug | Group 1, Group 2, Group 3 |
Primary outcome
Hematologic Improvement of Platelets (HI-P) After 4 Months on Therapy
Time frame: after 4 months on therapy (week 16)
The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of HI-P defined as an absolute increase of platelet count to ≥ 30/nL for patients starting at > 20/nL or an increase of platelets from < 20/nL to > 20/nL and by at least 100%, according to IWG 2006 criteria lasting for ≥ 8 weeks after at least 16 Weeks of romiplostim treatment.
6 secondary outcomes
Cumulative Hematologic Improvement
Time frame: week 16
The Incidence of Disease Progression to Higher Stage MDS or AML
Time frame: week 16
Increase of Peripheral Blasts During Therapy
Time frame: week 16
Association of the Presence of Certain Mutations With Disease Progression in a Retrospective Analysis
Time frame: week 16
Incidence of Bleeding Events
Time frame: up to 12 months
Type, Incidence and Severity of All Adverse Events Including Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Values
Time frame: up to 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Uwe Platzbecker, Prof. Dr. study director
University of Dresden
Lionel Ades, Prof. Dr. study director
Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
36 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing N-Plate / romiplostim in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbH at 36 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 36 sites in France, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hematologic Improvement of Platelets (HI-P) After 4 Months on Therapy (time frame: after 4 months on therapy (week 16)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2023.