AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 1/2SMARTNCT02358720

Single-fraction IMRT Versus External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Spine Bone Metastases

A Phase 1/2 study testing Arm A and Arm B in people with Pain, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective, randomized, monocentre, controlled explorative study in the parallel-group design to determine the pain relief after RT of patients with spinal bone metastases. Thereby two different techniques were evaluated: single fraction IMRT with 1 x 24 Gy versus fractionated RT with 10 x 3 Gy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
Arm A and Arm B
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Dec 2014to Dec 2016
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a histologically confirmed tumor diagnosis, with secondary diagnosed solitary/multiple spinal bone metastases
  • Indication for RT of the spinal bone metastases
  • Maximal two irradiated vertebral-bodies per region
  • Maximal two different vertebral regions
  • Age: between 18 and 80 years
  • Karnofsky index (10) ≥ 70
  • Signed Declaration of Informed Consent
  • Tumor distance > 3 mm to myelon

Who cannot join

  • Multiple myeloma or lymphoma
  • Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including dementia and epileptic seizures
  • Earlier RT at the current irradiated site
  • Other severe disorders that in the judgement of the study director may prevent the patient's participation in the study
  • Lacking or diminished legal capacity
  • Any medical of psychological condition that the study director considers a preventive factor for the patient's ability to complete the study or to adequately
  • understand the scope of the study and to give his/her consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany

    Heidelberg, Germany, 69120

    Harald Rief, MD, PhD, +49-6221-56´- ext. 8202, harald.rief@med.uni-heidelberg.de

    Harald Rief, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

This study is a prospective, randomized, monocentre, controlled explorative study in the parallel-group design to determine the pain relief after RT of patients with spinal bone metastases. Thereby two different techniques were evaluated: single fraction IMRT with 1 x 24 Gy versus fractionated RT with 10 x 3 Gy. Prior to their enrolment into the study, the patients will undergo a staging of the vertebral column in connection with their radiation-planning computed tomography (CT) and MRI to measure the myelon dimension. After the baseline results have been recorded, the patients will be randomized into one of the two groups: single-fraction IMRT 1 x 24 Gy (n = 30) or fractionated RT 10 x 3 Gy (n = 30). The target parameters will be measured and recorded at baseline, at the end of RT (t1) and twelve weeks (t2) and six months following the end of the irradiation period (t3).

Read the detailed description

The patients will be given information on the study by the medical personnel of the Radiotherapy Department in connection with the planning of the RT schedule (approximately 1-2 weeks prior to the start of RT). If they are interested in participating in the study, the potential study candidates will be given the Patient Information sheet including the Declaration of Informed Consent, with the request that they reread the information carefully and if they consent to the conditions return the signed declaration when they attend the next appointment. The patients will be given the opportunity to ask the study staff further questions. Among the preconditions for participation in the study is the condition that no metastatic spinal cord compression (tumor distance > 3 mm to myelon) of the metastasized vertebral body is detected in MRI recorded in the course of planning procedure. A block randomization procedure shall be used to ensure the even distribution of the patients into the two intervention groups, stratified to baseline pain level. The patients shall then be assigned 1:1 to one of the two treatment groups on the basis of the baseline measurements. The randomization procedure shall be carried out by a central office. The study personnel responsible for the recruitment and baseline measurements shall have no access to the randomization list, and the study director no influence on the recruitment of the patients. The recruitment phase shall be concluded with the attainment of the planned number of patients (60 patients in total). It shall last twelve months, and is scheduled to start in December 2014. Regular study participation shall end six months after enrolment into the study or, where applicable, with the respective patient's death. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the pain relief after RT of patients with spinal bone metastases. Thereby two different techniques were evaluated: single fraction IMRT with 1 x 24 Gy versus fractionated RT with 10 x 3 Gy. The primary endpoint was defined as pain relief > 2 points according to visual analog scale (VAS) measured at the irradiated region up to three months after the end of RT (t2). Secondary endpoints were quality of life (QoL), fatigue, pain, overall survival, bone survival, local control, pathological fracture, and neurological deficit. The baseline examination shall be carried out on the first day of radiotherapy prior to the start of therapy and is scheduled to comprise the comprehensive recording of the sociodemographic data, the recording of the current pain situation, the fear of suffering fractures, the quality of life, and the current degree of fatigue. The follow-up examinations shall take place after the end of radiotherapy (day of the last fraction) and twelve weeks and six months after radiotherapy, measuring those parameters recorded at the baseline examination. The further follow-up examinations shall correspond to those carried out as standard after-care investigations.

The secondary endpoints such as fatigue, quality of life, and anxiety shall be recorded using validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ FA13 (11), EORTC QLQ BM22 (12) and the questionnaire to record stress in cancer patients (FBK) according to Book et al. (13). All patients will also be asked to record their pain history using a pain diary (documentation of medication daily during treatment, once weekly after the end of treatment, VAS pain scale). Furthermore, the local control was assessed by means of CT images taken prior to, three and six months after RT. The pain response was documented on the VAS (range 0-10). Complete response (CR) was defined as VAS = 0 after three and six months, partial response (PR) as an improvement by at least two score points after three and six months, according to the international consensus response categories by Chow et al. (14). Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from initial diagnosis until death, bone survival as time from initial diagnosis of spinal bone metastasis until death.

Radiotherapy Immobilization was assessed with Aquaplast head mask®, vacuum mattress and Wingstep®. On the basis of the planning-CT risk organs and clinical target volume (CTV) were contoured. CTV confirmed planning target volume (PTV). The dose of PTV occured at the 80%-isodose, encircling the PTV. The RT procedure in group A was conducted as IMRT (Tomotherapy or Step-and-shoot IMRT) 24 Gy in a single-fraction occured at the 80%-isodose. In group B, RT was performed as irradiation of the involved vertebral body as well as the ones immediately above and below to a total-dose of 30 Gy with a single daily dose of 3 Gy using 6 MV individually-formed beams (Linac, multileaf collimator) after CT-scan based 3D planning. The tolerance doses of organs at risk were used according RTOG 0631 study.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
Arm A, Arm B
Keywords
bone metastases
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Arm ARadiation

    1x24Gy high dose IMRT on spinal bone metastasis

  • Arm BRadiation

    fractionated conformal RT 10 x 3 Gy on spinal bone metastasis

Study groups in NCT02358720
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A: single fraction IMRT with 1 x 24 GyExperimentalsingle fraction IMRT with 1 x 24 Gy on bone metastasis
Receives: Radiation: Arm A
B: fractionated RT with 10 x 3 GyActive comparatorfractionated RT with 10 x 3 Gy on bone metastasis
Receives: Radiation: Arm B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pain relief, as measured by visual analog scale (VAS)

    The primary endpoint was defined as pain relief > 2 points according to visual analog scale (VAS) measured at the irradiated region up to three months after the end of RT

    Measured: 3 months after therapy completed

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. quality of life measured on an EORTC BM22 questionnaire

    Secondary endpoints were quality of life (QoL) measured on an EORTC BM22 questionnaire

    Measured: 3 and 6 months after therapy completed

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02358720
Sponsor's protocol ID
SMART
Acronym
SMART
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
27 Jan 2015
Last updated
9 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Coleman RE. Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001 Jun;27(3):165-76. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210.

    PubMed 11417967
  • Chung Y, Yoon HI, Kim JH, Nam KC, Koom WS. Is helical tomotherapy accurate and safe enough for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;139(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1321-0. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

    PubMed 23052695
  • Nguyen QN, Shiu AS, Rhines LD, Wang H, Allen PK, Wang XS, Chang EL. Management of spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma using stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 15;76(4):1185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.062. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

    PubMed 19632064
  • Ryu S, Pugh SL, Gerszten PC, Yin FF, Timmerman RD, Hitchcock YJ, Movsas B, Kanner AA, Berk LB, Followill DS, Kachnic LA. RTOG 0631 phase 2/3 study of image guided stereotactic radiosurgery for localized (1-3) spine metastases: phase 2 results. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Mar-Apr;4(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

    PubMed 24890347
  • Janjan N, Lutz ST, Bedwinek JM, Hartsell WF, Ng A, Pieters RS Jr, Ratanatharathorn V, Silberstein EB, Taub RJ, Yasko AW, Rettenmaier A; American College of Radiology. Therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of bone metastasis: a report from the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology. J Palliat Med. 2009 May;12(5):417-26. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9633.

    PubMed 19416037
  • Sprave T, Verma V, Forster R, Schlampp I, Hees K, Bruckner T, Bostel T, El Shafie RA, Welzel T, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Rief H. Local response and pathologic fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for spinal metastases - a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4777-8.

    PubMed 30170568
  • Sprave T, Verma V, Forster R, Schlampp I, Bruckner T, Bostel T, Welte SE, Tonndorf-Martini E, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Rief H. Randomized phase II trial evaluating pain response in patients with spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Aug;128(2):274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 26.

    PubMed 29843899
  • Rief H, Katayama S, Bruckner T, Rieken S, Bostel T, Forster R, Schlampp I, Wolf R, Debus J, Sterzing F. High-dose single-fraction IMRT versus fractionated external beam radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Jun 9;16:264. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0761-7.

    PubMed 26054533

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Arm A and Arm B in people with Pain, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Harald Rief, MD, PhD (+496221568202 ext. 0, harald.rief@med.uni-heidelberg.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pain relief, as measured by visual analog scale (VAS) (time frame: 3 months after therapy completed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02358720, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in