AzTrials
AzTrials

Corneal DiseasesOCUREA2NCT02348242

Ocular Surface Disorders in Patients in Intensive Care Units, a Comparative Study of Three Preventive Approaches

A study testing Aqueous Gel, Eyelid Occlusion Dressing and Artificial Tears in people with Corneal Diseases, run by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

60% of the patients hospitalized in intensive care and sedated suffer from insufficient inferior eyelid occlusion. Thus, they are at risk for corneal damage (estimated risk 20% to 57%). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Corneal Diseases
What is being tested?
Aqueous Gel, Eyelid Occlusion Dressing and Artificial Tears
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Dec 2014to Feb 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patient
  • hospitalized in an intensive care unit
  • tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation since less than 24 hours, with an expected duration of artificial ventilation superior to 72h

Who cannot join

  • Patient currently treated by eyedrops for glaucoma
  • antecedent of corneal transplant
  • ocular prosthesis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

    Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75019

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Ocular Surface Disorders in Patients in Intensive Care Units, a Comparative Study

60% of the patients hospitalized in intensive care and sedated suffer from insufficient inferior eyelid occlusion. Thus, they are at risk for corneal damage (estimated risk 20% to 57%). The prevention of such corneal damage can be done using several techniques (artificial tears, eyelid occlusion dressing, aqueous gel). The efficacy of these techniques has never been compared in a rigorous study. Therefore it is not yet possible to determine an evidence-based strategy to prevent corneal damage in intensive care patients.

This study aims at assessing the efficacy of primary prevention of corneal lesions in intensive care patients, in order to elaborate an evidence-based nursing protocol.

Being tested
Aqueous Gel, Eyelid Occlusion Dressing, Artificial Tears
Keywords
Intensive care, corneal damage, prevention, nursing protocol
Medical subject headings
Corneal Diseases, Corneal Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aqueous GelDevice

    Also called Dexpanthenol® 0.2%

    1 drop of Dexpanthenol® 0.2% aqueous gel in the eye every 6 hours

  • Eyelid Occlusion DressingDevice

    Also called Pro-Ophta® Dressing

    Eyelid occlusion using pro-ophta® eyelid occlusion dressing, dressing to be verified every 6 hours and replaced daily

  • Artificial TearsDevice

    Also called Phylarm®

    1 drop of Phylarm® artificial tears in the eye every 6 hours

Study groups in NCT02348242
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aqueous gelExperimentalIn the same patient : one eye receives regular administration of aqueous gel (experimental treatment 1) and the other eye receives regular administration of artificial tears (active comparator)
Receives: Device: Aqueous Gel; Device: Artificial Tears
Eyelid occlusion dressingExperimentalIn the same patient : one eye is closed with an eyelid closure dressing (experimental treatment 2) and the other eye receives regular administration of artificial tears (active comparator)
Receives: Device: Eyelid Occlusion Dressing; Device: Artificial Tears

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence rate of corneal lesions (grade > 0 in the Mercieca classification)

    Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of stay in intensive care unit, an expected average of 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02348242
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014-A01197-40
Acronym
OCUREA2
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
16 Jan 2015
Last updated
13 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aqueous Gel, Eyelid Occlusion Dressing and Artificial Tears in people with Corneal Diseases, run by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence rate of corneal lesions (grade > 0 in the Mercieca classification) (time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of stay in intensive care unit, an expected average of 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in