Heart FailureNCT02355769
Complex Pathophysiological Background of Heart Failure Deterioration
An observational study of Heart Failure, run by Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
Preventing heart failure (HF) deterioration is a great challenge for contemporary medicine. The progress course of HF is with increasing frequency of subsequent hospitalizations (approximately 30% of hospitalizations are the repeated ones). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Jun 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 24 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with heart failure admitted to the Department of Internal Diseases and Cardiology urgently because of symptomatic heart failure deterioration
Who may be able to join
- patients of either sex
- urgent hospitalization caused by deterioration of HF.
Who cannot join
- unstable coronary artery disease including myocardial infarct within the last 40 days prior to recruitment
- stroke within 40 days prior to recruitment
- cardiac surgery within 90 days prior to recruitment
- pulmonary embolism
- severe pulmonary diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases - stage C/D, uncontrolled asthma, pulmonary hypertension)
- chronic kidney disease (stage 5 and requiring dialysis)
Show all 9Show fewer
- severe inflammatory disease
- severe mental and physical disorders
- patients' refusal to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
Military Institute of Medicine
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 04-141
About this study
Official title: Multiparametric Assessment of Complex Pathophysiological Background of Heart Failure Deterioration - Relation to Treatment Effects and Prognosis
Preventing heart failure (HF) deterioration is a great challenge for contemporary medicine. The progress course of HF is with increasing frequency of subsequent hospitalizations (approximately 30% of hospitalizations are the repeated ones). It is estimated that the costs of hospital stays constitute nearly 2/3 of healthcare costs provided for HF patients. The difficulty in treatment of patients with HF deterioration is associated with numerous comorbidities and coexisting complications (i.e. aggravation of ischaemic heart disease, lung diseases, infections, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, renal failure as well as operations, in particular emergency ones). Our study is aimed to evaluation the complex pathophysiological background related to heart failure deterioration with respect to the effect of applied in-hospital treatment.
Read the detailed description
PURPOSE:
Treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) is a great challenge for contemporary medicine. HF frequency in European population is assessed for 0.4 - 2%. This disease is characterized by high morbidity and mortality rate, poor quality of life and the necessity of frequent hospitalizations. Along with the medicine progress, in particular in the scope of acute coronary syndromes treatment, the number of HF patients is constantly growing. The essential problem connected with HF is its progress course and an increasing frequency of subsequent hospitalizations (approximately 30% of hospitalizations are the repeated ones). It is estimated that the costs of hospital stays constitute nearly 2/3 of healthcare costs provided for HF patients. In the United States approximately 50% of HF patients have been rehospitalized within 6 months from discharge and 70% of these hospitalizations were caused by HF deterioration.The prognosis in HF is closely connected with the progression of the disease defined in accordance with the NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional classification. The yearly mortality rate among each NYHA class is: class 1 - up to 10%, class 2 - 10-20%, class 3 - 20-40%, class 4 - mortality 40-60%. Over half of the patients with symptomatic HF die within 4 years of observation The high in-hospital mortality has been a great problem and results not only from the natural history of HF progression, but also from a number of coexisting complications (i.e. aggravation of ischaemic heart disease, lung diseases, infections, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, renal failure as well as operations, in particular emergency ones). The optimal schemes of identifying the individual risk are of fundamental importance to guide the safe therapy. Undoubtedly hemodynamic status and its change during hospitalization is one of the main predictive factors of treatment response and occurrences of adverse effects of therapy, i.e. renal function worsening. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to perform safe and effective non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring.
AIMS:
The evaluation of complex pathophysiological features related to heart failure deterioration, including the parameters characterizing i.e. cardiovascular hemodynamics, hydration status, renal failure, iron metabolism and gas exchange, with respect to the effect of applied in-hospital treatment The evaluation of clinical value of the parameters characterizing i.e. cardiovascular hemodynamics, hydration status, renal failure, iron metabolism and gas exchange in prognosis of patients with heart failure deterioration
METHODS:
All the recruited patients will undergo the following assessment:
Clinical examination Laboratory tests, ncluding i.e. white blood cells count, red blood cells count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean cell volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW); sodium, potassium, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rat (eGFR), urea, cystatin C; fasting glucose; bilirubin; total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP); hs-TnT (high sensitive troponin T), iron; ferritin; unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC), total iron binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin saturation, soluble transferrin receptor; pH, carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2), oxygen partial pressure (pO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), bicarbonate content (HCO3-), base excess (BE), lactates; thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), estradiol Electrocardiogram Echocardiography Chest X-ray Holter-ekg monitoring ambulatory blood pressure monitoring impedance cardiography (including assessment of: resting heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), thoracic fluid content (TFC), cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) bioimpedance (including assessment total body water (TBW), intracellular and extracellular water (ICW, ECW)) applanation tonometry (including assessment of augmentation index (AI) and central pulse pressure (CPP))
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- heart failure, renal failure, prognosis, impedance cardiography
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
in-hospital death
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
combined primary endpoint (in-hospital death and/or myocardial infract and/or stroke and/or serious arrhythmia and/or worsening renal function)
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
myocardial infract
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
stroke (clinical symptoms and confirmed in CT)
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
serious arrhythmia (new onset sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, sustained bradycardia <40/min)
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
worsening renal function (increase in creatinine 0,3mg/dl according to the definition of AKDI)
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
Measured: 8 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionJun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 24 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Paweł Krzesiński, Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute
- Investigators
- Pawel Krzesinski, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Military Institute of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02355769
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WIM-0000000213
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multiparametric Assessment of Complex Pathophysiological Background of Heart Failure Deterioration - Relation to Treatment Effects and Prognosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02355769
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WIM-0000000213
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- heart failure, renal failure, prognosis, impedance cardiography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Military Institute od Medicine National Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Preventing heart failure (HF) deterioration is a great challenge for contemporary medicine. The progress course of HF is with increasing frequency of subsequent hospitalizations (approximately 30% of hospitalizations are the repeated ones). It is estimated that the costs of hospital stays constitute nearly 2/3 of healthcare costs provided for HF patients. The difficulty in treatment of patients with HF deterioration is associated with numerous comorbidities and coexisting complications (i.e. aggravation of ischaemic heart disease, lung diseases, infections, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, renal failure as well as operations, in particular emergency ones). Our study is aimed to evaluation the complex pathophysiological background related to heart failure deterioration with respect to the effect of applied in-hospital treatment.
Detailed description
PURPOSE:
Treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) is a great challenge for contemporary medicine. HF frequency in European population is assessed for 0.4 - 2%. This disease is characterized by high morbidity and mortality rate, poor quality of life and the necessity of frequent hospitalizations. Along with the medicine progress, in particular in the scope of acute coronary syndromes treatment, the number of HF patients is constantly growing. The essential problem connected with HF is its progress course and an increasing frequency of subsequent hospitalizations (approximately 30% of hospitalizations are the repeated ones). It is estimated that the costs of hospital stays constitute nearly 2/3 of healthcare costs provided for HF patients. In the United States approximately 50% of HF patients have been rehospitalized within 6 months from discharge and 70% of these hospitalizations were caused by HF deterioration.The prognosis in HF is closely connected with the progression of the disease defined in accordance with the NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional classification. The yearly mortality rate among each NYHA class is: class 1 - up to 10%, class 2 - 10-20%, class 3 - 20-40%, class 4 - mortality 40-60%. Over half of the patients with symptomatic HF die within 4 years of observation The high in-hospital mortality has been a great problem and results not only from the natural history of HF progression, but also from a number of coexisting complications (i.e. aggravation of ischaemic heart disease, lung diseases, infections, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, renal failure as well as operations, in particular emergency ones). The optimal schemes of identifying the individual risk are of fundamental importance to guide the safe therapy. Undoubtedly hemodynamic status and its change during hospitalization is one of the main predictive factors of treatment response and occurrences of adverse effects of therapy, i.e. renal function worsening. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to perform safe and effective non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring.
AIMS:
The evaluation of complex pathophysiological features related to heart failure deterioration, including the parameters characterizing i.e. cardiovascular hemodynamics, hydration status, renal failure, iron metabolism and gas exchange, with respect to the effect of applied in-hospital treatment The evaluation of clinical value of the parameters characterizing i.e. cardiovascular hemodynamics, hydration status, renal failure, iron metabolism and gas exchange in prognosis of patients with heart failure deterioration
METHODS:
All the recruited patients will undergo the following assessment:
Clinical examination Laboratory tests, ncluding i.e. white blood cells count, red blood cells count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean cell volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW); sodium, potassium, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rat (eGFR), urea, cystatin C; fasting glucose; bilirubin; total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP); hs-TnT (high sensitive troponin T), iron; ferritin; unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC), total iron binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin saturation, soluble transferrin receptor; pH, carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2), oxygen partial pressure (pO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), bicarbonate content (HCO3-), base excess (BE), lactates; thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), estradiol Electrocardiogram Echocardiography Chest X-ray Holter-ekg monitoring ambulatory blood pressure monitoring impedance cardiography (including assessment of: resting heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), thoracic fluid content (TFC), cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) bioimpedance (including assessment total body water (TBW), intracellular and extracellular water (ICW, ECW)) applanation tonometry (including assessment of augmentation index (AI) and central pulse pressure (CPP))
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 24 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with heart failure admitted to the Department of Internal Diseases and Cardiology urgently because of symptomatic heart failure deterioration
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients of either sex
- urgent hospitalization caused by deterioration of HF.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- unstable coronary artery disease including myocardial infarct within the last 40 days prior to recruitment
- stroke within 40 days prior to recruitment
- cardiac surgery within 90 days prior to recruitment
- pulmonary embolism
- severe pulmonary diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases - stage C/D, uncontrolled asthma, pulmonary hypertension)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
in-hospital death
Time frame: 8 days
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
combined primary endpoint (in-hospital death and/or myocardial infract and/or stroke and/or serious arrhythmia and/or worsening renal function)
Time frame: 8 days
time frame - assumed mean time of hospitalization
4 secondary outcomes
myocardial infract
Time frame: 8 days
stroke (clinical symptoms and confirmed in CT)
Time frame: 8 days
serious arrhythmia (new onset sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, sustained bradycardia <40/min)
Time frame: 8 days
worsening renal function (increase in creatinine 0,3mg/dl according to the definition of AKDI)
Time frame: 8 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2018.
Related trials for Heart Failure
Recruiting
ELEVATE-HFpEF Clinical Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Recruiting
Barostim-Enabled NEurohormonal Intervention For Improving Treatment of Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class II
RecruitingObservational study
31P-MRS Myocardial Energetic Phenotyping and Prognosis Across the Cardiac Disease Spectrum
Cardiomyopathies, Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Importance of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Early Detection of Valvular and Cardiac Diseases (IMPROVE)
Valvular Heart Disease Patients, Aortic Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pawel Krzesinski, MD, PhD principal investigator
Military Institute of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heart Failure, run by Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
in-hospital death (time frame: 8 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2018.