Myelodysplastic SyndromePhase 1BRIGHT 1012NCT02367456
A Combination Study of PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) and Azacitidine In Untreated MDS, AML and CMML Patients
A Phase 1 study testing PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) and Azacitidine in people with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 33 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This multi center open label Phase 1b study is designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of glasdegib (PF-04449913) when combined with azacitidine in patients with previously untreated Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), or Chronic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) and Azacitidine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 73 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2015to 7 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have previously untreated MDS, AML, or CMML according to the WHO 2016 classification.
- MDS patients must have Intermediate (>3 to 4.5 points), High Risk (>4.5 - 6) or Very High Risk (>6 points) disease according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System 2012 (IPSS-R).
- Clinical indication for treatment with azacitidine for MDS or AML.
Who cannot join
- Patients with AML who are candidates for standard induction chemotherapy as first line treatment.
- Patients with known active CNS leukemia.
- Prior treatment with a smoothened inhibitor (SMOi) and/or hypomethylating agent.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 6 countries.
33 sites in 6 countries
United States21 sites
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama at Birmingham the Kirklin Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Duke University Health System: Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Clinic
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Duke University Health System, Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Duke University Health System
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Investigational Chemotherapy Service
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
Henry-Joyce Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Vanderbilt - Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Smilow Cancer Center at Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Huntsman Cancer Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA)
Seattle, Washington, 98109
University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC)
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Stony Brook University Hospital Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
France4 sites
CHU d'Amiens-Picardie - Hopital SUD
Amiens, 80054
Hopital Saint-Louis (AP-HP) - Service Hematologie Senior
Paris, 75475
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital Lyon Sud- Hematologie
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
CHU de Tours-Hopital Bretonneau-Centre Regional de cancerologie Henry Kaplan
Tours, 37044
United Kingdom3 sites
King's College Hospital
London, SE5 9RS
The Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, OX3 9DU
Belgium2 sites
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen - Campus Stuivenberg
Antwerp, 2060
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000
Canada2 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Center
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
University Of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
About this study
Official title: An Open-label Phase 1b Study of PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
This multi center open label Phase 1b study is designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of glasdegib (PF-04449913) when combined with azacitidine in patients with previously untreated Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML). This clinical study includes two components: (a) a safety lead in cohort (LIC) and (b) an expansion phase with an AML cohort and an MDS cohort.
- Being tested
- PF-04449913 (Glasdegib), Azacitidine
- Keywords
- MDS, AML, CMML
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-04449913 (Glasdegib)Drug
Daily dose of PF-04449913 100mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28 day cycles
AzacitidineDrug
75mg/m2 on Days 1-7 (+/- 3 days for each dose) of a 28 day cycle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | MDS patients: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) 100 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 Receives: Drug: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib); Drug: Azacitidine |
| Arm B | Experimental | AML patients: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) 100 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 Receives: Drug: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib); Drug: Azacitidine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Lead-in Cohort (LIC)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03.Grade 1=asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Measured: maximum of approximately 15 months
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the LIC
A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator.
Measured: maximum of approximately 15 months
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the LIC
Hematology lab parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, prothrombin international normalized ratio, lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell; chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, creatine phosphokinase, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate. Grades of lab abnormalities were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1(mild)=asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated;Grade 2(moderate)=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL;Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL;Grade 4=life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated. Grade 1-4 results are reported.
Measured: maximum of approximately 16 months
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Percentage of participants achieving CR as defined by the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) Response Criteria for all participants with AML and modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006) for all participants with MDS in the expansion cohorts.
For AML cohort, CR was defined as neutrophils ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥ 1 x 10^11/L, percentage of bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5% with no peripheral blasts and no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), and transfusion independent.
For MDS cohort, CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks.
Measured: maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort
Secondary outcomes (18)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) in the LIC
Response rate (Percentage of participants achieving CR + PR among all the enrolled and treated patients) as defined by modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006) in the LIC. CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks. PR was defined as meeting all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BMB, percentage of BMB decreased by ≥50% but still >5% for at least 4 weeks.
Measured: maximum of approximately 16 months
Number of Participants With Efficacy Measures Other Than CR in the LIC
Number of participants with efficacy measures other than CR as defined by modified IWG criteria (2006) in LIC, including marrow CR(mCR), stable disease(SD), hematologic improvement(HI). CR: hemoglobin≥11 g/dL, neutrophils≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts=0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), all responses last at least 4 weeks. mCR: BMB≤5% \& decreased by≥50%. SD: failure to achieve PR, no evidence of progression. HI: erythroid response (pretreatment<11g/dL): hemoglobin increase by≥1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 transfusions/8 weeks compared to pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 weeks; platelet response (pretreatment<1x10^11/L): increase of≥30x10^9/L if starting with >20x10^9/L, and increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil response (pretreatment<1x10^9/L): at least a 100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L
Measured: maximum of approximately 16 months
Number of Participants With TEAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03.Grade 1=asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Measured: maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort
Number of Participants With SAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator.
Measured: maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Hematology lab parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, prothrombin international normalized ratio, lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell; chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, creatine phosphokinase, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate. Grades of lab abnormalities were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1(mild)=asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated;Grade 2(moderate)=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL;Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL;Grade 4=life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated. Grade 1-4 results are reported.
Measured: maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort
Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the AML Cohort
Number of participants with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). CRh: neutrophils>5x10^8/L, platelets>5x10^10/L, BMB<5%, no peripheral blasts, no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), not qualifying for CR. CRi: neutrophils <1x10^9/L or platelets<1x10^11/L; BMB <5%, no peripheral blasts, no blasts with Auer rods; no EMD; neutrophils or platelets not recovered; not qualifying for CRh. PR: neutrophils ≥1x10^9/L; platelets ≥1x10^11/L; blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pretreatment; blasts≤5% if Auer rod positive. SD: ≥3 months of absence of CR without minimal residual disease (CRMRD-), CR, CRh, CRi, PR, and MLFS, criteria for PD not met. MLFS: neutrophils <1x10^9/L and platelets<1x10^11/L, BMB<5%, no blasts with Auer rods; no EMD; neutrophils and platelets not recovered; not qualifying for CRi
Measured: maximum of 23 months
Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the MDS Cohort
Number of participants with PR, mCR, SD, complete or partial cytogenetic response, and HI. PR: BMB >5% and decreased by ≥50% (at least 4 weeks), meeting all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BMB. mCR: BMB ≤5% and decreased by ≥50%. SD: failure to achieve PR, no evidence of progression. Complete or partial cytogenic response: disappearance of chromosomal abnormality without new ones, or ≥ 50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality. HI: erythroid response (pretreatment <11g/dL): hemoglobin increase by≥1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 transfusions/8 weeks compared to pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 weeks; platelet response (pretreatment <1x10^11/L): increase of ≥30x10^9/L if starting with >20x10^9/L, and increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil response (pretreatment <1x10^9/L): at least a 100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L.
Measured: maximum of 34 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Median Overall Survival (OS) in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of first study treatment to date of death from any cause. Patients last known to be alive were to be censored at the date of last contact. OS was analyzed and displayed graphically for each expansion cohort separately using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median event time and corresponding two-sided 95%CI were provided for each cohort. OS was first analyzed when the primary endpoint of CR was analyzed in the respective expansion cohort.
Measured: maximum of approximately 32 months in AML cohort and 32 months in MDS cohort
Duration of CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Duration of CR was defined as the duration from date of first achieving CR to the date of disease progression (relapse) after CR, or death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive who were free from disease progression or relapse after CR were censored at the date of the last assessment that verified their disease status. Duration of CR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Disease progression was defined as: percentage of bone marrow blasts increased by ≥50% to >5% (for participants with <5% blasts at screening), >10% (for participants with 5-10% blasts at screening), >20% (for participants with 11-20% blasts at screening) or >30% (for participants with 21-30% blasts at screening), and with any of the following condition: at least 50% decrease from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥2 g/dL; transfusion dependence.
Measured: maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort
Time to CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time to CR was defined for participants in the expansion cohorts who had achieved response on study as the time from date of the first dose of study drug to date of the first documentation of response. Time to CR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
Maximum plasma concentration of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Measured: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Measured: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Time to First Occurrence of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time to first occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Measured: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Cmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
Maximum plasma concentration of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Measured: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to extrapolated infinite time of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Measured: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7
Tmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time to first occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Measured: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7
Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib on Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Trough plasma concentration was defined as the estimated lowest concentration before next dose administration.
Measured: Pre-dose and 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
Number of Participants Meeting Categorical Criteria of QTcF Values in LIC, AML and MDS Cohorts
Number of participants that met categorical criteria of QTcF values in LIC, AML and MDS cohorts
Measured: maximum of approximately 15 months in the LIC cohort, 23 months in AML cohort, and 40 months in MDS cohort
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study start28 Apr 2015
- Primary completion29 Jan 2020
- Study completion7 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02367456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1371012
- Other IDs
- 2014-001345-24, BRIGHT MDS&AML1012, 2014
- Acronym
- BRIGHT 1012
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Sekeres MA, Schuster M, Joris M, Krauter J, Maertens J, Breems D, Gyan E, Kovacsovics T, Verma A, Vyas P, Wang ES, Ching K, O'Brien T, Gallo Stampino C, Ma WW, Kudla A, Chan G, Zeidan AM. A phase 1b study of glasdegib + azacitidine in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2022 Aug;101(8):1689-1701. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04853-4. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
PubMed 35488900
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Phase 1b Study of PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02367456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRIGHT 1012 / B1371012
- Keywords
- MDS, AML, CMML
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Mar 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multi center open label Phase 1b study is designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of glasdegib (PF-04449913) when combined with azacitidine in patients with previously untreated Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML). This clinical study includes two components: (a) a safety lead in cohort (LIC) and (b) an expansion phase with an AML cohort and an MDS cohort.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Drug: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib), Drug: AzacitidineMDS patients: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) 100 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 |
| Arm B | Experimental | Drug: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib), Drug: AzacitidineAML patients: PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) 100 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients must have previously untreated MDS, AML, or CMML according to the WHO 2016 classification.
- MDS patients must have Intermediate (>3 to 4.5 points), High Risk (>4.5 - 6) or Very High Risk (>6 points) disease according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System 2012 (IPSS-R).
- Clinical indication for treatment with azacitidine for MDS or AML.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with AML who are candidates for standard induction chemotherapy as first line treatment.
- Patients with known active CNS leukemia.
- Prior treatment with a smoothened inhibitor (SMOi) and/or hypomethylating agent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-04449913 (Glasdegib)Daily dose of PF-04449913 100mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28 day cycles | Drug | Arm A, Arm B |
| Azacitidine75mg/m2 on Days 1-7 (+/- 3 days for each dose) of a 28 day cycle | Drug | Arm A, Arm B |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Lead-in Cohort (LIC)
Time frame: maximum of approximately 15 months
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03.Grade 1=asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the LIC
Time frame: maximum of approximately 15 months
A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the LIC
Time frame: maximum of approximately 16 months
Hematology lab parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, prothrombin international normalized ratio, lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell; chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, creatine phosphokinase, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate. Grades of lab abnormalities were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1(mild)=asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated;Grade 2(moderate)=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL;Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL;Grade 4=life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated. Grade 1-4 results are reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort
Percentage of participants achieving CR as defined by the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) Response Criteria for all participants with AML and modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006) for all participants with MDS in the expansion cohorts. For AML cohort, CR was defined as neutrophils ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥ 1 x 10^11/L, percentage of bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5% with no peripheral blasts and no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), and transfusion independent. For MDS cohort, CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks.
18 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) in the LIC
Time frame: maximum of approximately 16 months
Number of Participants With Efficacy Measures Other Than CR in the LIC
Time frame: maximum of approximately 16 months
Number of Participants With TEAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort
Number of Participants With SAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of around 23 months in AML cohort and 40 months in MDS cohort
Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the AML Cohort
Time frame: maximum of 23 months
Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the MDS Cohort
Time frame: maximum of 34 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Median Overall Survival (OS) in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of approximately 32 months in AML cohort and 32 months in MDS cohort
Duration of CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort
Time to CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of 23 months in AML cohort and 34 months in MDS cohort
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Time to First Occurrence of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Cmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7
Tmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 7
Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib on Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 in the AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: Pre-dose and 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
Number of Participants Meeting Categorical Criteria of QTcF Values in LIC, AML and MDS Cohorts
Time frame: maximum of approximately 15 months in the LIC cohort, 23 months in AML cohort, and 40 months in MDS cohort
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jan 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35488900Sekeres MA, Schuster M, Joris M, Krauter J, Maertens J, Breems D, Gyan E, Kovacsovics T, Verma A, Vyas P, Wang ES, Ching K, O'Brien T, Gallo Stampino C, Ma WW, Kudla A, Chan G, Zeidan AM. A phase 1b study of glasdegib + azacitidine in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2022 Aug;101(8):1689-1701. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04853-4. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
33 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) and Azacitidine in people with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 33 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in United States, France, United Kingdom, Belgium, Canada and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Lead-in Cohort (LIC) (time frame: maximum of approximately 15 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02367456, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2024.