Renal Transplant RejectionPhase 4SATIRNCT02377193
Simulect Versus ATG in Sensitized Renal Transplant Patient
A Phase 4 study testing Simulect and ATG Fresenius in people with Renal Transplant Rejection, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Transplant Rejection
- What is being tested?
- Simulect and ATG Fresenius
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients aged from 18 to 70 years
- Recipient of a deceased or living donor kidney transplant with the following criteria:
- Incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50% for the last available serum before transplantation < 3 months
- Anti-HLA antibodies positive
- Negative DSA by luminex method on historical serum and day serum
- T and B negative Cross match on historical and day serum
Show all 9Show fewer
- Females capable of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to or at screening, and are required to practice an approved and reliable method of birth control for the duration of the study and for a period of 2 months after study medication discontinuation, even where there has been a history of infertility
- Patients who are willing and able to participate in the full course of the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained.
- Patients affiliated to, or recipients of, a social security system
Who cannot join
- Recipients of a multi-organ transplantation, including dual kidneys, or who have previously received non renal transplanted organs
- Recipients of a kidney from non-heart beating donor, or with ABO incompatibility against the donor or with a T positive cross match
- Patients with severe uncontrolled systemic infection or severe allergy requiring acute or chronic treatment
- Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALAT) or bilirubin ≥ 3 upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to rabbit proteins, basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid or any of the product excipients
- Patients who are Hepatitis C positive (positive PCR and normal hepatic test may be included), HIV positive, or Hepatitis B surface antigen positive (AgHBs).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with thrombocytopenia < 75,000/mm3, an absolute neutrophils count < 1,500/mm3, leukocytopenia < 2,500/mm3, and/or hemoglobin < 8g/dL at inclusion visit
- Patients with any past or present malignancy within the last five years except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin and treated in situ cervix uteri cancer
- Any surgical or medical condition, excluding transplantation which compromise the inclusion of the patient (investigator's opinion)
- Female patients who are pregnant, breast feeding or capable to become pregnant and not wishing or capable to practice a medically approved and reliable method of birth control
- Patients with symptoms of significant somatic or mental illness. Inability to cooperate or communicate with the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluating Two Induction Therapies With Simulect® Versus ATG® Fresenius Associated With Tacrolimus and Myfortic® in the Prevention of Treatment Failure, in Sensitized Renal Transplant
Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Both induction therapy regimens have a different tolerance profile. Infections and haematological side-effects are more frequently reported in patients receiving ATG.
The aim of the pilot study is to evaluate ATG and basiliximab induction therapy in de novo sensitized kidney-transplant patients (incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50%) without donor specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by Luminex.
Read the detailed description
Acute rejection after kidney transplantation can lead to graft loss by irreversible acute rejection or to interstitial fibrosis/ tubular atrophy that can induce graft loss. Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as Anti-Thymocyte Globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Both induction therapy regimens have a different tolerance profile. Infections and haematological side-effects are more frequently reported in patients receiving ATG. With respect to the efficacy, no comparison exists between both induction therapy regimens in high risk immunological patients as actually defined. Within the last few years, the development of new immunological screening tools, i.e. Luminex assay, had lead to a better evaluation of the immunological status of candidates for kidney transplantation, mainly those who were considered as highly sensitized. The aim of our pilot study is to evaluate ATG and basiliximab induction therapy in de novo sensitized kidney-transplant patients (incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50%) without Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs) detected by Luminex. Maintenance immunosuppressive regimen will be based on the combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and steroids. The primary endpoint is a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, loss of follow up, or death at 6 months post-transplant. The secondary endpoints are the efficacy of the therapy at month 12 posttransplant, and safety parameters (CMV infection, BK virus nephropathy, haematological tolerance, Adverse Events (AE)and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)). Our hypothesis is that basiliximab induction therapy may be sufficiently effective to prevent acute rejection in sensitized patients without DSA. This may reduce the post-transplant immunosuppression-induced side-effects.
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant Rejection
- Being tested
- Simulect, ATG Fresenius
- Keywords
- kidney transplant, luminex method, simulect ATG, immunosuppression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SimulectDrug
Also called Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4, and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day +, Myfortic 720 to 1440mg +, Corticosteroids 5mg
Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4
and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day + Myfortic 720 to 1440mg + Corticosteroids 5mg
ATG FreseniusDrug
Also called Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4, and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day +, Myfortic 720 to 1440mg +, Corticosteroids 5mg
Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4 and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day + Myfortic 720 to 1440mg + Corticosteroids 5mg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Simulect | Experimental | Simulect IV 40 mg D0 and D4 Receives: Drug: Simulect |
| ATG Fresenius | Active comparator | ATG IV min dose 3 mg/ kg/ day D0, D1, D3, D5 Receives: Drug: ATG Fresenius |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of treatment failure
Incidence of treatment failure (Biopsy Proved Reject, lost to follow up, graft loss or death) at 6 months post transplantation.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
feasibility estimating the number of informed consent obtained
Estimating the number of informed consent obtained
Measured: 12 months
treatment efficacy
Treatment failure at 12 months post transplantation.
- premature discontinuation of study medication, discontinuation from the study and reasons.
- incidence of all acute rejection episodes requiring an anti-T and /or anti-B antibodies treatment within 12 months post transplantation.
- Incidence of C4d positive biopsy findings.
- Renal function at 3, 6 and 12 months post transplantation (abbreviated MDRD, serum creatinine and adjusted Cockcroft- Gault).
Measured: 12 months
adverse events
Safety:
- Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events
Measured: 12 months
patient enrolled in each center
Estimating the number of patient enrolled in each center and by year
Measured: 12 months
number of patients lost from follow-up
Estimating the number of patients lost from from follow-up before 6 and before 12 months
Measured: 12 months
rejection
acute rejection at 6 and 12 months post transplantation
- Subclinical rejection at the 3 month per protocol renal biopsy.
Measured: 12 months
Donor Specific Antibodies
Donor Specific Antibodies at D0, M3 and M12.
Measured: 12 months
Incidence of BKV viremia
incidence of BKV viremia at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplantation
Measured: 12 months
values of hematologia : hemoglobine, leucocytes, plaquettes, hematies, neutrophiles
Measured: 12 months
Incidence of BKV nephropathy
Incidence of BKV nephropathy at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplantation
Measured: 12 months
incidence of CMV post transplantation
incidence of CMV(PCR) post transplantation at 6, 9 and 12 months
Measured: 12 months
incidence of infections
incidence of infections cancer and PTLD
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionJan 2017
- Study completionJan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal Transplant RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, ToulouseThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Neovii Biotech, Novartis
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nassim Kamar, MD PhD, Study chair, University Hospital, Toulouse
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02377193
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12 484 03
- Acronym
- SATIR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kamar N, Lepage B, Couzi L, Albano L, Durrbach A, Pernin V, Esposito L, Hebral AL, Darres A, Lequintrec M, Cassuto E, Merville P, Congy N, Del Bello A. A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Anti-T-Lymphocyte Igs to Basiliximab in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jun 2;5(8):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.05.020. eCollection 2020 Aug.
PubMed 32775820
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluating Two Induction Therapies With Simulect® Versus ATG® Fresenius Associated With Tacrolimus and Myfortic® in the Prevention of Treatment Failure, in Sensitized Renal Transplant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02377193
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SATIR / 12 484 03
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant Rejection
- Keywords
- kidney transplant, luminex method, simulect ATG, immunosuppression
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, ToulouseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Neovii Biotech, Novartis
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Both induction therapy regimens have a different tolerance profile. Infections and haematological side-effects are more frequently reported in patients receiving ATG.
The aim of the pilot study is to evaluate ATG and basiliximab induction therapy in de novo sensitized kidney-transplant patients (incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50%) without donor specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by Luminex.
Detailed description
Acute rejection after kidney transplantation can lead to graft loss by irreversible acute rejection or to interstitial fibrosis/ tubular atrophy that can induce graft loss. Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as Anti-Thymocyte Globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Both induction therapy regimens have a different tolerance profile. Infections and haematological side-effects are more frequently reported in patients receiving ATG. With respect to the efficacy, no comparison exists between both induction therapy regimens in high risk immunological patients as actually defined. Within the last few years, the development of new immunological screening tools, i.e. Luminex assay, had lead to a better evaluation of the immunological status of candidates for kidney transplantation, mainly those who were considered as highly sensitized. The aim of our pilot study is to evaluate ATG and basiliximab induction therapy in de novo sensitized kidney-transplant patients (incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50%) without Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs) detected by Luminex. Maintenance immunosuppressive regimen will be based on the combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and steroids. The primary endpoint is a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, loss of follow up, or death at 6 months post-transplant. The secondary endpoints are the efficacy of the therapy at month 12 posttransplant, and safety parameters (CMV infection, BK virus nephropathy, haematological tolerance, Adverse Events (AE)and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)). Our hypothesis is that basiliximab induction therapy may be sufficiently effective to prevent acute rejection in sensitized patients without DSA. This may reduce the post-transplant immunosuppression-induced side-effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Simulect | Experimental | Drug: SimulectSimulect IV 40 mg D0 and D4 |
| ATG Fresenius | Active comparator | Drug: ATG FreseniusATG IV min dose 3 mg/ kg/ day D0, D1, D3, D5 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female patients aged from 18 to 70 years
- Recipient of a deceased or living donor kidney transplant with the following criteria:
- Incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50% for the last available serum before transplantation < 3 months
- Anti-HLA antibodies positive
- Negative DSA by luminex method on historical serum and day serum
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Recipients of a multi-organ transplantation, including dual kidneys, or who have previously received non renal transplanted organs
- Recipients of a kidney from non-heart beating donor, or with ABO incompatibility against the donor or with a T positive cross match
- Patients with severe uncontrolled systemic infection or severe allergy requiring acute or chronic treatment
- Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALAT) or bilirubin ≥ 3 upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to rabbit proteins, basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid or any of the product excipients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SimulectAlso: Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4, and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day +, Myfortic 720 to 1440mg +, Corticosteroids 5mgSimulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4 and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day + Myfortic 720 to 1440mg + Corticosteroids 5mg | Drug | Simulect |
| ATG FreseniusAlso: Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4, and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day +, Myfortic 720 to 1440mg +, Corticosteroids 5mgSimulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4 and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day + Myfortic 720 to 1440mg + Corticosteroids 5mg | Drug | ATG Fresenius |
Primary outcome
Incidence of treatment failure
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of treatment failure (Biopsy Proved Reject, lost to follow up, graft loss or death) at 6 months post transplantation.
12 secondary outcomes
feasibility estimating the number of informed consent obtained
Time frame: 12 months
treatment efficacy
Time frame: 12 months
adverse events
Time frame: 12 months
patient enrolled in each center
Time frame: 12 months
number of patients lost from follow-up
Time frame: 12 months
rejection
Time frame: 12 months
Donor Specific Antibodies
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of BKV viremia
Time frame: 12 months
values of hematologia : hemoglobine, leucocytes, plaquettes, hematies, neutrophiles
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of BKV nephropathy
Time frame: 12 months
incidence of CMV post transplantation
Time frame: 12 months
incidence of infections
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 32775820Kamar N, Lepage B, Couzi L, Albano L, Durrbach A, Pernin V, Esposito L, Hebral AL, Darres A, Lequintrec M, Cassuto E, Merville P, Congy N, Del Bello A. A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Anti-T-Lymphocyte Igs to Basiliximab in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jun 2;5(8):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.05.020. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Related trials for Renal Transplant Rejection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
(TNX-1500) in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant, Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Felzartamab Infusions in Adults With Kidney Transplants Who Have Late Isolated Microvascular Inflammation
Microvascular Inflammation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Perceived Stress in an Observational Study Evaluating a Biopsy-sparing Surveillance Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Blood and Urinary Biomarkers Predictive of the Absence of Rejection
Renal Transplantation; Complication, Renal Transplant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nassim Kamar, MD PhD study chair
University Hospital, Toulouse
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Simulect and ATG Fresenius in people with Renal Transplant Rejection, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of treatment failure (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02377193, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2026.