Coronary Artery BypassPhase 4PhysiotherapyNCT02352376
Noninvasive Ventilation After Coronary Bypass Grafting
A Phase 4 study testing Conventional ventilator and Specific ventilator in people with Coronary Artery Bypass, run by Federal University of Uberlandia.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, quantitative, randomized, crossover study. Were included in this study 10 people in the Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital in Uberlandia, on the first day of the postoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Bypass
- What is being tested?
- Conventional ventilator and Specific ventilator
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age over 18 years .Who were breathing spontaneously with peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% and supplemental oxygen ≤ 3 l / min.
- Indication for use of NIV
Who cannot join
- Hemodynamic instability with hypertensive response being considered systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 110 mmHg, or difference in SBP and DBP less than 20 mmHg or framework shock considering SBP <90 mmHg and / or DBP <50 mmHg, since the normal SBP were between 90-130 mmHg and DBP 60-90 mmHg
- Presence of active cardiac pacemaker
- Invasive mechanical ventilation more than 24 hours
- Use of intra aortic balloon
- Postoperatively Myocardial infarction after surgery
- Ineffective cough with bronchial hypersecretion
Show all 10Show fewer
- Inability to adequately swallowing and/or protect the airway
- Abdominal distension
- Nausea
- Vomiting
About this study
Official title: Effects of Non Invasive Ventilation on Heart Rate Variability After Coronary Bypass Grafting: Comparison Between Different Ventilator
This is a prospective, quantitative, randomized, crossover study. Were included in this study 10 people in the Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital in Uberlandia, on the first day of the postoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). For data collection was performed randomization on the block (2: 4), to determine the first technique to be used and then a wash-out period of one hour was allowed for the research subject reaches the systemic arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation baseline. And after, for cross-over, the second technique was performed. Non-invasive ventilation was performed for 30 minutes each ventilator. All subjects underwent noninvasive ventilation using two models of ventilators, they are conventional (designed for invasive ventilation but is also used in non-invasive ventilation mode) and specific (designed for non-invasive ventilation). Hemodynamic, autonomic and respiratory variables are monitored. We use the hypothesis that non-invasive ventilation performed with two fan models can alter autonomic function and that there is hemodynamic changes related to autonomic function in different ventilators in postoperative coronary artery bypass grafting.
Read the detailed description
Background: The patients in postoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have impaired cardiac autonomic function. However, no studies have evaluated the influence of different ventilators during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in the autonomic modulation associated with hemodynamic changes. Objective: Evaluate the autonomic behavior and hemodynamic changes during the execution of the NIV with two models of mechanical ventilators in subjects after CABG. Material and Methods: This is quantitative randomized, prospective, crossover study. The subjects were selected on first day postoperatively CABG and was performance NIV procedure using two different ventilators: conventional ventilator and specific ventilator for the use of NIV for 30 minutes, each. Block randomization was used to determine the technique that begins to approach then by crossover, perform the sequential technique. The heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen peripheral saturation and arterial pressure were evaluated before procedure, in the instants 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 minutes during NIV each and 15 minutes after the end of the NIV application. HRV was evaluated using the time and frequency domain.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Bypass
- Being tested
- Conventional ventilator, Specific ventilator
- Keywords
- Noninvasive ventilation, Heart rate variability, Thoracic surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional ventilatorOther
A ventilator designed for invasive ventilation was used has mode non-invasive ventilation with leakage compensation (50% of the predetermined tidal volume).
Specific ventilatorOther
A ventilator was used designed for non-invasive ventilation has an algorithm that calculates the loss of pressure and automatically compensates for leak
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional ventilator | Other | 30 minutes of non-invasive ventilation was performed with conventional ventilator.The order of the procedures was determined by randomization. Receives: Other: Conventional ventilator; Other: Specific ventilator |
| Specific ventilator | Other | 30 minutes of non-invasive ventilation was performed with specific respirator. The order of the procedures was determined by randomization. Receives: Other: Conventional ventilator; Other: Specific ventilator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Variability of heart rate front the use of noninvasive ventilation in two different ventilators in patients after cardiac surgery, measured by Polar RS800 CX.
The autonomic variables evaluated are: standard deviation of all normal RR intervals recorded in a time interval (SDNN); standard deviation of the mean of normal RR intervals every 5 minutes at a time, expressed in milliseconds (SDANN); percentage of R-Ri with adjacent difference of duration greater than 50 milliseconds (pNN50) and the square root of the average squared difference between the adjacent R-Ri normal in a period of time, expressed in milliseconds (rMSSD). All variables will be assessed by Polar RS800CX
Measured: 3 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in the indices of variability of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate during noninvasive ventilation with two models of ventilatotors in patients after cardiac surgery.
Measured: 3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery BypassStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Uberlandia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Célia Regina Lopes, Federal University of Uberlandia
- Investigators
- Valdeci C Dionísio, Dr., Principal investigator, Federal University of Uberlandia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02352376
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11104413.6.0000.5152
- Acronym
- Physiotherapy
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81. No abstract available.
PubMed 8737210Carnevali L, Sgoifo A. Vagal modulation of resting heart rate in rats: the role of stress, psychosocial factors, and physical exercise. Front Physiol. 2014 Mar 24;5:118. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00118. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24715877Pantoni CB, Di Thommazo L, Mendes RG, Catai AM, Luzzi S, Amaral Neto O, Borghi-Silva A. Effects of different levels of positive airway pressure on breathing pattern and heart rate variability after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Jan;44(1):38-45. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500129. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
PubMed 21085891Ozyilmaz E, Ugurlu AO, Nava S. Timing of noninvasive ventilation failure: causes, risk factors, and potential remedies. BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Feb 13;14:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-19.
PubMed 24520952Sasaki K, Maruyama R. Consciously controlled breathing decreases the high-frequency component of heart rate variability by inhibiting cardiac parasympathetic nerve activity. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014 Jul;233(3):155-63. doi: 10.1620/tjem.233.155.
PubMed 24965685Radaelli A, Raco R, Perfetti P, Viola A, Azzellino A, Signorini MG, Ferrari AU. Effects of slow, controlled breathing on baroreceptor control of heart rate and blood pressure in healthy men. J Hypertens. 2004 Jul;22(7):1361-70. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000125446.28861.51.
PubMed 15201553Pinsky MR. Cardiovascular issues in respiratory care. Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5 Suppl 2):592S-597S. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5_suppl_2.592S.
PubMed 16306058Zhu GF, Wang DJ, Liu S, Jia M, Jia SJ. Efficacy and safety of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure after cardiac surgery. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Dec;126(23):4463-9.
PubMed 24286408Zarbock A, Mueller E, Netzer S, Gabriel A, Feindt P, Kindgen-Milles D. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure following cardiac surgery protects from postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 500 patients. Chest. 2009 May;135(5):1252-1259. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1602. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
PubMed 19017864Yang LX, Zhou YJ, Wang ZJ, Li YP, Chai M. Impact of invasive treatment strategy on health-related quality of life six months after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014 Sep;11(3):206-11. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.03.003.
PubMed 25278968Yan TD, Padang R, Poh C, Cao C, Wilson MK, Bannon PG, Vallely MP. Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 May;141(5):1134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
PubMed 21167508
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Non Invasive Ventilation on Heart Rate Variability After Coronary Bypass Grafting: Comparison Between Different Ventilator
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02352376
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Physiotherapy / 11104413.6.0000.5152
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Bypass
- Keywords
- Noninvasive ventilation, Heart rate variability, Thoracic surgery
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of UberlandiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, quantitative, randomized, crossover study. Were included in this study 10 people in the Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital in Uberlandia, on the first day of the postoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). For data collection was performed randomization on the block (2: 4), to determine the first technique to be used and then a wash-out period of one hour was allowed for the research subject reaches the systemic arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation baseline. And after, for cross-over, the second technique was performed. Non-invasive ventilation was performed for 30 minutes each ventilator. All subjects underwent noninvasive ventilation using two models of ventilators, they are conventional (designed for invasive ventilation but is also used in non-invasive ventilation mode) and specific (designed for non-invasive ventilation). Hemodynamic, autonomic and respiratory variables are monitored. We use the hypothesis that non-invasive ventilation performed with two fan models can alter autonomic function and that there is hemodynamic changes related to autonomic function in different ventilators in postoperative coronary artery bypass grafting.
Detailed description
Background: The patients in postoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have impaired cardiac autonomic function. However, no studies have evaluated the influence of different ventilators during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in the autonomic modulation associated with hemodynamic changes. Objective: Evaluate the autonomic behavior and hemodynamic changes during the execution of the NIV with two models of mechanical ventilators in subjects after CABG. Material and Methods: This is quantitative randomized, prospective, crossover study. The subjects were selected on first day postoperatively CABG and was performance NIV procedure using two different ventilators: conventional ventilator and specific ventilator for the use of NIV for 30 minutes, each. Block randomization was used to determine the technique that begins to approach then by crossover, perform the sequential technique. The heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen peripheral saturation and arterial pressure were evaluated before procedure, in the instants 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 minutes during NIV each and 15 minutes after the end of the NIV application. HRV was evaluated using the time and frequency domain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional ventilator | Other | Other: Conventional ventilator, Other: Specific ventilator30 minutes of non-invasive ventilation was performed with conventional ventilator.The order of the procedures was determined by randomization. |
| Specific ventilator | Other | Other: Conventional ventilator, Other: Specific ventilator30 minutes of non-invasive ventilation was performed with specific respirator. The order of the procedures was determined by randomization. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age over 18 years .Who were breathing spontaneously with peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% and supplemental oxygen ≤ 3 l / min.
- Indication for use of NIV
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Hemodynamic instability with hypertensive response being considered systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 110 mmHg, or difference in SBP and DBP less than 20 mmHg or framework shock considering SBP <90 mmHg and / or DBP <50 mmHg, since the normal SBP were between 90-130 mmHg and DBP 60-90 mmHg
- Presence of active cardiac pacemaker
- Invasive mechanical ventilation more than 24 hours
- Use of intra aortic balloon
- Postoperatively Myocardial infarction after surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional ventilatorA ventilator designed for invasive ventilation was used has mode non-invasive ventilation with leakage compensation (50% of the predetermined tidal volume). | Other | Conventional ventilator, Specific ventilator |
| Specific ventilatorA ventilator was used designed for non-invasive ventilation has an algorithm that calculates the loss of pressure and automatically compensates for leak | Other | Conventional ventilator, Specific ventilator |
Primary outcome
Variability of heart rate front the use of noninvasive ventilation in two different ventilators in patients after cardiac surgery, measured by Polar RS800 CX.
Time frame: 3 hours
The autonomic variables evaluated are: standard deviation of all normal RR intervals recorded in a time interval (SDNN); standard deviation of the mean of normal RR intervals every 5 minutes at a time, expressed in milliseconds (SDANN); percentage of R-Ri with adjacent difference of duration greater than 50 milliseconds (pNN50) and the square root of the average squared difference between the adjacent R-Ri normal in a period of time, expressed in milliseconds (rMSSD). All variables will be assessed by Polar RS800CX
1 secondary outcome
Change in the indices of variability of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate during noninvasive ventilation with two models of ventilatotors in patients after cardiac surgery.
Time frame: 3 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 8737210Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 24715877Carnevali L, Sgoifo A. Vagal modulation of resting heart rate in rats: the role of stress, psychosocial factors, and physical exercise. Front Physiol. 2014 Mar 24;5:118. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00118. eCollection 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 21085891Pantoni CB, Di Thommazo L, Mendes RG, Catai AM, Luzzi S, Amaral Neto O, Borghi-Silva A. Effects of different levels of positive airway pressure on breathing pattern and heart rate variability after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Jan;44(1):38-45. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500129. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 24520952Ozyilmaz E, Ugurlu AO, Nava S. Timing of noninvasive ventilation failure: causes, risk factors, and potential remedies. BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Feb 13;14:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-19.
- Results publication: PubMed 24965685Sasaki K, Maruyama R. Consciously controlled breathing decreases the high-frequency component of heart rate variability by inhibiting cardiac parasympathetic nerve activity. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014 Jul;233(3):155-63. doi: 10.1620/tjem.233.155.
- Results publication: PubMed 15201553Radaelli A, Raco R, Perfetti P, Viola A, Azzellino A, Signorini MG, Ferrari AU. Effects of slow, controlled breathing on baroreceptor control of heart rate and blood pressure in healthy men. J Hypertens. 2004 Jul;22(7):1361-70. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000125446.28861.51.
- Results publication: PubMed 16306058Pinsky MR. Cardiovascular issues in respiratory care. Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5 Suppl 2):592S-597S. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5_suppl_2.592S.
- Results publication: PubMed 24286408Zhu GF, Wang DJ, Liu S, Jia M, Jia SJ. Efficacy and safety of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure after cardiac surgery. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Dec;126(23):4463-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 19017864Zarbock A, Mueller E, Netzer S, Gabriel A, Feindt P, Kindgen-Milles D. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure following cardiac surgery protects from postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 500 patients. Chest. 2009 May;135(5):1252-1259. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1602. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 25278968Yang LX, Zhou YJ, Wang ZJ, Li YP, Chai M. Impact of invasive treatment strategy on health-related quality of life six months after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014 Sep;11(3):206-11. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.03.003.
- Results publication: PubMed 21167508Yan TD, Padang R, Poh C, Cao C, Wilson MK, Bannon PG, Vallely MP. Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 May;141(5):1134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Bypass
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Recruiting
CCTA-Based vs CAG-Based CABG: A Multicenter Pragmatic Non-Inferiority Trial
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Recruiting
Fasciotomy and Predilation for Radial Artery Grafts in CABG
Coronary Artery Bypass, Radial Artery Grafts
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparing High and lOw-dose asPirin With Dual anTIplatelet Therapy for Three Months Using prasUgrel and aSpirin Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. (OPTIMUS-CABG Trial)
Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Stable Coronary Artery Disease CAD
Not yet recruiting
Bedside Assessment of Right Ventricular Output Lying in Prone Or Supine
Right Ventricular Function, Prone Position
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Valdeci C Dionísio, Dr. principal investigator
Federal University of Uberlandia
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Conventional ventilator and Specific ventilator in people with Coronary Artery Bypass, run by Federal University of Uberlandia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Variability of heart rate front the use of noninvasive ventilation in two different ventilators in patients after cardiac surgery, measured by Polar RS800 CX. (time frame: 3 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02352376, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2015.